Skip to content

King Vision Video Laryngoscope Versus Glidescope Video Laryngoscope

King Vision Video Laryngoscope Versus Glidescope Video Laryngoscope: A Comparative Study in Ambulatory Surgery Center Patients

Status
Terminated
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02324465
Enrollment
40
Registered
2014-12-24
Start date
2013-04-30
Completion date
2017-10-31
Last updated
2019-04-23

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Difficult Intubation

Brief summary

The investigators plan to conduct a randomized trial comparing the intubation success rate and time of the King Vision Video Laryngoscope to the Glidescope video laryngoscope in order to demonstrate the comparability of the devices.

Detailed description

Both the King Vision and Glidescope video laryngoscopes are advanced airway devices that are relatively low cost and are designed to improve the efficiency of both routine and difficult intubation. Both systems use disposable blades, which eliminates the need for blade sterilization and may minimize the risk of infectious exposure to patients and improve cost and efficiency associated with the sterilization processing of non-disposable laryngoscopes. The Glidescope has been commercially available longer than the King Vision, and has been more frequently studied. Although similar in many respects, the King Vision and Glidescope systems have differing designs which may result in differences in speed and success in the management of routine and/or difficult airways.

Interventions

Intubation via King Vision Video Laryngoscope

Intubation via Glidescope Video Laryngoscope

Sponsors

Vanderbilt University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Adult patients scheduled for elective, ambulatory surgery requiring general anesthesia and endotracheal intubation

Exclusion criteria

* Patients who require rapid sequence induction and intubation or fiberoptic intubation. * Pregnancy

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Time Until Intubation With Each Device<100 secondstime from the introduction of the laryngoscope into the oral cavity to endotracheal tube reaching the glottic aperture

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Mean Pulse Oximetry Saturation Value Reading During Intubation<100 seconds
Total Number of Assisted Maneuvers Required to Complete Intubation (Includes All Participants in Arm)<100 secondsAssisted Maneuvers can include laryngeal manipulation, head lift, Backward Upward Rightward Pressure, stylet removed, Cricoid pressure, scope manipulation and bougie.

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants With Adverse Eventsduring and immediately after procedure (approx 180 minutes)Notation of any injury to lips, teeth, soft tissue.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
King Vision Video Laryngoscope
The patient would be randomized to intubation via use of the King Vision VL then Glidescope VL King Vision Video Laryngoscope: Intubation via King Vision Video Laryngoscope Glidescope Video Laryngoscope: Intubation via Glidescope Video Laryngoscope
18
Glidescope Video Laryngoscope
The patient would be randomized to intubation via use of the Glidescope VL then King Vision VL King Vision Video Laryngoscope: Intubation via King Vision Video Laryngoscope Glidescope Video Laryngoscope: Intubation via Glidescope Video Laryngoscope
22
Total40

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall Studydevice failure01

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicGlidescope Video LaryngoscopeTotalKing Vision Video Laryngoscope
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
4 Participants7 Participants3 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
18 Participants33 Participants15 Participants
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected0 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
22 participants40 participants18 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
11 Participants21 Participants10 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
11 Participants19 Participants8 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 180 / 22
other
Total, other adverse events
2 / 182 / 22
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 180 / 22

Outcome results

Primary

Time Until Intubation With Each Device

time from the introduction of the laryngoscope into the oral cavity to endotracheal tube reaching the glottic aperture

Time frame: <100 seconds

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
King Vision Video LaryngoscopeTime Until Intubation With Each Device32.3 seconds
Glidescope Video LaryngoscopeTime Until Intubation With Each Device27.2 seconds
Secondary

Mean Pulse Oximetry Saturation Value Reading During Intubation

Time frame: <100 seconds

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
King Vision Video LaryngoscopeMean Pulse Oximetry Saturation Value Reading During Intubation97.39 percentage of oxygen saturation
Glidescope Video LaryngoscopeMean Pulse Oximetry Saturation Value Reading During Intubation97.0 percentage of oxygen saturation
Secondary

Total Number of Assisted Maneuvers Required to Complete Intubation (Includes All Participants in Arm)

Assisted Maneuvers can include laryngeal manipulation, head lift, Backward Upward Rightward Pressure, stylet removed, Cricoid pressure, scope manipulation and bougie.

Time frame: <100 seconds

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
King Vision Video LaryngoscopeTotal Number of Assisted Maneuvers Required to Complete Intubation (Includes All Participants in Arm)stylet removed0 assisted maneuvers
King Vision Video LaryngoscopeTotal Number of Assisted Maneuvers Required to Complete Intubation (Includes All Participants in Arm)bougie0 assisted maneuvers
King Vision Video LaryngoscopeTotal Number of Assisted Maneuvers Required to Complete Intubation (Includes All Participants in Arm)Cricoid pressure0 assisted maneuvers
King Vision Video LaryngoscopeTotal Number of Assisted Maneuvers Required to Complete Intubation (Includes All Participants in Arm)scope manipulation0 assisted maneuvers
King Vision Video LaryngoscopeTotal Number of Assisted Maneuvers Required to Complete Intubation (Includes All Participants in Arm)Backward Upward Rightward Pressure0 assisted maneuvers
Glidescope Video LaryngoscopeTotal Number of Assisted Maneuvers Required to Complete Intubation (Includes All Participants in Arm)scope manipulation1 assisted maneuvers
Glidescope Video LaryngoscopeTotal Number of Assisted Maneuvers Required to Complete Intubation (Includes All Participants in Arm)Backward Upward Rightward Pressure1 assisted maneuvers
Glidescope Video LaryngoscopeTotal Number of Assisted Maneuvers Required to Complete Intubation (Includes All Participants in Arm)stylet removed1 assisted maneuvers
Glidescope Video LaryngoscopeTotal Number of Assisted Maneuvers Required to Complete Intubation (Includes All Participants in Arm)Cricoid pressure3 assisted maneuvers
Glidescope Video LaryngoscopeTotal Number of Assisted Maneuvers Required to Complete Intubation (Includes All Participants in Arm)bougie1 assisted maneuvers
Other Pre-specified

Number of Participants With Adverse Events

Notation of any injury to lips, teeth, soft tissue.

Time frame: during and immediately after procedure (approx 180 minutes)

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
King Vision Video LaryngoscopeNumber of Participants With Adverse Events2 participants
Glidescope Video LaryngoscopeNumber of Participants With Adverse Events2 participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026