Skip to content

Coordinated Healthcare Interventions for Childhood Asthma Gaps in Outcomes

Coordinated Healthcare Interventions for Childhood Asthma Gaps in Outcomes (CHICAGO Plan)

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02319967
Acronym
CHICAGO
Enrollment
373
Registered
2014-12-19
Start date
2015-03-31
Completion date
2017-03-31
Last updated
2019-06-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Asthma

Keywords

community health worker, emergency, asthma

Brief summary

Chicago is an epicenter for asthma health disparities in the U.S., with African-American children 5-11 yrs bearing a disproportionate share of the burden. Among the most visible of these disparities is the high rate of visits to the Emergency Department (ED) for uncontrolled asthma. Clinical uncertainties regarding the real-world effectiveness of guideline recommendations for ED discharge and strategies to reduce environmental triggers at home contribute to practice variation and poor adherence to guidelines. The CHICAGO Plan tests both ED- and home-level interventions to improve clinically meaningful outcomes in a minority pediatric ED population with uncontrolled asthma.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALCAPE

Decision support and communication tool to promote guideline-recommended care by providers and use of such care by children/caregivers

BEHAVIORALCHW home visits

Home visits by community health workers (CHW) to assist children and their caregivers to implement the CAPE and other guideline-recommended competencies.

Sponsors

Sinai Health System
CollaboratorOTHER
Cook County Health & Hospitals System
CollaboratorOTHER
Rush University Medical Center
CollaboratorOTHER
Ann & Robert H Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago
CollaboratorOTHER
University of Chicago
CollaboratorOTHER
Chicago Department of Public Health
CollaboratorOTHER_GOV
Respiratory Health Association
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Chicago Asthma Consortium
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Illinois Institute of Technology
CollaboratorOTHER
Illinois Emergency Department Asthma Surveillance Project
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute
CollaboratorOTHER
University of Illinois at Chicago
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
5 Years to 11 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

(all of the following): 1. Child is 5-11 years of age (a population in whom a diagnosis of asthma is generally reliable, and in whom exacerbations are common); 2. Child is presenting to the ED, urgent care center, or observation unit at a participating clinical center (Anne and Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago, Sinai Health System's Mount Sinai Hospital, John H. Stroger Jr. Hospital of Cook County Health & Hospitals System, Rush University Medical Center, University of Chicago Medicine Comer Children's Hospital, and the University of Illinois Hospital & Health Sciences System); 3. Child is treated with at least 1 dose of an inhaled or nebulized short-acting bronchodilator (quick-relief medication); 4. Child received systemic corticosteroids in the ED OR the caregiver reported at least 1 additional acute care visit for asthma in the previous 6 months (defined as an asthma-related ED visit or urgent care visit, or course of systemic corticosteroids); 5. Child and caregiver approached at least 1 hour after receipt of the first dose of quick-relief medication or systemic corticosteroids, whichever occurred first; 6. Diagnosis of asthma exacerbation by treating clinician; 7. Treating ED clinician indicates the child is likely to be discharged to home; and 8. Caregiver reports that English or Spanish is the preferred language at home.

Exclusion criteria

(none of the following): 1. Caregiver declines to provide informed consent, or the child declines to provide assent; 2. Child is admitted to an intensive care unit or transferred to another healthcare facility; 3. Child or another member of the child's primary household is a current or previous participant in the CHICAGO Plan; 4. Child is enrolled in another study involving a health-related intervention; 5. A CHW is already visiting the home as part of another program; 6. Child does not reside in Chicago.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
PROMIS Asthma Impact Scale (v1.0, SF8a)Baseline and 6 months after index ED dischargeRaw scores (0-32) were converted to T-scores to measure change from index visit to 6-month primary endpoint. Low scores indicate better asthma; high scores indicate worse asthma. PROMIS Asthma Impact Scale, Pediatric: Min possible T-score: 31.5; Max possible T-score: 76.2 Possible range for change in T-score is \[-44.7 to 44.7\] PROMIS Asthma Impact Scale, Parent proxy: Min possible T-score: 32; Max possible T-score: 80 Possible range for change in T-score is \[-48 to 48\] The reported value represents a change in T-score from baseline to 6 months after index ED discharge. A negative change in score indicates improvement in asthma. A positive change in score indicates worsening of asthma. A score of 0 indicates no change.
PROMIS Satisfaction With Participation in Social Roles (v1.0, SF4a)Baseline and 6 months after index ED dischargeRaw scores (4-20) were converted to T-scores to measure change from index visit to 6-month primary endpoint. Low scores indicate less satisfaction among caregivers; high scores indicate more satisfaction among caregivers. PROMIS Satisfaction With Participation in Social Roles: Min possible T-score: 29.0; Max possible T-score: 64.1 Possible range for change in T-score is \[-35.1 to 35.1\] The reported value represents a change in T-score from baseline to 6 months after index ED discharge. A negative change in score indicates less satisfaction among caregivers. A positive change in score indicates a more satisfaction among caregivers. A score of 0 indicates no change.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
PROMIS Depression (v1.0, SF4a)Baseline and 6 months after index ED dischargeRaw scores (4-20) were converted to T-scores to measure change from index visit to 6-month primary endpoint. Low scores indicate less depression; high scores indicate more depression. PROMIS Depression: Min possible T-score: 41.0; Max possible T-score: 79.4 Possible range for change in T-score is \[-38.4 to 38.4\] The reported value represents a change in T-score from baseline to 6 months after index ED discharge. A negative change in score indicates improvement in depression. A positive change in score indicates worsening of depression. A score of 0 indicates no change.
PROMIS Fatigue (v1.0, SF4a)Baseline and 6 months after index ED dischargeRaw scores (4-20) were converted to T-scores to measure change from index visit to 6-month primary endpoint. Low scores indicate less fatigue; high scores indicate more fatigue. PROMIS Fatigue: Min possible T-score: 33.7; Max possible T-score: 75.8 Possible range for change in T-score is \[-42.1 to 42.1\] The reported value represents a change in T-score from baseline to 6 months after index ED discharge. A negative change in score indicates improvement in fatigue (i.e., less fatigue). A positive change in score indicates worsening of fatigue (i.e., more fatigue). A score of 0 indicates no change.
PROMIS Sleep Disturbance (v1.0, SF4a)Baseline and 6 months after index ED dischargeRaw scores (4-20) were converted to T-scores to measure change from index visit to 6-month primary endpoint. Low scores indicate less sleep disturbance; high scores indicate more sleep disturbance. PROMIS Sleep Disturbance (v1.0, SF4a): Min possible T-score: 32.0; Max possible T-score: 73.3 Possible range for change in T-score is \[-41.3 to 41.3\] The reported value represents a change in T-score from baseline to 6 months after index ED discharge. A negative change in score indicates improvement in sleep disturbance (i.e., less sleep disturbance). A positive change in score indicates worsening of sleep disturbance (i.e., more sleep disturbance). A score of 0 indicates no change.
Pediatric Asthma Caregiver's Quality of Life Questionnaire (PACQLQ)Baseline and 6 months after index ED dischargeThe overall score is the mean score across all 13 items. Each item is scored on a 7-point Likert scale with 1 indicating severe impairment and 7 indicating no impairment. Higher scores indicate better quality of life; lower scores indicate worse quality of life. Pediatric Asthma Caregiver's Quality of Life Questionnaire (PACQLQ): Min possible score: 1; Max possible score: 7 Possible range for change in score is \[-6 to 6\] The reported value represents a change in overall score from baseline to 6 months after index ED discharge. A negative change in score indicates worsening quality of life. A positive change in score indicates improvement in quality of life. A score of 0 indicates no change.
Number of Participants With All-cause Emergency Department (ED) or Urgent Care Visits6 months post index ED dischargeCount of participants (children) with at least one all-cause ED or urgent care visit at 6 months
Number of Participants With All-cause Hospitalizations6 months post index ED dischargeCount of participants (children) with at least one all-cause hospitalization at 6 months
Childhood Asthma Control Test (cACT)Baseline and 6 months after index ED dischargeThe scores of each item were summed for a total score (0-27) to measure change from index to 6-month primary endpoint. Low scores indicate worse asthma; high scores indicate better asthma. Childhood Asthma Control Test (cACT): Min possible score: 0; Max possible score: 27 Possible range for change in score is \[-27 to 27\] The reported value represents a change in score from baseline to 6 months after index ED discharge. A negative change in score indicates improvement in asthma. A positive change in score indicates worsening of asthma. A score of 0 indicates no change.
Self-management Practices After ED Discharge: Number of Participants Who Filled Prescriptions for Inhaled Corticosteroids or Other Controller7 days post index ED dischargeCount of participants who filled prescription for inhaled corticosteroids or other controller within 7 days of discharge
Self-management Practices After ED Discharge: Number of Participants Who Attended an Outpatient Appointment With Patient-identified Asthma Provider4 weeks post index ED dischargeCount of participants who attended follow-up appointment with patient-identifier asthma provider within 4 weeks of discharge
Indicator of Guideline-consistent Care Provided on ED Discharge: Number of Participants Who Received Instructions to Use Systemic CorticosteroidsAt index ED dischargeCount of participants who were provided documented discharge instructions to use systemic corticosteroids
Indicator of Guideline-consistent Care Provided on ED Discharge: Number of Participants Who Received Instructions to Use Inhaled Corticosteroids or Other ControllerAt index ED dischargeCount of participants who were provided documented discharge instructions to use inhaled corticosteroids or other controller
Indicator of Guideline-consistent Care Provided on ED Discharge: Number of Participants Who Received Instructions to Use Inhaled Rescue MedicationAt index ED dischargeCount of participants who were provided documented discharge instructions to use an inhaled rescue medication
Indicator of Guideline-consistent Care Provided on ED Discharge: Number of Participants Who Received a Follow-up Appointment Scheduled by ED StaffAt index ED dischargeCount of participants who were provided documented discharge instructions for a follow-up appointment scheduled within 4 weeks of discharge
Self-management Practices After ED Discharge: Number of Participants Who Filled Prescriptions for Systemic Corticosteroids7 days post index ED dischargeCount of participants who filled a prescription for systemic corticosteroids within 7 days of discharge
PROMIS Anxiety (v1.0, SF4a)Baseline and 6 months after index ED dischargeRaw scores (4-20) were converted to T-scores to measure change from index visit to 6-month primary endpoint. Low scores indicate less anxiety; high scores indicate more anxiety. PROMIS Anxiety: Min possible T-score: 40.3; Max possible T-score: 81.6 Possible range for change in T-score is \[-41.3 to 41.3\] The reported value represents a change in T-score from baseline to 6 months after index ED discharge. A negative change in score indicates improvement in anxiety. A positive change in score indicates worsening of anxiety. A score of 0 indicates no change.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Enhanced Usual Care
Inhaler technique education and distribution of spacers to all participants.
126
ED-only
Inhaler technique education and distribution of spacers to all participants. Structured patient-centered ED discharge template (CAPE) to be completed by ED coordinator. CAPE: Structured patient-centered ED discharge template completed prior to ED discharge.
126
ED-plus-home
Inhaler technique education and distribution of spacers to all participants. Structured patient-centered ED discharge template (CAPE) to be completed by ED coordinator. Community-health worker-led home visits. CAPE: Structured patient-centered ED discharge template completed prior to ED discharge. Home: Home visits led by community-health workers to reinforce CAPE and guide environmental remediation.
121
Total373

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicEnhanced Usual CareED-onlyED-plus-homeTotal
Age, Continuous7.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.9
7.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2
7.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.9
7.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.9
Age, Customized
Age, Categorial
5-7 years
72 Participants75 Participants70 Participants217 Participants
Age, Customized
Age, Categorial
8-11 years
54 Participants51 Participants51 Participants156 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
38 Participants37 Participants41 Participants116 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
87 Participants87 Participants80 Participants254 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
1 Participants2 Participants0 Participants3 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
3 Participants0 Participants0 Participants3 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
81 Participants81 Participants77 Participants239 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
2 Participants7 Participants5 Participants14 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
39 Participants38 Participants38 Participants115 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
47 Participants35 Participants42 Participants124 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
79 Participants91 Participants79 Participants249 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 1260 / 1260 / 121
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 1260 / 1260 / 121
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 1260 / 1260 / 121

Outcome results

Primary

PROMIS Asthma Impact Scale (v1.0, SF8a)

Raw scores (0-32) were converted to T-scores to measure change from index visit to 6-month primary endpoint. Low scores indicate better asthma; high scores indicate worse asthma. PROMIS Asthma Impact Scale, Pediatric: Min possible T-score: 31.5; Max possible T-score: 76.2 Possible range for change in T-score is \[-44.7 to 44.7\] PROMIS Asthma Impact Scale, Parent proxy: Min possible T-score: 32; Max possible T-score: 80 Possible range for change in T-score is \[-48 to 48\] The reported value represents a change in T-score from baseline to 6 months after index ED discharge. A negative change in score indicates improvement in asthma. A positive change in score indicates worsening of asthma. A score of 0 indicates no change.

Time frame: Baseline and 6 months after index ED discharge

Population: The number of participants analyzed refers to the number of participants with evaluable data at baseline and 6 months after index ED discharge. The number of participants included in the analysis may not match the total number of participants enrolled as we were unable to obtain outcome data from some participants.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Enhanced Usual CarePROMIS Asthma Impact Scale (v1.0, SF8a)-7.8 T-score
ED-onlyPROMIS Asthma Impact Scale (v1.0, SF8a)-9.3 T-score
ED-plus-homePROMIS Asthma Impact Scale (v1.0, SF8a)-11.9 T-score
Primary

PROMIS Satisfaction With Participation in Social Roles (v1.0, SF4a)

Raw scores (4-20) were converted to T-scores to measure change from index visit to 6-month primary endpoint. Low scores indicate less satisfaction among caregivers; high scores indicate more satisfaction among caregivers. PROMIS Satisfaction With Participation in Social Roles: Min possible T-score: 29.0; Max possible T-score: 64.1 Possible range for change in T-score is \[-35.1 to 35.1\] The reported value represents a change in T-score from baseline to 6 months after index ED discharge. A negative change in score indicates less satisfaction among caregivers. A positive change in score indicates a more satisfaction among caregivers. A score of 0 indicates no change.

Time frame: Baseline and 6 months after index ED discharge

Population: The number of participants analyzed refers to the number of participants with evaluable data at baseline and 6 months after index ED discharge. The number of participants included in the analysis may not match the total number of participants enrolled as we were unable to obtain outcome data from some participants.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Enhanced Usual CarePROMIS Satisfaction With Participation in Social Roles (v1.0, SF4a)0.0 T-score
ED-onlyPROMIS Satisfaction With Participation in Social Roles (v1.0, SF4a)0.0 T-score
ED-plus-homePROMIS Satisfaction With Participation in Social Roles (v1.0, SF4a)0.0 T-score
Secondary

Childhood Asthma Control Test (cACT)

The scores of each item were summed for a total score (0-27) to measure change from index to 6-month primary endpoint. Low scores indicate worse asthma; high scores indicate better asthma. Childhood Asthma Control Test (cACT): Min possible score: 0; Max possible score: 27 Possible range for change in score is \[-27 to 27\] The reported value represents a change in score from baseline to 6 months after index ED discharge. A negative change in score indicates improvement in asthma. A positive change in score indicates worsening of asthma. A score of 0 indicates no change.

Time frame: Baseline and 6 months after index ED discharge

Population: The number of participants analyzed refers to the number of participants with evaluable data at baseline and 6 months after index ED discharge. The number of participants included in the analysis may not match the total number of participants enrolled as we were unable to obtain outcome data from some participants.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Enhanced Usual CareChildhood Asthma Control Test (cACT)3.0 score
ED-onlyChildhood Asthma Control Test (cACT)4.0 score
ED-plus-homeChildhood Asthma Control Test (cACT)5.5 score
Secondary

Indicator of Guideline-consistent Care Provided on ED Discharge: Number of Participants Who Received a Follow-up Appointment Scheduled by ED Staff

Count of participants who were provided documented discharge instructions for a follow-up appointment scheduled within 4 weeks of discharge

Time frame: At index ED discharge

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Enhanced Usual CareIndicator of Guideline-consistent Care Provided on ED Discharge: Number of Participants Who Received a Follow-up Appointment Scheduled by ED Staff10 Participants
ED-onlyIndicator of Guideline-consistent Care Provided on ED Discharge: Number of Participants Who Received a Follow-up Appointment Scheduled by ED Staff62 Participants
ED-plus-homeIndicator of Guideline-consistent Care Provided on ED Discharge: Number of Participants Who Received a Follow-up Appointment Scheduled by ED Staff56 Participants
Secondary

Indicator of Guideline-consistent Care Provided on ED Discharge: Number of Participants Who Received Instructions to Use Inhaled Corticosteroids or Other Controller

Count of participants who were provided documented discharge instructions to use inhaled corticosteroids or other controller

Time frame: At index ED discharge

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Enhanced Usual CareIndicator of Guideline-consistent Care Provided on ED Discharge: Number of Participants Who Received Instructions to Use Inhaled Corticosteroids or Other Controller52 Participants
ED-onlyIndicator of Guideline-consistent Care Provided on ED Discharge: Number of Participants Who Received Instructions to Use Inhaled Corticosteroids or Other Controller80 Participants
ED-plus-homeIndicator of Guideline-consistent Care Provided on ED Discharge: Number of Participants Who Received Instructions to Use Inhaled Corticosteroids or Other Controller87 Participants
Secondary

Indicator of Guideline-consistent Care Provided on ED Discharge: Number of Participants Who Received Instructions to Use Inhaled Rescue Medication

Count of participants who were provided documented discharge instructions to use an inhaled rescue medication

Time frame: At index ED discharge

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Enhanced Usual CareIndicator of Guideline-consistent Care Provided on ED Discharge: Number of Participants Who Received Instructions to Use Inhaled Rescue Medication107 Participants
ED-onlyIndicator of Guideline-consistent Care Provided on ED Discharge: Number of Participants Who Received Instructions to Use Inhaled Rescue Medication125 Participants
ED-plus-homeIndicator of Guideline-consistent Care Provided on ED Discharge: Number of Participants Who Received Instructions to Use Inhaled Rescue Medication118 Participants
Secondary

Indicator of Guideline-consistent Care Provided on ED Discharge: Number of Participants Who Received Instructions to Use Systemic Corticosteroids

Count of participants who were provided documented discharge instructions to use systemic corticosteroids

Time frame: At index ED discharge

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Enhanced Usual CareIndicator of Guideline-consistent Care Provided on ED Discharge: Number of Participants Who Received Instructions to Use Systemic Corticosteroids77 Participants
ED-onlyIndicator of Guideline-consistent Care Provided on ED Discharge: Number of Participants Who Received Instructions to Use Systemic Corticosteroids125 Participants
ED-plus-homeIndicator of Guideline-consistent Care Provided on ED Discharge: Number of Participants Who Received Instructions to Use Systemic Corticosteroids118 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With All-cause Emergency Department (ED) or Urgent Care Visits

Count of participants (children) with at least one all-cause ED or urgent care visit at 6 months

Time frame: 6 months post index ED discharge

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Enhanced Usual CareNumber of Participants With All-cause Emergency Department (ED) or Urgent Care Visits54 Participants
ED-onlyNumber of Participants With All-cause Emergency Department (ED) or Urgent Care Visits53 Participants
ED-plus-homeNumber of Participants With All-cause Emergency Department (ED) or Urgent Care Visits44 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With All-cause Hospitalizations

Count of participants (children) with at least one all-cause hospitalization at 6 months

Time frame: 6 months post index ED discharge

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Enhanced Usual CareNumber of Participants With All-cause Hospitalizations12 Participants
ED-onlyNumber of Participants With All-cause Hospitalizations11 Participants
ED-plus-homeNumber of Participants With All-cause Hospitalizations9 Participants
Secondary

Pediatric Asthma Caregiver's Quality of Life Questionnaire (PACQLQ)

The overall score is the mean score across all 13 items. Each item is scored on a 7-point Likert scale with 1 indicating severe impairment and 7 indicating no impairment. Higher scores indicate better quality of life; lower scores indicate worse quality of life. Pediatric Asthma Caregiver's Quality of Life Questionnaire (PACQLQ): Min possible score: 1; Max possible score: 7 Possible range for change in score is \[-6 to 6\] The reported value represents a change in overall score from baseline to 6 months after index ED discharge. A negative change in score indicates worsening quality of life. A positive change in score indicates improvement in quality of life. A score of 0 indicates no change.

Time frame: Baseline and 6 months after index ED discharge

Population: The number of participants analyzed refers to the number of participants with evaluable data at baseline and 6 months after index ED discharge. The number of participants included in the analysis may not match the total number of participants enrolled as we were unable to obtain outcome data from some participants.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Enhanced Usual CarePediatric Asthma Caregiver's Quality of Life Questionnaire (PACQLQ)0.8 score
ED-onlyPediatric Asthma Caregiver's Quality of Life Questionnaire (PACQLQ)1.1 score
ED-plus-homePediatric Asthma Caregiver's Quality of Life Questionnaire (PACQLQ)1.2 score
Secondary

PROMIS Anxiety (v1.0, SF4a)

Raw scores (4-20) were converted to T-scores to measure change from index visit to 6-month primary endpoint. Low scores indicate less anxiety; high scores indicate more anxiety. PROMIS Anxiety: Min possible T-score: 40.3; Max possible T-score: 81.6 Possible range for change in T-score is \[-41.3 to 41.3\] The reported value represents a change in T-score from baseline to 6 months after index ED discharge. A negative change in score indicates improvement in anxiety. A positive change in score indicates worsening of anxiety. A score of 0 indicates no change.

Time frame: Baseline and 6 months after index ED discharge

Population: The number of participants analyzed refers to the number of participants with evaluable data at baseline and 6 months after index ED discharge. The number of participants included in the analysis may not match the total number of participants enrolled as we were unable to obtain outcome data from some participants.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Enhanced Usual CarePROMIS Anxiety (v1.0, SF4a)-3.2 T-score
ED-onlyPROMIS Anxiety (v1.0, SF4a)-3.8 T-score
ED-plus-homePROMIS Anxiety (v1.0, SF4a)-2.5 T-score
Secondary

PROMIS Depression (v1.0, SF4a)

Raw scores (4-20) were converted to T-scores to measure change from index visit to 6-month primary endpoint. Low scores indicate less depression; high scores indicate more depression. PROMIS Depression: Min possible T-score: 41.0; Max possible T-score: 79.4 Possible range for change in T-score is \[-38.4 to 38.4\] The reported value represents a change in T-score from baseline to 6 months after index ED discharge. A negative change in score indicates improvement in depression. A positive change in score indicates worsening of depression. A score of 0 indicates no change.

Time frame: Baseline and 6 months after index ED discharge

Population: The number of participants analyzed refers to the number of participants with evaluable data at baseline and 6 months after index ED discharge. The number of participants included in the analysis may not match the total number of participants enrolled as we were unable to obtain outcome data from some participants.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Enhanced Usual CarePROMIS Depression (v1.0, SF4a)0.0 T-score
ED-onlyPROMIS Depression (v1.0, SF4a)0.0 T-score
ED-plus-homePROMIS Depression (v1.0, SF4a)0.0 T-score
Secondary

PROMIS Fatigue (v1.0, SF4a)

Raw scores (4-20) were converted to T-scores to measure change from index visit to 6-month primary endpoint. Low scores indicate less fatigue; high scores indicate more fatigue. PROMIS Fatigue: Min possible T-score: 33.7; Max possible T-score: 75.8 Possible range for change in T-score is \[-42.1 to 42.1\] The reported value represents a change in T-score from baseline to 6 months after index ED discharge. A negative change in score indicates improvement in fatigue (i.e., less fatigue). A positive change in score indicates worsening of fatigue (i.e., more fatigue). A score of 0 indicates no change.

Time frame: Baseline and 6 months after index ED discharge

Population: The number of participants analyzed refers to the number of participants with evaluable data at baseline and 6 months after index ED discharge. The number of participants included in the analysis may not match the total number of participants enrolled as we were unable to obtain outcome data from some participants.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Enhanced Usual CarePROMIS Fatigue (v1.0, SF4a)0.0 T-score
ED-onlyPROMIS Fatigue (v1.0, SF4a)0.0 T-score
ED-plus-homePROMIS Fatigue (v1.0, SF4a)-2.6 T-score
Secondary

PROMIS Sleep Disturbance (v1.0, SF4a)

Raw scores (4-20) were converted to T-scores to measure change from index visit to 6-month primary endpoint. Low scores indicate less sleep disturbance; high scores indicate more sleep disturbance. PROMIS Sleep Disturbance (v1.0, SF4a): Min possible T-score: 32.0; Max possible T-score: 73.3 Possible range for change in T-score is \[-41.3 to 41.3\] The reported value represents a change in T-score from baseline to 6 months after index ED discharge. A negative change in score indicates improvement in sleep disturbance (i.e., less sleep disturbance). A positive change in score indicates worsening of sleep disturbance (i.e., more sleep disturbance). A score of 0 indicates no change.

Time frame: Baseline and 6 months after index ED discharge

Population: The number of participants analyzed refers to the number of participants with evaluable data at baseline and 6 months after index ED discharge. The number of participants included in the analysis may not match the total number of participants enrolled as we were unable to obtain outcome data from some participants.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Enhanced Usual CarePROMIS Sleep Disturbance (v1.0, SF4a)0.0 T-score
ED-onlyPROMIS Sleep Disturbance (v1.0, SF4a)0.0 T-score
ED-plus-homePROMIS Sleep Disturbance (v1.0, SF4a)-1.9 T-score
Secondary

Self-management Practices After ED Discharge: Number of Participants Who Attended an Outpatient Appointment With Patient-identified Asthma Provider

Count of participants who attended follow-up appointment with patient-identifier asthma provider within 4 weeks of discharge

Time frame: 4 weeks post index ED discharge

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Enhanced Usual CareSelf-management Practices After ED Discharge: Number of Participants Who Attended an Outpatient Appointment With Patient-identified Asthma Provider37 Participants
ED-onlySelf-management Practices After ED Discharge: Number of Participants Who Attended an Outpatient Appointment With Patient-identified Asthma Provider48 Participants
ED-plus-homeSelf-management Practices After ED Discharge: Number of Participants Who Attended an Outpatient Appointment With Patient-identified Asthma Provider57 Participants
Secondary

Self-management Practices After ED Discharge: Number of Participants Who Filled Prescriptions for Inhaled Corticosteroids or Other Controller

Count of participants who filled prescription for inhaled corticosteroids or other controller within 7 days of discharge

Time frame: 7 days post index ED discharge

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Enhanced Usual CareSelf-management Practices After ED Discharge: Number of Participants Who Filled Prescriptions for Inhaled Corticosteroids or Other Controller42 Participants
ED-onlySelf-management Practices After ED Discharge: Number of Participants Who Filled Prescriptions for Inhaled Corticosteroids or Other Controller49 Participants
ED-plus-homeSelf-management Practices After ED Discharge: Number of Participants Who Filled Prescriptions for Inhaled Corticosteroids or Other Controller69 Participants
Secondary

Self-management Practices After ED Discharge: Number of Participants Who Filled Prescriptions for Systemic Corticosteroids

Count of participants who filled a prescription for systemic corticosteroids within 7 days of discharge

Time frame: 7 days post index ED discharge

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Enhanced Usual CareSelf-management Practices After ED Discharge: Number of Participants Who Filled Prescriptions for Systemic Corticosteroids82 Participants
ED-onlySelf-management Practices After ED Discharge: Number of Participants Who Filled Prescriptions for Systemic Corticosteroids89 Participants
ED-plus-homeSelf-management Practices After ED Discharge: Number of Participants Who Filled Prescriptions for Systemic Corticosteroids79 Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026