Sepsis
Conditions
Keywords
Sepsis diagnosis, Sepsis drug therapy, Sepsis outcome
Brief summary
The aim of the present study was to evaluate the ability of health-care professionals in addressing sepsis, and the impact of a telephone call upon receival of blood cultures in the clinical microbiology department, from a clinical microbiologist, in the early management of sepsis.
Detailed description
Sepsis is one of the major challenges of modern medicine. It is an important health problem with a high incidence, morbidity and mortality that affects population worldwide. Without an early recognition and a prompt management, patients can develop more severe stages of the disease and even death. An appropriate and aggressive management can significantly improve outcomes. Thus, it is necessary to develop early warning systems of sepsis in the hospital. In recent years, several campaigns and guidelines have been developed to help health care professionals in the management of sepsis. However, these have mainly focused on management protocols for severe sepsis and septic shock in intensive care units or emergency departments. To the best of the investigators knowledge, none of these have examined in depth either the impact of a sepsis alert system in general wards, nor the impact of a telephone call from a specialist in Clinical Microbiology, upon blood culture request, in the early recognition of sepsis. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the ability of health-care professionals in addressing sepsis, and the impact of a telephone call upon receival of blood cultures in the clinical microbiology department, from a clinical microbiologist, in the early management of sepsis. For this, the investigators performed a prospective study based on telephone calls followed by a phone interview to physicians and nurses in charge of patients whose blood cultures had just been received at the clinical microbiology department in a tertiary hospital.
Interventions
Aug-Dec 2012. Prospective study in patients who had blood cultures drawn and sent to the Microbiology Lab during the morning shift (9 am to 3 pm, Mon- Fri) to evaluate sepsis recognition. The investigators allocated 300 patients to 2 groups of 150 patients each, by opportunity sampling: patients whose clinical history number ended in odd numbers were assigned to group A (intervention) and those whose clinical history number ended in even numbers were assigned to group B (no intervention, control group). For patients in group A, the investigators attempted a telephone contact with the physician and/or nurse in charge and an interview, issuing recommendations regarding the convenience of further biochemical, microbiological or extra radiologic tests, and management and antimicrobial therapy.
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
In-patients with blood cultures drawn and sent to the Microbiology laboratory, regardless of patient allocation (eg., emergency department, intensive care units, general wards) Opportunity sampling: patients whose clinical history number ended in odd numbers were assigned to group A (intervention) and patients whose clinical history number ended in even numbers were assigned to group B (no intervention, control group). Inclusion Criteria: * Patients who had blood cultures drawn and sent to the Microbiology Laboratory, during the morning shift (from 9 am to 3 pm, Monday to Friday) * Patients \>/=18 years old
Exclusion criteria
* Patients \<18 years old * Patients with a recent bacteremic episode with no subsequent negative blood cultures * In-patients with blood cultures drawn to whom the telephone call had already been performed.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Sepsis recognition in patients who had blood cultures drawn | 72 h | Use of diagnostic resources and antimicrobial consumption |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Health care professionals who correctly identify a case of sepsis | 72 h |
Countries
Spain