Sedation of Cerebrovascular Ventilated Critical Care Patients
Conditions
Keywords
Neurocritical care, Severe Stroke, Ischemic stroke, Intracerebral hemorrhage, Subarachnoid hemorrhage, Sedation, RASS, BIS
Brief summary
Background: Sedation of the intensive care unit (ICU) patient is necessary to relieve the patient from pain, anxiety and agitation and to enable mechanical ventilation, diagnostic investigations and invasive procedures. While sedation policy has shifted from deep sedation to moderate, minimal, or even no sedation in the general ICU, optimal sedation of the cerebrovascular ICU patient is unclear and controversial. Method: MOderate vs DEep Regime in NeuroIntensive care SEdation (MODERNISE) is a prospective, randomized, open, two-center trial. Patients with acute ischemic stroke, intracerebral hemorrhage or subarachnoid hemorrhage who need to be ventilated are eligible for enrollment. It is intended to enroll 50 patients per group (n=100). Patients are randomized within 72h from admission to either moderate sedation as defined by Richmond Agitation Sedation Scale (RASS) \>= -3 or to deep sedation as defined by RASS \< -3 for the next 72h, after which weaning from sedation is aimed for in a stepwise fashion in both groups. If reduction of sedation is not feasible, patients remain at their respective sedation level for another 12 hours, and sedation reduction is then tried again. Patients are multimodally monitored for systemic and cerebral parameters (the latter including bispectral index (BIS) monitoring). The primary endpoint is ICU length of stay (ICU-LOS); secondary endpoints are several pre-defined variables of the ICU course, feasibility of sedation levels without violation of pre-defined safety criteria, pre-defined complications, and short- and long-term functional outcome and mortality. Conclusion: The feasibility, safety and benefits of moderate as opposed to deep sedation even in the acute phase of severe cerebrovascular disease needs to be clarified in a prospective randomized study. Results from this study might change sedation regimes and help prevent unwanted effects of deep sedation in the brain-injured patient.
Detailed description
Executive Summary Rationale While sedation policy has shifted from deep sedation to moderate, minimal, or even no sedation in the general ICU, optimal sedation of the cerebrovascular neuro-ICU (NICU) patient is unclear and controversial. The rationale of this study is to analyze potential benefits, feasibility and safety of moderate as opposed to deep sedation. Aim and hypothesis MODERNISE is a pilot trial aiming to investigate the safety, feasibility and potential benefits of moderate vs. deep sedation in patients with severe ischemic stroke, intracerebral hemorrhage or subarachnoid hemorrhage. The primary objective is to compare moderate sedation and deep sedation with respect to ICU-LOS. Design MODERNISE is a prospective, randomized, controlled, outcome observer-blinded, two-center trial. Patients are randomized to either moderate sedation as defined by RASS) \>= -3 or to deep sedation as defined by RASS \< -3. Study Outcomes The primary endpoint is ICU-LOS. Secondary endpoints are the ventilation-free ICU-LOS, ventilation duration, sedation duration, complications (including episodes of treatment-demanding increases of intracranial pressure (ICP), episodes of hypotension, episodes of cerebral hypoperfusion, pneumonia, sepsis, ileus, episodes of paroxysmal sympathetic hyperactivity (PSH)), time within sedation goal, demand of sedatives, demand of analgesics, demand of vasopressors, scores (RASS, nociception coma scale (NCS), Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS), intensive care delirium screening checklist (ICDSC), confusion assessment method - ICU (CAM-ICU), ICU mortality, in-hospital mortality, modified Rankin Scale (mRS) at 90 days, PTSD at 90 days. Discussion To clarify the benefits of moderate sedation in critical care ventilated stroke patients, a randomized multicentre trial is clearly needed. If this two-center pilot trial shows differences in relevant parameters of the ICU course and gives promising safety and feasibility results, a multi-centre trial may be planned on this basis.
Interventions
OTHERIntensive Care Sedation (depth, level)
As far as sedation is concerned, this will be adapted to all patients before randomization in the first 3 days according to what the diagnosis and acute treatment of the underlying disease demands. This will be deep sedation or even general anesthesia (for operative procedures) in most cases. After 72h at the sedation level of the respective randomization result, both groups will tried to be weaned from sedation with the goal of awakening, weaning from ventilation, overall de-escalation and transfer to rehabilitation as far as the course of the disease and the occurrence of complications allows. This reduction of sedation will follow individual regimes at he discretion of the treating physician. However, if cessation of sedation violates safety-limits (see below, Tab. 2) or is not feasible for other reasons, return to the level the patient was initially randomized for (or even below that) is mandatory with a re-assessment of safety for sedation weaning after 12h aimed for.
DRUGVasopressors to maintain normal blood pressure values, if needed
DRUGOsmotherapeutics to lowr intracranial pressure, if needed
PROCEDUREEndovascular stroke care to treat brain vessel occlusions, if needed
PROCEDUREDecompressive neurosurgery, if needed
Sponsors
Heidelberg University
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
NONE
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
1. age 18 years or older, either sex, 2. one of the following confirmed admission diagnoses: * non-traumatic acute ischemic infarction (AIS) * non-traumatic intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) * non-traumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH), 3. ventilated with expected need of further artificial ventilation for more than 72h, 4. expected ICU-LOS of more than 5 days, 5. informed consent by a legal representative.
Exclusion criteria
1. pregnancy 2. intubation and artificial ventilation for less than 3 days 3. severe adult respiratory distress Syndrome (ARDS) 4. severe sepsis 5. other systemic disorders that demand deep sedation 6. extreme agitation 7. need of pharmacological paralysis 8. epileptic state 9. refractory intracranial hypertension 10. participation in any other interventional trial 11. life expectancy \< 3 weeks, very poor prognosis
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Intensive Care Unit Length of Stay (ICU-LOS) | Admission to Discharge, ca. 3 weeks from onset | • Intensive care unit length of stay (ICU-LOS) \[days from admission until discharge from the intensive care unit\] |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Ventilation-free ICU-LOS | within hospital stay, ca. 3 weeks from onset | \[days from ventilator-independence for 24 h until discharge from the intensive care unit\] |
| Accumulated Duration of Ventilation | within hospital stay, ca. 3 weeks from onset | \[Sum of half-days on the ventilator until the patient is ventilator-independent for 24 h\] |
| Sedation duration | within hospital stay, ca. 3 weeks from onset | \[Sum of half-days on any sedative medication (irrespective of analgesic drugs)\] |
| Opioid Analgesia duration | within hospital stay, ca. 3 weeks from onset | \[Sum of half-days on any opioid medication (irrespective of sedative drugs)\] |
| Time within sedation goal | within hospital stay, ca. 3 weeks from onset | \[Sum of 8h-shifts fulfilling the randomized sedation target during the 72h after randomization or above that target afterwards within the first NICU week\] |
| Accumulated Duration of Ventilator Weaning | within hospital stay, ca. 3 weeks from onset | \[Sum of half-days spent under the application of a ventilator weaning protocol |
| Accumulated Duration of Analgesia and Sedation Dependence | within hospital stay, ca. 3 weeks from onset | \[ Sum of half-days requiring the application of sedatives and analgesics\] |
| Accumulated Duration of Vasopressor Dependence | within hospital stay, ca. 3 weeks from onset | \[Sum of half-days spent under any vasopressors\] |
| In-hospital stay | within hospital stay, ca. 3 weeks from onset | \[days from admission until discharge from hospital\] |
| Average BIS during sedation target period | within hospital stay, ca. 3 weeks from onset | \[Median and interquartile range of 3 x 3 x average BIS measurements per shift during the 72h from randomization\] |
| Average BIS after sedation target period | within hospital stay, ca. 3 weeks from onset | \[Median and interquartile range of 3 x 3 x average BIS measurements per shift from 72h after randomization to discharge\] |
| Occurrence and Duration of Sepsis | within hospital stay, ca. 3 weeks from onset | \[number of episodes and duration of sepsis as defined by international criteria\] |
| Complications [number and type of pre-defined complications ] | within hospital stay, ca. 3 weeks from onset | \[number and type of pre-defined complications \] |
| Functional Outcome [modified Rankin Scale (mRS) | 3 months from insult | \[modified Rankin Scale (mRS) at 3 months from insult\] |
| Mortality | during the ICU-stay or in-hospital stay or within 3 months after admission | \[death of any cause and type of death during the ICU-stay or in-hospital stay or within 3 months after admission\] |
| Cost of Treatment | within hospital stay, ca. 3 weeks from onset | \[total ICU-cost estimated by length of stay and severity-based disease-related Groups\] multiplicator of each individual patient\] \[total ICU-cost estimated by length of stay and severity-based DRG multiplicator of each individual patient\] |
| Average ICP during sedation target period (if available) | within hospital stay, ca. 3 weeks from onset | \[Median and interquartile range of 3 x 3 maximum ICP measurements per shift during the 72h after randomization\] |
Countries
Germany
Contacts
Primary ContactJulian Bösel, MD
Outcome results
None listed