Skip to content

Ocriplasmin for Vitreomacular Traction/Symptomatic Vitreomacular Adhesion

Assessment of Anatomical and Functional Outcomes in Subjects Treated With Ocriplasmin for Vitreomacular Traction/Symptomatic Vitreomacular Adhesion (VMT/sVMA)

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02322229
Enrollment
62
Registered
2014-12-23
Start date
2015-05-26
Completion date
2016-05-09
Last updated
2018-08-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Vitreomacular Adhesion, Vitreomacular Traction

Keywords

VMT, sVMA, vitrectomy, ocriplasmin

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to observe the anatomical and functional outcomes of ocriplasmin (JETREA™®) over a 6-month period.

Interventions

DRUGOcriplasmin 0.125 mg in a 0.1 mL volume

Sponsors

Alcon Research
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Diagnosis of VMT/sVMA, with evidence of focal VMT visible on Spectral Domain - Optical Coherence Tomography (SD-OCT). * Read, sign, and date an Institutional Review Board/Ethics Committee-approved informed consent form. * Willing and able to attend all study visits. * Other protocol-specified inclusion criteria may apply.

Exclusion criteria

* Women of childbearing potential if pregnant, test positive on a urine pregnancy test, intend to become pregnant during the study period, breastfeeding, or not in agreement to use adequate birth control methods to prevent pregnancy throughout the study. * Hypersensitivity to ocriplasmin or any of the JETREA™® excipients. * Active or suspected intraocular or periocular infection in either eye. * Participation in any interventional clinical trial within 30 days prior to baseline. * Presence of epiretinal membrane (ERM) over the macula at baseline in the study eye. * Broad VMT/VMA \> 1500 microns at baseline in the study eye. * History of vitrectomy in the study eye. * History of laser photocoagulation to the macula in the study eye. * Any relevant concomitant ocular condition in the study eye that, in the opinion of the Investigator, could be expected to worsen or require surgical intervention during the study period. * Macular hole of \> 400 microns diameter in the study eye. * High myopia in the study eye. * Pseudo-exfoliation, Marfan's syndrome, phacodonesis, or any other finding in the study eye that, in the Investigator's opinion, suggests lens/zonular instability. * Aphakia in the study eye. * History of retinal detachment in the study eye. * Recent ocular surgery or ocular injection in the study eye within the past 90 days (including laser therapy). * Proliferative diabetic retinopathy or ischemic retinopathies in the study eye. * Retinal vein occlusions in the study eye. * Exudative age-related macular degeneration (AMD) in the study eye. * Vitreous hemorrhage in the study eye. * Other protocol-specified

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Subjects With Non-surgical Resolution of Focal VMT/sVMA at Day 28, as Determined by Central Reading Center (CRC) Spectral Domain Optical Coherence Tomography (SD-OCT) EvaluationDay 28Vitreous separation was assessed, by SD-OCT according to CRC OCT image reading, into 1 of 12 categories, where the targeted status of VMA resolution was 7=Vitreous attached only at optic nerve (ON) or at ON and elsewhere, but not attached in macular, 9=Vitreous visible with complete separation and no attachment, and 10=No visible vitreous separation, which needed to be reached without prior vitrectomy. The assessment of resolution of VMT/sVMA was based upon the anatomical resolution of VMA only, i.e. no resolution of the related symptoms was considered. One eye (study eye) contributed to the analysis.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in Best-corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) at Distance at Days 7, 28, 90, and 180Baseline (Day 0), Day 7, Day 28, Day 90, Day 180BCVA was assessed using Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) testing. BCVA was determined as follows: if tested at 4 meters, BCVA=the number of letters read correctly at 4 meters+30; if tested at 1 meter, BCVA=the number of letters read correctly at 1 meter, with 83-84 representing normal vision. BCVA change was defined as a change in letters read from the baseline assessment. A positive change value indicates improvement. One eye (study eye) contributed to the analysis.
Percentage of Subjects With Closure of Macular Hole (MH), at Days 7, 28, 90, and 180 (if Present at Baseline)Day 7, Day 28, Day 90, Day 180The closure of macular hole (a full thickness defect of the retinal tissue involving the anatomical fovea) is defined as a flattened and reattached hole rim along the whole circumference of macular hole. Closure was determined by SD-OCT evaluation and the percentage of subjects tabulated. One eye (study eye) contributed to the analysis.
Percentage of Subjects With Non-surgical Resolution of VMT/sVMA at Days 7, 90, and 180Baseline (Day 0), Day 7, Day 90, Day 180As described in Primary Outcome Measure
Percentage of Subjects Experiencing Pars Plana Vitrectomy (PPV) at Day 180Day 180Pars plana vitrectomy (the surgical removal of vitreous gel from the eye) was captured in Concomitant Ocular Procedures. One eye (study eye) contributed to the analysis.
Change From Baseline in Central Foveal Thickness at Days 28 and 180Baseline (Day 0), Day 28, Day 180Central foveal thickness (CFT) was determined by subtracting the measurements in subretinal fluid (SRF) and retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) elevation and/or subretinal hyper-reflective material (SHRM) from the value in total retinal measurement. The change was defined as a change from baseline values of CFT. One eye (study eye) contributed to the analysis.

Countries

Australia

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Subjects were recruited from 9 sites located in Australia and 1 site located in New Zealand.

Pre-assignment details

Of the 62 enrolled, 10 subjects were exited as screen failures prior to initiation of treatment. This reporting group includes all eligible subjects (52).

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Ocriplasmin
Ocriplasmin 0.125 mg in a 0.1 mL volume administered as a single dose by IVT injection
52
Total52

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall StudyPhysician Decision2

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicOcriplasmin
Age, Continuous74.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7
Sex: Female, Male
Female
39 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
13 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 620 / 52
other
Total, other adverse events
1 / 6241 / 52
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 625 / 52

Outcome results

Primary

Percentage of Subjects With Non-surgical Resolution of Focal VMT/sVMA at Day 28, as Determined by Central Reading Center (CRC) Spectral Domain Optical Coherence Tomography (SD-OCT) Evaluation

Vitreous separation was assessed, by SD-OCT according to CRC OCT image reading, into 1 of 12 categories, where the targeted status of VMA resolution was 7=Vitreous attached only at optic nerve (ON) or at ON and elsewhere, but not attached in macular, 9=Vitreous visible with complete separation and no attachment, and 10=No visible vitreous separation, which needed to be reached without prior vitrectomy. The assessment of resolution of VMT/sVMA was based upon the anatomical resolution of VMA only, i.e. no resolution of the related symptoms was considered. One eye (study eye) contributed to the analysis.

Time frame: Day 28

Population: Full Analysis Set. Missing data imputed using the last observation carried forward (LOCF) method. Subjects who had vitrectomy after VMA resolution are considered as 'no VMA resolution' after timepoint of vitrectomy.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
OcriplasminPercentage of Subjects With Non-surgical Resolution of Focal VMT/sVMA at Day 28, as Determined by Central Reading Center (CRC) Spectral Domain Optical Coherence Tomography (SD-OCT) Evaluation26.9 percentage of subjects
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Best-corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) at Distance at Days 7, 28, 90, and 180

BCVA was assessed using Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) testing. BCVA was determined as follows: if tested at 4 meters, BCVA=the number of letters read correctly at 4 meters+30; if tested at 1 meter, BCVA=the number of letters read correctly at 1 meter, with 83-84 representing normal vision. BCVA change was defined as a change in letters read from the baseline assessment. A positive change value indicates improvement. One eye (study eye) contributed to the analysis.

Time frame: Baseline (Day 0), Day 7, Day 28, Day 90, Day 180

Population: Full Analysis Set. Missing data imputed using the LOCF method. BCVA values after a vitrectomy are imputed with the last non-missing value prior to the vitrectomy.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
OcriplasminChange From Baseline in Best-corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) at Distance at Days 7, 28, 90, and 180Baseline (BL)70.6 lettersStandard Deviation 10.62
OcriplasminChange From Baseline in Best-corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) at Distance at Days 7, 28, 90, and 180Change from BL at Day 7-1.8 lettersStandard Deviation 7.09
OcriplasminChange From Baseline in Best-corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) at Distance at Days 7, 28, 90, and 180Change from BL at Day 281.0 lettersStandard Deviation 7.67
OcriplasminChange From Baseline in Best-corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) at Distance at Days 7, 28, 90, and 180Change from BL at Day 902.1 lettersStandard Deviation 8.07
OcriplasminChange From Baseline in Best-corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) at Distance at Days 7, 28, 90, and 180Change from BL at Day 1803.3 lettersStandard Deviation 9.16
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Central Foveal Thickness at Days 28 and 180

Central foveal thickness (CFT) was determined by subtracting the measurements in subretinal fluid (SRF) and retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) elevation and/or subretinal hyper-reflective material (SHRM) from the value in total retinal measurement. The change was defined as a change from baseline values of CFT. One eye (study eye) contributed to the analysis.

Time frame: Baseline (Day 0), Day 28, Day 180

Population: Missing data is imputed using the LOCF method. CFT values after a vitrectomy are imputed with the last non-missing value prior to the vitrectomy.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
OcriplasminChange From Baseline in Central Foveal Thickness at Days 28 and 180Baseline (BL)302.3 MicronsStandard Deviation 161.23
OcriplasminChange From Baseline in Central Foveal Thickness at Days 28 and 180Change from BL at Day 28-35.5 MicronsStandard Deviation 95.53
OcriplasminChange From Baseline in Central Foveal Thickness at Days 28 and 180Change from BL at Day 180-17.6 MicronsStandard Deviation 143.63
Secondary

Percentage of Subjects Experiencing Pars Plana Vitrectomy (PPV) at Day 180

Pars plana vitrectomy (the surgical removal of vitreous gel from the eye) was captured in Concomitant Ocular Procedures. One eye (study eye) contributed to the analysis.

Time frame: Day 180

Population: Full Analysis Set

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
OcriplasminPercentage of Subjects Experiencing Pars Plana Vitrectomy (PPV) at Day 1807.7 percentage of subjects
Secondary

Percentage of Subjects With Closure of Macular Hole (MH), at Days 7, 28, 90, and 180 (if Present at Baseline)

The closure of macular hole (a full thickness defect of the retinal tissue involving the anatomical fovea) is defined as a flattened and reattached hole rim along the whole circumference of macular hole. Closure was determined by SD-OCT evaluation and the percentage of subjects tabulated. One eye (study eye) contributed to the analysis.

Time frame: Day 7, Day 28, Day 90, Day 180

Population: This analysis population includes all subjects in Full Analysis Set with MH at baseline (n=4). Subjects who had vitrectomy after MH closure are considered as 'no MH closure' after the timepoint of vitrectomy.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
OcriplasminPercentage of Subjects With Closure of Macular Hole (MH), at Days 7, 28, 90, and 180 (if Present at Baseline)Day 725.0 percentage of subjects
OcriplasminPercentage of Subjects With Closure of Macular Hole (MH), at Days 7, 28, 90, and 180 (if Present at Baseline)Day 2850.0 percentage of subjects
OcriplasminPercentage of Subjects With Closure of Macular Hole (MH), at Days 7, 28, 90, and 180 (if Present at Baseline)Day 9050.0 percentage of subjects
OcriplasminPercentage of Subjects With Closure of Macular Hole (MH), at Days 7, 28, 90, and 180 (if Present at Baseline)Day 18050.0 percentage of subjects
Secondary

Percentage of Subjects With Non-surgical Resolution of VMT/sVMA at Days 7, 90, and 180

As described in Primary Outcome Measure

Time frame: Baseline (Day 0), Day 7, Day 90, Day 180

Population: Full Analysis Set. Missing data imputed for Days 90 and 180 using the LOCF method. Subjects who had vitrectomy are considered as 'no VMA resolution' after the timepoint of vitrectomy.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
OcriplasminPercentage of Subjects With Non-surgical Resolution of VMT/sVMA at Days 7, 90, and 180Day 719.2 percentage of subjects
OcriplasminPercentage of Subjects With Non-surgical Resolution of VMT/sVMA at Days 7, 90, and 180Day 9038.5 percentage of subjects
OcriplasminPercentage of Subjects With Non-surgical Resolution of VMT/sVMA at Days 7, 90, and 180Day 18040.4 percentage of subjects

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026