Skip to content

PCORI-1306-02918 Evaluation of Parent-based Programs to Support Children After Traumatic Injury

PCORI-1306-02918 Evaluation of Parent-based Programs to Support Children After Traumatic Injury

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02323204
Enrollment
628
Registered
2014-12-23
Start date
2015-02-17
Completion date
2018-03-31
Last updated
2019-06-10

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Coping, Depression, Psychological Trauma

Keywords

posttraumatic stress

Brief summary

Children presenting to the University of Iowa Health Care System (UIHC), Blank Children's Hospital (Blank), Children's Hospital of Minneapolis, and Kansas City Mercy Children's Hospital with an injury resulting in admission will be the sample population. A child will be included if they are 10-17 years old with an unintentional injury. Consenting children and their parents will be asked to complete a series of four questionnaires: before hospital discharge, at 1-month post discharge, 3-months and 6-months post discharge. The parent-child dyads will be randomized (1:1) to receive 1) training in Link for Injured Kids or 2) Trauma Education. The survey completed in the hospital will be a paper survey or online via an iPad, and follow-up surveys can be completed on paper or online. Aim #1: Assess the feasibility of Link for Injured Kids through qualitative research with parents and providers of previously injured children from UI Children's Hospital. Aim #2: Through a randomized trial, determine the range of potential psychosocial and behavioral health indicators possibly impacted by Link for Injured Kids. This will identify the types of outcomes which could include post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), depression, nonspecific distress, quality of life, absenteeism, school performance, coping skills, communication skills, and access to mental health.

Detailed description

Qualitative Phase I. Aim 1: Assess the feasibility of Link for Injured Kids through qualitative research with parents of previous injured children and social workers and pediatric trauma providers from the the children's hospitals. For phase 1 at UIHC, the investigators will hold focus groups with parents and pediatric health providers at the UIHC. The investigators will work with the Ul Pediatric Trauma Nurse Coordinator (Wetjen) to identify parents whose children were previously injured and treated at the UIHC in the past 12 months. These children are logged into the Trauma Alert system. UIHC: For the focus groups with providers, the investigators will invite emergency medicine physicians, nurses, pediatric psychiatrists and psychologists to participate in one focus group; and social workers and parent advocates to participate in the second focus groups. Participants identified with the assistance of Ms. Wetjen and Dr. Denning (Research Coordinator, Emergency Medicine) will be provided an introductory email about the study and an information sheet. Those interested in attending will be invited to attend the focus group session during a lunch hour. Blank Children's Hospital: Using the Iowa Trauma Database, Ms. Wetjen, UIHC Pediatric Nurse Trauma Coordinator will work with Blank Children's Hospital Pediatric Trauma Coordinator to identify parents whose children previously received an unintentional injury and were treated at the Blank Children's Hospital in the past 12 months. Focus groups will last approximately one hour, and will include open-ended questions about the various types of trauma experienced by children, the kinds of psychosocial consequences encountered by traumatized children, and the types of services perceived as available, accessible and acceptable to families particularly from rural Iowa. During the focus groups, participants will be provided a copy of the LPC for Injured Kids manual, and feedback will be solicited from participants about the content of the intervention and its applicability to families from rural Iowa. As a qualitative study, the sample will be adaptive and purposeful. The investigators anticipate holding the focus group with 6-10 participants. All sessions will be audiotaped and transcribed. Analysis will involve qualitative coding, content analysis, and triangulation. Phase II: Randomized Controlled Trial. Aim 2: Through a randomized trial, determine the range of potential psychosocial and behavioral health indicators possibly impacted by the newly developed Link for Injured Kids program. This will identify the types of outcomes which could include PTSD, depression, nonspecific distress, quality of life, absenteeism, school performance, coping skills, communication skills, and access to mental health. Eligibility: Children with unintentional injuries will be recruited to participate in the randomized trial. Children will be administered the Children's Orientation and Amnesia Test (COAT), which is a measure of orientation to self, place and memory, and those that pass the COAT with a score of at least 55 out of a possible 65 points, will be recruited into the study. One parent of the child will be recruited for participation. Children with intentional injuries will be excluded from the study. Inclusion and exclusion criteria are the same for both randomization groups. Exclusions include non-English speaking, diagnosis of intellectual deficit or psychosis, suicide attempt in the last year, and residential treatment placement in the last year. Sample Size. The investigators conducted sample size based on testing a moderate effect size of 0.5 standard deviation comparing Trauma Education vs Link. With an alpha of 0.05, a sample size of 134 parent-child dyads in each of the arms (n=268) has 100% power to examine comparisons. The investigators will oversample by 12% for a total n = 300. Recruitment, Screening and Randomization. The research team will review patient admission records morning and afternoon/evening to identify eligible patients (unintentional injury admissions between 10-17 years of age). The team will determine if the child meets inclusion criteria by reviewing information collected from EPIC, the electronic health record system at UIHC. A study team member will be texted if a child is admitted and meets eligibility criteria. The text will not contain identifying information, just a text like A patient is added to the database. The research team will review the child's medical record to determine if he/she meet eligibility criteria and are going to be admitted. A brief information sheet will be included in the patient's admission packet describing the study and the potential for participation. On a daily basis, the research team will review each child's medical record to determine when the child is likely to be discharged. On the day of discharge or any convenient time recommended by the provider, a member of the research team will present to the child's room to determine if the child has an appropriate level of consciousness to complete the consent process (an orientation score of at least 55), and if appropriate recruit the dyad. The team member will discuss the study and complete the consent process with the dyad in-person. To minimize the possibility of coercion during the consent process, the research team will follow the consent document closely and stress to the dyad that the child's health care will not be affected by participation in the study. Randomization. After enrollment, each family will be randomly assigned on a rolling basis to either the Link or trauma education arms of the study. Intervention Training. Parents randomized to the intervention arm will be trained to offer Link to their child as needed. A 20 to 45 minute training session will be offered at the ED or in-patient ward in a private consultation room by a member of the research team. In addition, the investigators will offer training, if desired, at another location outside the hospital during a convenient time. A training manual will be offered to the family. The steps of Link will be taught. In Link 1, the parents will be taught to use reflective listening skills based on motivational interviewing to obtain information without invasive probing (found to be harmful in the practice of Critical Incident Stress Debriefing). Additionally, the parent will briefly assess current emotional response to the crisis using the modified Kessler-6 screener, a six-item tool that asks about feelings of sadness, nervousness, restlessness, hopelessness, effort, and worthlessness. In Link 2, the psychological first aid interventionist facilitates access to resources and further care if necessary to support their child. Resources are given to the family including a toll-free help line and support for advanced mental health care at UIHC and their local community. Trauma Education families will not be trained but be given a parent booklet, So you've been in an accident. Data Collection. Data about the injury visit and follow-up visits will be collected from each enrolled child from the medical records. The investigators will collect nature of injury and body location using the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-9). Additional information collected will include length of stay, diagnostic procedures, mechanism of injury, initial vital signs, and any follow-up complications or co-morbidities. Information on injury severity will be recorded through the collection of abbreviated injury scale (AIS) and injury severity scale (ISS) scores. Baseline, 6-week, 3-month and 6-month surveys will be administered with parents and children in both Link and Trauma Education arms. The investigators will ask the child and parent to complete baseline surveys in the patient ward. Follow-up 6-week, 3-month and 6-month surveys will be conducted by self-administered mailed surveys or online. Questionnaires will measure depressive symptoms, symptoms of post traumatic stress disorder, social support, family communication, strengths and difficulties and quality of life and asks about any mental health or community resources they may have used since the last questionnaire. For follow-up, the research team will e-mail a link for the parent and the child to complete their surveys as well as mail a hard copy version of the questionnaire with a cover letter explaining that the survey can be completed on paper or online and a postage paid envelope. If completed online, the questionnaires will be done electronically using REDCap, a U of I supported online survey system. A telephone call will be placed to the dyad the day the hard copy questionnaire is mailed informing the dyad of the mailing. If an online or mailed questionnaire is not returned within 10 days the research team will attempt to contact the dyad by phone 6 times within a month to remind them of the questionnaire. After a month of no response, the investigators will resend the package or online link. If a dyad does not complete the 6-week questionnaire, they will still be asked to complete the 3-month and 6-month questionnaires. Analytic Plan The investigators will compare the effectiveness of the two intervention arms (Link and Trauma Education) to each other. The research team will examine several parent-related and child-related outcomes potentially impacted by the interventions, including symptoms of PTSD and depression, coping, family social support, quality of life, school outcomes, and contacts with mental health professionals. Outcomes may be continuous or categorical in nature. A number of comparisons will involve repeated measures of subjects (child or parent) across time. The investigators will first calculate t-tests and Wilcoxon rank sum tests to examine continuous outcomes (e.g., levels of depression, level of family social support), and chi-square tests for categorical outcomes (e.g., symptomatic for PTSD vs. asymptomatic). If randomization is not achieved, the investigators will pursue Generalized Linear Mixed Models (GLMM). As an example, for PTSD symptoms, the research team will examine 1) onset of symptoms at six weeks, and 2) changes measured from six weeks to three months and to six months. 1) For six-week measurements, the investigators will conduct a simple generalized linear model and include time-varying covariates to account for measures changed from baseline (e.g., coping, social support). 2) For changes from six weeks through six months, the GLMMs will account for clustering of repeated observations clustered within subjects over time.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALLink for Injured Kids

Psychological First Aid

OTHERSo you've been in an accident

Educational materials

Sponsors

The University of Queensland
CollaboratorOTHER
Children's Mercy Hospital Kansas City
CollaboratorOTHER
Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute
CollaboratorOTHER
Blank Children's Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Children's Hospitals and Clinics of Minnesota
CollaboratorOTHER
Marizen Ramirez
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
10 Years to 17 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* unintentional injury

Exclusion criteria

* intentional injury * non-English speaking families * children with cognitive impairment.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Post-traumatic Stress Symptoms (Child Post-traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) Scale) Through the First and Last Survey Administered Post-Baselinesurveys were provided at 6 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months post-baselinePost-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) (modified) scale, a questionnaire. Lower scores are preferable. Scores may range from 1 to 52. Responses submitted by parents are with respect to themselves. Responses submitted by children are with respect to themselves.
Depressive Symptoms (Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) Through the First and Last Survey Administered Post-Baselinesurveys were provided at 6 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months post-baselineCenter for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) (modified), a questionnaire. Lower scores are preferable. Scores may range from 1 to 31. Responses submitted by parents are with respect to themselves. Responses submitted by children are with respect to themselves.
Quality of Life (Questionnaire) Through the First and Last Survey Administered Post-Baselinesurveys were provided at 6 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months post-baselineQuality of Life, a questionnaire (modified). Lower scores are preferable. Scores may range from 1 to 101. Responses submitted by parents are with respect to their children. Responses submitted by children are with respect to themselves.
Psychological Distress Symptoms (Kessler Screening Scale for Psychological Distress (K6)) Through the First and Last Survey Administered Post-Baselinesurveys were provided at 6 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months post-baselinePsychological Distress Symptoms (Kessler Screening Scale for Psychological Distress (K6)) (modified). Lower scores are preferable. Scores may range from 1 to 25. Responses submitted by parents are with respect to themselves. Responses submitted by children are with respect to themselves.
Strengths and Difficulties (Questionnaire to Assess Internalizing and Externalizing Behaviors (SDQ)) Through the First and Last Survey Administered Post-Baselinesurveys were provided at 6 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months post-baselineStrengths and Difficulties (Questionnaire to Assess Internalizing and Externalizing Behaviors (SDQ)) (modified). Lower scores are preferable. Scores may range from 1 to 41. Responses submitted by parents are with respect to their children. Responses submitted by children are with respect to themselves.
Emotional Symptoms (SDQ Subscale) Through the First and Last Survey Administered Post-Baselinesurveys were provided at 6 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months post-baselineEmotional Symptoms (SDQ Subscale) (modified). Lower scores are preferable. Scores may range from 1 to 11. Responses submitted by parents are with respect to their children. Responses submitted by children are with respect to themselves.
Conduct Problems (SDQ Subscale) Through the First and Last Survey Administered Post-Baselinesurveys were provided at 6 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months post-baselineConduct Problems (SDQ Subscale) (modified). Lower scores are preferable. Scores may range from 1 to 11. Responses submitted by parents are with respect to their children. Responses submitted by children are with respect to themselves.
Hyperactivity (SDQ Subscale) Through the First and Last Survey Administered Post-Baselinesurveys were provided at 6 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months post-baselineHyperactivity (SDQ Subscale) (modified). Lower scores are preferable. Scores may range from 1 to 11. Responses submitted by parents are with respect to their children. Responses submitted by children are with respect to themselves.
Peer Relationship Problems (SDQ Subscale) Through the First and Last Survey Administered Post-Baselinesurveys were provided at 6 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months post-baselinePeer Problems (SDQ Subscale) (modified). Lower scores are preferable. Scores may range from 1 to 11. Responses submitted by parents are with respect to their children. Responses submitted by children are with respect to themselves.
Prosocial Behavior (SDQ Subscale) Through the First and Last Survey Administered Post-Baselinesurveys were provided at 6 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months post-baselineProsocial Behavior (SDQ Subscale) (modified). Lower scores are preferable. Scores may range from 1 to 11. Responses submitted by parents are with respect to their children. Responses submitted by children are with respect to themselves.
Implementation Through the First and Last Survey Administered Post-Baselinesurveys were provided at 6 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months post-baselineImplementation was measured on a scale ranging from 0 to 2, where a score of 0 is indicative of no implementation, a score of 1 indicative of partial implementation, and 2 of full implementation. For the trauma education group, a score of 0 was assigned if the subject never read the provided materials, a score of 1 was assigned if participants read but did not use the provided materials, and a score of 2 was assigned if the participant read and used the material at least once. For the link group, a score of 0 was assigned if the subject did not use any of the skills associated with the intervention, a score of 1 was assigned if at least one but not all three skills were used, and a score of 2 was assigned if all skills were used.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Children between the ages of 10-17 who were hospitalized because of traumatic injury between January 2015-July 2017 along with one parent were recruited for participation at 4 children's hospitals in the Midwest.

Pre-assignment details

After consenting to participation, participants completed baseline questionnaires, and were randomized to one of two interventions.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Link: Child Participants
Participants of this group were injured children who completed a baseline questionnaire and whose parents received Link for Injured Kids: Psychological First Aid, an in-person training in key intervention communication skills from a trained interventionist.
145
Link: Parent Participants
Participants of this group completed a baseline questionnaire and received Link for Injured Kids: Psychological First Aid, an in-person training in key intervention communication skills from a trained interventionist.
146
Trauma Education: Child Participants
Participants of this group were injured children who completed a baseline questionnaire and whose parents received the trauma education booklet, So you've been in an accident.
154
Trauma Education: Parent Participants
Participants of this group completed a baseline questionnaire and received the trauma education booklet, So you've been in an accident.
156
Total601

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002FG003
3-month Follow-up Survey CompletionLost to Follow-up54454142
3-month Follow-up Survey CompletionWithdrawal by Subject0202
6-month Follow-up Survey CompletionLost to Follow-up49503843
6-month Follow-up Survey CompletionWithdrawal by Subject0031
6-week Follow-up Intervention BoosterLost to Follow-up035034
6-week Follow-up Intervention BoosterWithdrawal by Subject0802
6-week Follow-up Survey CompletionLost to Follow-up29283935
6-week Follow-up Survey CompletionWithdrawal by Subject12832
Baseline Survey CompletionWithdrawal by Subject10953

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTotalLink: Child ParticipantsTrauma Education: Child ParticipantsLink: Parent ParticipantsTrauma Education: Parent Participants
Age, Continuous
Child Participants
13.93 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.38
14.04 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.16
13.82 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.57
Age, Continuous
Parent Participants
42.21 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.15
42.73 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7
41.71 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.28
CESD
Child Participants
9.24 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.93
9.51 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.08
8.98 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.79
CESD
Parent Participants
8.53 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.7
8.40 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.26
8.65 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.1
Composite SDQ
Child Participants
8.70 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.05
8.24 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.75
9.13 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.32
Composite SDQ
Parent Participants
7.94 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.09
7.68 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.82
8.18 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.34
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Child Participants
Hispanic or Latino
23 Participants9 Participants14 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Child Participants
Not Hispanic or Latino
275 Participants136 Participants139 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Child Participants
Unknown or Not Reported
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Parent Participants
Hispanic or Latino
16 Participants9 Participants7 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Parent Participants
Not Hispanic or Latino
284 Participants137 Participants147 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Parent Participants
Unknown or Not Reported
2 Participants0 Participants2 Participants
Psychological Distress
Child Participants
6.18 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.49
6.24 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.26
6.11 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.72
Psychological Distress
Parent Participants
4.85 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.08
4.98 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.83
4.72 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.31
PTSD
Child Participants
9.96 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.1
9.97 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.91
9.95 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.31
PTSD
Parent Participants
7.90 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.73
8.21 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.87
7.61 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.62
Quality of Life
Child Participants
13.27 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.31
12.06 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.13
14.47 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.32
Quality of Life
Parent Participants
13.52 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.9
13.13 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.65
13.92 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.21
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Child Participants
African American
13 Participants6 Participants7 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Child Participants
American Indian / Alaskan Native
2 Participants2 Participants0 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Child Participants
Asian / Pacific Islander
5 Participants2 Participants3 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Child Participants
Multi-Race
10 Participants5 Participants5 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Child Participants
Other
2 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Child Participants
Unknown or Not Reported
10 Participants4 Participants6 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Child Participants
White
257 Participants125 Participants132 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Parent Participants
African American
10 Participants3 Participants7 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Parent Participants
American Indian / Alaskan Native
1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Parent Participants
Asian / Pacific Islander
2 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Parent Participants
Multi-Race
9 Participants7 Participants2 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Parent Participants
Other
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Parent Participants
Unknown or Not Reported
14 Participants6 Participants8 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Parent Participants
White
265 Participants128 Participants137 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
601 participants145 participants154 participants146 participants156 participants
SDQ: Conduct Subscale
Child Participants
2.51 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.61
2.47 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.68
2.55 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.54
SDQ: Conduct Subscale
Parent Participants
2.24 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.67
2.19 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.6
2.28 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.74
SDQ: Emotional Subscale
Child Participants
2.67 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.11
2.58 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.01
2.76 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.2
SDQ: Emotional Subscale
Parent Participants
2.41 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.89
2.33 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.84
2.49 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.94
SDQ: Hyperactivity Subscale
Child Participants
4.00 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.33
3.91 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.33
4.08 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.33
SDQ: Hyperactivity Subscale
Parent Participants
3.86 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.56
3.85 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.46
3.87 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.67
SDQ: Peer Subscale
Child Participants
2.57 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.72
2.39 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.53
2.75 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.87
SDQ: Peer Subscale
Parent Participants
2.44 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.64
2.38 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.56
2.50 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.73
SDQ: Prosocial Scale
Child Participants
2.78 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.88
2.76 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.88
2.80 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.88
SDQ: Prosocial Scale
Parent Participants
2.40 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.77
2.31 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.61
2.49 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.91
Sex: Female, Male
Child Participants
Female
112 Participants52 Participants60 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Child Participants
Male
187 Participants93 Participants94 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Parent Participants
Female
237 Participants114 Participants123 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Parent Participants
Male
63 Participants32 Participants31 Participants
Urbanicity
Child Participants
Rural
109 Participants51 Participants58 Participants
Urbanicity
Child Participants
Urban
189 Participants94 Participants95 Participants
Urbanicity
Parent Participants
Rural
110 Participants51 Participants59 Participants
Urbanicity
Parent Participants
Urban
192 Participants95 Participants97 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 00 / 00 / 00 / 0
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 00 / 00 / 00 / 0
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 00 / 00 / 00 / 0

Outcome results

Primary

Conduct Problems (SDQ Subscale) Through the First and Last Survey Administered Post-Baseline

Conduct Problems (SDQ Subscale) (modified). Lower scores are preferable. Scores may range from 1 to 11. Responses submitted by parents are with respect to their children. Responses submitted by children are with respect to themselves.

Time frame: surveys were provided at 6 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months post-baseline

Population: Subjects who completed the baseline questionnaire and at least one questionnaire post-baseline were eligible for analyses. Of these, only those subjects whose data were observed or could be imputed were used in the fitting of Generalized Linear Mixed Models (GLMMs). Means and standard deviations were computed using observed data only.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Link: Child ParticipantsConduct Problems (SDQ Subscale) Through the First and Last Survey Administered Post-BaselineSecond survey post-baseline (~3 months)2.80 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.59
Link: Child ParticipantsConduct Problems (SDQ Subscale) Through the First and Last Survey Administered Post-BaselineFirst survey post-baseline (~6 weeks)2.91 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.64
Link: Child ParticipantsConduct Problems (SDQ Subscale) Through the First and Last Survey Administered Post-BaselineLast survey post-baseline (~6 months)2.62 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.77
Link: Parent ParticipantsConduct Problems (SDQ Subscale) Through the First and Last Survey Administered Post-BaselineSecond survey post-baseline (~3 months)2.42 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.6
Link: Parent ParticipantsConduct Problems (SDQ Subscale) Through the First and Last Survey Administered Post-BaselineFirst survey post-baseline (~6 weeks)2.79 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.8
Link: Parent ParticipantsConduct Problems (SDQ Subscale) Through the First and Last Survey Administered Post-BaselineLast survey post-baseline (~6 months)2.43 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.78
Trauma Education: Child ParticipantsConduct Problems (SDQ Subscale) Through the First and Last Survey Administered Post-BaselineSecond survey post-baseline (~3 months)2.64 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.81
Trauma Education: Child ParticipantsConduct Problems (SDQ Subscale) Through the First and Last Survey Administered Post-BaselineFirst survey post-baseline (~6 weeks)2.55 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.69
Trauma Education: Child ParticipantsConduct Problems (SDQ Subscale) Through the First and Last Survey Administered Post-BaselineLast survey post-baseline (~6 months)2.57 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.77
Trauma Education: Parent ParticipantsConduct Problems (SDQ Subscale) Through the First and Last Survey Administered Post-BaselineSecond survey post-baseline (~3 months)2.26 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.59
Trauma Education: Parent ParticipantsConduct Problems (SDQ Subscale) Through the First and Last Survey Administered Post-BaselineLast survey post-baseline (~6 months)2.38 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.76
Trauma Education: Parent ParticipantsConduct Problems (SDQ Subscale) Through the First and Last Survey Administered Post-BaselineFirst survey post-baseline (~6 weeks)2.32 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.64
Comparison: A Generalized Linear Mixed Model (GLMM) with log link and gamma distribution was fit to five imputed data sets. Obtained estimates and standard errors were adjusted accordingly.~A comparison of intervention efficacy was made through the intervention-time interaction effect included in the model. Statistical significance of the interaction effect is indicative of a difference in effect between interventions over time.p-value: 0.0286Wald 2-sided t-test
Comparison: A Generalized Linear Mixed Model (GLMM) with log link and gamma distribution was fit to five imputed data sets. Obtained estimates and standard errors were adjusted accordingly.~A comparison of intervention efficacy was made through the intervention-time interaction effect included in the model. Statistical significance of the interaction effect is indicative of a difference in effect between interventions over time.p-value: 0.0201Wald 2-sided t-test
Primary

Depressive Symptoms (Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) Through the First and Last Survey Administered Post-Baseline

Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) (modified), a questionnaire. Lower scores are preferable. Scores may range from 1 to 31. Responses submitted by parents are with respect to themselves. Responses submitted by children are with respect to themselves.

Time frame: surveys were provided at 6 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months post-baseline

Population: Subjects who completed the baseline questionnaire and at least one questionnaire post-baseline were eligible for analyses. Of these, only those subjects whose data were observed or could be imputed were used in the fitting of Generalized Linear Mixed Models (GLMMs). Means and standard deviations were computed using observed data only.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Link: Child ParticipantsDepressive Symptoms (Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) Through the First and Last Survey Administered Post-BaselineFirst survey post-baseline (~6 weeks)8.21 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.74
Link: Child ParticipantsDepressive Symptoms (Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) Through the First and Last Survey Administered Post-BaselineLast survey post-baseline (~6 months)7.07 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.53
Link: Child ParticipantsDepressive Symptoms (Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) Through the First and Last Survey Administered Post-BaselineSecond survey post-baseline (~3 months)6.90 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.64
Link: Parent ParticipantsDepressive Symptoms (Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) Through the First and Last Survey Administered Post-BaselineFirst survey post-baseline (~6 weeks)8.84 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.05
Link: Parent ParticipantsDepressive Symptoms (Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) Through the First and Last Survey Administered Post-BaselineLast survey post-baseline (~6 months)8.04 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.4
Link: Parent ParticipantsDepressive Symptoms (Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) Through the First and Last Survey Administered Post-BaselineSecond survey post-baseline (~3 months)7.92 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.03
Trauma Education: Child ParticipantsDepressive Symptoms (Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) Through the First and Last Survey Administered Post-BaselineSecond survey post-baseline (~3 months)7.16 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.35
Trauma Education: Child ParticipantsDepressive Symptoms (Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) Through the First and Last Survey Administered Post-BaselineFirst survey post-baseline (~6 weeks)7.91 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.68
Trauma Education: Child ParticipantsDepressive Symptoms (Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) Through the First and Last Survey Administered Post-BaselineLast survey post-baseline (~6 months)6.41 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.16
Trauma Education: Parent ParticipantsDepressive Symptoms (Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) Through the First and Last Survey Administered Post-BaselineFirst survey post-baseline (~6 weeks)8.52 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.44
Trauma Education: Parent ParticipantsDepressive Symptoms (Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) Through the First and Last Survey Administered Post-BaselineLast survey post-baseline (~6 months)7.76 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.64
Trauma Education: Parent ParticipantsDepressive Symptoms (Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) Through the First and Last Survey Administered Post-BaselineSecond survey post-baseline (~3 months)7.36 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.68
Comparison: A Generalized Linear Mixed Model (GLMM) with log link and gamma distribution was fit to five imputed data sets. Obtained estimates and standard errors were adjusted accordingly.~A comparison of intervention efficacy was made through the intervention-time interaction effect included in the model. Statistical significance of the interaction effect is indicative of a difference in effect between interventions over time.p-value: 0.7893Wald 2-sided t-test
Comparison: A Generalized Linear Mixed Model (GLMM) with log link and gamma distribution was fit to five imputed data sets. Obtained estimates and standard errors were adjusted accordingly.~A comparison of intervention efficacy was made through the intervention-time interaction effect included in the model. Statistical significance of the interaction effect is indicative of a difference in effect between interventions over time.p-value: 0.2951Wald 2-sided t-test
Primary

Emotional Symptoms (SDQ Subscale) Through the First and Last Survey Administered Post-Baseline

Emotional Symptoms (SDQ Subscale) (modified). Lower scores are preferable. Scores may range from 1 to 11. Responses submitted by parents are with respect to their children. Responses submitted by children are with respect to themselves.

Time frame: surveys were provided at 6 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months post-baseline

Population: Subjects who completed the baseline questionnaire and at least one questionnaire post-baseline were eligible for analyses. Of these, only those subjects whose data were observed or could be imputed were used in the fitting of Generalized Linear Mixed Models (GLMMs). Means and standard deviations were computed using observed data only.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Link: Child ParticipantsEmotional Symptoms (SDQ Subscale) Through the First and Last Survey Administered Post-BaselineSecond survey post-baseline (~3 months)2.62 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.03
Link: Child ParticipantsEmotional Symptoms (SDQ Subscale) Through the First and Last Survey Administered Post-BaselineLast survey post-baseline (~6 months)2.77 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.19
Link: Child ParticipantsEmotional Symptoms (SDQ Subscale) Through the First and Last Survey Administered Post-BaselineFirst survey post-baseline (~6 weeks)3.11 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.34
Link: Parent ParticipantsEmotional Symptoms (SDQ Subscale) Through the First and Last Survey Administered Post-BaselineFirst survey post-baseline (~6 weeks)3.14 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.16
Link: Parent ParticipantsEmotional Symptoms (SDQ Subscale) Through the First and Last Survey Administered Post-BaselineSecond survey post-baseline (~3 months)2.60 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.94
Link: Parent ParticipantsEmotional Symptoms (SDQ Subscale) Through the First and Last Survey Administered Post-BaselineLast survey post-baseline (~6 months)2.85 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.14
Trauma Education: Child ParticipantsEmotional Symptoms (SDQ Subscale) Through the First and Last Survey Administered Post-BaselineLast survey post-baseline (~6 months)2.92 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.2
Trauma Education: Child ParticipantsEmotional Symptoms (SDQ Subscale) Through the First and Last Survey Administered Post-BaselineSecond survey post-baseline (~3 months)2.88 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.28
Trauma Education: Child ParticipantsEmotional Symptoms (SDQ Subscale) Through the First and Last Survey Administered Post-BaselineFirst survey post-baseline (~6 weeks)3.03 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.3
Trauma Education: Parent ParticipantsEmotional Symptoms (SDQ Subscale) Through the First and Last Survey Administered Post-BaselineLast survey post-baseline (~6 months)2.75 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.1
Trauma Education: Parent ParticipantsEmotional Symptoms (SDQ Subscale) Through the First and Last Survey Administered Post-BaselineSecond survey post-baseline (~3 months)2.98 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.42
Trauma Education: Parent ParticipantsEmotional Symptoms (SDQ Subscale) Through the First and Last Survey Administered Post-BaselineFirst survey post-baseline (~6 weeks)3.25 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.35
Comparison: A Generalized Linear Mixed Model (GLMM) with log link and gamma distribution was fit to five imputed data sets. Obtained estimates and standard errors were adjusted accordingly.~A comparison of intervention efficacy was made through the intervention-time interaction effect included in the model. Statistical significance of the interaction effect is indicative of a difference in effect between interventions over time.p-value: 0.0654Wald 2-sided t-test
Comparison: A Generalized Linear Mixed Model (GLMM) with log link and gamma distribution was fit to five imputed data sets. Obtained estimates and standard errors were adjusted accordingly.~A comparison of intervention efficacy was made through the intervention-time interaction effect included in the model. Statistical significance of the interaction effect is indicative of a difference in effect between interventions over time.p-value: 0.7957Wald 2-sided t-test
Primary

Hyperactivity (SDQ Subscale) Through the First and Last Survey Administered Post-Baseline

Hyperactivity (SDQ Subscale) (modified). Lower scores are preferable. Scores may range from 1 to 11. Responses submitted by parents are with respect to their children. Responses submitted by children are with respect to themselves.

Time frame: surveys were provided at 6 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months post-baseline

Population: Subjects who completed the baseline questionnaire and at least one questionnaire post-baseline were eligible for analyses. Of these, only those subjects whose data were observed or could be imputed were used in the fitting of Generalized Linear Mixed Models (GLMMs). Means and standard deviations were computed using observed data only.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Link: Child ParticipantsHyperactivity (SDQ Subscale) Through the First and Last Survey Administered Post-BaselineSecond survey post-baseline (~3 months)4.30 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.21
Link: Child ParticipantsHyperactivity (SDQ Subscale) Through the First and Last Survey Administered Post-BaselineLast survey post-baseline (~6 months)4.18 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.7
Link: Child ParticipantsHyperactivity (SDQ Subscale) Through the First and Last Survey Administered Post-BaselineFirst survey post-baseline (~6 weeks)3.98 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.15
Link: Parent ParticipantsHyperactivity (SDQ Subscale) Through the First and Last Survey Administered Post-BaselineFirst survey post-baseline (~6 weeks)4.44 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.22
Link: Parent ParticipantsHyperactivity (SDQ Subscale) Through the First and Last Survey Administered Post-BaselineSecond survey post-baseline (~3 months)4.04 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.55
Link: Parent ParticipantsHyperactivity (SDQ Subscale) Through the First and Last Survey Administered Post-BaselineLast survey post-baseline (~6 months)3.95 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.7
Trauma Education: Child ParticipantsHyperactivity (SDQ Subscale) Through the First and Last Survey Administered Post-BaselineSecond survey post-baseline (~3 months)3.92 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.37
Trauma Education: Child ParticipantsHyperactivity (SDQ Subscale) Through the First and Last Survey Administered Post-BaselineFirst survey post-baseline (~6 weeks)3.99 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.38
Trauma Education: Child ParticipantsHyperactivity (SDQ Subscale) Through the First and Last Survey Administered Post-BaselineLast survey post-baseline (~6 months)3.92 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.44
Trauma Education: Parent ParticipantsHyperactivity (SDQ Subscale) Through the First and Last Survey Administered Post-BaselineFirst survey post-baseline (~6 weeks)4.27 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.41
Trauma Education: Parent ParticipantsHyperactivity (SDQ Subscale) Through the First and Last Survey Administered Post-BaselineLast survey post-baseline (~6 months)4.15 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.82
Trauma Education: Parent ParticipantsHyperactivity (SDQ Subscale) Through the First and Last Survey Administered Post-BaselineSecond survey post-baseline (~3 months)4.17 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.54
Comparison: A Generalized Linear Mixed Model (GLMM) with log link and gamma distribution was fit to five imputed data sets. Obtained estimates and standard errors were adjusted accordingly.~A comparison of intervention efficacy was made through the intervention-time interaction effect included in the model. Statistical significance of the interaction effect is indicative of a difference in effect between interventions over time.p-value: 0.9928Wald 2-sided t-test
Comparison: A Generalized Linear Mixed Model (GLMM) with log link and gamma distribution was fit to five imputed data sets. Obtained estimates and standard errors were adjusted accordingly.~A comparison of intervention efficacy was made through the intervention-time interaction effect included in the model. Statistical significance of the interaction effect is indicative of a difference in effect between interventions over time.p-value: 0.0982Wald 2-sided t-test
Primary

Implementation Through the First and Last Survey Administered Post-Baseline

Implementation was measured on a scale ranging from 0 to 2, where a score of 0 is indicative of no implementation, a score of 1 indicative of partial implementation, and 2 of full implementation. For the trauma education group, a score of 0 was assigned if the subject never read the provided materials, a score of 1 was assigned if participants read but did not use the provided materials, and a score of 2 was assigned if the participant read and used the material at least once. For the link group, a score of 0 was assigned if the subject did not use any of the skills associated with the intervention, a score of 1 was assigned if at least one but not all three skills were used, and a score of 2 was assigned if all skills were used.

Time frame: surveys were provided at 6 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months post-baseline

Population: Subjects who completed the baseline questionnaire and at least one questionnaire post-baseline were eligible for analyses. Only those parents who submitted responses to implementation-related questions were included in these analyses.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Link: Parent ParticipantsImplementation Through the First and Last Survey Administered Post-BaselineFirst survey post-baseline (~6 weeks)1.10 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.64
Link: Parent ParticipantsImplementation Through the First and Last Survey Administered Post-BaselineSecond survey post-baseline (~3 months)1.03 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.64
Link: Parent ParticipantsImplementation Through the First and Last Survey Administered Post-BaselineLast survey post-baseline (~6 months)0.90 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.67
Trauma Education: Parent ParticipantsImplementation Through the First and Last Survey Administered Post-BaselineFirst survey post-baseline (~6 weeks)1.46 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.73
Trauma Education: Parent ParticipantsImplementation Through the First and Last Survey Administered Post-BaselineSecond survey post-baseline (~3 months)1.22 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.78
Trauma Education: Parent ParticipantsImplementation Through the First and Last Survey Administered Post-BaselineLast survey post-baseline (~6 months)1.16 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.77
Comparison: A Generalized Linear Mixed Model (GLMM) with cumulative logit link and multinomial distribution was fit to the data. A comparison of implementation over time between interventions was made through the intervention-time interaction effect included in the model. Significance in the interaction effect is indicative of a difference in the rate of change in implementation between interventions over time.p-value: 0.7949Wald 2-sided t-test
Comparison: A Generalized Linear Mixed Model (GLMM) with cumulative logit link and multinomial distribution was fit to the data. A comparison of implementation between interventions was made through the intervention main effect included in the model. The model at hand does not contain an interaction between intervention and time. Significance in the main intervention effect is indicative of a difference in implementation between intervention groups.p-value: 0.0003Wald 2-sided t-test
Primary

Peer Relationship Problems (SDQ Subscale) Through the First and Last Survey Administered Post-Baseline

Peer Problems (SDQ Subscale) (modified). Lower scores are preferable. Scores may range from 1 to 11. Responses submitted by parents are with respect to their children. Responses submitted by children are with respect to themselves.

Time frame: surveys were provided at 6 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months post-baseline

Population: Subjects who completed the baseline questionnaire and at least one questionnaire post-baseline were eligible for analyses. Of these, only those subjects whose data were observed or could be imputed were used in the fitting of Generalized Linear Mixed Models (GLMMs). Means and standard deviations were computed using observed data only.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Link: Child ParticipantsPeer Relationship Problems (SDQ Subscale) Through the First and Last Survey Administered Post-BaselineFirst survey post-baseline (~6 weeks)2.66 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.55
Link: Child ParticipantsPeer Relationship Problems (SDQ Subscale) Through the First and Last Survey Administered Post-BaselineLast survey post-baseline (~6 months)2.54 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.62
Link: Child ParticipantsPeer Relationship Problems (SDQ Subscale) Through the First and Last Survey Administered Post-BaselineSecond survey post-baseline (~3 months)2.65 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.73
Link: Parent ParticipantsPeer Relationship Problems (SDQ Subscale) Through the First and Last Survey Administered Post-BaselineFirst survey post-baseline (~6 weeks)2.58 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.8
Link: Parent ParticipantsPeer Relationship Problems (SDQ Subscale) Through the First and Last Survey Administered Post-BaselineLast survey post-baseline (~6 months)2.57 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.71
Link: Parent ParticipantsPeer Relationship Problems (SDQ Subscale) Through the First and Last Survey Administered Post-BaselineSecond survey post-baseline (~3 months)2.44 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.77
Trauma Education: Child ParticipantsPeer Relationship Problems (SDQ Subscale) Through the First and Last Survey Administered Post-BaselineSecond survey post-baseline (~3 months)3.07 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.04
Trauma Education: Child ParticipantsPeer Relationship Problems (SDQ Subscale) Through the First and Last Survey Administered Post-BaselineFirst survey post-baseline (~6 weeks)2.74 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.7
Trauma Education: Child ParticipantsPeer Relationship Problems (SDQ Subscale) Through the First and Last Survey Administered Post-BaselineLast survey post-baseline (~6 months)3.09 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.95
Trauma Education: Parent ParticipantsPeer Relationship Problems (SDQ Subscale) Through the First and Last Survey Administered Post-BaselineFirst survey post-baseline (~6 weeks)2.46 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.52
Trauma Education: Parent ParticipantsPeer Relationship Problems (SDQ Subscale) Through the First and Last Survey Administered Post-BaselineLast survey post-baseline (~6 months)2.76 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.78
Trauma Education: Parent ParticipantsPeer Relationship Problems (SDQ Subscale) Through the First and Last Survey Administered Post-BaselineSecond survey post-baseline (~3 months)2.67 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.76
Comparison: A Generalized Linear Mixed Model (GLMM) with log link and gamma distribution was fit to five imputed data sets. Obtained estimates and standard errors were adjusted accordingly.~A comparison of intervention efficacy was made through the intervention-time interaction effect included in the model. Statistical significance of the interaction effect is indicative of a difference in effect between interventions over time.p-value: 0.0325Wald 2-sided t-test
Comparison: A Generalized Linear Mixed Model (GLMM) with log link and gamma distribution was fit to five imputed data sets. Obtained estimates and standard errors were adjusted accordingly.~A comparison of intervention efficacy was made through the intervention-time interaction effect included in the model. Statistical significance of the interaction effect is indicative of a difference in effect between interventions over time.p-value: 0.2568Wald 2-sided t-test
Primary

Post-traumatic Stress Symptoms (Child Post-traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) Scale) Through the First and Last Survey Administered Post-Baseline

Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) (modified) scale, a questionnaire. Lower scores are preferable. Scores may range from 1 to 52. Responses submitted by parents are with respect to themselves. Responses submitted by children are with respect to themselves.

Time frame: surveys were provided at 6 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months post-baseline

Population: Subjects who completed the baseline questionnaire and at least one questionnaire post-baseline were eligible for analyses. Of these, only those subjects whose data were observed or could be imputed were used in the fitting of Generalized Linear Mixed Models (GLMMs). Means and standard deviations were computed using observed data only.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Link: Child ParticipantsPost-traumatic Stress Symptoms (Child Post-traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) Scale) Through the First and Last Survey Administered Post-BaselineFirst survey post-baseline (~6 weeks)10.64 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.34
Link: Child ParticipantsPost-traumatic Stress Symptoms (Child Post-traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) Scale) Through the First and Last Survey Administered Post-BaselineLast survey post-baseline (~6 months)7.39 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.3
Link: Child ParticipantsPost-traumatic Stress Symptoms (Child Post-traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) Scale) Through the First and Last Survey Administered Post-BaselineSecond survey post-baseline (~3 months)8.88 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.63
Link: Parent ParticipantsPost-traumatic Stress Symptoms (Child Post-traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) Scale) Through the First and Last Survey Administered Post-BaselineFirst survey post-baseline (~6 weeks)8.53 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.05
Link: Parent ParticipantsPost-traumatic Stress Symptoms (Child Post-traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) Scale) Through the First and Last Survey Administered Post-BaselineLast survey post-baseline (~6 months)6.45 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.23
Link: Parent ParticipantsPost-traumatic Stress Symptoms (Child Post-traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) Scale) Through the First and Last Survey Administered Post-BaselineSecond survey post-baseline (~3 months)7.03 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.94
Trauma Education: Child ParticipantsPost-traumatic Stress Symptoms (Child Post-traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) Scale) Through the First and Last Survey Administered Post-BaselineSecond survey post-baseline (~3 months)8.54 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.45
Trauma Education: Child ParticipantsPost-traumatic Stress Symptoms (Child Post-traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) Scale) Through the First and Last Survey Administered Post-BaselineFirst survey post-baseline (~6 weeks)9.87 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.07
Trauma Education: Child ParticipantsPost-traumatic Stress Symptoms (Child Post-traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) Scale) Through the First and Last Survey Administered Post-BaselineLast survey post-baseline (~6 months)7.50 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.97
Trauma Education: Parent ParticipantsPost-traumatic Stress Symptoms (Child Post-traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) Scale) Through the First and Last Survey Administered Post-BaselineFirst survey post-baseline (~6 weeks)8.17 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.08
Trauma Education: Parent ParticipantsPost-traumatic Stress Symptoms (Child Post-traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) Scale) Through the First and Last Survey Administered Post-BaselineLast survey post-baseline (~6 months)6.71 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.98
Trauma Education: Parent ParticipantsPost-traumatic Stress Symptoms (Child Post-traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) Scale) Through the First and Last Survey Administered Post-BaselineSecond survey post-baseline (~3 months)7.25 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.61
Comparison: A Generalized Linear Mixed Model (GLMM) with log link and gamma distribution was fit to five imputed data sets. Obtained estimates and standard errors were adjusted accordingly.~A comparison of intervention efficacy was made through the intervention-time interaction effect included in the model. Statistical significance of the interaction effect is indicative of a difference in effect between interventions over time.p-value: 0.6298Wald 2-sided t-test
Comparison: A Generalized Linear Mixed Model (GLMM) with log link and gamma distribution was fit to five imputed data sets. Obtained estimates and standard errors were adjusted accordingly.~A comparison of intervention efficacy was made through the intervention-time interaction effect included in the model. Statistical significance of the interaction effect is indicative of a difference in effect between interventions over time.p-value: 0.2341Wald 2-sided t-test
Primary

Prosocial Behavior (SDQ Subscale) Through the First and Last Survey Administered Post-Baseline

Prosocial Behavior (SDQ Subscale) (modified). Lower scores are preferable. Scores may range from 1 to 11. Responses submitted by parents are with respect to their children. Responses submitted by children are with respect to themselves.

Time frame: surveys were provided at 6 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months post-baseline

Population: Subjects who completed the baseline questionnaire and at least one questionnaire post-baseline were eligible for analyses. Of these, only those subjects whose data were observed or could be imputed were used in the fitting of Generalized Linear Mixed Models (GLMMs). Means and standard deviations were computed using observed data only.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Link: Child ParticipantsProsocial Behavior (SDQ Subscale) Through the First and Last Survey Administered Post-BaselineLast survey post-baseline (~6 months)3.19 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.13
Link: Child ParticipantsProsocial Behavior (SDQ Subscale) Through the First and Last Survey Administered Post-BaselineFirst survey post-baseline (~6 weeks)3.78 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.31
Link: Child ParticipantsProsocial Behavior (SDQ Subscale) Through the First and Last Survey Administered Post-BaselineSecond survey post-baseline (~3 months)3.58 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.44
Link: Parent ParticipantsProsocial Behavior (SDQ Subscale) Through the First and Last Survey Administered Post-BaselineSecond survey post-baseline (~3 months)3.04 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.02
Link: Parent ParticipantsProsocial Behavior (SDQ Subscale) Through the First and Last Survey Administered Post-BaselineFirst survey post-baseline (~6 weeks)3.34 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.25
Link: Parent ParticipantsProsocial Behavior (SDQ Subscale) Through the First and Last Survey Administered Post-BaselineLast survey post-baseline (~6 months)3.04 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.28
Trauma Education: Child ParticipantsProsocial Behavior (SDQ Subscale) Through the First and Last Survey Administered Post-BaselineLast survey post-baseline (~6 months)3.00 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.13
Trauma Education: Child ParticipantsProsocial Behavior (SDQ Subscale) Through the First and Last Survey Administered Post-BaselineFirst survey post-baseline (~6 weeks)3.15 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.95
Trauma Education: Child ParticipantsProsocial Behavior (SDQ Subscale) Through the First and Last Survey Administered Post-BaselineSecond survey post-baseline (~3 months)3.10 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.78
Trauma Education: Parent ParticipantsProsocial Behavior (SDQ Subscale) Through the First and Last Survey Administered Post-BaselineSecond survey post-baseline (~3 months)2.69 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.01
Trauma Education: Parent ParticipantsProsocial Behavior (SDQ Subscale) Through the First and Last Survey Administered Post-BaselineFirst survey post-baseline (~6 weeks)3.08 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.99
Trauma Education: Parent ParticipantsProsocial Behavior (SDQ Subscale) Through the First and Last Survey Administered Post-BaselineLast survey post-baseline (~6 months)3.04 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.35
Comparison: A Generalized Linear Mixed Model (GLMM) with log link and gamma distribution was fit to five imputed data sets. Obtained estimates and standard errors were adjusted accordingly.~A comparison of intervention efficacy was made through the intervention-time interaction effect included in the model. Statistical significance of the interaction effect is indicative of a difference in effect between interventions over time.p-value: 0.5824Wald 2-sided t-test
Comparison: A Generalized Linear Mixed Model (GLMM) with log link and gamma distribution was fit to five imputed data sets. Obtained estimates and standard errors were adjusted accordingly.~A comparison of intervention efficacy was made through the intervention-time interaction effect included in the model. Statistical significance of the interaction effect is indicative of a difference in effect between interventions over time.p-value: 0.4635Wald 2-sided t-test
Primary

Psychological Distress Symptoms (Kessler Screening Scale for Psychological Distress (K6)) Through the First and Last Survey Administered Post-Baseline

Psychological Distress Symptoms (Kessler Screening Scale for Psychological Distress (K6)) (modified). Lower scores are preferable. Scores may range from 1 to 25. Responses submitted by parents are with respect to themselves. Responses submitted by children are with respect to themselves.

Time frame: surveys were provided at 6 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months post-baseline

Population: Subjects who completed the baseline questionnaire and at least one questionnaire post-baseline were eligible for analyses. Of these, only those subjects whose data were observed or could be imputed were used in the fitting of Generalized Linear Mixed Models (GLMMs). Means and standard deviations were computed using observed data only.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Link: Child ParticipantsPsychological Distress Symptoms (Kessler Screening Scale for Psychological Distress (K6)) Through the First and Last Survey Administered Post-BaselineSecond survey post-baseline (~3 months)4.69 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.06
Link: Child ParticipantsPsychological Distress Symptoms (Kessler Screening Scale for Psychological Distress (K6)) Through the First and Last Survey Administered Post-BaselineLast survey post-baseline (~6 months)4.77 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.25
Link: Child ParticipantsPsychological Distress Symptoms (Kessler Screening Scale for Psychological Distress (K6)) Through the First and Last Survey Administered Post-BaselineFirst survey post-baseline (~6 weeks)5.74 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.85
Link: Parent ParticipantsPsychological Distress Symptoms (Kessler Screening Scale for Psychological Distress (K6)) Through the First and Last Survey Administered Post-BaselineLast survey post-baseline (~6 months)4.28 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4
Link: Parent ParticipantsPsychological Distress Symptoms (Kessler Screening Scale for Psychological Distress (K6)) Through the First and Last Survey Administered Post-BaselineFirst survey post-baseline (~6 weeks)4.26 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.4
Link: Parent ParticipantsPsychological Distress Symptoms (Kessler Screening Scale for Psychological Distress (K6)) Through the First and Last Survey Administered Post-BaselineSecond survey post-baseline (~3 months)4.05 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.24
Trauma Education: Child ParticipantsPsychological Distress Symptoms (Kessler Screening Scale for Psychological Distress (K6)) Through the First and Last Survey Administered Post-BaselineLast survey post-baseline (~6 months)4.22 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.15
Trauma Education: Child ParticipantsPsychological Distress Symptoms (Kessler Screening Scale for Psychological Distress (K6)) Through the First and Last Survey Administered Post-BaselineFirst survey post-baseline (~6 weeks)5.34 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.11
Trauma Education: Child ParticipantsPsychological Distress Symptoms (Kessler Screening Scale for Psychological Distress (K6)) Through the First and Last Survey Administered Post-BaselineSecond survey post-baseline (~3 months)4.41 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.24
Trauma Education: Parent ParticipantsPsychological Distress Symptoms (Kessler Screening Scale for Psychological Distress (K6)) Through the First and Last Survey Administered Post-BaselineSecond survey post-baseline (~3 months)3.91 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.65
Trauma Education: Parent ParticipantsPsychological Distress Symptoms (Kessler Screening Scale for Psychological Distress (K6)) Through the First and Last Survey Administered Post-BaselineFirst survey post-baseline (~6 weeks)4.88 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.64
Trauma Education: Parent ParticipantsPsychological Distress Symptoms (Kessler Screening Scale for Psychological Distress (K6)) Through the First and Last Survey Administered Post-BaselineLast survey post-baseline (~6 months)4.11 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.49
Comparison: A Generalized Linear Mixed Model (GLMM) with log link and gamma distribution was fit to five imputed data sets. Obtained estimates and standard errors were adjusted accordingly.~A comparison of intervention efficacy was made through the intervention-time interaction effect included in the model. Statistical significance of the interaction effect is indicative of a difference in effect between interventions over time.p-value: 0.6756Wald 2-sided t-test
Comparison: A Generalized Linear Mixed Model (GLMM) with log link and gamma distribution was fit to five imputed data sets. Obtained estimates and standard errors were adjusted accordingly.~A comparison of intervention efficacy was made through the intervention-time interaction effect included in the model. Statistical significance of the interaction effect is indicative of a difference in effect between interventions over time.p-value: 0.5381Wald 2-sided t-test
Primary

Quality of Life (Questionnaire) Through the First and Last Survey Administered Post-Baseline

Quality of Life, a questionnaire (modified). Lower scores are preferable. Scores may range from 1 to 101. Responses submitted by parents are with respect to their children. Responses submitted by children are with respect to themselves.

Time frame: surveys were provided at 6 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months post-baseline

Population: Subjects who completed the baseline questionnaire and at least one questionnaire post-baseline were eligible for analyses. Of these, only those subjects whose data were observed or could be imputed were used in the fitting of Generalized Linear Mixed Models (GLMMs). Means and standard deviations were computed using observed data only.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Link: Child ParticipantsQuality of Life (Questionnaire) Through the First and Last Survey Administered Post-BaselineFirst survey post-baseline (~6 weeks)29.01 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.99
Link: Child ParticipantsQuality of Life (Questionnaire) Through the First and Last Survey Administered Post-BaselineLast survey post-baseline (~6 months)16.67 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.86
Link: Child ParticipantsQuality of Life (Questionnaire) Through the First and Last Survey Administered Post-BaselineSecond survey post-baseline (~3 months)19.71 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.15
Link: Parent ParticipantsQuality of Life (Questionnaire) Through the First and Last Survey Administered Post-BaselineFirst survey post-baseline (~6 weeks)34.87 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.64
Link: Parent ParticipantsQuality of Life (Questionnaire) Through the First and Last Survey Administered Post-BaselineLast survey post-baseline (~6 months)15.18 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.53
Link: Parent ParticipantsQuality of Life (Questionnaire) Through the First and Last Survey Administered Post-BaselineSecond survey post-baseline (~3 months)21.22 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.2
Trauma Education: Child ParticipantsQuality of Life (Questionnaire) Through the First and Last Survey Administered Post-BaselineSecond survey post-baseline (~3 months)20.36 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.16
Trauma Education: Child ParticipantsQuality of Life (Questionnaire) Through the First and Last Survey Administered Post-BaselineFirst survey post-baseline (~6 weeks)27.30 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.44
Trauma Education: Child ParticipantsQuality of Life (Questionnaire) Through the First and Last Survey Administered Post-BaselineLast survey post-baseline (~6 months)16.23 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.73
Trauma Education: Parent ParticipantsQuality of Life (Questionnaire) Through the First and Last Survey Administered Post-BaselineFirst survey post-baseline (~6 weeks)32.68 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.22
Trauma Education: Parent ParticipantsQuality of Life (Questionnaire) Through the First and Last Survey Administered Post-BaselineLast survey post-baseline (~6 months)17.66 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.04
Trauma Education: Parent ParticipantsQuality of Life (Questionnaire) Through the First and Last Survey Administered Post-BaselineSecond survey post-baseline (~3 months)24.12 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.14
Comparison: A Generalized Linear Mixed Model (GLMM) with log link and gamma distribution was fit to five imputed data sets. Obtained estimates and standard errors were adjusted accordingly.~A comparison of intervention efficacy was made through the intervention-time interaction effect included in the model. Statistical significance of the interaction effect is indicative of a difference in effect between interventions over time.p-value: 0.7166Wald 2-sided t-test
Comparison: A Generalized Linear Mixed Model (GLMM) with log link and gamma distribution was fit to five imputed data sets. Obtained estimates and standard errors were adjusted accordingly.~A comparison of intervention efficacy was made through the intervention-time interaction effect included in the model. Statistical significance of the interaction effect is indicative of a difference in effect between interventions over time.p-value: 0.4501Wald 2-sided t-test
Primary

Strengths and Difficulties (Questionnaire to Assess Internalizing and Externalizing Behaviors (SDQ)) Through the First and Last Survey Administered Post-Baseline

Strengths and Difficulties (Questionnaire to Assess Internalizing and Externalizing Behaviors (SDQ)) (modified). Lower scores are preferable. Scores may range from 1 to 41. Responses submitted by parents are with respect to their children. Responses submitted by children are with respect to themselves.

Time frame: surveys were provided at 6 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months post-baseline

Population: Subjects who completed the baseline questionnaire and at least one questionnaire post-baseline were eligible for analyses. Of these, only those subjects whose data were observed or could be imputed were used in the fitting of Generalized Linear Mixed Models (GLMMs). Means and standard deviations were computed using observed data only.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Link: Child ParticipantsStrengths and Difficulties (Questionnaire to Assess Internalizing and Externalizing Behaviors (SDQ)) Through the First and Last Survey Administered Post-BaselineLast survey post-baseline (~6 months)8.91 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.53
Link: Child ParticipantsStrengths and Difficulties (Questionnaire to Assess Internalizing and Externalizing Behaviors (SDQ)) Through the First and Last Survey Administered Post-BaselineSecond survey post-baseline (~3 months)9.24 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.92
Link: Child ParticipantsStrengths and Difficulties (Questionnaire to Assess Internalizing and Externalizing Behaviors (SDQ)) Through the First and Last Survey Administered Post-BaselineFirst survey post-baseline (~6 weeks)9.39 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.7
Link: Parent ParticipantsStrengths and Difficulties (Questionnaire to Assess Internalizing and Externalizing Behaviors (SDQ)) Through the First and Last Survey Administered Post-BaselineLast survey post-baseline (~6 months)8.66 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.64
Link: Parent ParticipantsStrengths and Difficulties (Questionnaire to Assess Internalizing and Externalizing Behaviors (SDQ)) Through the First and Last Survey Administered Post-BaselineFirst survey post-baseline (~6 weeks)10.03 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.95
Link: Parent ParticipantsStrengths and Difficulties (Questionnaire to Assess Internalizing and Externalizing Behaviors (SDQ)) Through the First and Last Survey Administered Post-BaselineSecond survey post-baseline (~3 months)8.37 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.1
Trauma Education: Child ParticipantsStrengths and Difficulties (Questionnaire to Assess Internalizing and Externalizing Behaviors (SDQ)) Through the First and Last Survey Administered Post-BaselineSecond survey post-baseline (~3 months)9.21 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.72
Trauma Education: Child ParticipantsStrengths and Difficulties (Questionnaire to Assess Internalizing and Externalizing Behaviors (SDQ)) Through the First and Last Survey Administered Post-BaselineFirst survey post-baseline (~6 weeks)9.12 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.37
Trauma Education: Child ParticipantsStrengths and Difficulties (Questionnaire to Assess Internalizing and Externalizing Behaviors (SDQ)) Through the First and Last Survey Administered Post-BaselineLast survey post-baseline (~6 months)9.26 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.94
Trauma Education: Parent ParticipantsStrengths and Difficulties (Questionnaire to Assess Internalizing and Externalizing Behaviors (SDQ)) Through the First and Last Survey Administered Post-BaselineLast survey post-baseline (~6 months)9.08 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.86
Trauma Education: Parent ParticipantsStrengths and Difficulties (Questionnaire to Assess Internalizing and Externalizing Behaviors (SDQ)) Through the First and Last Survey Administered Post-BaselineSecond survey post-baseline (~3 months)9.17 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.57
Trauma Education: Parent ParticipantsStrengths and Difficulties (Questionnaire to Assess Internalizing and Externalizing Behaviors (SDQ)) Through the First and Last Survey Administered Post-BaselineFirst survey post-baseline (~6 weeks)9.29 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.33
Comparison: A Generalized Linear Mixed Model (GLMM) with log link and gamma distribution was fit to five imputed data sets. Obtained estimates and standard errors were adjusted accordingly.~A comparison of intervention efficacy was made through the intervention-time interaction effect included in the model. Statistical significance of the interaction effect is indicative of a difference in effect between interventions over time.p-value: 0.1507Wald 2-sided t-test
Comparison: A Generalized Linear Mixed Model (GLMM) with log link and gamma distribution was fit to five imputed data sets. Obtained estimates and standard errors were adjusted accordingly.~A comparison of intervention efficacy was made through the intervention-time interaction effect included in the model. Statistical significance of the interaction effect is indicative of a difference in effect between interventions over time.p-value: 0.0769Wald 2-sided t-test

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 14, 2026