Skip to content

Randomized Clinical Trial of Polyester vs. Polyurethane Patch for Carotid Endarterectomy

Randomized Clinical Trial of Polyester vs. Polyurethane Patch for Carotid Endarterectomy. Long-term Results

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02341196
Enrollment
450
Registered
2015-01-19
Start date
1995-01-31
Completion date
2014-12-31
Last updated
2015-01-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Carotid Artery Thrombosis, Carotid Artery Stenosis, Stroke

Brief summary

This study examines the risk of thrombogenicity of the carotid patches in polyurethane compared to carotid patches in polyester including death, any stroke, carotid thrombosis at 30 days and long-term results including stroke and recurrent carotid stenosis at 10 years. This study was run at the University of Roma, La Sapienza and at the University of Poitiers, randomisation was done in both enters after approval by the Ethical committee of the University of Roma (Record uploaded)

Detailed description

This study examines the risk of thrombogenicity of the carotid patches in polyurethane compared to carotid patches in polyester including death, any stroke, carotid thrombosis at 30 days and long-term results including stroke and recurrent carotid stenosis at 10 years. 598 patients were considered for randomisation between January 1995 and January 2004. The following patients were excluded for randomisation (Redo carotid surgery: N=34, radiation induced carotid stenosis:N=45, indication for carotid bypass: N=65, Refusal of randomisation: N=4). In total, 450 patients were randomized in two groups, 225 received a polyester patch and 225 received a polyurethane patch. All patients were operated under general anaesthesia and all received an intraoperative angiography. A shunt was selectively used in patients with a recent stroke (\<15 days) or with a contralateral carotid occlusion

Interventions

PROCEDURECEA

Patients in both groups received an intra-operative angiography

Sponsors

University of Roma La Sapienza
CollaboratorOTHER
University of Poitiers
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
25 Years to 90 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Carotid stenosis \> 60% NASCET criteria

Exclusion criteria

* Redo carotid surgery * Radiation induced carotid stenosis * Extensive carotid lesion \> 5 cm in length with involvement of the common carotid artery best treated by a carotid bypass

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
carotid artery restenosis5 to 10 years after surgeryRestenosis of carotid endarterectomy \> 70% in diameter occurring 5 to 10 years after surgery diagnosed by color duplex ultrasound

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Any death occurring during follow-upTime 0 (operation) to 10 years after surgeryAll death even those not related to carotid surgery
Any ipsilateral stroke0 days to 10 yearsAny paralysis occurring in relation with the operated carotid artery and lasting more than 24 hours

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026