Skip to content

Endocuff-assisted vs. Standard Colonoscopy

Endocuff-assisted vs. Standard Colonoscopy: a Randomized, Back-to-Back Study

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02340065
Enrollment
200
Registered
2015-01-16
Start date
2015-01-31
Completion date
2016-04-30
Last updated
2016-07-14

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Colon Neoplasms

Keywords

colonoscopy, adenoma detection rate, Endocuff-assisted colonoscopy

Brief summary

The aim of this study is to evaluate Endocuff- assisted colonoscopy in terms of its possible additive contribution in the detection of important lesions, namely polyps and cancers, compared to standard colonoscopy, in a series of patients undergoing back-to-back screening or surveillance colonoscopies in a randomized fashion. Moreover, we aim to assess possible changes regarding post-polypectomy surveillance programs following Endocuff utilization.

Detailed description

Tandem colonoscopies studies results, show that novel endoscopic technologies detect about 20% more adenomas than those conventional colonoscopy does (missed adenomas). Since Endocuff-assisted colonoscopy cannot be considered as a perfect examination, we hypothesize that conventional colonoscopy will detect one third of the missed adenomas that Endocuff-assisted colonoscopy detects in a similar setting. Therefore a sample size of 120 adenomas achieves 80% power to detect an odds ratio of 3.0 using a two-sided McNemar test with a significance level of 0.05. The odds ratio is equivalent to a difference between two paired proportions of 14% which occurs when the proportion of detected missed adenomas during Endocuff-assisted colonoscopy is 21% and the proportion of missed adenomas during conventional colonoscopy is 7%. During one year period before the study initiation, our colonoscopy performance quality data show that we detect a mean number of adenomas per patient equal of 0.7 in a population similar to the one recruited in our study. Therefore, 172 patients overall will be required to detect 120 adenomas. Given the uncertainty of our estimation and in order to cope with patients exclusions, withdrawals and unexpected incomplete colonoscopies, we decided to recruit 200 patients. A more extensive description regarding the investigators study is provided in the following fields.

Interventions

PROCEDUREstandard colonoscopy

examination of the colon with a conventional colonoscope

examination of the colon with Endocuff-assisted colonoscopy

Sponsors

Attikon Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* adults undergoing elective screening or surveillance colonoscopy * symptomatic adults with indication for colonoscopy

Exclusion criteria

* age\<18 and \> 80 years * poor overall health (ASA III, IV) * recent abdominal surgery * presence of abdominal wall hernias * active colitis * previous bowel resection * inflammatory bowel disease * polyposis syndromes

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
number and rate of missed adenomasone weekin the entire colon

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
number of adenomas and adenoma detection rate in the right colonone weekwith both Endocuff-assisted and standard colonoscopy
number of polyps and polyp detection rate in the entire colonone weekwith both Endocuff-assisted and standard colonoscopy
number of polyps and polyp detection rate in the right colonone weekwith both Endocuff-assisted and standard colonoscopy
colonoscopy completion (colonoscopy completion rate, reason for incomplete colonoscopy)one weekcolonoscopy completion rate, reason for incomplete colonoscopy
number of adenomas and adenoma detection rate in the entire colonone weekwith both Endocuff-assisted and standard colonoscopy
adverse eventsone weekadverse event rate
endoscopist's satisfaction (quantified using a scale from 0 (not satisfied) to 10 (completely satisfied)one weekendoscopist's satisfaction quantified using a scale from 0 (not satisfied) to 10 (completely satisfied) for Endocuff-assisted colonoscopy
mean number of adenomas per procedureone weekwith both Endocuff-assisted and standard colonoscopy
intubation and withdrawal timeone weekfor both Endocuff-assisted and standard colonoscopy (time spent for therapeutic procedures is excluded)

Countries

Greece

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 26, 2026