Skip to content

Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Benralizumab in Adult Patients With Mild to Moderate Persistent Asthma

A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Parallel Group, Placebo-controlled, Phase 3 Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Benralizumab in Adult Patients With Mild to Moderate Persistent Asthma.

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02322775
Enrollment
211
Registered
2014-12-23
Start date
2015-02-02
Completion date
2015-10-07
Last updated
2017-08-15

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Asthma

Keywords

Asthma, Bronchial Diseases, Respiratory Tract Diseases, Lung Diseases, Obstructive Lung Diseases,

Brief summary

The purpose of this trial is to confirm the safety and clinical benefit of benralizumab administration in asthma patients with mild to moderate persistent asthma in order to gain an understanding of the benefit/risk of benralizumab across the spectrum of asthma disease.

Interventions

BIOLOGICALBenralizumab

Benralizumab administered subcutaneously every 4 weeks

BIOLOGICALPlacebo

Placebo administered subcutaneously every 4 weeks

Sponsors

AstraZeneca
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Written informed consent for study participation must be obtained prior to any study related procedures being performed and according to international guidelines and/or applicable European Union (EU) guidelines. * Female and male aged 18 to 75 years, inclusively, at the time of Visit 1. * Weight of ≥40 kg. * Evidence of asthma as documented by post-bronchodilator (post-BD) reversibility in FEV1 of ≥ 12% demonstrated at Visit 2. * Documented use of 1 of the following types of asthma therapy at time of informed consent: Low- to medium-dose ICS (ie, 100 to 500 μg fluticasone dry powder formulation equivalents total daily dose) with or without other controller medications, eg, an LTRA and/or theophylline or Low-dose ICS/LABA fixed combination therapy (eg, the lowest regular maintenance dose approved in the local country will meet this criterion) * Morning pre-bronchodilator (pre-BD) FEV1 of \> 50% to ≤ 90% predicted at Visit 2.

Exclusion criteria

* Clinically important pulmonary disease other than asthma (eg, active lung infection, COPD, bronchiectasis, pulmonary fibrosis, cystic fibrosis, hypoventilation syndrome associated with obesity, lung cancer, alpha 1 anti-trypsin deficiency, and primary ciliary dyskinesia) or ever been diagnosed with pulmonary or systemic disease, other than asthma, that are associated with elevated peripheral eosinophil counts (eg, allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis/mycosis, Churg-Strauss syndrome, hypereosinophilic syndrome). * Any disorder, including, but not limited to, cardiovascular, gastrointestinal, hepatic, renal, neurological, musculoskeletal, infectious, endocrine, metabolic, hematological, psychiatric, or major physical impairment that is not stable in the opinion of the Investigator and could: * Affect the safety of the patient throughout the study * nfluence the findings of the studies or their interpretations,- Impede the patient's ability to complete the entire duration of study. * Known history of allergy or reaction to the investigational product formulation. * History of anaphylaxis to any biologic therapy.- History of Guillain-Barré syndrome. * A helminth parasitic infection diagnosed within 24 weeks prior to the date informed consent is obtained that has not been treated with, or has failed to respond to standard of care therapy.- Acute upper or lower respiratory infections requiring antibiotics or antiviral medication within 30 days prior to the date informed consent is obtained or during the screening/run-in period. * Any clinically significant abnormal findings in physical examination, vital signs, hematology, clinical chemistry, or urinalysis during screening period, which in the opinion of the Investigator, may put the patient at risk because of his/her participation in the study, or may influence the results of the study, or the patient's ability to complete entire duration of the study. * Positive hepatitis B surface antigen, or hepatitis C virus antibody serology, or a positive medical history for hepatitis B or C. Patients with a history of hepatitis B vaccination without history of hepatitis B are allowed to enroll. * A history of known immunodeficiency disorder including a positive human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) test. * History of cancer: * Patients who have had basal cell carcinoma, localized squamous cell carcinoma of the skin or in situ carcinoma of the cervix are eligible provided that the patient is in remission and curative therapy was completed at least 12 months prior to the date informed consent was obtained. * Patients who have had other malignancies are eligible provided that the patient is in remission and curative therapy was completed at least 5 years prior to the date informed consent was obtained

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in Pre-bronchodilator Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) (L) at Week 12Baseline, Week 4, Week 8 and Week 12The FEV1 (L) change from baseline are compared between benralizumab 30 mg Q4W and placebo by using the mixed-effect repeated measures (MMRM) analysis with baseline blood eosinophil count (≥300 cells/μL or \<300 cells/μL), protocol specified visit (Week 4, Week 8, Week 12), region (Europe or North America) and treatment\*visit interaction as fixed effects and baseline pre-bronchodilator FEV1 (L) as a covariate. Changes at Week 12 were calculated based on patients with both baseline and Week 12.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in Evening Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) (L/Min) at Home at Week 12Baseline, Week 1, Week 2, Week 3, Week 4, Week 5, Week 6, Week 7, Week 8, Week 9, Week 10, Week 11 and Week 12The changes from baseline of weekly average of evening PEF (L/min) are compared between benralizumab 30 mg Q4W and placebo by using the mixed-effect model for repeated measures (MMRM) with baseline blood eosinophil count (≥300 cells/μL or \<300 cells/μL), protocol specified visit, region (Europe or North America) and treatment\*visit interaction as fixed effects and baseline evening PEF (L/min) as a covariate. Changes at Week 12 were calculated based on patients with both baseline and Week 12.
Change From Baseline in Total Asthma Symptom Score at Week 12Baseline, Week 1, Week 2, Week 3, Week 4, Week 5, Week 6, Week 7, Week 8, Week 9, Week 10, Week 11 and Week 12Asthma symptoms were recorded by the patient each morning and evening in the asthma daily diary. Symptoms were recorded using a scale of 0-3, where 0 indicates no asthma symptoms. The daily asthma symptom total score was calculated by taking the sum of the daytime score recorded in the evening and the nighttime score recorded the following morning. The weekly total asthma score was averaged from the daily scores over a 7 day period, with score ranging from 0 to 6, where 0 indicates no asthma symptoms. The changes from baseline of weekly total asthma score are compared between benralizumab 30 mg Q4W and placebo by using the mixed-effect model repeated measures (MMRM) with baseline blood eosinophil count (≥300 cells/μL or \<300 cells/μL), protocol specified visit, region (Europe or North America) and treatment\*visit interaction as fixed effects and baseline total asthma score as a covariate. Changes at Week 12 were calculated based on patients with both baseline and Week 12.
Change From Baseline in Total Asthma Rescue Medication Use (Puffs) at Week 12Baseline, Week 1, Week 2, Week 3, Week 4, Week 5, Week 6, Week 7, Week 8, Week 9, Week 10, Week 11 and Week 12The number of rescue medication inhalations and nebulizer treatments taken were recorded by the patient in the asthma daily diary twice daily. The number of inhalations (puffs) per day was calculated as \[number of night inhaler puffs\] + 2 x \[number of night nebulizer times\] + number of day inhaler puffs + 2 x \[number of day nebulizer times\]. The changes from baseline in weekly total asthma rescue medication use (puffs) are compared between benralizumab 30 mg Q4W and placebo by using the mixed-effect model repeated measures (MMRM) with baseline blood eosinophil count (≥300 cells/μL or \<300 cells/μL), protocol specified visit, region (Europe or North America) and treatment\*visit interaction as fixed effects and baseline total asthma rescue medication use (puffs) as a covariate. Changes at Week 12 were calculated based on patients with both baseline and Week 12.
Change From Baseline in Proportion of Nights With Nocturnal Awakenings at Week 12Baseline, Week 1, Week 2, Week 3, Week 4, Week 5, Week 6, Week 7, Week 8, Week 9, Week 10, Week 11 and Week 12Nocturnal awakenings due to asthma symptoms and requiring rescue medication use was recorded by the patient in the asthma daily diary each morning. Proportion of nights with nocturnal awakenings was defined as the number of nights with awakenings due to asthma and requiring rescue medication divided by number of nights with data for awakening due to asthma. The outcome variable for proportion of nights with nocturnal awakenings was the change from baseline at Week 12 in weekly proportion of nights with nocturnal awakenings. The changes are compared between benralizumab 30 mg Q4W and placebo by using the mixed-effect model repeated measures (MMRM) with baseline blood eosinophil count (≥300 cells/μL or \<300 cells/μL), protocol specified visit, region (Europe or North America) and treatment\*visit interaction as fixed effects and baseline proportion of nights with nocturnal awakenings as a covariate. Changes at Week 12 were calculated based on patients with both baseline and Week 12.
Change From Baseline in Morning Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) (L/Min) at Home at Week 12Baseline, Week 1, Week 2, Week 3, Week 4, Week 5, Week 6, Week 7, Week 8, Week 9, Week 10, Week 11 and Week 12The changes from baseline of weekly average of morning PEF (L/min) are compared between benralizumab 30 mg Q4W and placebo by using the mixed-effect model for repeated measures (MMRM) with baseline blood eosinophil count (≥300 cells/μL or \<300 cells/μL), protocol specified visit, region (Europe or North America) and treatment\*visit interaction as fixed effects and baseline morning PEF (L/min) as a covariate. Changes at Week 12 were calculated based on patients with both baseline and Week 12.
Asthma ExacerbationsUp to Week 12An asthma exacerbation was defined as a worsening of asthma that led to use of systemic corticosteroids for at least 3 days (a single depo-injectable dose of corticosteroids was considered equivalent to a 3-day course of systemic corticosteroids) or an emergency room or urgent care visit (defined as evaluation and treatment for \<24 hours in an emergency department or urgent care center) due to asthma that required systemic corticosteroids (as per above) or an inpatient hospitalization (defined as admission to an inpatient facility and/or evaluation and treatment in a healthcare facility for ≥24 hours) due to asthma. Number of patients experiencing an event included in the definition of asthma exacerbation was presented.
Change From Baseline in AQLQ(S)+12 Total and Domain Scores at Week 12Baseline and Week 12The asthma quality of life questionnaire for 12 years and older, AQLQ(S)+12, consists of 32 questions; all assessed on a 7-point scale from 7 to 1, where 7 represents no impairment and 1 represents severe impairment. The 4 individual domain scores (symptoms, activity limitations, emotional function, and environmental stimuli) are the means of the responses to the questions in each of the domains. The overall score is calculated as the mean response to all questions. The changes from baseline of AQLQ(S)+12 score are compared between benralizumab 30 mg Q4W and placebo by using the analyse of covariance (ANCOVA) with baseline blood eosinophil count (≥300 cells/μL or \<300 cells/μL) and region (Europe or North America) as fixed effects and baseline AQLQ(S)+12 score as a covariate. Changes at Week 12 were calculated based on patients with both baseline and Week 12.
Serum Concentrations (ng/mL)Baseline, Week 12 and Week 20Blood samples (processed to serum) for pharmacokinetic assessments were collected from all patients at baseline prior to first benralizumab administration at Day 1, at the Week 12 visit or the IP discontinuation visit, and at the Week 20 follow-up visit. Serum concentrations of benralizumab were determined using a validated electrochemiluminescent (ECL) immunoassay.
Peripheral Blood Eosinophil LevelsBaseline, Week 12 and Week 20Peripheral blood eosinophil levels assessments were collected from all patients at baseline prior to first benralizumab administration at Day 1, at the Week 12 visit or the IP discontinuation visit, and at the Week 20 follow-up visit. Changes at Week 12 (respectively at Week 20) were calculated based on patients with both baseline and Week 12 (respectively Week 20).
Change From Baseline in Mean ACQ-6 Score at Week 12Baseline, Week 4, Week 8 and Week 12The asthma control questionnaire, ACQ-6, consists of six questions; all assessed on a 7-point scale from 0 to 6, where 0 represents good control and 6 represents poor control. The overall score is the mean of the responses to each of the six questions. The changes from baseline of ACQ-6 score are compared between benralizumab 30 mg Q4W and placebo by using the mixed-effect repeated measures (MMRM) with baseline blood eosinophil count (≥300 cells/μL or \<300 cells/μL), protocol specified visit (Week 4, Week 8, Week 12), region (Europe or North America) and treatment\*visit interaction as fixed effects and baseline ACQ-6 score as a covariate. Changes at Week 12 were calculated based on patients with both baseline and Week 12.

Countries

Canada, Germany, Hungary, Poland, Slovakia, United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

After enrollment, eligible patients entered a 2- to 4-week screening/run-in period and were converted to budesonide dry powder inhaler twice daily for the duration of the study. Patients who continued to meet eligibility criteria at the end of the run-in period entered a 12 weeks double-blind treatment period followed by two follow-up visits.

Pre-assignment details

Eligible adult patients were stratified by baseline blood eosinophil count (\<300 cells/μL or ≥300 cells/μL) and by region (USA versus Rest of the World per the IVRS). Patients were then randomized to either benralizumab 30 mg Q4W or placebo in a 1:1 ratio.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Benralizumab 30 mg Q4W
Benralizumab administered subcutaneously every 4 weeks
106
Placebo
Placebo administered subcutaneously every 4 weeks
105
Total211

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyAdverse Event10
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up01
Overall StudyNot willing to perform all FU visits01
Overall StudyProtocol Violation10
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject34

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicBenralizumab 30 mg Q4WPlaceboTotal
Age, Continuous48.3 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.4
51.1 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.6
49.7 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.58
Age, Customized
>=18-<50 years
49 Participants44 Participants93 Participants
Age, Customized
>=50-<65 years
43 Participants46 Participants89 Participants
Age, Customized
>=65-<=75 years
14 Participants15 Participants29 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black or African American
7 Participants4 Participants11 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Hispanic or Latino
6 Participants3 Participants9 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Not Hispanic or Latino
100 Participants102 Participants202 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Other
0 Participants2 Participants2 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
98 Participants99 Participants197 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
62 Participants67 Participants129 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
44 Participants38 Participants82 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
19 / 10614 / 105
serious
Total, serious adverse events
2 / 1062 / 105

Outcome results

Primary

Change From Baseline in Pre-bronchodilator Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) (L) at Week 12

The FEV1 (L) change from baseline are compared between benralizumab 30 mg Q4W and placebo by using the mixed-effect repeated measures (MMRM) analysis with baseline blood eosinophil count (≥300 cells/μL or \<300 cells/μL), protocol specified visit (Week 4, Week 8, Week 12), region (Europe or North America) and treatment\*visit interaction as fixed effects and baseline pre-bronchodilator FEV1 (L) as a covariate. Changes at Week 12 were calculated based on patients with both baseline and Week 12.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 4, Week 8 and Week 12

Population: The Full Analysis Set comprised all patients randomised and receiving any investigational product (IP), irrespective of their protocol adherence and continued participation in the study.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Benralizumab 30 mg Q4WChange From Baseline in Pre-bronchodilator Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) (L) at Week 12Baseline2.248 LitreStandard Deviation 0.6062
Benralizumab 30 mg Q4WChange From Baseline in Pre-bronchodilator Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) (L) at Week 12Week 122.310 LitreStandard Deviation 0.6702
Benralizumab 30 mg Q4WChange From Baseline in Pre-bronchodilator Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) (L) at Week 12Change from baseline at Week 120.057 LitreStandard Deviation 0.2734
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Pre-bronchodilator Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) (L) at Week 12Baseline2.246 LitreStandard Deviation 0.7677
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Pre-bronchodilator Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) (L) at Week 12Week 122.261 LitreStandard Deviation 0.7959
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Pre-bronchodilator Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) (L) at Week 12Change from baseline at Week 12-0.016 LitreStandard Deviation 0.235
Comparison: The null hypothesis was: H0: Change from baseline in pre-bronchodilator FEV1 (L) at Week 12 (benralizumab vs placebo)=0.p-value: 0.0495% CI: [0, 0.15]Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Asthma Exacerbations

An asthma exacerbation was defined as a worsening of asthma that led to use of systemic corticosteroids for at least 3 days (a single depo-injectable dose of corticosteroids was considered equivalent to a 3-day course of systemic corticosteroids) or an emergency room or urgent care visit (defined as evaluation and treatment for \<24 hours in an emergency department or urgent care center) due to asthma that required systemic corticosteroids (as per above) or an inpatient hospitalization (defined as admission to an inpatient facility and/or evaluation and treatment in a healthcare facility for ≥24 hours) due to asthma. Number of patients experiencing an event included in the definition of asthma exacerbation was presented.

Time frame: Up to Week 12

Population: The Full Analysis Set comprised all patients randomised and receiving any investigational product (IP), irrespective of their protocol adherence and continued participation in the study.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Benralizumab 30 mg Q4WAsthma Exacerbations0 exacerbation105 Patients per number of exacerbations
Benralizumab 30 mg Q4WAsthma Exacerbations1 exacerbation0 Patients per number of exacerbations
Benralizumab 30 mg Q4WAsthma Exacerbations2 exacerbations1 Patients per number of exacerbations
PlaceboAsthma Exacerbations0 exacerbation103 Patients per number of exacerbations
PlaceboAsthma Exacerbations1 exacerbation2 Patients per number of exacerbations
PlaceboAsthma Exacerbations2 exacerbations0 Patients per number of exacerbations
Secondary

Change From Baseline in AQLQ(S)+12 Total and Domain Scores at Week 12

The asthma quality of life questionnaire for 12 years and older, AQLQ(S)+12, consists of 32 questions; all assessed on a 7-point scale from 7 to 1, where 7 represents no impairment and 1 represents severe impairment. The 4 individual domain scores (symptoms, activity limitations, emotional function, and environmental stimuli) are the means of the responses to the questions in each of the domains. The overall score is calculated as the mean response to all questions. The changes from baseline of AQLQ(S)+12 score are compared between benralizumab 30 mg Q4W and placebo by using the analyse of covariance (ANCOVA) with baseline blood eosinophil count (≥300 cells/μL or \<300 cells/μL) and region (Europe or North America) as fixed effects and baseline AQLQ(S)+12 score as a covariate. Changes at Week 12 were calculated based on patients with both baseline and Week 12.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 12

Population: The Full Analysis Set comprised all patients randomised and receiving any investigational product (IP), irrespective of their protocol adherence and continued participation in the study.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Benralizumab 30 mg Q4WChange From Baseline in AQLQ(S)+12 Total and Domain Scores at Week 12Activity limitations score - W125.503 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.9672
Benralizumab 30 mg Q4WChange From Baseline in AQLQ(S)+12 Total and Domain Scores at Week 12Symptoms score - Baseline4.649 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.0367
Benralizumab 30 mg Q4WChange From Baseline in AQLQ(S)+12 Total and Domain Scores at Week 12Total score - Baseline4.825 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.9787
Benralizumab 30 mg Q4WChange From Baseline in AQLQ(S)+12 Total and Domain Scores at Week 12Emotional function score - Baseline4.95 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.277
Benralizumab 30 mg Q4WChange From Baseline in AQLQ(S)+12 Total and Domain Scores at Week 12Symptoms score - W125.380 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.0076
Benralizumab 30 mg Q4WChange From Baseline in AQLQ(S)+12 Total and Domain Scores at Week 12Emotional function score - W125.54 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.215
Benralizumab 30 mg Q4WChange From Baseline in AQLQ(S)+12 Total and Domain Scores at Week 12Total score - CFB at W120.585 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.8675
Benralizumab 30 mg Q4WChange From Baseline in AQLQ(S)+12 Total and Domain Scores at Week 12Emotional function score - CFB at W120.57 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.094
Benralizumab 30 mg Q4WChange From Baseline in AQLQ(S)+12 Total and Domain Scores at Week 12Symptoms score - CFB at W120.727 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.989
Benralizumab 30 mg Q4WChange From Baseline in AQLQ(S)+12 Total and Domain Scores at Week 12Environmental stimuli score - Baseline4.658 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.332
Benralizumab 30 mg Q4WChange From Baseline in AQLQ(S)+12 Total and Domain Scores at Week 12Total score - W125.415 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.9478
Benralizumab 30 mg Q4WChange From Baseline in AQLQ(S)+12 Total and Domain Scores at Week 12Environmental stimuli score - W125.120 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.291
Benralizumab 30 mg Q4WChange From Baseline in AQLQ(S)+12 Total and Domain Scores at Week 12Activity limitations score - Baseline5.017 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.0029
Benralizumab 30 mg Q4WChange From Baseline in AQLQ(S)+12 Total and Domain Scores at Week 12Environmental stimuli score - CFB at W120.466 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.0135
Benralizumab 30 mg Q4WChange From Baseline in AQLQ(S)+12 Total and Domain Scores at Week 12Activity limitations score - CFB at W120.481 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.8156
PlaceboChange From Baseline in AQLQ(S)+12 Total and Domain Scores at Week 12Environmental stimuli score - CFB at W120.216 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.9505
PlaceboChange From Baseline in AQLQ(S)+12 Total and Domain Scores at Week 12Total score - Baseline4.895 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.0339
PlaceboChange From Baseline in AQLQ(S)+12 Total and Domain Scores at Week 12Total score - CFB at W120.357 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.7979
PlaceboChange From Baseline in AQLQ(S)+12 Total and Domain Scores at Week 12Symptoms score - Baseline4.692 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.083
PlaceboChange From Baseline in AQLQ(S)+12 Total and Domain Scores at Week 12Symptoms score - W125.212 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.1373
PlaceboChange From Baseline in AQLQ(S)+12 Total and Domain Scores at Week 12Symptoms score - CFB at W120.483 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.9243
PlaceboChange From Baseline in AQLQ(S)+12 Total and Domain Scores at Week 12Activity limitations score - Baseline5.048 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.0277
PlaceboChange From Baseline in AQLQ(S)+12 Total and Domain Scores at Week 12Activity limitations score - W125.343 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.0803
PlaceboChange From Baseline in AQLQ(S)+12 Total and Domain Scores at Week 12Activity limitations score - CFB at W120.275 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.8105
PlaceboChange From Baseline in AQLQ(S)+12 Total and Domain Scores at Week 12Emotional function score - Baseline5.04 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.373
PlaceboChange From Baseline in AQLQ(S)+12 Total and Domain Scores at Week 12Emotional function score - W125.45 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.307
PlaceboChange From Baseline in AQLQ(S)+12 Total and Domain Scores at Week 12Emotional function score - CFB at W120.35 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.014
PlaceboChange From Baseline in AQLQ(S)+12 Total and Domain Scores at Week 12Environmental stimuli score - Baseline4.905 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.3554
PlaceboChange From Baseline in AQLQ(S)+12 Total and Domain Scores at Week 12Environmental stimuli score - W125.130 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.3372
PlaceboChange From Baseline in AQLQ(S)+12 Total and Domain Scores at Week 12Total score - W125.284 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.0851
Comparison: Parameter: Total scorep-value: 0.05595% CI: [0, 0.42]ANCOVA
Comparison: Parameter: Symptoms scorep-value: 0.06395% CI: [-0.01, 0.47]ANCOVA
Comparison: Parameter: Activity limitation scorep-value: 0.06195% CI: [-0.01, 0.41]ANCOVA
Comparison: Parameter: Emotional function scorep-value: 0.15695% CI: [-0.07, 0.45]ANCOVA
Comparison: Parameter: Environmental stimuli scorep-value: 0.13595% CI: [-0.06, 0.44]ANCOVA
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Evening Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) (L/Min) at Home at Week 12

The changes from baseline of weekly average of evening PEF (L/min) are compared between benralizumab 30 mg Q4W and placebo by using the mixed-effect model for repeated measures (MMRM) with baseline blood eosinophil count (≥300 cells/μL or \<300 cells/μL), protocol specified visit, region (Europe or North America) and treatment\*visit interaction as fixed effects and baseline evening PEF (L/min) as a covariate. Changes at Week 12 were calculated based on patients with both baseline and Week 12.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 1, Week 2, Week 3, Week 4, Week 5, Week 6, Week 7, Week 8, Week 9, Week 10, Week 11 and Week 12

Population: The Full Analysis Set comprised all patients randomised and receiving any investigational product (IP), irrespective of their protocol adherence and continued participation in the study.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Benralizumab 30 mg Q4WChange From Baseline in Evening Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) (L/Min) at Home at Week 12Baseline326.948 L/minStandard Deviation 97.4034
Benralizumab 30 mg Q4WChange From Baseline in Evening Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) (L/Min) at Home at Week 12Week 12330.719 L/minStandard Deviation 106.7579
Benralizumab 30 mg Q4WChange From Baseline in Evening Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) (L/Min) at Home at Week 12Change from baseline at Week 121.361 L/minStandard Deviation 51.9979
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Evening Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) (L/Min) at Home at Week 12Baseline316.743 L/minStandard Deviation 116.6919
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Evening Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) (L/Min) at Home at Week 12Week 12316.047 L/minStandard Deviation 118.7
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Evening Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) (L/Min) at Home at Week 12Change from baseline at Week 12-2.956 L/minStandard Deviation 47.9136
p-value: 0.45695% CI: [-8.67, 19.25]Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Mean ACQ-6 Score at Week 12

The asthma control questionnaire, ACQ-6, consists of six questions; all assessed on a 7-point scale from 0 to 6, where 0 represents good control and 6 represents poor control. The overall score is the mean of the responses to each of the six questions. The changes from baseline of ACQ-6 score are compared between benralizumab 30 mg Q4W and placebo by using the mixed-effect repeated measures (MMRM) with baseline blood eosinophil count (≥300 cells/μL or \<300 cells/μL), protocol specified visit (Week 4, Week 8, Week 12), region (Europe or North America) and treatment\*visit interaction as fixed effects and baseline ACQ-6 score as a covariate. Changes at Week 12 were calculated based on patients with both baseline and Week 12.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 4, Week 8 and Week 12

Population: The Full Analysis Set comprised all patients randomised and receiving any investigational product (IP), irrespective of their protocol adherence and continued participation in the study.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Benralizumab 30 mg Q4WChange From Baseline in Mean ACQ-6 Score at Week 12Baseline2.119 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.8423
Benralizumab 30 mg Q4WChange From Baseline in Mean ACQ-6 Score at Week 12Week 121.428 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.8621
Benralizumab 30 mg Q4WChange From Baseline in Mean ACQ-6 Score at Week 12Change from baseline at Week 12-0.714 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.87
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Mean ACQ-6 Score at Week 12Baseline2.092 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.8975
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Mean ACQ-6 Score at Week 12Week 121.568 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.009
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Mean ACQ-6 Score at Week 12Change from baseline at Week 12-0.495 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.7908
p-value: 0.11495% CI: [-0.39, 0.04]Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Morning Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) (L/Min) at Home at Week 12

The changes from baseline of weekly average of morning PEF (L/min) are compared between benralizumab 30 mg Q4W and placebo by using the mixed-effect model for repeated measures (MMRM) with baseline blood eosinophil count (≥300 cells/μL or \<300 cells/μL), protocol specified visit, region (Europe or North America) and treatment\*visit interaction as fixed effects and baseline morning PEF (L/min) as a covariate. Changes at Week 12 were calculated based on patients with both baseline and Week 12.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 1, Week 2, Week 3, Week 4, Week 5, Week 6, Week 7, Week 8, Week 9, Week 10, Week 11 and Week 12

Population: The Full Analysis Set comprised all patients randomised and receiving any investigational product (IP), irrespective of their protocol adherence and continued participation in the study.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Benralizumab 30 mg Q4WChange From Baseline in Morning Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) (L/Min) at Home at Week 12Baseline307.413 L/minStandard Deviation 95.9467
Benralizumab 30 mg Q4WChange From Baseline in Morning Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) (L/Min) at Home at Week 12Week 12311.041 L/minStandard Deviation 101.8169
Benralizumab 30 mg Q4WChange From Baseline in Morning Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) (L/Min) at Home at Week 12Change from baseline at Week 121.675 L/minStandard Deviation 56.5182
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Morning Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) (L/Min) at Home at Week 12Change from baseline at Week 12-6.196 L/minStandard Deviation 45.3077
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Morning Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) (L/Min) at Home at Week 12Baseline308.226 L/minStandard Deviation 113.5895
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Morning Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) (L/Min) at Home at Week 12Week 12304.037 L/minStandard Deviation 113.2538
p-value: 0.23395% CI: [-5.74, 23.42]Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Proportion of Nights With Nocturnal Awakenings at Week 12

Nocturnal awakenings due to asthma symptoms and requiring rescue medication use was recorded by the patient in the asthma daily diary each morning. Proportion of nights with nocturnal awakenings was defined as the number of nights with awakenings due to asthma and requiring rescue medication divided by number of nights with data for awakening due to asthma. The outcome variable for proportion of nights with nocturnal awakenings was the change from baseline at Week 12 in weekly proportion of nights with nocturnal awakenings. The changes are compared between benralizumab 30 mg Q4W and placebo by using the mixed-effect model repeated measures (MMRM) with baseline blood eosinophil count (≥300 cells/μL or \<300 cells/μL), protocol specified visit, region (Europe or North America) and treatment\*visit interaction as fixed effects and baseline proportion of nights with nocturnal awakenings as a covariate. Changes at Week 12 were calculated based on patients with both baseline and Week 12.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 1, Week 2, Week 3, Week 4, Week 5, Week 6, Week 7, Week 8, Week 9, Week 10, Week 11 and Week 12

Population: The Full Analysis Set comprised all patients randomised and receiving any investigational product (IP), irrespective of their protocol adherence and continued participation in the study.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Benralizumab 30 mg Q4WChange From Baseline in Proportion of Nights With Nocturnal Awakenings at Week 12Baseline0.246 Proportion of nightsStandard Deviation 0.2924
Benralizumab 30 mg Q4WChange From Baseline in Proportion of Nights With Nocturnal Awakenings at Week 12Week 120.086 Proportion of nightsStandard Deviation 0.2003
Benralizumab 30 mg Q4WChange From Baseline in Proportion of Nights With Nocturnal Awakenings at Week 12Change from baseline at Week 12-0.158 Proportion of nightsStandard Deviation 0.2515
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Proportion of Nights With Nocturnal Awakenings at Week 12Baseline0.279 Proportion of nightsStandard Deviation 0.3326
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Proportion of Nights With Nocturnal Awakenings at Week 12Week 120.144 Proportion of nightsStandard Deviation 0.2796
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Proportion of Nights With Nocturnal Awakenings at Week 12Change from baseline at Week 12-0.139 Proportion of nightsStandard Deviation 0.2659
p-value: 0.3895% CI: [-0.08, 0.03]Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Total Asthma Rescue Medication Use (Puffs) at Week 12

The number of rescue medication inhalations and nebulizer treatments taken were recorded by the patient in the asthma daily diary twice daily. The number of inhalations (puffs) per day was calculated as \[number of night inhaler puffs\] + 2 x \[number of night nebulizer times\] + number of day inhaler puffs + 2 x \[number of day nebulizer times\]. The changes from baseline in weekly total asthma rescue medication use (puffs) are compared between benralizumab 30 mg Q4W and placebo by using the mixed-effect model repeated measures (MMRM) with baseline blood eosinophil count (≥300 cells/μL or \<300 cells/μL), protocol specified visit, region (Europe or North America) and treatment\*visit interaction as fixed effects and baseline total asthma rescue medication use (puffs) as a covariate. Changes at Week 12 were calculated based on patients with both baseline and Week 12.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 1, Week 2, Week 3, Week 4, Week 5, Week 6, Week 7, Week 8, Week 9, Week 10, Week 11 and Week 12

Population: The Full Analysis Set comprised all patients randomised and receiving any investigational product (IP), irrespective of their protocol adherence and continued participation in the study.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Benralizumab 30 mg Q4WChange From Baseline in Total Asthma Rescue Medication Use (Puffs) at Week 12Baseline2.953 Puffs per dayStandard Deviation 3.0794
Benralizumab 30 mg Q4WChange From Baseline in Total Asthma Rescue Medication Use (Puffs) at Week 12Week 121.647 Puffs per dayStandard Deviation 2.4782
Benralizumab 30 mg Q4WChange From Baseline in Total Asthma Rescue Medication Use (Puffs) at Week 12Change from baseline at Week 12-1.098 Puffs per dayStandard Deviation 2.3588
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Total Asthma Rescue Medication Use (Puffs) at Week 12Change from baseline at Week 12-0.665 Puffs per dayStandard Deviation 2.2744
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Total Asthma Rescue Medication Use (Puffs) at Week 12Baseline2.641 Puffs per dayStandard Deviation 3.0671
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Total Asthma Rescue Medication Use (Puffs) at Week 12Week 122.070 Puffs per dayStandard Deviation 2.6848
p-value: 0.295% CI: [-0.91, 0.19]Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Total Asthma Symptom Score at Week 12

Asthma symptoms were recorded by the patient each morning and evening in the asthma daily diary. Symptoms were recorded using a scale of 0-3, where 0 indicates no asthma symptoms. The daily asthma symptom total score was calculated by taking the sum of the daytime score recorded in the evening and the nighttime score recorded the following morning. The weekly total asthma score was averaged from the daily scores over a 7 day period, with score ranging from 0 to 6, where 0 indicates no asthma symptoms. The changes from baseline of weekly total asthma score are compared between benralizumab 30 mg Q4W and placebo by using the mixed-effect model repeated measures (MMRM) with baseline blood eosinophil count (≥300 cells/μL or \<300 cells/μL), protocol specified visit, region (Europe or North America) and treatment\*visit interaction as fixed effects and baseline total asthma score as a covariate. Changes at Week 12 were calculated based on patients with both baseline and Week 12.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 1, Week 2, Week 3, Week 4, Week 5, Week 6, Week 7, Week 8, Week 9, Week 10, Week 11 and Week 12

Population: The Full Analysis Set comprised all patients randomised and receiving any investigational product (IP), irrespective of their protocol adherence and continued participation in the study.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Benralizumab 30 mg Q4WChange From Baseline in Total Asthma Symptom Score at Week 12Baseline1.934 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.931
Benralizumab 30 mg Q4WChange From Baseline in Total Asthma Symptom Score at Week 12Week 121.326 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.0448
Benralizumab 30 mg Q4WChange From Baseline in Total Asthma Symptom Score at Week 12Change from baseline at Week 12-0.567 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.7875
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Total Asthma Symptom Score at Week 12Baseline1.952 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.0375
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Total Asthma Symptom Score at Week 12Week 121.541 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.1208
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Total Asthma Symptom Score at Week 12Change from baseline at Week 12-0.420 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.8767
p-value: 0.26695% CI: [-0.35, 0.1]Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Peripheral Blood Eosinophil Levels

Peripheral blood eosinophil levels assessments were collected from all patients at baseline prior to first benralizumab administration at Day 1, at the Week 12 visit or the IP discontinuation visit, and at the Week 20 follow-up visit. Changes at Week 12 (respectively at Week 20) were calculated based on patients with both baseline and Week 12 (respectively Week 20).

Time frame: Baseline, Week 12 and Week 20

Population: The safety analysis set comprised all patients who received at least one dose of IP. Patients were classified according to the treatment they actually received. A patient who has on one or several occasions received active treatment was classified as active.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
Benralizumab 30 mg Q4WPeripheral Blood Eosinophil LevelsWeek 120.00 Cells/µL
Benralizumab 30 mg Q4WPeripheral Blood Eosinophil LevelsWeek 200 Cells/µL
Benralizumab 30 mg Q4WPeripheral Blood Eosinophil LevelsChange from baseline at Week 12-170 Cells/µL
Benralizumab 30 mg Q4WPeripheral Blood Eosinophil LevelsChange from Baseline at Week 20-160 Cells/µL
Benralizumab 30 mg Q4WPeripheral Blood Eosinophil LevelsBaseline170 Cells/µL
PlaceboPeripheral Blood Eosinophil LevelsChange from Baseline at Week 2010 Cells/µL
PlaceboPeripheral Blood Eosinophil LevelsBaseline220 Cells/µL
PlaceboPeripheral Blood Eosinophil LevelsWeek 12230 Cells/µL
PlaceboPeripheral Blood Eosinophil LevelsChange from baseline at Week 1210 Cells/µL
PlaceboPeripheral Blood Eosinophil LevelsWeek 20210 Cells/µL
Secondary

Serum Concentrations (ng/mL)

Blood samples (processed to serum) for pharmacokinetic assessments were collected from all patients at baseline prior to first benralizumab administration at Day 1, at the Week 12 visit or the IP discontinuation visit, and at the Week 20 follow-up visit. Serum concentrations of benralizumab were determined using a validated electrochemiluminescent (ECL) immunoassay.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 12 and Week 20

Population: The pharmacokinetic (PK) analysis set comprised all patients who received benralizumab and from whom PK blood samples were obtained are assumed not to be affected by factors such as protocol violations. Those patients who had at least 1 quantifiable serum PK observation post first dose were included in the PK analysis dataset.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
Benralizumab 30 mg Q4WSerum Concentrations (ng/mL)Pre- 1st doseNA ng/mL
Benralizumab 30 mg Q4WSerum Concentrations (ng/mL)Week 12999.16 ng/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 95.53
Benralizumab 30 mg Q4WSerum Concentrations (ng/mL)Week 2059.04 ng/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 317.71

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 10, 2026