Skip to content

Study on Allogeneic Osteoblastic Cells Implantation in Rescue Interbody Fusion

A Pilot Phase 2a, Multicentre, Open, Proof-of-concept Study on the Safety and the Efficacy of Allogeneic Osteoblastic Cells (ALLOB®) Implantation in Rescue Interbody Fusion

Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02328287
Enrollment
6
Registered
2014-12-31
Start date
2014-09-30
Completion date
2020-04-30
Last updated
2020-06-11

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Failed Lumbar Fusion

Keywords

Spinal Fusion, Revision Surgery, Pseudarthrosis, Cell Therapy, Bone Graft

Brief summary

Failed fusion and failure to relieve back pain following spinal fusion are still frequent, irrespective of the type of procedures or grafts used by the surgeon. Moreover, revision surgeries are unfortunately associated with higher procedure-related complication rates, technical difficulties, longer operative time, and quite disappointing and unreliable success rates for both fusion and clinical results. The present Phase 2a study aims at demonstrating the safety and efficacy of ALLOB®, a proprietary population of allogeneic osteoblastic cells, in rescue interbody fusion.

Interventions

DRUGALLOB®

Each patient will undergo a single administration of ALLOB® into the failed fusion lumbar level under anesthesia.

Sponsors

Bone Therapeutics S.A
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Ability to provide a written, dated, and signed informed consent prior to any study related procedure, and to understand and comply with study requirements * Failed lumbar fusion of 15 months minimum requiring a revision surgery at one or two levels between L1 and S1

Exclusion criteria

* More than two failed interbody fusions at the involved lumbar level(s) * Instrumentation failure requiring revision surgery * Local active or latent infection at the involved lumbar level(s) * Positive serology for hepatitis B, hepatitis C, HIV * Current or past medical disease that could interfere with the evaluation of the safety and efficacy, as judged by the investigator

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Lumbar fusion progression as assessed by CT scan12 months
Functional Disability using Oswestry Disability Index12 months
Potential occurrence of any AE or SAE, related to the product or to the procedure, using patient open non-directive questionnaire, physical examination and laboratory measurements12 months

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Lumbar fusion progression as assessed by CT scan12 months
Pain using a Visual Analogue Scale12 months
Potential occurrence of any AE or SAE, related to the product or to the procedure, using patient open non-directive questionnaire, physical examination and laboratory measurements36 months
Percentage of patients having a rescue surgery12 months
Global Disease Evaluation using a Visual Analogue Scale12 months
Functional Disability using Oswestry Disability Index12 months

Countries

Belgium

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026