Skip to content

Comparison of Efficacy on Healing, and Safety of Two Dressings Urgotul and TulleGras MS on Surgical Acute Wounds.

Multicentre, Randomized, Parallel Group, Non-inferiority, Open-label Study Aiming at Comparing the Healing Rates (With Blinded Assessment Based on Photographs) of TULLEGRAS M.S.® With URGOTUL® in the Treatment of Surgical Acute Wounds.

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02322710
Enrollment
208
Registered
2014-12-23
Start date
2014-12-31
Completion date
2016-11-30
Last updated
2022-03-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Surgical Acute Wounds

Keywords

non-inferiority, randomized, TulleGras, Urgotul, healing, surgical acute wounds, pain

Brief summary

Evaluation of non-inferiority on healing rates of two dressings Urgotul and TulleGras MS in the treatment of surgical acute wounds.

Interventions

DEVICEUrgotul: Low-adherent dressing
DEVICETulleGras M.S.: Vaseline gauze

Sponsors

Fovea
CollaboratorOTHER
Mylan Inc.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Male or female subject. * Aged 18 to 75 years * With a planned surgery: * Of abdominal location * Leading to an acute wound of a maximum total length ≤ 18 cm (corresponding to 2 investigational products) * Absence of clinical sign suggestive of worsened wound (assessed only at the randomization visit) * Followed-up in surgery department * Written and signed informed consent obtained * Affiliated to the French Social Security system or equivalent.

Exclusion criteria

* Underlying pathology that may interfere with wound healing in the opinion of the Investigator (human immunodeficiency virus \[HIV\], cancer, immunodeficiency disease, generalized infection, systemic disease ...). The presence of low-risk prostate cancer according to the Amico classification (1) (PSA\<10 ng/mL and Gleason's score \< 6 and clinical grade T1c ou T2a) or a grade T1 (a or b) N0M0 renal cancer which requires surgery without adjuvant therapy (radiotherapy, chemotherapy, hormonal therapy...), in a patient whose general condition is preserved without significant comorbidity or signs of malnutrition are not considered as a non- inclusion criteria * Inadequately controlled diabetes (Glycosylated hemoglobin \> 8%) * Hypo or hyperthyroidism * Intake of a systemic treatment with glucocorticoids or immunosuppressives * Known allergy to one of study dressings components * Participation in a clinical trial in the month prior to his/her inclusion in the study * Pregnancy or breastfeeding or of childbearing potential and saying not to use contraception.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Patients With Complete Healing (100% of Epithelialization).Day 21Using photographs,independent assessor blinded assessment.

Countries

France

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

4 patients were not randomized Presence of clinical sign suggestive of worsened wound assessed at the randomization visit (n=4)

Participants by arm

ArmCount
TulleGras M.S.
Sterile dressing that consists of viscose tissue coated with mineral vaseline TulleGras M.S.: Vaseline gauze
105
Urgotul
Sterile, hydrocolloid dressing, that consists of a polyester fabric coated with hydrocolloid particles and vaseline Urgotul: Low-adherent dressing
98
Total203

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyNo efficacy assessment post-baseline01
Overall StudyProtocol Violation2025

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTulleGras M.S.UrgotulTotal
Age, Continuous52.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.2
54.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.1
53.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.6
Body Mass Index29.6 kg/m²
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.3
28.9 kg/m²
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.2
29.2 kg/m²
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.8
Height170.4 Cm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.6
170.0 Cm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.2
170.2 Cm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.4
Sex: Female, Male
Female
39 Participants43 Participants82 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
66 Participants55 Participants121 Participants
Weight85.4 Kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 21.6
83.0 Kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 18.9
84.2 Kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 20.3

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 1050 / 99
other
Total, other adverse events
23 / 10530 / 99
serious
Total, serious adverse events
14 / 1057 / 99

Outcome results

Primary

Percentage of Patients With Complete Healing (100% of Epithelialization).

Using photographs,independent assessor blinded assessment.

Time frame: Day 21

Population: Per protocol population

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
TulleGras M.S.Percentage of Patients With Complete Healing (100% of Epithelialization).77 Participants
UrgotulPercentage of Patients With Complete Healing (100% of Epithelialization).67 Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026