Skip to content

What is the Optimal Stiffness and Height of a Running-specific Prosthesis?

What is the Optimal Stiffness and Height of a Running-specific Prosthesis?

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02318979
Enrollment
30
Registered
2014-12-17
Start date
2013-10-31
Completion date
2018-01-31
Last updated
2019-07-30

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Amputation, Traumatic, Traumatic Amputation of Lower Extremity, Wounds and Injuries

Brief summary

The proposed study aims to characterize the effects of running-specific leg prosthetic stiffness and height during on performance during running and sprinting to optimize running-specific prosthesis prescription. The investigators will collect biomechanical and metabolic data from participants with unilateral and bilateral below the knee amputations while they run at different speeds on a treadmill. This data will be used to understand the effects of running prostheses. Then, these parameters will be used to develop prosthetic prescription techniques for people with below the knee amputations.

Interventions

DEVICEOtto Bock prosthesis

Participants will run using the Otto Bock prosthesis at a recommended stiffness and height, one category stiffer than recommended at the recommended height, one category softter than recommended at the recommended height, at the optimal stiffness and 2 cm taller, and at the optimal stiffness and 2 cm shorter.

DEVICEOssur prosthesis

Participants will run using the Ossur prosthesis at a recommended stiffness and height, one category stiffer than recommended at the recommended height, one category softter than recommended at the recommended height, at the optimal stiffness and 2 cm taller, and at the optimal stiffness and 2 cm shorter.

DEVICEFreedom Innovations prosthesis

Participants will run using the Freedom Innovations prosthesis at a recommended stiffness and height, one category stiffer than recommended at the recommended height, one category softter than recommended at the recommended height, at the optimal stiffness and 2 cm taller, and at the optimal stiffness and 2 cm shorter.

Sponsors

United States Department of Defense
CollaboratorFED
VA Eastern Colorado Health Care System
Lead SponsorFED

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
BASIC_SCIENCE
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

10 athletes with a unilateral and 5 athletes with bilateral transtibial amputations used 15 different running-specific prosthetic configurations while they ran at one speed and we measured metabolic rates and biomechanics. 10 athletes with a unilateral and 5 athletes with bilateral transtibial amputations used 15 different running-specific prosthetic configurations while they ran at multiple speeds and we measured top speeds and biomechanics.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 55 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* bilateral or unilateral transtibial amputation * at least one year of running experience using running-specific prostheses * 18-55 years old * no current problems with their prosthesis or residual limb * at a K4 Medicare Functional Classification Level

Exclusion criteria

* Cardiovascular, pulmonary, or neurological disease or disorder

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Biomechanics4-10 daysThe investigators will measure stance average vertical ground reaction forces during running and sprinting.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Metabolic Demand4 daysThe investigators will measure rates of oxygen consumption and carbon dioxide production during running to determine the optimal prosthesis for each participant.
Top Speed4-10 daysThe investigators will measure the top sprinting speed to determine the optimal prosthesis for each participant.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Running
Participants will run on an instrumented treadmill at one speed using different prostheses. Participants will run using the Otto Bock, Ossur and Freedom Innovations prostheses at a recommended stiffness and height, one category stiffer than recommended at the recommended height, one category softter than recommended at the recommended height, at the optimal stiffness and 2 cm taller, and at the optimal stiffness and 2 cm shorter.
15
Sprinting
Participants will run on an instrumented treadmill at a range of speeds from a jogging speed up to top speed using different prostheses. Participants will run using the Otto Bock, Ossur and Freedom Innovations prostheses at a recommended stiffness and height, one category stiffer than recommended at the recommended height, one category softter than recommended at the recommended height, at the optimal stiffness and 2 cm taller, and at the optimal stiffness and 2 cm shorter.
15
Total30

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicRunningTotalSprinting
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
15 Participants30 Participants15 Participants
Age, Continuous33.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.1
30 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.1
28 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
14 Participants29 Participants15 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Height1.77 m
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.08
1.77 m
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.12
1.77 m
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.12
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
4 Participants9 Participants5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
11 Participants21 Participants10 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
15 Participants30 Participants15 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
3 Participants6 Participants3 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
12 Participants24 Participants12 Participants
Weight76.1 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.1
76.1 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.1
76 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.4

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 150 / 15
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 150 / 15
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 150 / 15

Outcome results

Primary

Biomechanics

The investigators will measure stance average vertical ground reaction forces during running and sprinting.

Time frame: 4-10 days

Population: We hypothesized that prosthetic configurations would affect stance average vertical ground reaction forces.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
RunningBiomechanics0.1386 N/kgStandard Deviation 0.0031
SprintingBiomechanics0.1835 N/kgStandard Deviation 0.0204
Secondary

Metabolic Demand

The investigators will measure rates of oxygen consumption and carbon dioxide production during running to determine the optimal prosthesis for each participant.

Time frame: 4 days

Population: Best metabolic cost for a running-specific prosthetic configuration.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
RunningMetabolic Demand3.82 Net CoT (J/kg/m)Standard Error 1.5
SprintingMetabolic Demand3.38 Net CoT (J/kg/m)Standard Error 1
Secondary

Top Speed

The investigators will measure the top sprinting speed to determine the optimal prosthesis for each participant.

Time frame: 4-10 days

Population: Fastest top speed for a running-specific prosthetic configuration.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
RunningTop Speed8.18 m/sStandard Deviation 1
SprintingTop Speed9.42 m/sStandard Deviation 0.9

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026