Skip to content

Comparison of Microwave Ablation-Assisted Enucleation and Conventional Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy in the Treatment of T1a Renal Cell Carcinoma

Comparison of Zero Ischemia Laparoscopic Microwave Ablation-Assisted Enucleation and Conventional Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy in the Treatment of T1a Renal Cell Carcinoma

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02326558
Enrollment
183
Registered
2014-12-29
Start date
2014-10-31
Completion date
2016-09-30
Last updated
2017-04-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Renal Cell Carcinoma

Keywords

zero ischemia, microwave, ablation, enucleation, renal cell carcinoma

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the feasibility, safety and efficiency of zero ischemia laparoscopic microwave ablation-assisted enucleation in comparison with conventional laparoscopic partial nephrectomy in the treatment of T1a renal cell carcinoma.

Detailed description

Microwave ablation has been widely used in the minimally-invasive treatment of renal tumors. Recently, a technique of laparoscopic microwave ablation-assisted renal tumor enucleation was developed, but the experience was preliminary. This study aims to evaluate the feasibility, safety and efficiency of this technique, particularly its role in the preservation of renal function, in comparison with conventional laparoscopic partial nephrectomy.

Interventions

PROCEDURElaparoscopic microwave ablation-assisted enucleation

Sponsors

National Natural Science Foundation of China
CollaboratorOTHER_GOV
RenJi Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
15 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* patients with sporadic, unilateral, newly diagnosed T1a presumed renal cell carcinoma * exophytic cancer * distance from the hilar renal vessels and urinary collecting system \>= 1cm * patients with normal contralateral renal function (differential renal function of \>40% as determined by renal scintigraphy) * patients giving consent to the participation in the current clinical trial

Exclusion criteria

* patients with a history of other renal diseases, such as urinary lithiasis * patients with a history of renal surgery

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
absolute change in glomerular filtration rate (GFR) of the affected kidneybaseline, 3 months and 12 monthsmeasured by renal scintigraphy

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
absolute change in total GFRbaseline and 6 monthsmeasured by renal scintigraphy
blood lossduring surgery
operation timeduring surgery
absolute change in eGFR of the affected kidneybaseline, 3 months, 6 months and 12 months
postoperative complicationsup to 6 monthsnumber of participants with postoperative complications graded by Clavien- Dindo system
progression-free survival12 months
local recurrence12 months
surgical margin1 monthassessed according to the pathology report of the operation specimen

Countries

China

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026