Skip to content

A Phase 1 Study to Evaluate the Immunogenicity and Safety of a Pandemic Avian Influenza Vaccine in Adults

A Randomised, Controlled, Blinded Phase 1 Study to Evaluate the Immunogenicity and Safety of a Pandemic Avian H5 Influenza Vaccine in Adults

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 1
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02335164
Acronym
FLU003
Enrollment
270
Registered
2015-01-09
Start date
2015-07-31
Completion date
2019-05-01
Last updated
2019-05-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Influenza

Brief summary

Recombinant hemagglutinin has been shown to induce protective neutralising antibodies against avian influenza virus but is relatively non-immunogenic. An ideal pandemic avian influenza influenza vaccine would combine hemagglutinin antigen with an appropriate adjuvant to increase its immunogenicity. This Phase 1 study will collect preliminary human safety and efficacy data on combined formulations of recombinant hemagglutinin with Advax adjuvant formulations administered by intramuscular injection

Detailed description

This is a study to test new vaccine formulations against pandemic avian influenza (bird flu). Bird flu is a potentially deadly disease that is caused by influenza virus from birds. It is not the same as the common seasonal flu for which there is a seasonal vaccine released around March each year. To date, bird flu due to the H5N1 strain of influenza virus has infected over 500 people mainly in Asia resulting in death in more than half the cases. More recently there has been an outbreak of another bird flu virus in China known as H9N7 that is also highly lethal when it infects humans. Vaccination is the single most effective measure to prevent infection from bird flu viruses such as H5N1 or H9N7 should such a pandemic occur. In the event of a major bird flu pandemic outbreak, vaccine supplies are likely to be very limited, as there is not currently sufficient manufacturing capacity to provide enough vaccine quickly for the whole population. Research is needed on how to make the pandemic flu vaccine more effective but also how to stretch vaccine supplies using a strategy called 'antigen-sparing'. This can potentially be achieved by using an important ingredient called an 'adjuvant'. Adjuvants act by stimulating the immune system to make vaccines more effective. This study will test Advax adjuvants which are based on delta inulin in combination with recombinant hemagglutinin from the H5N1 influenza virus serotype.

Interventions

recombinant influenza hemagglutinin

BIOLOGICALAdvax1

Delta inulin adjuvant formulation 1

BIOLOGICALAdvax2

Delta inulin adjuvant formulation 2

Sponsors

Flinders University
CollaboratorOTHER
Australian Respiratory and Sleep Medicine Institute
CollaboratorOTHER
Vaxine Pty Ltd
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Ambulatory males or females aged 18 years and over * Able to provide written informed consent * Willing and able to comply with the protocol for the duration of the study. * Not planning to have seasonal influenza vaccine within 2 months from the time of the first trial immunization

Exclusion criteria

* Pregnant or lactating women. * Women of childbearing potential unless using a reliable and appropriate contraceptive method. * Receipt of another investigational agent within 28 days preceding initiation of treatment. * Any other serious medical, social or mental condition which, in the opinion of the investigator, would be detrimental to the subjects or the study.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The incidence of adverse events12 monthsThe frequency of adverse events will be compared between groups

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Hemagglutination inhibition assay1 month post each immunization and 11 months post final immunizationSeroconversion, seroprotection and GMT fold increase will be compared between groups at each time point using hemagglutination inhibition titers

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Plasmablast response7 and 28 days post each immunizationThe size of the plasmablast response will be compared between groups as an experimental endpoint
T-cell response7 and 28 days post each immunizationThe size of the memory T cell response will be compared between groups as an experimental endpoint

Countries

Australia

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026