Skip to content

Evaluation of Posturing-Adherence in Patients After Intraocular Surgery

Measurement and Logging of Posturing Adherence of Patients After Intraocular Surgery With Gasendotamponades Using a Sensorsystem With Different Feedback-Methods

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02336334
Enrollment
48
Registered
2015-01-13
Start date
2014-10-31
Completion date
2016-07-31
Last updated
2016-07-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Adherence, Retina; Lesion

Brief summary

Measuring and logging head positions of patients which underwent surgery with gasendotamponades.

Detailed description

After surgery with gasendotamponades various positions are recommended to support the success of surgery. In patients with macular holes face-down-position is recommended. In patients with retinal detachment the recommended position depends on the region of the detachment. The adherence of patients to follow this posturing instructions is very inhomogenous. Therefore the investigators want to measure the posturing by the use of a position-sensor. In some study arms the patients also receive a feedback from the sensor (tone, vibration) to correct the position. The sensor-device was developed by the study-staff and is not commercial available. In addition there is no trade name. The patients safety of the used device was approved by the in house technical department.

Interventions

DEVICEPositioning measurement

Logging of posturing informations

Evaluation of patients questionary

PROCEDUREUsefulness of a sketch

Helping the patients to understand posturing positions by randomized allocation of sketches

DEVICEClosure rate of macular holes

closure rates of macular holes in the group with macular holes. Measurement using SD-OCT (spectral domain optical coherence tomography=

Sponsors

University Hospital Tuebingen
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* age \>18 years * full thickness macular hole or retinal detachment * informed consent

Exclusion criteria

* intraoperative complications with the need of other endotamponades * combined treatment

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Effective time of ideal posturing with different sensors-systemsup to 12 monthTime (measured in minutes and in percent of 24h) with correct posturing in relation to the used sensor-type (with and without feedback)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Time analysis with optimal posturing after detailed explanation of posturing positionsup to 12 monthTime (measured in minutes and in percent of 24h) with correct posturing in patients which received an detailed posturing explanation (with graphics)
Analysis of time with optimal posturing for both Sensor-Feedback-Systemsup to 12 monthTime (measured in minutes and in percent of 24h) with correct posturing depending on the used sensor-type (noise vs. vibration)
Closure rate of macular holes after 3 month as measured by optical coherence tomography (hole closed: yes or no)up to 12 monthStatus of macular holes after 3 month in macular hole group measured by optical coherence tomography (hole closed: yes or no) and in relation to time with optimal posturing
Tolerability of sensor-systems for patients as measured by questionnaireup to 12 monthUsing a questionnaire patients are asked to give their view on the tolerability of the used system.

Countries

Germany

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026