Skip to content

Endocuff-assisted Versus Cap-assisted Versus Standard Colonoscopy

Endocuff-assisted Versus Cap-assisted Versus Standard Colonoscopy for Adenoma Detection: A Randomized Controlled European Multicenter Study

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02331836
Acronym
EC-Cap-SC
Enrollment
561
Registered
2015-01-06
Start date
2015-02-28
Completion date
2019-02-01
Last updated
2019-02-12

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Colorectal Polyps, Colorectal Adenomas

Keywords

adenoma detection rate, polyp detection rate, withdrawal time, coecal and ileum intubation rate

Brief summary

Comparison of Endocuff-assisted, Cap-assisted and Standard colonoscopy for assessment of the adenoma detection rate (ADR)

Detailed description

The Endocuff is a medical device, approved in 2012 by the American Food and Drug Administration, which was also authorized by the European Agency for the Evaluation of Medicinal Products. The aim of the cuff is to optimize the view of the colonic mucosa. There is also a transparent cap on the market, which is used in colonoscopy for a better evaluation of the mucosa and polyp detection. The goal of this project is to conduct a prospective randomized trial for clarification of the hypotheses, whether the usage of the Endocuff increases the detection rate of adenomas compared to the transparent cap or compared to standard colonoscopy.

Interventions

DEVICEArc Endocuff (AEC 110, 120, 130, 140)
DEVICECap

Olympus Disposable distal attachment 15mm diameter, 4mm depth

Sponsors

Helios Albert-Schweitzer-Klinik Northeim
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
FACTORIAL
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Colonoscopy independent from indication * Age ≥ 18 * Patient is able to provide informed consent for the procedure

Exclusion criteria

* Inflammatory Bowel Disease stenosis * Pregnant of nursing patient * Acute diverticulitis * Active Inflammatory Bowel Disease * Age ≤ 18 * Coagulation disorder (INR\>1.4 , Thrombocytes \< 50000/µl)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Adenoma detection rate1 yearProportion of patients having at least one adenoma
Polyp detection rate1 yearProportion of patients having at least one adenoma

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Ileum intubation rateone year
Coecum intubation timeone day
withdrawal timeone day
Bowel preparation resultone day
severe bleedingone day
perforationone day
mucosal lacerationone day
Coecum intubation rateone year

Countries

Germany, Poland

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026