Skip to content

Safety of a Single, Intravitreal Injection of Human Retinal Progenitor Cells (jCell) in Retinitis Pigmentosa

A Prospective, Multicenter, Open-Label, Single-Arm Study of the Safety and Tolerability of a Single, Intravitreal Injection of Human Retinal Progenitor Cells (jCell) in Adult Subjects With Retinitis Pigmentosa (RP)

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 1Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02320812
Enrollment
28
Registered
2014-12-19
Start date
2015-06-30
Completion date
2017-07-19
Last updated
2019-03-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Retinitis Pigmentosa (RP)

Brief summary

This study evaluates the safety and potential activity of a single dose of live human retinal progenitor cells (jCell) administered to adults with retinitis pigmentosa. Four different dose levels of cells will be assessed in each of two groups of patients.

Detailed description

The primary purpose of this study is to test the safety and tolerability of the administration of a single dose of jCell to adults with retinitis pigmentosa. The goal of jCell therapy is to preserve vision by intervening in the disease at a time when host photoreceptors can be protected and potentially reactivated. Human allogeneic retinal progenitor cells will be injected into adults with advanced RP to see if the procedure is safe, if the cells survive, and whether they have any impact on the visual status of the patients.

Interventions

single intravitreal injection of 0.5 - 3.0 million human retinal progenitor cells (hRPC)

Sponsors

California Institute for Regenerative Medicine (CIRM)
CollaboratorOTHER
jCyte, Inc
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Clinical diagnosis of RP confirmed by electroretinogram (ERG) and willing to consent to mutation typing, if not already done * Best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) 20/63 or worse and no worse than hand motions (HM) * Adequate organ function and negative infectious disease screen * Female of childbearing potential must have negative pregnancy test and be willing to use medically accepted methods of contraception throughout the study

Exclusion criteria

* Eye disease other than RP that impairs visual function * Pseudo-RP, cancer-associated retinopathies * History of malignancy or other end-stage organ disease, or any chronic disease requiring continuous treatment with system steroids, anticoagulants or immunosuppressive agents * Known allergy to penicillin or streptomycin

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Subjects With Adverse Events as a Measure of Safety and Tolerability12 monthsproportion of subjects with treatment emergent adverse events (TEAE), related TEAE and severe TEAE

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Mean Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA)12 monthschange in mean best corrected visual acuity in test eye versus untreated eye; BCVA is measured using an eye chart and is reported as the number of letters read correctly (ranging from 0 to 100 letters) in the study eye. The lower the number of letters read correctly on the eye chart, the worse the vision (or visual acuity). A positive change from baseline indicates an improvement and a negative change from baseline indicates a worsening. Change between baseline and month 12 is reported.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Treated Subjects
human retinal progenitor cells human retinal progenitor cells: single intravitreal injection of 0.5 - 3.0 million human retinal progenitor cells (hRPC)
28
Total28

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTreated Subjects
Age, Continuous49.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.7
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
7 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
21 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
4 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
24 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
28 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
17 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
11 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 28
other
Total, other adverse events
20 / 28
serious
Total, serious adverse events
1 / 28

Outcome results

Primary

Number of Subjects With Adverse Events as a Measure of Safety and Tolerability

proportion of subjects with treatment emergent adverse events (TEAE), related TEAE and severe TEAE

Time frame: 12 months

Population: all treated subjects

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Treated SubjectsNumber of Subjects With Adverse Events as a Measure of Safety and TolerabilitySubjects with TEAE25 Participants
Treated SubjectsNumber of Subjects With Adverse Events as a Measure of Safety and TolerabilitySubjects with related TEAE21 Participants
Treated SubjectsNumber of Subjects With Adverse Events as a Measure of Safety and TolerabilitySubjects with grade 3 TEAE1 Participants
Secondary

Change in Mean Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA)

change in mean best corrected visual acuity in test eye versus untreated eye; BCVA is measured using an eye chart and is reported as the number of letters read correctly (ranging from 0 to 100 letters) in the study eye. The lower the number of letters read correctly on the eye chart, the worse the vision (or visual acuity). A positive change from baseline indicates an improvement and a negative change from baseline indicates a worsening. Change between baseline and month 12 is reported.

Time frame: 12 months

Population: all treated subjects

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
Treated SubjectsChange in Mean Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA)1.4 number of letters read correctly
1.0 Million Cells CohortChange in Mean Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA)1.0 number of letters read correctly
2.0 Million Cells CohortChange in Mean Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA)4.8 number of letters read correctly
3.0 Million Cells CohortChange in Mean Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA)9.0 number of letters read correctly

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 24, 2026