Skip to content

SentiMag® Intraoperative Comparison in Breast Cancer

A Pivotal, Prospective, Open-Label, Multicenter Paired Comparison Study Of SentiMag/SiennaXP And The Standard Of Care In Patients With Breast Cancer Who Are Undergoing Lymph Node Mapping As Part Of A Sentinel Node Biopsy Procedure

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02336737
Acronym
SentiMagIC
Enrollment
160
Registered
2015-01-13
Start date
2015-01-31
Completion date
2015-12-31
Last updated
2020-11-23

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Breast Cancer

Keywords

breast cancer, sentinel lymph node biopsy

Brief summary

The purpose of this pivotal study is to provide prospective evidence that the SentiMag®/SiennaXP® is safe and non-inferior to the current standard of care for lymph node localization in patients with breast cancer as part of a sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) procedure and to summarize measures of product safety and performance.

Detailed description

This is a pivotal, prospective, open label, multicenter, paired comparison of the SentiMag® and SiennaXP® magnetic sentinel node localization system with the standard of care (radioisotope with blue dye) for lymph node localization in the detection of lymph nodes in patients with breast cancer undergoing a sentinel lymph node biopsy. The trial is designed to provide powered evidence that the lymph node detection rate of the SentiMag® and SiennaXP® system is non-inferior to the standard of care in patients with breast cancer.

Interventions

DEVICESiennaXP

Sub-cutaneous injection of SiennaXP magnetic marker, followed by lymph node localization using the SentiMag handheld magnetic probe

DRUGTechnetium Tc99m Sulfur Colloid

Injection of a single dose of radioisotope (Technetium Tc99m Sulfur Colloid)

Injection of a single dose of isosulfan blue dye

Sponsors

Regulatory and Clinical Research Institute Inc
CollaboratorOTHER
Endomagnetics Inc
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Subjects with a diagnosis of primary breast cancer or subjects with pure ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). * Subjects scheduled for surgical intervention, with a sentinel lymph node biopsy procedure being a part of the surgical plan. * Subjects aged 18 years or more at the time of consent. * Subjects with an ECOG (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group) performance status of Grade 0 - 2. * Subject has a clinical negative node status (i.e. T0-3, N0, M0).

Exclusion criteria

* The subject is pregnant or lactating. * The subject has clinical or radiological evidence of metastatic cancer including palpably abnormal or enlarged lymph nodes. * The subject has a known hypersensitivity to Isosulfan Blue Dye. * The subject has participated in another investigational drug study within 30 days of scheduled surgery. * Subject has had either a) previous axilla surgery, b) reduction mammoplasty, or c) lymphatic function that is impaired in the surgeon's judgment. * Subject has had preoperative radiation therapy to the affected breast or axilla. * Subject has received a Feraheme® (ferumoxytol) Injection within the past 6 months. * Subject has intolerance or hypersensitivity to iron or dextran compounds or to SiennaXP. * Subject has an iron overload disease. * Subject has pacemaker or other implantable device in the chest wall.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants With Detected Lymph NodesDuring surgical procedure <1 hourThe proportion of lymph nodes detected intraoperatively by SentiMag and SiennaXP in relation the proportion of lymph nodes detected by the combination of Technetium Sulfur Colloid and Isosulfan blue dye
Safety of SiennaXP and SentiMag® as Indicated by Adverse Events and Serious Adverse Events and Their Relatedness to the Detection Method or Procedure.3-6 weeksNumber of Participants with Adverse Events relating to Sienna XP Injection

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Nodal Concordance: Number of Nodes Identified by Both Test and Control Out of Nodes Identified by ControlIntraoperative <1 hourThe number of nodes identified by both SiennaXP and Control out of nodes identified by Control
Number of Participants With Lymph Nodes Detected by Combined Radioisotope,Blue Dye and Magnetic TechniqueIntraoperative <1 hourThe per patient detection rate for a combination of all methods (magnetic, combined radioisotope and blue dye; radioisotope alone; blue dye alone)

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
SiennaXP Injection
Single injection of SiennaXP in addition to comparator single dose of radioisotope (Technetium Tc99m Sulfur Colloid) and single dose of isosulfan blue dye. Lymph node localization using the SentiMag handheld intraoperative localization system in addition to localization with standard of care handheld gamma probe. SiennaXP: Sub-cutaneous injection of SiennaXP magnetic marker, followed by lymph node localization using the SentiMag handheld magnetic probe Technetium Tc99m Sulfur Colloid: Injection of a single dose of radioisotope (Technetium Tc99m Sulfur Colloid)
147
SiennaXP Injection
Single injection of SiennaXP in addition to comparator single dose of radioisotope (Technetium Tc99m Sulfur Colloid) and single dose of isosulfan blue dye. Lymph node localization using the SentiMag handheld intraoperative localization system in addition to localization with standard of care handheld gamma probe. SiennaXP: Sub-cutaneous injection of SiennaXP magnetic marker, followed by lymph node localization using the SentiMag handheld magnetic probe Technetium Tc99m Sulfur Colloid: Injection of a single dose of radioisotope (Technetium Tc99m Sulfur Colloid)
369
Total516

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall StudyPhysician Decision8
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject5

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicSiennaXP Injection
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
57 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
90 Participants
Age, Continuous61.1 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.3
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
17 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
130 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
7 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
11 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
8 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
121 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
147 subjects
Sex: Female, Male
Female
147 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
0 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 147
other
Total, other adverse events
23 / 147
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 147

Outcome results

Primary

Number of Participants With Detected Lymph Nodes

The proportion of lymph nodes detected intraoperatively by SentiMag and SiennaXP in relation the proportion of lymph nodes detected by the combination of Technetium Sulfur Colloid and Isosulfan blue dye

Time frame: During surgical procedure <1 hour

Population: 146/147 were evaluated for the primary objective. One (1) subject had missing data and therefore was not included in the primary endpoint analysis

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
SiennaXP InjectionNumber of Participants With Detected Lymph Nodes145 Participants
Primary

Safety of SiennaXP and SentiMag® as Indicated by Adverse Events and Serious Adverse Events and Their Relatedness to the Detection Method or Procedure.

Number of Participants with Adverse Events relating to Sienna XP Injection

Time frame: 3-6 weeks

Population: Number of subjects experiencing Sienna XP injection-related adverse events from enrollment through subject exit or completion

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
SiennaXP InjectionSafety of SiennaXP and SentiMag® as Indicated by Adverse Events and Serious Adverse Events and Their Relatedness to the Detection Method or Procedure.20 Participants
Secondary

Nodal Concordance: Number of Nodes Identified by Both Test and Control Out of Nodes Identified by Control

The number of nodes identified by both SiennaXP and Control out of nodes identified by Control

Time frame: Intraoperative <1 hour

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
SiennaXP InjectionNodal Concordance: Number of Nodes Identified by Both Test and Control Out of Nodes Identified by Control94.5 percentage of concordance
Secondary

Number of Participants With Lymph Nodes Detected by Combined Radioisotope,Blue Dye and Magnetic Technique

The per patient detection rate for a combination of all methods (magnetic, combined radioisotope and blue dye; radioisotope alone; blue dye alone)

Time frame: Intraoperative <1 hour

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
SiennaXP InjectionNumber of Participants With Lymph Nodes Detected by Combined Radioisotope,Blue Dye and Magnetic Technique145 Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026