Skip to content

REAL HEALTH-Diabetes: Reach Ahead for Lifestyle and Health-Diabetes

REAL HEALTH-Diabetes: Reach Ahead for Lifestyle and Health-Diabetes

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02320253
Enrollment
211
Registered
2014-12-19
Start date
2014-11-30
Completion date
2021-07-31
Last updated
2021-09-20

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Obesity, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

Keywords

Diabetes, Obesity, Primary Care, Lifestyle Intervention

Brief summary

The goal of this project is to translate the Look AHEAD intensive lifestyle intervention for type 2 diabetes and obesity into usual care at community health centers, comparing an in-person group program (IP), a telephone conference call (TCC) group program, and referral to medical nutrition therapy (MNT), the current standard of care.

Detailed description

Participants will be randomly assigned to one of three arms: MNT, IP, or TCC. Participants will be enrolled in the study for a total of three years. During those three years, participants will have 5 research visits, at baseline, where randomization occurs, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months, and 36 months. At each research visit, participants will have a lipid panel and HbA1c sample drawn, their blood pressure, weight, and height, baseline only, taken. Participants will also answer questionnaires that will address health behaviors, self-efficacy, measures of self-determination, depression, literacy and numeracy, food insecurity, health-related quality-of-life and patient satisfaction with quality of care. For the group-based interventions, dietitians will deliver the adapted Look AHEAD lifestyle intervention. The first 14 sessions will be delivered weekly and the next 5 sessions biweekly. In the subsequent 18 months, group sessions will be delivered monthly from 6-24 months. In addition, participants will be offered up to 5 individual MNT sessions over the 2 year intervention period. At these individual visits, dietitians will address diabetes-related issues and discuss tailored goals and behaviors, based on the Look AHEAD model. Dietitians will provide ongoing feedback to participants' own PCPs about patient progress toward goals and will encourage PCPs to reinforce weight loss strategies with their patients. Each group will contain up to 12 participants with type 2 diabetes and will last 1-1.5 hours. The program curriculum focuses on nutrition, activity, and behavioral topics and incorporates the use of meal replacements for the first 4-16 weeks to enhance weight loss success. In addition to the teaching component, participants who are taking insulin or medications that can cause hypoglycemia will self-monitor blood glucose levels at least 2 times per day and submit self-monitoring records for review each week, either by delivering them at the in-person sessions or by mailing, faxing, or emailing them to the study team. Patients on oral hypoglycemics who are not adjusting medications based on blood sugar will be instructed to do targeted monitoring to determine the effects of exercise and meals on blood glucose. The study provider at each health center will review BG records and make any needed adjustments to insulin or medication doses according to an algorithm to maintain glycemic control and prevent hypoglycemia as participants lose weight. A trained member of the study staff will provide MNT referral participants with an educational handout emphasizing that modest weight loss (5 - 10%) via caloric restriction and gradual adoption of moderate increases in daily physical activity (equivalent to brisk walking for 30 minutes daily) is safe and effective in managing diabetes and schedule them for an appointment with a dietitian from Nutrition Services for follow up.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALIn Person Group (IP)

The goals of the diabetes lifestyle intervention program are weight loss of 5-10% of initial body weight and increased activity levels to 175 minutes/week of moderate intensity physical activity. Dietitians will deliver the adapted Look AHEAD lifestyle intervention via in-person groups combined with 2-3 individual sessions per year. The program curriculum focuses on nutrition, activity, and behavioral topics and incorporates the use of meal replacements for the first 4-16 weeks to enhance weight loss success.

BEHAVIORALTelephone Conference Call Group (TCC)

The goals of the diabetes lifestyle intervention program are weight loss of 5-10% of initial body weight and increased activity levels to 175 minutes/week of moderate intensity physical activity. Dietitians will deliver the adapted Look AHEAD lifestyle intervention via telephone conference call groups combined with 2-3 individual sessions per year. The program curriculum focuses on nutrition, activity, and behavioral topics and incorporates the use of meal replacements for the first 4-16 weeks to enhance weight loss success. Dietitians will deliver the adapted Look AHEAD lifestyle intervention.

Participants are referred to meet with a registered dietitian for individual medical nutrition therapy sessions up to 3-4 times per year.

Sponsors

National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK)
CollaboratorNIH
Massachusetts General Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Diagnosis of type 2 diabetes * Age 18 years or older * Overweight or obese (BMI \>25 kg/m2) * HbA1c level 6.5\<11.5% * Systolic blood pressure (SBP) \<160 mmHg, diastolic blood pressure (DBP) \<100 mmHg * Willing to lose 5-7% of body weight * Willing to increase activity to at least 175 minutes/week * Willing to commit to random assignment to either attend and participate in the lifestyle change program in person or on the telephone or be referred to Nutrition Services for medical nutrition therapy * Stable health, with no severe comorbidities that might interfere with their ability to participate in a group intervention that includes increasing activity or decreasing calories, such as severe psychiatric illness or significant heart disease * Ability to understand and communicate effectively in English or Spanish * Willing to self-monitor blood glucose * Willing to keep a food, exercise, and blood glucose diary * Have a primary care physician at MGH Chelsea, Charlestown, or Revere Health Centers, or be willing to attend sessions, in-person or by phone, and have medications adjusted by a provider based at one of those health centers with communication to the referring primary care provider

Exclusion criteria

* Weight greater than 350 pounds * Pregnant or planning pregnancy in the next year * Currently seeing a dietitian (regular scheduled follow up appointments) or participating in a weight loss program and unwilling to stop * Weight change of more than 3% of weight in the previous month. * Currently enrolled in another diabetes intervention study * Lack of availability of telephone

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percent Weight Change From BaselineBaseline, 6, 12, 24, and 36 months.Percent weight change form baseline; negative values indicate weight loss.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Hemoglobin A1c: Change From Baseline6, 12, 24 monthsChange in percentage of glycated hemoglobin. Negative values indicate HbA1c reduction (improvement) from baseline.
Systolic Blood Pressure: Change From Baseline6, 12, 24, months.Blood pressure is reported as change in systolic blood pressure only. Negative values indicate improvement.
Triglyceride Levels: Change From Baseline6, 12, 24 monthsTriglycerides are measured in mg/dl. Negative values indicate improved triglyceride levels compared to baseline.
Diet Self-efficacy: Change From Baseline6, 12, 24, and 36 months.Diet Self-Efficacy Scale is scored 1-5 with higher scores denoting greater self confidence in managing diet and positive values denoting improved self-confidence in managing diet. Hickey ML, Owen SV, Froman RD. Instrument development: cardiac diet and exercise self-efficacy. Nursing research. 1992;41(6):347-351
Dietary Restraint: Change From BaselineBaseline, 6, 12, 24, and 36 months.Dietary restraint was measured by the Dutch Eating Behavior Questionnaire with higher scores (1-5) denoting greater self-regulation of dietary behaviors and positive values denoting improved dietary restraint. Van Strien T, Frijters JER, Defares PB. The Dutch Eating Behavior Questionnaire (DEBQ) for assessment of restrained, emotional, and external eating behavior. International Journal of Eating Disorders. 1986;5(2):295-315.
Diabetes Distress: Change From BaselineBaseline, 6, 12, 24, and 36 months.Diabetes distress was measured with the Problem Areas in Diabetes Scale. The scale ranges from 0 to 100, in which higher scores indicate greater emotional distress, with a score of 40 marking the threshold for severe emotional distress. Negative values indicate reduction in diabetes-related distress. Welch GW, Jacobson AM, Polonsky WH. The Problem Areas in Diabetes Scale. An evaluation of its clinical utility. Diabetes Care. 1997;20(5):760-766
Depression Score: Change From Baseline.Baseline, 6, 12, 24, and 36 months.The PHQ-8 measures depressed mood, with higher scores representing a higher degree of depressed mood and negative values indicating improvement. The range of scores is 0 to 24. Kroenke K, Strine TW, Spitzer RL, Williams JB, Berry JT, Mokdad AH. The PHQ-8 as a measure of current depression in the general population. J Affect Disord. 2009;114(1-3):163-173.
Fat-related Diet Behavior: Change From Baseline.Baseline, 6, 12, 24, and 36 months.Fat-related diet behavior was scored on a scale of 1 to 5, in which lower scores indicate lower fat dietary habits. Negative values indicate a shift to lower-fat diet behavior. Kristal AR, Shattuck AL, Henry HJ. Patterns of dietary behavior associated with selecting diets low in fat: reliability and validity of a behavioral approach to dietary assessment. J Am Diet Assoc. 1990;90(2):214-220. Glasgow RE, Perry JD, Toobert DJ, Hollis JF. Brief assessments of dietary behavior in field settings. Addictive behaviors. 1996;21(2):239-247

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Health Economics12 monthsTotal cost of intervention at 12 months taking into account intervention cost and savings from medication dose reduction. Incremental cost effectiveness and probabilistic sensitivity analyses and further details are reported in: Delahanty LM, Levy DE, Chang Y, Porneala BC, Goldman V, McCarthy J, Bissett L, Rodriguez AR, Chase B, LaRocca R, Wheeler A, Wexler DJ. Effectiveness of Lifestyle Intervention for Type 2 Diabetes in Primary Care: the REAL HEALTH-Diabetes Randomized Clinical Trial. J Gen Intern Med. 2020 Sep;35(9):2637-2646. doi: 10.1007/s11606-019-05629-9. Epub 2020 Jan 21. PMID: 31965526; PMCID: PMC7458982.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Actual enrollment 211

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Medical Nutrition Therapy (MNT)
Participants in this arm will meet with a dietitian at their respective Health Center, not with a study dietitian. The participant and dietitian will decide how frequently to meet and create an individualized treatment plan. The participant's health insurance will be billed for these dietitian visit(s) and the participant is responsible for any copay(s) or deductible(s) associated with the visit(s). Medical Nutrition Therapy (MNT): Participants are referred to meet with a registered dietitian for individual medical nutrition therapy sessions up to 3-4 times per year.
66
In Person Group (IP)
Participants enrolled to the IP arm will meet weekly for 14 weeks, biweekly for 10 weeks, and then monthly for the next 18 months. Each session will be led by a study dietitian that has been assigned to that specific health center and will last 1.5 hours. Participants will be allowed to have one-on-one sessions with their dietitian throughout the first two years, twice in the first year and three times in the second year. In Person Group (IP): The goals of the diabetes lifestyle intervention program are weight loss of 5-10% of initial body weight and increased activity levels to 175 minutes/week of moderate intensity physical activity. Dietitians will deliver the adapted Look AHEAD lifestyle intervention via in-person groups combined with 2-3 individual sessions per year. The program curriculum focuses on nutrition, activity, and behavioral topics and incorporates the use of meal replacements for the first 4-16 weeks to enhance weight loss success.
70
Telephone Conference Call Group (TCC)
Participants enrolled in the TCC arm will meet weekly for 14 weeks, biweekly for 10 weeks, and then monthly for the next 18 months. Each session will be led, over-the-phone, by a study dietitian that has been assigned to that specific health center and will last 1.5 hours. Participants will be allowed to have one-on-one sessions with their dietitian throughout the first two years, twice in the first year and three times in the second year. Telephone Conference Call Group (TCC): The goals of the diabetes lifestyle intervention program are weight loss of 5-10% of initial body weight and increased activity levels to 175 minutes/week of moderate intensity physical activity. Dietitians will deliver the adapted Look AHEAD lifestyle intervention via telephone conference call groups combined with 2-3 individual sessions per year. The program curriculum focuses on nutrition, activity, and behavioral topics and incorporates the use of meal replacements for the first 4-16 weeks to enhance weight loss success. Dietitians will deliver the adapted Look AHEAD lifestyle intervention.
72
Total208

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002
Overall StudyDeath101
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up221
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject300

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicMedical Nutrition Therapy (MNT)In Person Group (IP)Telephone Conference Call Group (TCC)Total
Age, Continuous61.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.7
61.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.3
62.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.8
61.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.2
Diabetes Distress36.9 score
STANDARD_DEVIATION 23.1
39.3 score
STANDARD_DEVIATION 19.5
40.3 score
STANDARD_DEVIATION 23.3
38.9 score
STANDARD_DEVIATION 22
Dietary restraint2.8 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.6
2.9 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.6
2.8 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.8
2.8 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.7
Diet self efficacy scale3.7 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.6
3.6 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.7
3.8 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.7
3.7 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.7
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
11 Participants10 Participants7 Participants28 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
55 Participants60 Participants65 Participants180 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Fat-related diet behavior2.7 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.6
2.7 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.5
2.8 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.6
2.7 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.6
Hemoglobin A1c7.8 Percentage of glycated hemoglobin
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.2
7.8 Percentage of glycated hemoglobin
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.2
7.6 Percentage of glycated hemoglobin
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.1
7.7 Percentage of glycated hemoglobin
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.2
Mood5.3 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.4
4.7 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.4
4.4 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.8
4.8 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.6
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
2 Participants3 Participants2 Participants7 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
5 Participants2 Participants2 Participants9 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
12 Participants10 Participants10 Participants32 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
47 Participants55 Participants58 Participants160 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
66 participants70 participants72 participants208 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
37 Participants37 Participants41 Participants115 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
29 Participants33 Participants31 Participants93 Participants
Systolic blood pressure125 mmHg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16
126 mmHg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14
124 mmHg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10
125 mmHg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14
Triglycerides146 mg/dl
STANDARD_DEVIATION 99
196 mg/dl
STANDARD_DEVIATION 290
152 mg/dl
STANDARD_DEVIATION 94
165 mg/dl
STANDARD_DEVIATION 186
Weight99.7 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 21.4
98.8 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 17
96.1 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 18.2
98.7 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 18.9

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
1 / 660 / 701 / 72
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 00 / 00 / 0
serious
Total, serious adverse events
18 / 6616 / 7012 / 72

Outcome results

Primary

Percent Weight Change From Baseline

Percent weight change form baseline; negative values indicate weight loss.

Time frame: Baseline, 6, 12, 24, and 36 months.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Medical Nutrition Therapy (MNT)Percent Weight Change From BaselineSix months-1.1 percentage of weightStandard Deviation 3.7
Medical Nutrition Therapy (MNT)Percent Weight Change From BaselineTwelve months-2.0 percentage of weightStandard Deviation 4.1
Medical Nutrition Therapy (MNT)Percent Weight Change From BaselineTwenty-four months-3.1 percentage of weightStandard Deviation 5.2
Medical Nutrition Therapy (MNT)Percent Weight Change From BaselineThirty-six months-5.8 percentage of weightStandard Deviation 7.1
In Person Group (IP)Percent Weight Change From BaselineThirty-six months-4.4 percentage of weightStandard Deviation 5.4
In Person Group (IP)Percent Weight Change From BaselineSix months-5.6 percentage of weightStandard Deviation 4.9
In Person Group (IP)Percent Weight Change From BaselineTwenty-four months-4.4 percentage of weightStandard Deviation 5.9
In Person Group (IP)Percent Weight Change From BaselineTwelve months-4.5 percentage of weightStandard Deviation 6.1
Telephone Conference Call Group (TCC)Percent Weight Change From BaselineThirty-six months-5.3 percentage of weightStandard Deviation 6.4
Telephone Conference Call Group (TCC)Percent Weight Change From BaselineTwelve months-4.8 percentage of weightStandard Deviation 6.1
Telephone Conference Call Group (TCC)Percent Weight Change From BaselineTwenty-four months-4.0 percentage of weightStandard Deviation 5.8
Telephone Conference Call Group (TCC)Percent Weight Change From BaselineSix months-4.6 percentage of weightStandard Deviation 5.8
Secondary

Depression Score: Change From Baseline.

The PHQ-8 measures depressed mood, with higher scores representing a higher degree of depressed mood and negative values indicating improvement. The range of scores is 0 to 24. Kroenke K, Strine TW, Spitzer RL, Williams JB, Berry JT, Mokdad AH. The PHQ-8 as a measure of current depression in the general population. J Affect Disord. 2009;114(1-3):163-173.

Time frame: Baseline, 6, 12, 24, and 36 months.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Medical Nutrition Therapy (MNT)Depression Score: Change From Baseline.Six months-0.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.5
Medical Nutrition Therapy (MNT)Depression Score: Change From Baseline.Twelve months-0.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.1
Medical Nutrition Therapy (MNT)Depression Score: Change From Baseline.Twenty-four months-1.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.3
Medical Nutrition Therapy (MNT)Depression Score: Change From Baseline.Thirty-six months-0.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.2
In Person Group (IP)Depression Score: Change From Baseline.Thirty-six months-0.7 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.7
In Person Group (IP)Depression Score: Change From Baseline.Six months-1.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.3
In Person Group (IP)Depression Score: Change From Baseline.Twenty-four months-0.8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.2
In Person Group (IP)Depression Score: Change From Baseline.Twelve months-1.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.8
Telephone Conference Call Group (TCC)Depression Score: Change From Baseline.Thirty-six months0.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.3
Telephone Conference Call Group (TCC)Depression Score: Change From Baseline.Twelve months-0.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.7
Telephone Conference Call Group (TCC)Depression Score: Change From Baseline.Twenty-four months-0.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.1
Telephone Conference Call Group (TCC)Depression Score: Change From Baseline.Six months-0.7 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.1
Secondary

Diabetes Distress: Change From Baseline

Diabetes distress was measured with the Problem Areas in Diabetes Scale. The scale ranges from 0 to 100, in which higher scores indicate greater emotional distress, with a score of 40 marking the threshold for severe emotional distress. Negative values indicate reduction in diabetes-related distress. Welch GW, Jacobson AM, Polonsky WH. The Problem Areas in Diabetes Scale. An evaluation of its clinical utility. Diabetes Care. 1997;20(5):760-766

Time frame: Baseline, 6, 12, 24, and 36 months.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Medical Nutrition Therapy (MNT)Diabetes Distress: Change From BaselineSix months-7.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.6
Medical Nutrition Therapy (MNT)Diabetes Distress: Change From BaselineTwelve months-5.8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 18
Medical Nutrition Therapy (MNT)Diabetes Distress: Change From BaselineTwenty-four months-9.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.8
Medical Nutrition Therapy (MNT)Diabetes Distress: Change From BaselineThirty-six months-13.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.9
In Person Group (IP)Diabetes Distress: Change From BaselineThirty-six months-14.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.8
In Person Group (IP)Diabetes Distress: Change From BaselineSix months-12.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.3
In Person Group (IP)Diabetes Distress: Change From BaselineTwenty-four months-13.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.3
In Person Group (IP)Diabetes Distress: Change From BaselineTwelve months-14.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 15
Telephone Conference Call Group (TCC)Diabetes Distress: Change From BaselineThirty-six months-14.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.6
Telephone Conference Call Group (TCC)Diabetes Distress: Change From BaselineTwelve months-15.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.9
Telephone Conference Call Group (TCC)Diabetes Distress: Change From BaselineTwenty-four months-16.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 20
Telephone Conference Call Group (TCC)Diabetes Distress: Change From BaselineSix months-14.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.4
Secondary

Dietary Restraint: Change From Baseline

Dietary restraint was measured by the Dutch Eating Behavior Questionnaire with higher scores (1-5) denoting greater self-regulation of dietary behaviors and positive values denoting improved dietary restraint. Van Strien T, Frijters JER, Defares PB. The Dutch Eating Behavior Questionnaire (DEBQ) for assessment of restrained, emotional, and external eating behavior. International Journal of Eating Disorders. 1986;5(2):295-315.

Time frame: Baseline, 6, 12, 24, and 36 months.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Medical Nutrition Therapy (MNT)Dietary Restraint: Change From BaselineTwenty-four months0.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.7
Medical Nutrition Therapy (MNT)Dietary Restraint: Change From BaselineSix months0.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.7
Medical Nutrition Therapy (MNT)Dietary Restraint: Change From BaselineThirty six months0.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.4
Medical Nutrition Therapy (MNT)Dietary Restraint: Change From BaselineTwelve months0.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.7
In Person Group (IP)Dietary Restraint: Change From BaselineTwenty-four months0.7 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.7
In Person Group (IP)Dietary Restraint: Change From BaselineTwelve months0.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.6
In Person Group (IP)Dietary Restraint: Change From BaselineSix months0.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.6
In Person Group (IP)Dietary Restraint: Change From BaselineThirty six months0.7 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.7
Telephone Conference Call Group (TCC)Dietary Restraint: Change From BaselineThirty six months0.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.8
Telephone Conference Call Group (TCC)Dietary Restraint: Change From BaselineSix months0.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.7
Telephone Conference Call Group (TCC)Dietary Restraint: Change From BaselineTwelve months0.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.7
Telephone Conference Call Group (TCC)Dietary Restraint: Change From BaselineTwenty-four months0.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.6
Secondary

Diet Self-efficacy: Change From Baseline

Diet Self-Efficacy Scale is scored 1-5 with higher scores denoting greater self confidence in managing diet and positive values denoting improved self-confidence in managing diet. Hickey ML, Owen SV, Froman RD. Instrument development: cardiac diet and exercise self-efficacy. Nursing research. 1992;41(6):347-351

Time frame: 6, 12, 24, and 36 months.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Medical Nutrition Therapy (MNT)Diet Self-efficacy: Change From BaselineSix months-0.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.7
Medical Nutrition Therapy (MNT)Diet Self-efficacy: Change From BaselineTwelve months-0.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.8
Medical Nutrition Therapy (MNT)Diet Self-efficacy: Change From BaselineTwenty-four months-0.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.8
Medical Nutrition Therapy (MNT)Diet Self-efficacy: Change From BaselineThirty-six months-0.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.9
In Person Group (IP)Diet Self-efficacy: Change From BaselineThirty-six months-0.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.9
In Person Group (IP)Diet Self-efficacy: Change From BaselineSix months0.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.7
In Person Group (IP)Diet Self-efficacy: Change From BaselineTwenty-four months0.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.7
In Person Group (IP)Diet Self-efficacy: Change From BaselineTwelve months0.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.8
Telephone Conference Call Group (TCC)Diet Self-efficacy: Change From BaselineThirty-six months-0.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.8
Telephone Conference Call Group (TCC)Diet Self-efficacy: Change From BaselineTwelve months-0.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.8
Telephone Conference Call Group (TCC)Diet Self-efficacy: Change From BaselineTwenty-four months-0.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.8
Telephone Conference Call Group (TCC)Diet Self-efficacy: Change From BaselineSix months0.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.6
Secondary

Fat-related Diet Behavior: Change From Baseline.

Fat-related diet behavior was scored on a scale of 1 to 5, in which lower scores indicate lower fat dietary habits. Negative values indicate a shift to lower-fat diet behavior. Kristal AR, Shattuck AL, Henry HJ. Patterns of dietary behavior associated with selecting diets low in fat: reliability and validity of a behavioral approach to dietary assessment. J Am Diet Assoc. 1990;90(2):214-220. Glasgow RE, Perry JD, Toobert DJ, Hollis JF. Brief assessments of dietary behavior in field settings. Addictive behaviors. 1996;21(2):239-247

Time frame: Baseline, 6, 12, 24, and 36 months.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Medical Nutrition Therapy (MNT)Fat-related Diet Behavior: Change From Baseline.Six months-0.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.4
Medical Nutrition Therapy (MNT)Fat-related Diet Behavior: Change From Baseline.Twelve months-0.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.4
Medical Nutrition Therapy (MNT)Fat-related Diet Behavior: Change From Baseline.Twenty-four months-0.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.4
Medical Nutrition Therapy (MNT)Fat-related Diet Behavior: Change From Baseline.Thirty-six months-0.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.5
In Person Group (IP)Fat-related Diet Behavior: Change From Baseline.Thirty-six months-0.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.4
In Person Group (IP)Fat-related Diet Behavior: Change From Baseline.Six months-0.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.5
In Person Group (IP)Fat-related Diet Behavior: Change From Baseline.Twenty-four months-0.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.4
In Person Group (IP)Fat-related Diet Behavior: Change From Baseline.Twelve months-0.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.5
Telephone Conference Call Group (TCC)Fat-related Diet Behavior: Change From Baseline.Thirty-six months-0.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.4
Telephone Conference Call Group (TCC)Fat-related Diet Behavior: Change From Baseline.Twelve months-0.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.5
Telephone Conference Call Group (TCC)Fat-related Diet Behavior: Change From Baseline.Twenty-four months-0.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.5
Telephone Conference Call Group (TCC)Fat-related Diet Behavior: Change From Baseline.Six months-0.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.5
Secondary

Hemoglobin A1c: Change From Baseline

Change in percentage of glycated hemoglobin. Negative values indicate HbA1c reduction (improvement) from baseline.

Time frame: 6, 12, 24 months

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Medical Nutrition Therapy (MNT)Hemoglobin A1c: Change From BaselineTwelve months-0.4 units of HbA1c (%)Standard Deviation 1.2
Medical Nutrition Therapy (MNT)Hemoglobin A1c: Change From BaselineSix months-0.3 units of HbA1c (%)Standard Deviation 1.1
Medical Nutrition Therapy (MNT)Hemoglobin A1c: Change From BaselineTwenty-four months-0.2 units of HbA1c (%)Standard Deviation 1.4
In Person Group (IP)Hemoglobin A1c: Change From BaselineTwelve months-0.4 units of HbA1c (%)Standard Deviation 0.8
In Person Group (IP)Hemoglobin A1c: Change From BaselineSix months-0.6 units of HbA1c (%)Standard Deviation 0.8
In Person Group (IP)Hemoglobin A1c: Change From BaselineTwenty-four months-0.3 units of HbA1c (%)Standard Deviation 1.3
Telephone Conference Call Group (TCC)Hemoglobin A1c: Change From BaselineSix months-0.5 units of HbA1c (%)Standard Deviation 1.2
Telephone Conference Call Group (TCC)Hemoglobin A1c: Change From BaselineTwenty-four months0.1 units of HbA1c (%)Standard Deviation 1.4
Telephone Conference Call Group (TCC)Hemoglobin A1c: Change From BaselineTwelve months-0.2 units of HbA1c (%)Standard Deviation 1.3
Secondary

Systolic Blood Pressure: Change From Baseline

Blood pressure is reported as change in systolic blood pressure only. Negative values indicate improvement.

Time frame: 6, 12, 24, months.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Medical Nutrition Therapy (MNT)Systolic Blood Pressure: Change From BaselineTwelve months1.8 mmHgStandard Deviation 16
Medical Nutrition Therapy (MNT)Systolic Blood Pressure: Change From BaselineSix months0 mmHgStandard Deviation 14.7
Medical Nutrition Therapy (MNT)Systolic Blood Pressure: Change From BaselineTwenty-four months-0.6 mmHgStandard Deviation 16
In Person Group (IP)Systolic Blood Pressure: Change From BaselineTwelve months-1.8 mmHgStandard Deviation 16
In Person Group (IP)Systolic Blood Pressure: Change From BaselineSix months-4.0 mmHgStandard Deviation 15
In Person Group (IP)Systolic Blood Pressure: Change From BaselineTwenty-four months-3.5 mmHgStandard Deviation 15
Telephone Conference Call Group (TCC)Systolic Blood Pressure: Change From BaselineSix months-2.3 mmHgStandard Deviation 14
Telephone Conference Call Group (TCC)Systolic Blood Pressure: Change From BaselineTwenty-four months-3.3 mmHgStandard Deviation 15
Telephone Conference Call Group (TCC)Systolic Blood Pressure: Change From BaselineTwelve months-1.0 mmHgStandard Deviation 15
Secondary

Triglyceride Levels: Change From Baseline

Triglycerides are measured in mg/dl. Negative values indicate improved triglyceride levels compared to baseline.

Time frame: 6, 12, 24 months

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Medical Nutrition Therapy (MNT)Triglyceride Levels: Change From BaselineTwenty-four months-8.6 mg/dlStandard Deviation 71
Medical Nutrition Therapy (MNT)Triglyceride Levels: Change From BaselineSix months12.5 mg/dlStandard Deviation 80
Medical Nutrition Therapy (MNT)Triglyceride Levels: Change From BaselineTwelve months7.9 mg/dlStandard Deviation 76
In Person Group (IP)Triglyceride Levels: Change From BaselineTwelve months-57.4 mg/dlStandard Deviation 259
In Person Group (IP)Triglyceride Levels: Change From BaselineTwenty-four months-31.8 mg/dlStandard Deviation 228
In Person Group (IP)Triglyceride Levels: Change From BaselineSix months-56.0 mg/dlStandard Deviation 253
Telephone Conference Call Group (TCC)Triglyceride Levels: Change From BaselineSix months-21.3 mg/dlStandard Deviation 81
Telephone Conference Call Group (TCC)Triglyceride Levels: Change From BaselineTwenty-four months-4.1 mg/dlStandard Deviation 86
Telephone Conference Call Group (TCC)Triglyceride Levels: Change From BaselineTwelve months-1.1 mg/dlStandard Deviation 114
Other Pre-specified

Health Economics

Total cost of intervention at 12 months taking into account intervention cost and savings from medication dose reduction. Incremental cost effectiveness and probabilistic sensitivity analyses and further details are reported in: Delahanty LM, Levy DE, Chang Y, Porneala BC, Goldman V, McCarthy J, Bissett L, Rodriguez AR, Chase B, LaRocca R, Wheeler A, Wexler DJ. Effectiveness of Lifestyle Intervention for Type 2 Diabetes in Primary Care: the REAL HEALTH-Diabetes Randomized Clinical Trial. J Gen Intern Med. 2020 Sep;35(9):2637-2646. doi: 10.1007/s11606-019-05629-9. Epub 2020 Jan 21. PMID: 31965526; PMCID: PMC7458982.

Time frame: 12 months

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
Medical Nutrition Therapy (MNT)Health Economics591 US Dollar
In Person Group (IP)Health Economics1390 US Dollar
Telephone Conference Call Group (TCC)Health Economics1814 US Dollar

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 6, 2026