Skip to content

2D Versus 3D Radical Laparoscopic Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer: a Prospective Randomized Trial

Prospective Randomized Trial on2D Versus 3D Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy With Pelvic Lymphadenectomy for the Treatment of Early Stage Cervical Cancer (FIGO Stages IA2-IB1-IIA<2cm) and Advanced Stage Cervical Cancer (FIGO Stages IB2-IIA>2 Cm-IIB) Submitted to NACT With Complete Clinical Response.

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02320578
Enrollment
26
Registered
2014-12-19
Start date
2014-10-31
Completion date
2015-03-31
Last updated
2015-06-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Laparoscopic Surgical Procedures, Uterine Cervical Neoplasms

Keywords

Neoadjuvant Chemoptherapy, Laparoscopy 3D, Cervical cancer

Brief summary

The aim of this prospective randomized pilot study is to verify if the operative time of a Radical abdominal hysterectomy (LRH) with pelvic lymphadenectomy for early stage cervical cancer (FIGO stages IA2-IB1-IIA\<2cm) and for advanced stage cervical cancer (FIGO stages IB2-IIA\>2cm-IIB) submitted to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) with complete clinical response could be further reduced using 3D Laparoscopy (Olympus Medical Systems Corp) versus standard laparoscopy

Detailed description

Radical abdominal hysterectomy (RAH) with pelvic lymphadenectomy is the standard surgical treatment for early stage cervical carcinoma FIGO stages IA2-IB1-IIA\<2cm. Since the early 90's laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy (LRH) has been suggested as surgical approach for the treatment of cervical cancer. In the recent years, many institutions have begun to consider it an attractive technique and to study its feasibility and safety. Most of these studies have shown that LRH is relatively more time-consuming than standard laparotomy and ranges from 90 to 420 minutes according to surgeons' experience and different techniques adopted to achieve hemostasis, resect the parametrium and uterosacrals. Spirtos et al. demonstrated that staplers could reduce mean operation time from 253 to 205 minutes if compared to argon beam coagulator. Moreover, the pulsed bipolar system was associated with significant reduction in operative time in comparison with the conventional bipolar system (mean, 172 minutes vs 229 minutes; P \< 0.001). The largest series of LRH reported from a single institution by Puntambekar et al included 248 patients and described the Pune technique (anterior and posterior peritoneal U cuts, early dissection of the rectovaginal space, fully mobilization of the uterus, resection of the cardinal and uterosacral ligaments with Ligasure system (Ligasure Vessel Sealing System; Valleylab, Tyco Healthcare, Boulder, CO)), obtaining a very short mean operative time (mean, 92 minutes; range 6-120 minutes). A recent review on laparoscopic and robot-assisted radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy including 17 studies reported a mean operating time of 202 minutes \[range, 184-221 minutes\] in the group of LRH, which matches with our experience of 210 min (range 180-240), using conventional bipolar electrosurgery. This prospective randomized pilot study is aimed to verify if the operative time of a LRH with pelvic lymphadenectomy for early stage cervical cancer (FIGO stages IA2-IB1-IIA\<2cm) and for advanced stage cervical cancer (FIGO stages IB2-IIA\>2cm-IIB) submitted to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) with complete clinical response could be further reduced using 3D Laparoscopy (Olympus Medical Systems Corp) vs. standard laparoscopy. Saving operative time would mean shorter anesthesia and faster recovery, further improving the safety profile of the laparoscopic approach in the treatment of cervical cancer. Secondary endopoints of this comparison are incidence of intra- or postoperative complications (Cardiac, Respiratory, Neurological, Gastrointestinal, Renal, Fever, Wound or other Infection, Lymphocele), estimated blood loss, days of hospitalization and costs for the health care system.

Interventions

3D Laparoscopy approach

Standard laparoscopy approach

Sponsors

Fanfani, Francesco, M.D.
CollaboratorINDIV
Fagotti, Anna, M.D.
CollaboratorINDIV
Catholic University of the Sacred Heart
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Caregiver, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
No minimum to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age ≤ 75 years * Patient's informed consent * American Society of Anesthesiologists: \< class III or IV * No actual pregnancies or P.I.D. * No previous major abdominal surgical procedures * Early stage cervical cancer (FIGO stages IA2-IB1-IIA\<2cm) and advanced stage cervical cancer (FIGO stages IB2-IIA\>2cm-IIB) submitted to NACT with complete clinical response * No previous radiotherapy on the pelvic field * No uterine size larger than conform 10 weeks gestation

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Operative time for laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomyIntraoperativeOperative time will be calculated from the entrance in the abdominal cavity to the closure of the skin trocar accesses

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of participants with intra or post operative complicationstwo yearsCardiac, Respiratory, Neurological, Gastrointestinal, Renal, Fever, Wound or other Infection, Lymphocele

Countries

Italy

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026