Skip to content

Using a Video Otoscope in Pediatric Ear Examination: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Study:

The Impact of Using a Video Otoscope on Parents' Satisfaction in Pediatric Ear Examination: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Study:

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02340429
Enrollment
60
Registered
2015-01-16
Start date
2015-01-31
Completion date
2015-04-30
Last updated
2015-07-14

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Parental Satisfaction of Using Video Otoscopy in Pediatric Emergency Room

Brief summary

Medical care today is moving towards patient centered care (PC) and patient empowerment (PE), both in practice and in medical staff training . Applying this methodology enhances patient autonomy in the clinical setting and allows shared decision making. Current mobile and video technology enables the caregiver(clinician) to share visual data with the patient, making him or her a more active participant in the medical procedure. It has been shown that higher patient satisfaction rate regarding the patient/physician encounter, has a positive effect on medical procedure outcome and patient compliance. Patient centered care and Patient Empowerment benefits are maximized using the proper tools. One such tool is the video otoscope. In this study we apply the PC/PE approach of medical care and introduce video otoscopy in the setting of a pediatric emergency room. We use an affordable (\ 300$), FDA approved, High Res. video otoscope. (DE500 Digital Video Otoscope,Firefly global Inc.) Patients will be randomized upon admission into two groups: video otoscopy and standard otoscopy. Upon discharge from the pediatric ER, parents will be asked to answer a short questionnaire regarding their satisfaction with the ER visit and the otoscopic examination. We aim to study the impact of affordable, high res. video otoscopy, on the general satisfaction of parents from their emergency room experience, vs their experience when undergoing a regular otoscopic examination. Inclusion criteria: children under 18y admitted to the pediatric ER for any reason, undergoing routine otoscopy, who's parents have signed an informed consent. Exclusion criteria: no parental informed consent,lake of compliance or inability to perform otoscopy. Number of participants: 60 (30 in each group) Study start: January 2015 Study ends:January 2016 Study location: Ziv medical center, Zefat Israel

Interventions

DEVICEDE500 Digital Video Otoscope

Sponsors

Ziv Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER_GOV

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Children under 18y admitted to the pediatric ER for any reason, undergoing routine otoscopy, who's parents have signed an informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

* no parental informed consent, lack of compliance or inability to perform otoscopy.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
parental satisfaction questionnaire1 year

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026