Skip to content

Urotherapy vs. Urotherapy With Constipation Treatment for Children With Lower Urinary Tract Dysfunction

A Controlled Randomized, Physician Blinded Study to Assess Isolated Uro-therapy vs. Urotherapy With Constipation Treatment for Patients With Lower Urinary Tract Dysfunction (LUTD) Not Meeting ROME-III Constipation Criteria

Status
Withdrawn
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02336906
Enrollment
0
Registered
2015-01-13
Start date
2020-01-31
Completion date
2020-12-31
Last updated
2018-04-11

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Diurnal Enuresis

Keywords

Lower urinary tract dysfunction, constipation

Brief summary

Constipation treatment has been found to ameliorate symptoms in some patients with lower urinary tract dysfunction (including day time or combined day time/night time urinary incontinence). This study aims to explore if treatment of patients without overt constipation (As defined by the ROME III criteria) will also respond to anti-constipation treatment with reduction of their urinary tract symptoms. Assessment of severity and response of lower urinary tract dysfunction will be based on the Vancouver NULTD/DES questionnaire.

Interventions

DRUGpolyethylene glycol 3350

Patients will initially receive three days of high dose PEG3350 treatment (1.5gr/kg up to 100gr maximum) and the stepped down to 0.8gr/kg subsequently tapered according to stool consistency and frequency.

Patients in the active group will receive dietary instruction as to fiber content, as well as behavior therapy including active sitting on the toilet to attempt defacation following meals.

BEHAVIORALUrotherapy

The children will be guided for appropriate drinking and toilet habits, and will start with timed voiding.

Sponsors

Rabin Medical Center
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
5 Years to 17 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Aged 5-17 years at time of signing of informed consent. 2. Lower urinary tract dysfunction (LUTD)-daytime/daytime and nighttime urinary incontinence as defined by a score of \>11 on the Vancouver Questionnaire . 3. Do not meet Rome III criteria for functional constipation.

Exclusion criteria

1. Inability to provide signed informed consent. 2. Inability to comply with the study protocol. 3. Neurogenic bladder 4. Attention Deficit Disorder (ADD or ADHD) on medical treatment. 5. Known significant sacral, perineal, or other congenital or surgical defect. 6. Known orthopedic/neurological disease which may affect urinary continence, cause constipation, or affect reading of abdominal x-rays. (e.g. spastic cerebral palsy, severe scoliosis) 7. Patient taking medicinal drugs which can cause urinary incontinence or constipation.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Complete (Vancouver score - ≤90% of screening value) or Partial (Vancouver score ≤ 50% screening value) response at the end of intervention.14 weeks

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of participants with adverse effects14 weeksAdverse effects of interventions as reported by patients/care givers during visits
Number of participants with complete (Vancouver score - ≤90% of screening value) or Partial (Vancouver score ≤ 50% screening value) response in patient subgroups with fecal loading compared to those without fecal loading.14 weeksNumber of participants with complete (Vancouver score - ≤90% of screening value) or Partial (Vancouver score ≤ 50% screening value) response to therapy in those with radiological evidence of fecal loading on enrollment abdominal x-ray (as defined by rectal/pelvic outlet ratio, Leech score, and Barr score) compared to those who did not in the intervention group and the urotherapy group
Sustained Response - Number of participants with complete (Vancouver score - ≤90% of screening value) or Partial (Vancouver score ≤ 50% screening value) response 12 weeks after intervention has ended.26 weeks

Countries

Israel

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026