Skip to content

Effect of Ursolic Acid Administration on Insulin Sensitivity and Metabolic Syndrome

Effect of Ursolic Acid Administration on Insulin Sensitivity and Metabolic Syndrome

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02337933
Enrollment
24
Registered
2015-01-14
Start date
2014-09-30
Completion date
2015-09-30
Last updated
2020-10-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Metabolic Syndrome X

Keywords

Metabolic Syndrome, Central Obesity, Insulin Sensitivity, Ursolic Acid, Triterpenoid

Brief summary

The metabolic syndrome is characterized by the presence of overweight/obesity, insulin resistance, hyperglycemia, dyslipidaemia and hypertension and an inflammatory state, which together increase the risk of developing cardiovascular disease (CVD) or diabetes mellitus type 2 (DM2). It is also characterized by a decreased insulin sensitivity, namely, lower ability of insulin to metabolize glucose, key in the physiopathogeny of disease process. In the search for a pharmacological agent that can attend more components of the metabolic syndrome and above all improve insulin sensitivity to effectively prevent the development of CVD and DM2, ursolic acid is a promising compound. Ursolic acid is a pentacyclic carboxylic acid present in medicinal herbs, parts of some fruits like apple peel, and plants such as rosemary. There is scientific evidence of important benefits of ursolic acid level in vitro and in vivo on insulin, metabolism of lipids and glucose, as well as on the body weight and metabolic parameters. However, the results are not clear and the mechanisms are not fully elucidate. The aim of this study is to evaluate the effect of ursolic acid on the insulin sensitivity and metabolic syndrome.

Detailed description

A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial in 24 patients of both sexes aged between 30 and 60 years, with a diagnosis of metabolic syndrome according to the modified International Diabetes Federation (IDF) criteria, without treatment. They will be assigned randomly two groups of 12 patients, each to receive 150 mg of ursolic acid or placebo before breakfast for 12 weeks. Insulin sensitivity will be calculated by Matsuda Index with dates from glucose and insulin levels from Oral Glucose Tolerance Test; Waist circumference will be measured; triglycerides and High density lipoprotein (HDL-C) and blood pressure will be evaluated before and after intervention in both groups. Statistical analysis will be presented through measures of central tendency and dispersion, average and deviation standard for quantitative variables; frequencies and percentages for variable qualitative. Qualitative variables will be analyzed by X2, will be used for differences inter-group Mann-Whitney U Test and Wilcoxon Test for the within-groups differences. Will be considered statistical significance p ≤0.05. This protocol was approved by a local ethics committee (CEI/075/2014) and written informed consent will be obtained from all volunteers.

Interventions

Ursolic acid capsules of 150 mg extracted from rosemary, once a day before breakfast

DRUGPlacebo

Calcined magnesia capsules of 150 mg, once a day before breakfast

Sponsors

University of Guadalajara
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
30 Years to 60 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Informed consent signed * Patients both sexes * Age between 30 and 60 years * Metabolic Syndrome according to the IDF criteria: * Waist circumference Man ≥90 cm, Woman ≥80 cm; and two of the following criteria: * High density lipoprotein Man ≤40 mg/dL, Woman ≤50 mg/dL; * Fasting glucose ≥100 mg/dL; * Triglycerides ≥150 mg/dL; * Blood pressure ≥130/85 mmHg

Exclusion criteria

* Women with confirmed or suspected pregnancy * Women under lactation and/or puerperium * Hypersensibility to ursolic acid o calcined magnesia * Physical impossibility for taking pills * Known uncontrolled renal, hepatic, heart or thyroid diseased * Previous treatment for the metabolic syndrome components * Body Mass Index ≥39.9 kg/m2 * Fasting glucose ≥126 mg/dL * Triglycerides ≥500 mg/dL * Total cholesterol ≥240 mg/dL * Low density lipoprotein (c-LDL) ≥190 mg/dL * Blood Pressure ≥140/90 mmHg

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Systolic Blood PressureWeek 12The systolic blood pressure was evaluated at baseline and week 12 with a digital sphygmomanometer and the entered values reflect the systolic blood pressure at week 12
Diastolic Blood PressureWeek 12The diastolic blood pressure was evaluated at baseline and week 12 with a digital sphygmomanometer and the entered values reflect the diastolic blood pressure at week 12
Total Insulin SensitivityWeek 12The insulin sensitivity was calculated at baseline and at week 12. The value reported corresponds at week 12 with Matsuda index. Matsuda Index value is used to indicate insulin resistance on diabetes. Insulin sensitivity was calculated with Matsuda index \[10,000 / √glucose 0' x insulin 0') (mean glucose oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) x mean insulin OGTT)\]. The entered values reflect the insulin sensitivity
Waist CircumferenceWeek 12Waist circumference was evaluated at baseline and at week 12 with a flexible tape and the entered values reflect the waist circumference measure at week 12
Fasting GlucoseWeek 12The fasting glucose levels were evaluated at baseline and week 12 with enzymatic/colorimetric techniques and the entered values reflect the fasting glucose level at week 12
TriglyceridesWeek 12The triglycerides were evaluated at baseline and week 12 with enzymatic-colorimetric techniques and the entered values reflect the triglycerides level at week 12
High Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-c)Week 12The HDL-c levels were evaluated at baseline and week 12 with enzymatic/colorimetric techniques and the entered values reflect the c-HDL level at week 12

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Body Mass IndexWeek 12The Body Mass index was calculated at baseline and at week 12 with the Quetelet index and the entered values reflect the body mass index at week 12
Total CholesterolWeek 12The total cholesterol was estimated by standardized techniques at baseline and week 12 and the entered values reflect the total cholesterol level at week 12
Low Density Lipoproteins Cholesterol (LDL-c)Week 12The LDL-c levels were measured at baseline and at week 12 with standardized techniques and the entered values reflect the c-LDL levels at week 12
CreatinineWeek 12The creatinine levels were measured at baseline and at week 12 with standardized techniques and the entered values reflect the creatinine levels at week 12
Uric AcidWeek 12The uric acid levels were measured at baseline and at week 12 with standardized techniques and the entered values reflect the uric acid levels at week 12
Body WeightWeek 12The body weight was measured at baseline and week 12 with a bioimpedance balance and the entered values reflect the weight at week 12

Countries

Mexico

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Ursolic Acid
Ursolic acid capsules, 150 mg, once a day before breakfast during 12 weeks Ursolic acid: Ursolic acid capsules of 150 mg extracted from rosemary, once a day before breakfast
12
Placebo
Calcined magnesia capsules, 150 mg, once a day before breakfast during 12 weeks Placebo: Calcined magnesia capsules of 150 mg, once a day before breakfast
12
Total24

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPlaceboUrsolic AcidTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
12 Participants12 Participants24 Participants
Age, Continuous46.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.7
43.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.5
45.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.6
Body Mass Index31.7 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.2
29.9 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.6
30.8 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.9
Body Weight81.5 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14
75.7 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.5
78.6 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.8
Creatinine68.1 µmol/L
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15
61.1 µmol/L
STANDARD_DEVIATION 18.6
64.6 µmol/L
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.8
Diastolic Blood Pressure80 mmHg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10
77 mmHg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12
78 mmHg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11
Fasting Glucose5.8 mmol/L
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.9
6.0 mmol/L
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.5
5.9 mmol/L
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.7
High Density Lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-c)1.8 mmol/L
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.7
1.6 mmol/L
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.6
1.7 mmol/L
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.7
Low Density Lipoproteins cholesterol (LDL-c)3.5 mmol/L
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.1
3.7 mmol/L
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.1
3.6 mmol/L
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.6
Region of Enrollment
Mexico
12 participants12 participants24 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
10 Participants10 Participants20 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
2 Participants2 Participants4 Participants
Systolic Blood Pressure128 mmHg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 20
125 mmHg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13
127 mmHg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 17
Total Cholesterol6.0 mmol/L
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2
6.0 mmol/L
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.4
6.0 mmol/L
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.7
Total Insulin Sensitivity3.1 index
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.6
3.1 index
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.1
3.1 index
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.8
Triglycerides2.5 mmol/L
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.1
2.0 mmol/L
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.6
2.3 mmol/L
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.4
Uric acid291.5 µmol/L
STANDARD_DEVIATION 71.4
243.9 µmol/L
STANDARD_DEVIATION 53.5
267.7 µmol/L
STANDARD_DEVIATION 62.5
Waist Circumference97 cm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10
93 cm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9
95 cm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 120 / 12
other
Total, other adverse events
4 / 126 / 12
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 120 / 12

Outcome results

Primary

Diastolic Blood Pressure

The diastolic blood pressure was evaluated at baseline and week 12 with a digital sphygmomanometer and the entered values reflect the diastolic blood pressure at week 12

Time frame: Week 12

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Ursolic AcidDiastolic Blood Pressure76 mmHgStandard Deviation 6
PlaceboDiastolic Blood Pressure76 mmHgStandard Deviation 7
p-value: 0.373Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Primary

Fasting Glucose

The fasting glucose levels were evaluated at baseline and week 12 with enzymatic/colorimetric techniques and the entered values reflect the fasting glucose level at week 12

Time frame: Week 12

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Ursolic AcidFasting Glucose4.7 mmol/LStandard Deviation 0.4
PlaceboFasting Glucose5.7 mmol/LStandard Deviation 0.7
p-value: 0.002Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Primary

High Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-c)

The HDL-c levels were evaluated at baseline and week 12 with enzymatic/colorimetric techniques and the entered values reflect the c-HDL level at week 12

Time frame: Week 12

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Ursolic AcidHigh Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-c)1.8 mmol/LStandard Deviation 0.9
PlaceboHigh Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-c)1.8 mmol/LStandard Deviation 0.7
p-value: 0.575Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Primary

Systolic Blood Pressure

The systolic blood pressure was evaluated at baseline and week 12 with a digital sphygmomanometer and the entered values reflect the systolic blood pressure at week 12

Time frame: Week 12

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Ursolic AcidSystolic Blood Pressure120 mmHgStandard Deviation 8
PlaceboSystolic Blood Pressure124 mmHgStandard Deviation 15
p-value: 0.169Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Primary

Total Insulin Sensitivity

The insulin sensitivity was calculated at baseline and at week 12. The value reported corresponds at week 12 with Matsuda index. Matsuda Index value is used to indicate insulin resistance on diabetes. Insulin sensitivity was calculated with Matsuda index \[10,000 / √glucose 0' x insulin 0') (mean glucose oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) x mean insulin OGTT)\]. The entered values reflect the insulin sensitivity

Time frame: Week 12

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Ursolic AcidTotal Insulin Sensitivity4.2 indexStandard Deviation 1.2
PlaceboTotal Insulin Sensitivity2.6 indexStandard Deviation 1.4
p-value: 0.003Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Primary

Triglycerides

The triglycerides were evaluated at baseline and week 12 with enzymatic-colorimetric techniques and the entered values reflect the triglycerides level at week 12

Time frame: Week 12

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Ursolic AcidTriglycerides1.8 mmol/LStandard Deviation 0.8
PlaceboTriglycerides2.5 mmol/LStandard Deviation 1.3
p-value: 0.308Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Primary

Waist Circumference

Waist circumference was evaluated at baseline and at week 12 with a flexible tape and the entered values reflect the waist circumference measure at week 12

Time frame: Week 12

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Ursolic AcidWaist Circumference83 cmStandard Deviation 9
PlaceboWaist Circumference96 cmStandard Deviation 8
p-value: 0.008Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Secondary

Body Mass Index

The Body Mass index was calculated at baseline and at week 12 with the Quetelet index and the entered values reflect the body mass index at week 12

Time frame: Week 12

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Ursolic AcidBody Mass Index24.9 kg/m^2Standard Deviation 1.2
PlaceboBody Mass Index32.1 kg/m^2Standard Deviation 3.9
p-value: 0.049Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Secondary

Body Weight

The body weight was measured at baseline and week 12 with a bioimpedance balance and the entered values reflect the weight at week 12

Time frame: Week 12

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Ursolic AcidBody Weight71 kgStandard Deviation 11
PlaceboBody Weight81 kgStandard Deviation 15
p-value: 0.002Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Secondary

Creatinine

The creatinine levels were measured at baseline and at week 12 with standardized techniques and the entered values reflect the creatinine levels at week 12

Time frame: Week 12

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Ursolic AcidCreatinine0.06 mmol/LStandard Deviation 0.02
PlaceboCreatinine0.06 mmol/LStandard Deviation 0.02
p-value: 0.953Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Secondary

Low Density Lipoproteins Cholesterol (LDL-c)

The LDL-c levels were measured at baseline and at week 12 with standardized techniques and the entered values reflect the c-LDL levels at week 12

Time frame: Week 12

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Ursolic AcidLow Density Lipoproteins Cholesterol (LDL-c)2.8 mmol/LStandard Deviation 1.2
PlaceboLow Density Lipoproteins Cholesterol (LDL-c)4.3 mmol/LStandard Deviation 2.3
p-value: 0.116Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Secondary

Total Cholesterol

The total cholesterol was estimated by standardized techniques at baseline and week 12 and the entered values reflect the total cholesterol level at week 12

Time frame: Week 12

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Ursolic AcidTotal Cholesterol5.2 mmol/LStandard Deviation 1.2
PlaceboTotal Cholesterol6.4 mmol/LStandard Deviation 1.9
p-value: 0.224Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Secondary

Uric Acid

The uric acid levels were measured at baseline and at week 12 with standardized techniques and the entered values reflect the uric acid levels at week 12

Time frame: Week 12

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Ursolic AcidUric Acid249.8 µmol/LStandard Deviation 53.5
PlaceboUric Acid422.3 µmol/LStandard Deviation 124.9
p-value: 0.999Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026