Skip to content

Therapeutic Effect of Ethanol-gelfoam Mixture for the Treatment of Arterioportal Shunts (APS) in Patients With HCC

A Randomized Controlled Trial of Ethanol-gelfoam Mixture(EGM) Versus Gelfoam for the Treatment of Arterioportal Shunts (APS) in Patients With Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC) Treated With Transarterial Chemoembolization (TACE)

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02338297
Enrollment
236
Registered
2015-01-14
Start date
2016-02-29
Completion date
2017-12-31
Last updated
2016-04-01

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Carcinoma, Hepatocellular

Keywords

Hepatocellular Carcinoma, Arterioportal shunts, Transarterial Chemoembolization, Ethanol, Gelfoam, Polyvinyl Alcohol Foam Embolization Particles (PVA)

Brief summary

Transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) is a key palliative treatment for patients with inoperable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Arterioportal shunts (APS) can aggravate portal hypertension and the shunts let lipiodol flow to normal liver tissue and result in poor Lipiodol deposition in the tumor, causing liver ischemia. Occlusion of APS is a vital and initial step for the following embolization of tumor. Ethanol-gelfoam mixture(EGM) and gelfoam only both can occlude APS in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of EGM in treatment of APS in the procedure of TACE, and to analyze the prognostic factors for survival in this kind of patients.

Interventions

PROCEDURETACE

Transarterial chemoembolisation (TACE)

DRUGEGM

Occlude arterioportal shunts(APS) with ethanol/gelfoam mixture(EGM)

DRUGPVA

Occlude arterioportal shunts(APS) with PVA

Sponsors

Nanjing Medical University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age \> 18 * Child-Pugh A or B cirrhosis * ECOG performance status Grade 2 or below * No serious concurrent medical illness * No prior treatment (including surgery) for HCC * Histologically or cytologically proven HCC (an alphafetoprotein level \> 500 ug/ml in the presence of radiological findings suggestive of HCC in a patient with chronic HBV or HCV infection can be considered eligible at investigator's discretion) * Unresectable and locally advanced disease without extra-hepatic disease * Massive expansive or nodular tumor morphology with measurable lesion on CT * Size of largest tumor \<= 15cm in largest dimension * Number of main tumor \<= 5, excluding associated small satellite lesions * Arterioportal shunts (APS) is found in the angiography of HCC blood supply

Exclusion criteria

* History of prior malignancy except skin cancer * History of significant concurrent medical illness such as ischemic heart disease or heart failure * History of acute tumor rupture * Serum creatinine level \> 180 umol/L * Presence of biliary obstruction not amenable to percutaneous drainage * Child-Pugh C cirrhosis * History of hepatic encephalopathy, or * Intractable ascites not controllable by medical therapy, or * History of variceal bleeding within last 3 months, or * Serum total bilirubin level \> 50 umol/L, or * Serum albumin level \< 28g/L, or * INR \> 1.3 * Presence of extrahepatic metastasis * Predominantly infiltrative lesion * Diffuse tumor morphology with extensive lesions involving both lobes. * Hepatic artery thrombosis, or * Partial or complete thrombosis of the main portal vein, or * Tumor invasion of portal branch of contralateral lobe, or * Hepatic vein tumor thrombus

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
overall survival3 yearsDefined as time (in days) from time of TACE non-eligibility to death due to any cause, and will be evaluated every 8 weeks in the protocol treatment, and every one year in the follow-up period, respectively. Patients lost to follow-up or alive at the end of the study will be censored at the last date known to be alive.
APS improvement2 monthChanges of Arterioportal Shunts Treated with PVA or EGM

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Time To Progressionevery 8 weeks, upto 3 years from date of randomizationTime from randomization to radiological progression. Definition of progression is based on the mRECIST criteria. Deaths during follow-up without evidence of radiological progression are censored.
progression free survivalevery 8 weeks, upto 3 years from date of randomizationTime from randomization to either radiological progression or death. Patients alive and free of progression at the end of follow-up are censored.
Response Rateevery 8 weeks, upto 3 years from date of randomizationDefinition of response is based on the mRECIST criteria.

Countries

China

Contacts

Primary ContactHaibin Shi, MD, PhD.
shihb@njmu.edu.cn086-025 681 369 18

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026