Skip to content

Feasibility of a Novel Technique for Pilonidal Wound Healing

A Feasibility Study of a Novel Technique for Pilonidal Wound Healing on Patient, Financial, and Quality of Life Outcomes

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02330159
Enrollment
20
Registered
2015-01-01
Start date
2015-02-28
Completion date
2016-07-31
Last updated
2015-11-20

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Pilonidal Cyst, Pilonidal Disease, Pilonidal Sinus

Keywords

Pilonidal, Quality of Life

Brief summary

Pilonidal disease (PD) is a chronic disease with a major impact on patient quality of life and productivity. Thus, wound healing would have a significant effect on patient quality outcomes, patient quality of life, and healthcare utilization, as well as societal benefits from allowing this vital population to return to productivity. There is no consensus on postoperative wound care after surgery for PD. Negative pressure therapy is commonly used. However, this therapy is costly and cumbersome, and not evidence-based to optimize wound healing or postoperative patient or financial outcomes. The investigators goal is to investigate the impact of MatriStem® Wound Matrix and MicroMatrix® (ACell, Inc., Columbia, MD) on pilonidal wound healing. Secondary goals are to evaluate the impact of MatriStem Wound Matrix and MicroMatrix on postoperative outcomes, quality of life, and healthcare costs after surgical management of pilonidal disease.

Detailed description

The investigators study has 2 main goals: Aim 1: To evaluate wound healing at 2 weeks, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months postoperatively in a prospective MatriStem Wound Matrix and MicroMatrix cohort Aim 2: To evaluate pilonidal recurrence, reoperation rates, healthcare utilization, and quality of life at 2 weeks, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months postoperatively in a prospective MatriStem Wound Matrix and MicroMatrix cohort The investigators main hypothesis is that using MatriStem Wound Matrix and MicroMatrix for postoperative wound care will significantly improve healing rates, healthcare utilization, and quality of life outcomes. The null hypothesis of the study is that there is no significant difference in healing rates, healthcare utilization, and quality of life outcomes between MatriStem Wound Matrix/ MicroMatrix and negative pressure dressing cohorts. The alternative hypothesis is that there are differences in healing rates, healthcare utilization, and quality of life outcomes between MatriStem Wound Matrix/ MicroMatrix and negative pressure dressing cohorts. Twenty consecutive patients undergoing surgical excision for Pilonidal Disease will be recruited for treatment. All patients will undergo comparable surgical excision and application of the novel protocol. The wound will be left undisturbed for 10-14 days (until the 1st follow-up visit). At the 1st scheduled postoperative visit, the wound will reassessed in the operative suite, and a second application of the protocol may be performed at the surgeon's discretion. The next follow-up visits will be at 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months. At these visits, the wound bed will be measured, photo documentation will be captured, and patients will complete a survey to assess quality of life. Study Endpoints are: 1. Wound healing at 6 months. Success is defined at a 60% healing rate of epithelialization and wound contracture by volume measurements in centimeters. 2. Observation of quality of life, total costs for treatment, recurrence and reoperation rates at 6 months

Interventions

PROCEDURENovel Wound Healing Protocol

All patients will undergo surgical excision of the pilonidal disease and application of the novel wound healing protocol. After excision, MatriStem MicroMatrix powder will be applied to the wound bed. A MatriStem Multilayer Wound Matrix sheet will then be placed over the MatriStem MicroMatrix, secured in place, then covered with surface dressings. The wound should be left undisturbed for 10-14 days (until the 1st follow-up visit). At the 1st postoperative visit, the wound will reassessed, and a second application of the MicroMatrix to the wound bed may be performed. At subsequent follow-up visits at 1, 3, and 6 months, the wound bed will be measured, photo documentation will be captured, and patients will complete a survey to assess quality of life.

Sponsors

Integra LifeSciences Corporation
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Southeast Clinical Research Associates, Houston, Texas
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

1. Subjects who have pilonidal disease that are being scheduled for surgical excision 2. Subjects who are 18 years of age and older 3. Subjects of either gender 4. Subjects with no previous drainage or surgical procedures for pilonidal disease 5. Subjects who are willing and able to adhere to protocol requirements, agree to participate in the study program and provide written and informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

1. Subjects with previous drainage or surgical procedures for pilonidal disease. 2. Subjects who are pregnant. 3. Subjects with an allergy or medical condition that may interfere with the use of the study medications. 4. Subjects who have another condition or general disability or infirmity that in the opinion of the investigator precludes further participation in the study. 5. Patients under 16 years of age 6. Patients with incomplete medical records 7. Patients on chronic opioids for pain management.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Wound Healing6 monthsTo evaluate healing at 2 weeks, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months postoperatively in a prospective MatriStem Wound Matrix and MicroMatrix cohort

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Disease Recurrence6 monthsTo evaluate recurrence and reoperation rates at 2 weeks, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months postoperatively in a prospective MatriStem Wound Matrix and MicroMatrix cohort
Healthcare costs using the novel protocol6 months
Quality of Life6 monthsTo evaluate quality of life at 2 weeks, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months postoperatively in a prospective MatriStem Wound Matrix and MicroMatrix cohort

Countries

United States

Contacts

Primary ContactEric M Haas, MD
ehaasmd@houstoncolon.com7137900600
Backup ContactDeborah S Keller, MS MD
dkellermd@houstoncolon.com7137900600

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026