Skip to content

BIO monitorinG in Patients With Preserved Left ventricUlar Function AfteR Diagnosed Myocardial Infarction

BIO monitorinG in Patients With Preserved Left ventricUlar Function AfteR Diagnosed Myocardial Infarction

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02341534
Acronym
BIO-GUARD-MI
Enrollment
802
Registered
2015-01-19
Start date
2015-08-07
Completion date
2021-11-03
Last updated
2023-04-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Myocardial Infarction, Myocardial Infarction, Acute, Myocardial Infarction Old

Brief summary

The BIO\|GUARD-MI study investigates whether continuous arrhythmia monitoring and the consequent treatment after detected arrhythmias in patients after myocardial infarction with preserved cardiac function, but other risk factors, decreases the risk of major adverse cardiac events.

Detailed description

Patients randomized to the BioMonitor arm will receive an implantable cardiac monitor (ICM; BioMonitor) with remote monitoring function (Home Monitoring®). If the device detects and reports an arrhythmia, patients will be appropriately examined and treated. Patients randomized to the control arm will receive best proven treatment, but no implantable cardiac monitor.

Interventions

Patients will be implanted with the BioMonitor + Home Monitoring feature

Sponsors

IHF GmbH - Institut für Herzinfarktforschung
CollaboratorOTHER
Qmed Consulting A/S
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Biotronik SE & Co. KG
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

An independent Endpoint Committee was installed to evaluate all reported cardiovascular and serious AEs. The information provided to the Committee did not contain information about the group assigment of the patients.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 99 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patient has a history of MI according to guidelines * CHA2DS2-VASc-Score ≥ 4 in men / ≥ 5 in women * LVEF \> 35 % as estimated within 6 months before enrollment but after conclusion of AMI treatment * Patient accepts activation of Home Monitoring® * Patient is able to understand the nature of the clinical study and has provided written informed consent

Exclusion criteria

* Patients with hemorrhagic diathesis * Permanent oral anticoagulation treatment for atrial fibrillation * Indication for chronic renal dialysis * Pacemaker or ICD implanted or indication for implantation * Parkinson's disease * Life expectancy \< 1 year * Participation in another interventional clinical Investigation * Age \< 18 years * Woman who are pregnant or breast feeding

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Kaplan-Meier Estimate of Percentage of Participants With Major Adverse Cardiac Event (MACE)2 yearsThe primary endpoint is defined as death for cardiovascular reasons or unplanned hospitalization for cardiovascular reasons as per study protocol. The time period with regards to the Time-to-Event Outcome Measures starts with the randomization of the patient. All patients will be assessed for Time-to-Event Outcome Measures until formal study termination is announced or until the individual patient meets a drop out criterion in accordance with the study protocol. The study period is estimated 6 years.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Kaplan-Meier Estimate of Percentage of Participants With Outcome of Death Due to Any Cause2 yearsThe occurrence of death due to any cause will be recorded and analyzed.
Kaplan-Meier Estimate of Percentage of Participants With Outcome of Death Due to Any Cause or Heart Transplantation2 yearsAssessment of the time from randomization to death for any reason or heart transplantation during the clinical investigation.
Kaplan-Meier Estimate of Percentage of Participants With Outcome of Cardiovascular Death or Heart Transplantation2 yearsAssessment of the time from randomization to cardiovascular death or heart transplantation during the clinical investigation. A specified endpoint definition will be given by the members of the EAEC and documented in the charter agreement.
Kaplan-Meier Estimate of Percentage of Participants With Worsening of Heart Failure Requiring Hospitalization or Urgent Visit2 yearsAssessment of the time from randomization to first hospitalization or urgent visit for worsening of the patient status due to heart failure, or death due to heart failure. A specified endpoint definition will be given by the members of the EAEC and documented in the charter agreement.
Kaplan-Meier Estimate of Percentage of Participants With an Arrhythmia Resulting in Hospitalization2 yearsAssessment of the time from randomization to the first hospitalization resulting from an arrhythmia or death resulting from arrhythmia. A specified endpoint definition will be given by the members of the EAEC and documented in the charter agreement.
Kaplan-Meier Estimate of Percentage of Participants With Acute Coronary Syndrome Resulting in Hospitalization2 yearsAssessment of the time from randomization to the first hospitalization resulting from acute coronary syndrome or death resulting from acute coronary syndrome. A specified endpoint definition will be given by the members of the EAEC and documented in the charter agreement.
Kaplan-Meier Estimate of Percentage of Participants With Major Bleeding Resulting in Hospitalization2 yearsAssessment of the time from randomization to the first hospitalization resulting from major bleeding or death resulting from major bleeding. A specified endpoint definition will be given by the members of the EAEC and documented in the charter agreement.
Kaplan-Meier Estimate of Percentage of Participants With Systemic Embolism Resulting in Hospitalization2 yearsAssessment of the time from randomization to the first hospitalization resulting from systemic embolism or death resulting from systemic embolism. A specified endpoint definition will be given by the members of the EAEC and documented in the charter agreement.
Kaplan-Meier Estimate of Percentage of Participants With an Arrhythmia2 yearsAssessment of the time from randomization to first arrhythmia.
Type of Initiated TherapiesAll data are collected for the period from randomization until official study end or drop-out, for all enrolled patients, up to 6 years.Post-hoc categorical summary of most frequent therapies initiated after detection of arrhythmias.
Kaplan-Meier Estimate of Percentage of Participants Receiving Therapy After Arrhythmia Diagnosis2 yearsAssessment of the time from randomization to first therapy. In this context therapy is the attempted remediation of the patient's regular heartbeat.
Change in World Health Organization Five Well-being Index (WHO-5) From 6 Months to 24 Months.We report the intraindividual change from 6-months to 24-months. All data are collected for the period from randomization until official study end or drop-out, for all enrolled patients.A further secondary endpoint is the assessment of the patient's well-being. The patient's well-being will be recorded during the regular telephone contacts using the WHO-5 Well-being Index. The scale reaches from 0 (worst status) to 100 (best possible status).
Kaplan-Meier Estimate of Percentage of Participants With Stroke Resulting in Hospitalization2 yearsAssessment of the time from randomization to the first hospitalization resulting from stroke or death resulting from stroke. A specified endpoint definition will be given by the members of the EAEC and documented in the charter agreement.

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Mean Value of EQ-5D-5LFrom Baseline measurement to 60 months. All data are collected for the period from randomization until official study end or drop-out, for all enrolled patients.The EQ-5D-5L questionnaire was administered during the telephone contacts to estimate utility values at different time points for an economic evaluation. The descriptive system comprises five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 5 levels: no problems, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems and extreme problems. The patient is asked to indicate his/her health state by ticking the box next to the most appropriate statement in each of the five dimensions. The scale reaches from 0 (worst status) to 100 (best possible status).

Countries

Australia, Austria, Belgium, Czechia, Denmark, France, Germany, Hungary, Latvia, Netherlands, Poland, Slovakia, Spain, United States

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

802 patients were enrolled, 12 exited the study before randomization.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
BioMonitor Arm
BioMonitor group (implantation with investigational device + transfer of information via Home Monitoring) BioMonitor: Patients will be implanted with the BioMonitor + Home Monitoring feature
398
Control Arm
Control group (standard of care)
392
Total790

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicBioMonitor ArmControl ArmTotal
Age, Continuous71.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.7
70.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.5
71.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.1
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected0 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
107 Participants115 Participants222 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
291 Participants277 Participants568 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
43 / 39842 / 392
other
Total, other adverse events
259 / 398173 / 392
serious
Total, serious adverse events
300 / 398267 / 392

Outcome results

Primary

Kaplan-Meier Estimate of Percentage of Participants With Major Adverse Cardiac Event (MACE)

The primary endpoint is defined as death for cardiovascular reasons or unplanned hospitalization for cardiovascular reasons as per study protocol. The time period with regards to the Time-to-Event Outcome Measures starts with the randomization of the patient. All patients will be assessed for Time-to-Event Outcome Measures until formal study termination is announced or until the individual patient meets a drop out criterion in accordance with the study protocol. The study period is estimated 6 years.

Time frame: 2 years

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
BioMonitor ArmKaplan-Meier Estimate of Percentage of Participants With Major Adverse Cardiac Event (MACE)21.6 percentage of patients with event
Control ArmKaplan-Meier Estimate of Percentage of Participants With Major Adverse Cardiac Event (MACE)24.3 percentage of patients with event
p-value: 0.2195% CI: [0.64, 1.1]Log Rank
Secondary

Change in World Health Organization Five Well-being Index (WHO-5) From 6 Months to 24 Months.

A further secondary endpoint is the assessment of the patient's well-being. The patient's well-being will be recorded during the regular telephone contacts using the WHO-5 Well-being Index. The scale reaches from 0 (worst status) to 100 (best possible status).

Time frame: We report the intraindividual change from 6-months to 24-months. All data are collected for the period from randomization until official study end or drop-out, for all enrolled patients.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
BioMonitor ArmChange in World Health Organization Five Well-being Index (WHO-5) From 6 Months to 24 Months.0.1 Change in units on the WHO-5 scaleStandard Deviation 17.6
Control ArmChange in World Health Organization Five Well-being Index (WHO-5) From 6 Months to 24 Months.0.7 Change in units on the WHO-5 scaleStandard Deviation 21.2
Secondary

Kaplan-Meier Estimate of Percentage of Participants Receiving Therapy After Arrhythmia Diagnosis

Assessment of the time from randomization to first therapy. In this context therapy is the attempted remediation of the patient's regular heartbeat.

Time frame: 2 years

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
BioMonitor ArmKaplan-Meier Estimate of Percentage of Participants Receiving Therapy After Arrhythmia Diagnosis53.6 percentage of patients with event
Control ArmKaplan-Meier Estimate of Percentage of Participants Receiving Therapy After Arrhythmia Diagnosis10.0 percentage of patients with event
Secondary

Kaplan-Meier Estimate of Percentage of Participants With Acute Coronary Syndrome Resulting in Hospitalization

Assessment of the time from randomization to the first hospitalization resulting from acute coronary syndrome or death resulting from acute coronary syndrome. A specified endpoint definition will be given by the members of the EAEC and documented in the charter agreement.

Time frame: 2 years

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
BioMonitor ArmKaplan-Meier Estimate of Percentage of Participants With Acute Coronary Syndrome Resulting in Hospitalization10.6 percentage of patients with event
Control ArmKaplan-Meier Estimate of Percentage of Participants With Acute Coronary Syndrome Resulting in Hospitalization15.1 percentage of patients with event
Secondary

Kaplan-Meier Estimate of Percentage of Participants With an Arrhythmia

Assessment of the time from randomization to first arrhythmia.

Time frame: 2 years

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
BioMonitor ArmKaplan-Meier Estimate of Percentage of Participants With an Arrhythmia53.6 percentage of patients with event
Control ArmKaplan-Meier Estimate of Percentage of Participants With an Arrhythmia10 percentage of patients with event
Secondary

Kaplan-Meier Estimate of Percentage of Participants With an Arrhythmia Resulting in Hospitalization

Assessment of the time from randomization to the first hospitalization resulting from an arrhythmia or death resulting from arrhythmia. A specified endpoint definition will be given by the members of the EAEC and documented in the charter agreement.

Time frame: 2 years

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
BioMonitor ArmKaplan-Meier Estimate of Percentage of Participants With an Arrhythmia Resulting in Hospitalization3.3 percentage of patients with event
Control ArmKaplan-Meier Estimate of Percentage of Participants With an Arrhythmia Resulting in Hospitalization3.4 percentage of patients with event
Secondary

Kaplan-Meier Estimate of Percentage of Participants With Major Bleeding Resulting in Hospitalization

Assessment of the time from randomization to the first hospitalization resulting from major bleeding or death resulting from major bleeding. A specified endpoint definition will be given by the members of the EAEC and documented in the charter agreement.

Time frame: 2 years

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
BioMonitor ArmKaplan-Meier Estimate of Percentage of Participants With Major Bleeding Resulting in Hospitalization0.6 percentage of patients with event
Control ArmKaplan-Meier Estimate of Percentage of Participants With Major Bleeding Resulting in Hospitalization1.1 percentage of patients with event
Secondary

Kaplan-Meier Estimate of Percentage of Participants With Outcome of Cardiovascular Death or Heart Transplantation

Assessment of the time from randomization to cardiovascular death or heart transplantation during the clinical investigation. A specified endpoint definition will be given by the members of the EAEC and documented in the charter agreement.

Time frame: 2 years

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
BioMonitor ArmKaplan-Meier Estimate of Percentage of Participants With Outcome of Cardiovascular Death or Heart Transplantation3.5 percentage of patients with event
Control ArmKaplan-Meier Estimate of Percentage of Participants With Outcome of Cardiovascular Death or Heart Transplantation4.7 percentage of patients with event
Secondary

Kaplan-Meier Estimate of Percentage of Participants With Outcome of Death Due to Any Cause

The occurrence of death due to any cause will be recorded and analyzed.

Time frame: 2 years

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
BioMonitor ArmKaplan-Meier Estimate of Percentage of Participants With Outcome of Death Due to Any Cause6.7 percentage of patients with event
Control ArmKaplan-Meier Estimate of Percentage of Participants With Outcome of Death Due to Any Cause7.1 percentage of patients with event
Secondary

Kaplan-Meier Estimate of Percentage of Participants With Outcome of Death Due to Any Cause or Heart Transplantation

Assessment of the time from randomization to death for any reason or heart transplantation during the clinical investigation.

Time frame: 2 years

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
BioMonitor ArmKaplan-Meier Estimate of Percentage of Participants With Outcome of Death Due to Any Cause or Heart Transplantation6.7 percentage of patients with event
Control ArmKaplan-Meier Estimate of Percentage of Participants With Outcome of Death Due to Any Cause or Heart Transplantation7.1 percentage of patients with event
Secondary

Kaplan-Meier Estimate of Percentage of Participants With Stroke Resulting in Hospitalization

Assessment of the time from randomization to the first hospitalization resulting from stroke or death resulting from stroke. A specified endpoint definition will be given by the members of the EAEC and documented in the charter agreement.

Time frame: 2 years

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
BioMonitor ArmKaplan-Meier Estimate of Percentage of Participants With Stroke Resulting in Hospitalization3.6 percentage of patients with event
Control ArmKaplan-Meier Estimate of Percentage of Participants With Stroke Resulting in Hospitalization3.0 percentage of patients with event
Secondary

Kaplan-Meier Estimate of Percentage of Participants With Systemic Embolism Resulting in Hospitalization

Assessment of the time from randomization to the first hospitalization resulting from systemic embolism or death resulting from systemic embolism. A specified endpoint definition will be given by the members of the EAEC and documented in the charter agreement.

Time frame: 2 years

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
BioMonitor ArmKaplan-Meier Estimate of Percentage of Participants With Systemic Embolism Resulting in Hospitalization0.3 percentage of patients with event
Control ArmKaplan-Meier Estimate of Percentage of Participants With Systemic Embolism Resulting in Hospitalization0.7 percentage of patients with event
Secondary

Kaplan-Meier Estimate of Percentage of Participants With Worsening of Heart Failure Requiring Hospitalization or Urgent Visit

Assessment of the time from randomization to first hospitalization or urgent visit for worsening of the patient status due to heart failure, or death due to heart failure. A specified endpoint definition will be given by the members of the EAEC and documented in the charter agreement.

Time frame: 2 years

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
BioMonitor ArmKaplan-Meier Estimate of Percentage of Participants With Worsening of Heart Failure Requiring Hospitalization or Urgent Visit6.0 percentage of patients with event
Control ArmKaplan-Meier Estimate of Percentage of Participants With Worsening of Heart Failure Requiring Hospitalization or Urgent Visit5.9 percentage of patients with event
Secondary

Type of Initiated Therapies

Post-hoc categorical summary of most frequent therapies initiated after detection of arrhythmias.

Time frame: All data are collected for the period from randomization until official study end or drop-out, for all enrolled patients, up to 6 years.

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
BioMonitor ArmType of Initiated TherapiesReduction of heart-rate lowering drugs43 Participants
BioMonitor ArmType of Initiated TherapiesBetablocker treatment13 Participants
BioMonitor ArmType of Initiated TherapiesPacemaker implantation45 Participants
BioMonitor ArmType of Initiated TherapiesAntiarrhythmics10 Participants
BioMonitor ArmType of Initiated TherapiesOral anticoagulation treatment84 Participants
Control ArmType of Initiated TherapiesAntiarrhythmics9 Participants
Control ArmType of Initiated TherapiesOral anticoagulation treatment18 Participants
Control ArmType of Initiated TherapiesPacemaker implantation6 Participants
Control ArmType of Initiated TherapiesBetablocker treatment6 Participants
Control ArmType of Initiated TherapiesReduction of heart-rate lowering drugs5 Participants
Other Pre-specified

Mean Value of EQ-5D-5L

The EQ-5D-5L questionnaire was administered during the telephone contacts to estimate utility values at different time points for an economic evaluation. The descriptive system comprises five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 5 levels: no problems, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems and extreme problems. The patient is asked to indicate his/her health state by ticking the box next to the most appropriate statement in each of the five dimensions. The scale reaches from 0 (worst status) to 100 (best possible status).

Time frame: From Baseline measurement to 60 months. All data are collected for the period from randomization until official study end or drop-out, for all enrolled patients.

Population: Not all patients contributed to this endpoint. The EQ-5D-5L was only introduced later in the trial via an amendment in 2019.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
BioMonitor ArmMean Value of EQ-5D-5LBaseline74.9 Units on the EQ-5D-5L scaleStandard Deviation 16.4
BioMonitor ArmMean Value of EQ-5D-5L12-months72.5 Units on the EQ-5D-5L scaleStandard Deviation 17.7
BioMonitor ArmMean Value of EQ-5D-5L24-months71.6 Units on the EQ-5D-5L scaleStandard Deviation 18.2
BioMonitor ArmMean Value of EQ-5D-5L36-months71.2 Units on the EQ-5D-5L scaleStandard Deviation 19.2
BioMonitor ArmMean Value of EQ-5D-5L48-months69.9 Units on the EQ-5D-5L scaleStandard Deviation 17.3
BioMonitor ArmMean Value of EQ-5D-5L60-months74.8 Units on the EQ-5D-5L scaleStandard Deviation 20.8
Control ArmMean Value of EQ-5D-5L48-months69.8 Units on the EQ-5D-5L scaleStandard Deviation 19.2
Control ArmMean Value of EQ-5D-5LBaseline75.0 Units on the EQ-5D-5L scaleStandard Deviation 18.8
Control ArmMean Value of EQ-5D-5L36-months69.5 Units on the EQ-5D-5L scaleStandard Deviation 18.4
Control ArmMean Value of EQ-5D-5L12-months73.2 Units on the EQ-5D-5L scaleStandard Deviation 16.9
Control ArmMean Value of EQ-5D-5L60-months64.4 Units on the EQ-5D-5L scaleStandard Deviation 21.2
Control ArmMean Value of EQ-5D-5L24-months71.3 Units on the EQ-5D-5L scaleStandard Deviation 18.1

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: May 15, 2026