Skip to content

Comparison of a Patient Warming System Using a Forced-air, Non-compressible Under-body Mattress Versus a Regular Forced-air Underbody Mattress System During Pediatric Cardiac Catheterization

Comparison of a Patient Warming System Using a Forced-air, Non-compressible Under-body Mattress Versus a Regular Forced-air Underbody Mattress System During Pediatric Cardiac Catheterization

Status
Withdrawn
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02342431
Enrollment
0
Registered
2015-01-21
Start date
2010-10-31
Completion date
2011-03-31
Last updated
2015-01-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Hypothermia

Keywords

Thermoregulation, Pediatric Anesthesia, Cardiac Catheterization

Brief summary

The study is a comparison of a patient warming system using a forced-air, non-compressible under-body mattress (Möck & Möck, Hamburg, Germany) versus a regular forced-air underbody mattress system during pediatric cardiac catheterization in 40 patients. The hypothesis is, that the non-compressible mattress provides better warming with less incidence of perioperative hypothermia (Core temperature \< 36 °C) and faster warming slope (°C / time). The study is prospective, randomized, controlled and single-blinded. Inclusion criteria will be pediatric patients \< 1 year of age without fever or a treatment of therapeutic hypothermia.

Interventions

DEVICEForced air warming compressible

Warming with a compressible forced air mattress

DEVICEForced air non-compressible

Warming with a non-compressible forced air mattress

Sponsors

Medical University of Vienna
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
No minimum to 1 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Pediatric patient scheduled for cardiac catheterization (diagnostic and/or interventional)\< 1 year old

Exclusion criteria

* fever or therapeutic hypothermia

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Incidence of hypothermiaduring surgery (1 - 6 hours)

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Core Temperature Slopeduring surgery (1 - 6 hours)

Countries

Austria

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026