Skip to content

To Compare the Efficacy Between 3 Fetal Monitoring Methods

A Prospective, Blinded Clinical Study to Compare the Efficacy Between Three Fetal Monitoring Methods: Electro Uterine Monitor (EUM), Fetal Doppler and Scalp Electrode.

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02331888
Acronym
EUM
Enrollment
100
Registered
2015-01-06
Start date
2014-05-31
Completion date
2015-09-30
Last updated
2015-09-09

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Fetal Heartbeat Tracings

Brief summary

Once in labor, the parturient will be connected to the routine fetal doppler and EUM. When necessary according to clinical indications, the scalp electrode will be connected. Tracing will be recorded simultaneously from all three devices until delivery.

Detailed description

Once in labor, the parturient will be connected to the routine fetal doppler and EUM. When necessary according to clinical indications, the scalp electrode will be connected. Tracing will be recorded simultaneously from all three devices until delivery. study design: 1. signing an informed consent at vas\<3 2. admittance to delivery room. 3. Verifying inclusion and exclusion criteria, describing clinical rial goal, motivation and phases. 4. Connecting the patient to three devices (fetal Doppler, scalp electrode and EUM) simultaneously. 5. Recording fetal heart rate until delivery. 6. Disconnecting the patient from all devices if required according to clinical need.

Interventions

DEVICEScalp electrode, fetal doppler and EUM

the parturient will be connected to the routine fetal Doppler and to the EUM. and When necessary to the scalp electrode will be connected. Tracings will be recorded simultaneously from all three devices until delivery. three separate outputs will be processed Output of the scalp electrode recording. Output of the fetal doppler. Output of the EUM. Three noncontinuous segments of 30 minutes each with two segments occurring during the first stage of labor and the third occurring during the second stage of labor, will be randomly picked from the scalp electrode recording with 3 matching segments in time from the EUM100pro and the fetal doppler.

Sponsors

OB-Tools Ltd.
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Yariv yogev
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
DOUBLE (Caregiver, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to 45 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

1. Clinical indication to insert a scalp electrode for fetal heart rate tracing. 2. Maternal age\>18 years. 3. Reactive fetal heart rate monitoring and BPP (Biophysical Profile) 8/8 at enrollment. 4. Singleton pregnancy. 5. No fetal abnormality or chromosomal defect. 6. Subjects are willing and able to comply with the requirements of the protocol. 7. Fully understand all elements of, and have singed and dated the written informed consent form before initiation of protocol specified procedures, when vas\<3.

Exclusion criteria

1. Women who refuse to sign the informed consent form. 2. Maternal age\<18 years. 3. Multiple pregnancy. 4. Women with implanted electronic device of any kind. 5. Women with allergic to silver. 6. Irritated skin or open wound.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The difference between the fetal scalp electrode tracings and the EUM tracings of the fetal heart activity.12 monthMean Positive Percent Agreement (PPA) for interpretable/un interpretable traces (between EUM, scalp electrode and fetal doppler).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Reliability12 monthsMean sensitivity for individual tracing identification (between EUM, scalp electrode and fetal doppler)
Accuracy12 monthsThe difference in fetal heart rate baseline and variability (between EUM, scalp electrode and fetal doppler)
Adverse events12 monthsNumber and percentage of adverse events during the study period

Countries

Israel

Contacts

Primary ContactYariv Yogev, professor
yarivy@clalit.org.il972-3-9377494

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026