Skip to content

Prospective Observational Study on the Management of Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Follicular Lymphoma (OLYMPE)

OLYMPE - Prospective Cohort Study on the Management of Patients With Relapsed Follicular Lymphoma

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02316613
Enrollment
260
Registered
2014-12-15
Start date
2007-02-28
Completion date
2013-04-30
Last updated
2016-02-25

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Follicular Lymphoma

Brief summary

This French national, multicenter, prospective, longitudinal, observational study will describe the treatment modalities of a cohort of patients with relapsed or refractory follicular non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, with evaluation of the cohort overall and according to the presence or not of MabThera® (rituximab) maintenance therapy. Actively participating physicians will enroll patients and collect therapeutic management data in a real-life setting up to 5 years.

Interventions

DRUGRituximab

Sponsors

Hoffmann-La Roche
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Adult patient (age \>/= 18 years) * Presenting with WHO grade 1-3, CD20-positive follicular non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, histologically confirmed at initial diagnosis * In relapse (or refractory) after at least one line of treatment, regardless of the nature of previous treatments (chemotherapy and/or immunotherapy and/or radioimmunoconjugate therapy and/or radiation+chemotherapy) and for whom a decision was made to give salvage therapy * Having received oral and written information about the study and having raised no objections to electronic capture and processing of his/her personal data

Exclusion criteria

* Patient participating in a clinical trial evaluating a new, non-commercialized cancer treatment at the time of inclusion * Follicular lymphoma presenting with a transformation to diffuse large cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma * First line treatment with radiotherapy alone * Initial abstention from treatment (decision to not treat the progression at the time of inclusion in the OLYMPE study)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants With MabThera Maintenance Therapy and at Least One Observation PhaseMaintenance/observation Phase: 67.8 monthsAfter study induction period (three visits) participants entered into either of two periods: 1. period of maintenance with MabThera followed by observation or 2. period of observation/maintenance without MabThera, followed by maintenance with MabThera.
Percentage of Participants With Modalities of the Therapeutic Decision Before First Study Induction Treatment PhaseBaselineAt study inclusion, the therapeutic management of participants was decided by either pluri-disciplinary consultation meeting, Only the physician in charge of the participant, Discussion between physicians, or Punctual consultation of an external physician. Percentage of participants with each of these modalities of therapeutic decision was reported.
Percentage of Participants With Treatments Prescribed Over the First Study Induction PhaseInduction Phase: 18.7 monthsOver the first treatment induction period, participants received following therapies for the treatment of refractory/relapsed follicular non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: chemotherapy combined with MabThera, chemotherapy alone, MabThera monotherapy, and stem cell transplantation, radio-immunotherapy, or radiation therapy combined with any other treatment. Study induction treatment phase consists total of three visits (one before the first cycle, one halfway through therapy and one after the last cycle to evaluate response). Induction treatment duration ranged between \<3 months to \>6 months. Each participants may received more than one therapy.
Percentage of Participants With Chemotherapies Prescribed Over the First Study Induction PhaseInduction Phase: 18.7 monthsOver the first study induction phase, participants received the following chemotherapy: regimen including fludarabine; regimen including aracytine - platinum salts; cyclophosphamide/hydroxydaunorubicin/oncovin/prednisone (CHOP-like); cyclophosphamide/vincristine/prednisone (CVP); regimen including ifosfamide - etoposide; and other chemotherapy. One participant could receive more than one type of chemotherapy over the first treatment induction period.
Percentage of Participants With MabThera as Maintenance TherapyMaintenance/observation Phase: 67.8 monthsDuring the maintenance period participants received four weekly infusion of MabThera.
Duration of MabThera Maintenance Therapy When Associated With ObservationMaintenance/observation Phase: 67.8 monthsDuration of MabThera maintenance therapy was calculated from the end of induction period to the day before the first disease progression over the study (or to the date of last participant information if no disease progression until the end of the participant follow-up). Disease progression was based on the followings: Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status; presence of B symptoms (fever 38°C in absence of infection for more than 8 days, night sweats, weight loss exceeding 10% in 6 months); evaluation of tumor mass (Groupe d'Etudes des Lymphomes Folliculaires criteria); number of nodal sites; number and location of extranodal sites; Ann-Arbor stage (I to IV); any histological documentation: type of biopsy (nodal, extranodal, bone marrow); histological type (progression of follicular non-Hodgkin's lymphomas or transformation); latest available hemoglobin, neutrophils, normal or leukemic lymphocytes, platelets, lactate dehydrogenase, and total gamma globulins level.
Percentage of Participants With Prescription of Injection ProphylaxisMaintenance/observation Phase: 67.8 monthsParticipants was prescribed with either of the following infection prophylaxis treatment: anti-pneumocystosis agents, antiviral agents, or immunoglobulins.
Percentage of Participants With Injection Prophylaxis TreatmentMaintenance/observation Phase: 67.8 monthsParticipants received anti-pneumocystosis agents, antiviral agents, or immunoglobulins as infection prophylaxis. One participant could receive more than one infection prophylaxis treatment.
Percentage of Participants With Modalities of the Therapeutic Decision at First Study Disease ProgressionUp to 6 yearsThe therapeutic management of participants was decided by either pluri-disciplinary consultation meeting, Only the physician in charge of the participant, Discussion between physicians, or Punctual consultation of an external physician. Percentage of participants with each of these modalities of therapeutic decision was reported.
Number of Participants With Therapeutic Management After the First Study Disease ProgressionUp to 6 yearsAfter the first disease progression the participants received chemotherapy, immunotherapy, radio immunotherapy, stem cell transplantation, or radiation therapy for therapeutic management of the refractory/relapsed follicular non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. One participant could receive more than one type of treatment after the first study disease progression.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
MabThera Regimen: Time Between CyclesUp to Induction phase (18.7 months), Maintenance phase/observation phase (67.8 months)
Percentage of Participants With Discontinuations and Modifications of MabThera During Maintenance PhaseMaintenance phase : 67.8 months
Overall Survival (OS)Up to 6 yearsThe overall survival was defined as the time from the date of first induction treatment administration over the study to the date of participants' death or early study withdrawal. OS was calculated using Kaplan-Meier method.
Number and Type of Hospitalization Associated With MabThera PerfusionUp to 6 yearsNumber and type of hospitalization (a day hospitalization, short-lasting hospitalization, and short-stay hospitalization) was reported.
Function Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-General (FACT-G) With Lymphoma-Specific Additional Concerns Subscale (Lym) Total ScoreUp to 6 years (assessed at start, mid and end of induction [induction: 18.7 months], at each infusion during maintenance [maintenance phase: 67.8 months], and at disease progression [maximum up to 6 years])The FACT-G with Lymphoma-Specific Additional Concerns Subscale (Lym) total score was calculated by adding the score obtained on the FACT-G (physical well-being, scored 0-28; social well-being, scored 0-28; functional well-being, scored 0-28; emotional well-being, scored 0-24), to the score obtained on the LYM subscale (15 items; responses to each item range from 0, Not at all to 4, Very much). Total score ranges from 0 to 168. Higher scores indicated a better participant-reported outcome/quality of life over the past week when responding to the items.
Percentage of Participants With Last Induction Treatment ResponseInduction Phase: 18.7 monthsLast Induction treatment response: the last response assessment over the first study induction treatment (complete response \[CR\]: complete disappearance of all detectable clinical and radiographic evidence of disease and disappearance of all disease-related symptoms if present before therapy; CR unconfirmed: CR along with regression in lymph node mass by more than \[\>\]75% in the sum of the products of greatest diameters \[SPD\]; Partial Response \[PR\]: greater than or equal to \[\>=\] 50% decrease in SPD of 6 largest dominant nodes or nodal masses; Progression was 1 of the following: 1) lymphadenopathy; 2) a \>=50% increase in previously noted or new appearance of hepato/splenomegaly; 3) \>=50% increase in blood lymphocyte count with at least 5000 B lymphocytes/μL; 4) transformation to Richter's syndrome; or 5) occurrence of cytopenia; Stable disease \[SD\]: absence of necessary criteria to achieve CR or PR, but no advancement to progression) was described at the end of first study induction.
Percentage of Participants With Number of Disease ProgressionsUp to 6 yearsParticipants with at least one disease progression after the first study induction period were reported.
Percentage of Participants With Disease Characteristics at First Study Disease ProgressionUp to 6 yearsDisease characteristics included (tumor burden, measured from whole body computed tomography (CT) scan. Groupe d'Etudes des Lymphomes Folliculaires (GELF) criteria defined as parameters to initiate treatment in participants with untreated follicular lymphoma, grade 1,2,or 3A; having just one of the criteria justified treatment: 1. involvement of \>=3 nodal sites, each with diameter of \>=3 centimeter(cm); 2. any nodal/extranodal tumor mass with diameter of \>=7cm; 3. B symptoms (temperature \>=38 degrees celsius or night sweats or weight loss \>10% over past 6 months); 4. splenomegaly; 5. pleural effusion/peritoneal ascites; 6. cytopenia (leukocytes \<1×10\^9 and/or platelets \<100×10\^9/L. One participant could present with more than 1 GELF criterion. Ann Arbor staging was used as staging system for lymphomas (Stage I to IV); stage depended upon the place where malignant tissue was located (through biopsy, CT scan, or positron emission tomography) and on systemic symptoms due to lymphoma).
Progression Free Survival (PFS)Up to 6 yearsThe PFS was defined as the time from the date of first induction treatment over the study (first treatment administration of first cycle) to the date of first disease progression or participants death or date of lymphoma transformation diagnosis.
Time to Next TreatmentUp to 6 yearsTime to next treatment was calculated from the date of the end of first induction treatment administration over the study to the date of the start of next treatment after disease progression.
Number of Participants Who Used MabTheraUp to Induction phase (18.7 months), Maintenance phase/observation phase (67.8 months)
MabThera Regimen: Dose of MabTheraUp to Induction phase (18.7 months), Maintenance phase/observation phase (67.8 months)All participants who received MabThera treatment before the first disease progression were reported.
MabThera Regimen: Infusion DurationUp to Induction phase (18.7 months), Maintenance phase/observation phase (67.8 months)
MabThera Regimen: Number of Cycles of MabTheraUp to Induction phase (18.7 months), Maintenance phase/observation phase (67.8 months)

Countries

France

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

Of 260 participants, 5 were excluded as no data available and duplicate cases (N=255; safety population) and 14 were excluded as other selection criteria not met (N=241; overall population).

Participants by arm

ArmCount
All Participants
Participants with histologically confirmed, refractory/relapsed CD2 0-positive follicular non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (grade IIII), whatever the first-line treatment was (chemotherapy and/or immunotherapy and/or radio-immunoconjugate and/or radiochemotherapy), and eligible for salvage treatment were observed for approximately 6 years.
241
Total241

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall StudyDeath63
Overall StudyDid not met selection criteria14
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up9
Overall StudyLymphoma transformation2
Overall StudyNo data and duplicate cases5
Overall StudyParticipant moved/changed medical team11

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicAll Participants
Age, Continuous61.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.2
Sex: Female, Male
Female
110 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
131 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
134 / 243
serious
Total, serious adverse events
94 / 243

Outcome results

Primary

Duration of MabThera Maintenance Therapy When Associated With Observation

Duration of MabThera maintenance therapy was calculated from the end of induction period to the day before the first disease progression over the study (or to the date of last participant information if no disease progression until the end of the participant follow-up). Disease progression was based on the followings: Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status; presence of B symptoms (fever 38°C in absence of infection for more than 8 days, night sweats, weight loss exceeding 10% in 6 months); evaluation of tumor mass (Groupe d'Etudes des Lymphomes Folliculaires criteria); number of nodal sites; number and location of extranodal sites; Ann-Arbor stage (I to IV); any histological documentation: type of biopsy (nodal, extranodal, bone marrow); histological type (progression of follicular non-Hodgkin's lymphomas or transformation); latest available hemoglobin, neutrophils, normal or leukemic lymphocytes, platelets, lactate dehydrogenase, and total gamma globulins level.

Time frame: Maintenance/observation Phase: 67.8 months

Population: Overall population: All the participants (except duplicate cases and participants without data available) meeting all the inclusion/exclusion criteria were included. Number of participants analyzed = those who received at least one infusion of MabThera and completed maintenance therapy with MabThera when associated with observation period.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
All ParticipantsDuration of MabThera Maintenance Therapy When Associated With Observation24.5 months
Primary

Number of Participants With Therapeutic Management After the First Study Disease Progression

After the first disease progression the participants received chemotherapy, immunotherapy, radio immunotherapy, stem cell transplantation, or radiation therapy for therapeutic management of the refractory/relapsed follicular non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. One participant could receive more than one type of treatment after the first study disease progression.

Time frame: Up to 6 years

Population: Overall population: All the participants (except duplicate cases and participants without data available) meeting all the inclusion/exclusion criteria were included. Number of participants analyzed= participants with at least one disease progression over the study period.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants With Therapeutic Management After the First Study Disease ProgressionChemotherapy24 participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants With Therapeutic Management After the First Study Disease ProgressionRadio immunotherapy0 participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants With Therapeutic Management After the First Study Disease ProgressionMissing2 participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants With Therapeutic Management After the First Study Disease ProgressionStem cell transplantation7 participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants With Therapeutic Management After the First Study Disease ProgressionImmunotherapy24 participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants With Therapeutic Management After the First Study Disease ProgressionRadiation therapy6 participants
MabThera as Maintenance TherapyNumber of Participants With Therapeutic Management After the First Study Disease ProgressionImmunotherapy27 participants
MabThera as Maintenance TherapyNumber of Participants With Therapeutic Management After the First Study Disease ProgressionMissing4 participants
MabThera as Maintenance TherapyNumber of Participants With Therapeutic Management After the First Study Disease ProgressionChemotherapy29 participants
MabThera as Maintenance TherapyNumber of Participants With Therapeutic Management After the First Study Disease ProgressionRadiation therapy5 participants
MabThera as Maintenance TherapyNumber of Participants With Therapeutic Management After the First Study Disease ProgressionRadio immunotherapy4 participants
MabThera as Maintenance TherapyNumber of Participants With Therapeutic Management After the First Study Disease ProgressionStem cell transplantation7 participants
Primary

Percentage of Participants With Chemotherapies Prescribed Over the First Study Induction Phase

Over the first study induction phase, participants received the following chemotherapy: regimen including fludarabine; regimen including aracytine - platinum salts; cyclophosphamide/hydroxydaunorubicin/oncovin/prednisone (CHOP-like); cyclophosphamide/vincristine/prednisone (CVP); regimen including ifosfamide - etoposide; and other chemotherapy. One participant could receive more than one type of chemotherapy over the first treatment induction period.

Time frame: Induction Phase: 18.7 months

Population: Overall population: All the participants (except duplicate cases and participants without data available) meeting all the inclusion/exclusion criteria were included.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
All ParticipantsPercentage of Participants With Chemotherapies Prescribed Over the First Study Induction PhaseRegimen including fludarabine45.9 percentage of participants
All ParticipantsPercentage of Participants With Chemotherapies Prescribed Over the First Study Induction PhaseRegimen including aracytine - platinum salts44.3 percentage of participants
All ParticipantsPercentage of Participants With Chemotherapies Prescribed Over the First Study Induction PhaseCHOP-like32.0 percentage of participants
All ParticipantsPercentage of Participants With Chemotherapies Prescribed Over the First Study Induction PhaseCVP13.1 percentage of participants
All ParticipantsPercentage of Participants With Chemotherapies Prescribed Over the First Study Induction PhaseRegimen including ifosfamide - etoposide10.7 percentage of participants
All ParticipantsPercentage of Participants With Chemotherapies Prescribed Over the First Study Induction PhaseOther chemotherapy23.8 percentage of participants
Primary

Percentage of Participants With Injection Prophylaxis Treatment

Participants received anti-pneumocystosis agents, antiviral agents, or immunoglobulins as infection prophylaxis. One participant could receive more than one infection prophylaxis treatment.

Time frame: Maintenance/observation Phase: 67.8 months

Population: Overall population: All the participants (except duplicate cases and participants without data available) meeting all the inclusion/exclusion criteria were included. Number participants analyzed= all participants having had maintenance/observation period before the first study disease progression and received infection prophylaxis treatment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
All ParticipantsPercentage of Participants With Injection Prophylaxis TreatmentAnti-pneumocystosis agent65.8 percentage of participants
All ParticipantsPercentage of Participants With Injection Prophylaxis TreatmentAntiviral agents83.5 percentage of participants
All ParticipantsPercentage of Participants With Injection Prophylaxis TreatmentImmunoglobulins26.9 percentage of participants
Primary

Percentage of Participants With MabThera as Maintenance Therapy

During the maintenance period participants received four weekly infusion of MabThera.

Time frame: Maintenance/observation Phase: 67.8 months

Population: Overall population: All the participants (except duplicate cases and participants without data available) meeting all the inclusion/exclusion criteria were included. Number of participants analyzed= those who entered in maintenance/observation after the first induction and before the first disease progression over the study.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
All ParticipantsPercentage of Participants With MabThera as Maintenance Therapy63.2 percentage of participants
Primary

Percentage of Participants With MabThera Maintenance Therapy and at Least One Observation Phase

After study induction period (three visits) participants entered into either of two periods: 1. period of maintenance with MabThera followed by observation or 2. period of observation/maintenance without MabThera, followed by maintenance with MabThera.

Time frame: Maintenance/observation Phase: 67.8 months

Population: Overall population: All the participants (except duplicate cases and participants without data available) meeting all the inclusion/exclusion criteria were included. Number of participants analyzed = those who received at least one MabThera infusion over the maintenance therapy period.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
All ParticipantsPercentage of Participants With MabThera Maintenance Therapy and at Least One Observation PhaseMaintenance with MabThera followed by observation70.9 percentage of participants
All ParticipantsPercentage of Participants With MabThera Maintenance Therapy and at Least One Observation PhaseObservation followed by maintenance with MabThera1.6 percentage of participants
All ParticipantsPercentage of Participants With MabThera Maintenance Therapy and at Least One Observation PhaseOnly maintenance therapy27.6 percentage of participants
Primary

Percentage of Participants With Modalities of the Therapeutic Decision at First Study Disease Progression

The therapeutic management of participants was decided by either pluri-disciplinary consultation meeting, Only the physician in charge of the participant, Discussion between physicians, or Punctual consultation of an external physician. Percentage of participants with each of these modalities of therapeutic decision was reported.

Time frame: Up to 6 years

Population: Overall population: All the participants (except duplicate cases and participants without data available) meeting all the inclusion/exclusion criteria were included. Number of participants analyzed= participants with at least one disease progression over the study period.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
All ParticipantsPercentage of Participants With Modalities of the Therapeutic Decision at First Study Disease ProgressionPluri-disciplinary consultation meeting80.0 percentage of participants
All ParticipantsPercentage of Participants With Modalities of the Therapeutic Decision at First Study Disease ProgressionOnly physician in charge of the participant17.1 percentage of participants
All ParticipantsPercentage of Participants With Modalities of the Therapeutic Decision at First Study Disease ProgressionDiscussion between physicians2.9 percentage of participants
All ParticipantsPercentage of Participants With Modalities of the Therapeutic Decision at First Study Disease ProgressionPunctual consultation with an external physician0.0 percentage of participants
MabThera as Maintenance TherapyPercentage of Participants With Modalities of the Therapeutic Decision at First Study Disease ProgressionPunctual consultation with an external physician2.5 percentage of participants
MabThera as Maintenance TherapyPercentage of Participants With Modalities of the Therapeutic Decision at First Study Disease ProgressionPluri-disciplinary consultation meeting67.5 percentage of participants
MabThera as Maintenance TherapyPercentage of Participants With Modalities of the Therapeutic Decision at First Study Disease ProgressionDiscussion between physicians10.0 percentage of participants
MabThera as Maintenance TherapyPercentage of Participants With Modalities of the Therapeutic Decision at First Study Disease ProgressionOnly physician in charge of the participant20.0 percentage of participants
Primary

Percentage of Participants With Modalities of the Therapeutic Decision Before First Study Induction Treatment Phase

At study inclusion, the therapeutic management of participants was decided by either pluri-disciplinary consultation meeting, Only the physician in charge of the participant, Discussion between physicians, or Punctual consultation of an external physician. Percentage of participants with each of these modalities of therapeutic decision was reported.

Time frame: Baseline

Population: Overall population: All the participants (except duplicate cases and participants without data available) meeting all the inclusion/exclusion criteria were included. Number of participants analyzed = participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
All ParticipantsPercentage of Participants With Modalities of the Therapeutic Decision Before First Study Induction Treatment PhasePluri-disciplinary consultation meeting81.9 percentage of participants
All ParticipantsPercentage of Participants With Modalities of the Therapeutic Decision Before First Study Induction Treatment PhaseDiscussion between physicians6.3 percentage of participants
All ParticipantsPercentage of Participants With Modalities of the Therapeutic Decision Before First Study Induction Treatment PhaseOnly the physician in charge of the participants8.4 percentage of participants
All ParticipantsPercentage of Participants With Modalities of the Therapeutic Decision Before First Study Induction Treatment PhasePunctual consultation of an external physician3.4 percentage of participants
Primary

Percentage of Participants With Prescription of Injection Prophylaxis

Participants was prescribed with either of the following infection prophylaxis treatment: anti-pneumocystosis agents, antiviral agents, or immunoglobulins.

Time frame: Maintenance/observation Phase: 67.8 months

Population: Overall population: All the participants (except duplicate cases and participants without data available) meeting all the inclusion/exclusion criteria were included. Number of participants analyzed=all participants having had maintenance/observation period before the first study disease progression.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
All ParticipantsPercentage of Participants With Prescription of Injection Prophylaxis39.3 percentage of participants
Primary

Percentage of Participants With Treatments Prescribed Over the First Study Induction Phase

Over the first treatment induction period, participants received following therapies for the treatment of refractory/relapsed follicular non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: chemotherapy combined with MabThera, chemotherapy alone, MabThera monotherapy, and stem cell transplantation, radio-immunotherapy, or radiation therapy combined with any other treatment. Study induction treatment phase consists total of three visits (one before the first cycle, one halfway through therapy and one after the last cycle to evaluate response). Induction treatment duration ranged between \<3 months to \>6 months. Each participants may received more than one therapy.

Time frame: Induction Phase: 18.7 months

Population: Overall population: All the participants (except duplicate cases and participants without data available) meeting all the inclusion/exclusion criteria were included.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
All ParticipantsPercentage of Participants With Treatments Prescribed Over the First Study Induction PhaseChemotherapy plus MabThera47.7 percentage of participants
All ParticipantsPercentage of Participants With Treatments Prescribed Over the First Study Induction PhaseRadiation therapy2.5 percentage of participants
All ParticipantsPercentage of Participants With Treatments Prescribed Over the First Study Induction PhaseStem Cells Transplantation19.5 percentage of participants
All ParticipantsPercentage of Participants With Treatments Prescribed Over the First Study Induction PhaseRadio-immunotherapy11.2 percentage of participants
All ParticipantsPercentage of Participants With Treatments Prescribed Over the First Study Induction PhaseChemotherapy alone2.9 percentage of participants
All ParticipantsPercentage of Participants With Treatments Prescribed Over the First Study Induction PhaseMabThera as monotherapy21.2 percentage of participants
Secondary

Function Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-General (FACT-G) With Lymphoma-Specific Additional Concerns Subscale (Lym) Total Score

The FACT-G with Lymphoma-Specific Additional Concerns Subscale (Lym) total score was calculated by adding the score obtained on the FACT-G (physical well-being, scored 0-28; social well-being, scored 0-28; functional well-being, scored 0-28; emotional well-being, scored 0-24), to the score obtained on the LYM subscale (15 items; responses to each item range from 0, Not at all to 4, Very much). Total score ranges from 0 to 168. Higher scores indicated a better participant-reported outcome/quality of life over the past week when responding to the items.

Time frame: Up to 6 years (assessed at start, mid and end of induction [induction: 18.7 months], at each infusion during maintenance [maintenance phase: 67.8 months], and at disease progression [maximum up to 6 years])

Population: All the participants (except duplicate cases and participants without data available) meeting all the inclusion/exclusion criteria were included. n=number of evaluable questionnaires for each category.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
All ParticipantsFunction Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-General (FACT-G) With Lymphoma-Specific Additional Concerns Subscale (Lym) Total ScorePhysical well-being (n=661)22.14 score on scaleStandard Deviation 4.99
All ParticipantsFunction Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-General (FACT-G) With Lymphoma-Specific Additional Concerns Subscale (Lym) Total ScoreSocial well-being (n=660)17.67 score on scaleStandard Deviation 5.31
All ParticipantsFunction Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-General (FACT-G) With Lymphoma-Specific Additional Concerns Subscale (Lym) Total ScoreEmotional well-being (n=664)17.30 score on scaleStandard Deviation 4.46
All ParticipantsFunction Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-General (FACT-G) With Lymphoma-Specific Additional Concerns Subscale (Lym) Total ScoreFunctional well-being (n=659)15.32 score on scaleStandard Deviation 5.69
All ParticipantsFunction Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-General (FACT-G) With Lymphoma-Specific Additional Concerns Subscale (Lym) Total ScoreOther worrying participants (n=662)45.92 score on scaleStandard Deviation 8.88
All ParticipantsFunction Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-General (FACT-G) With Lymphoma-Specific Additional Concerns Subscale (Lym) Total ScoreGlobal score (n=663)118.11 score on scaleStandard Deviation 23.09
Secondary

MabThera Regimen: Dose of MabThera

All participants who received MabThera treatment before the first disease progression were reported.

Time frame: Up to Induction phase (18.7 months), Maintenance phase/observation phase (67.8 months)

Population: All the participants (except duplicate cases and participants without data available) meeting all the inclusion/exclusion criteria were included. Number of participants analyzed= participants who received at least one cycle of MabThera and available with valid data for this outcome.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
All ParticipantsMabThera Regimen: Dose of MabThera661.25 milligram (mg)Standard Deviation 92.94
MabThera as Maintenance TherapyMabThera Regimen: Dose of MabThera671.15 milligram (mg)Standard Deviation 111.05
Secondary

MabThera Regimen: Infusion Duration

Time frame: Up to Induction phase (18.7 months), Maintenance phase/observation phase (67.8 months)

Population: All the participants (except duplicate cases and participants without data available) meeting all the inclusion/exclusion criteria were included. Number of participants analyzed= participants who received at least one cycle of MabThera and available with valid data.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
All ParticipantsMabThera Regimen: Infusion Duration168.60 minutes (mn)Standard Deviation 64.74
MabThera as Maintenance TherapyMabThera Regimen: Infusion Duration150.25 minutes (mn)Standard Deviation 60.09
Secondary

MabThera Regimen: Number of Cycles of MabThera

Time frame: Up to Induction phase (18.7 months), Maintenance phase/observation phase (67.8 months)

Population: All the participants (except duplicate cases and participants without data available) meeting all the inclusion/exclusion criteria were included. Number of participants analyzed= participants who received at least one cycle of MabThera and available with valid data for this outcome.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
All ParticipantsMabThera Regimen: Number of Cycles of MabThera4.8 number of cyclesStandard Deviation 1.9
MabThera as Maintenance TherapyMabThera Regimen: Number of Cycles of MabThera7.6 number of cyclesStandard Deviation 3.2
Secondary

MabThera Regimen: Time Between Cycles

Time frame: Up to Induction phase (18.7 months), Maintenance phase/observation phase (67.8 months)

Population: All the participants (except duplicate cases and participants without data available) meeting all the inclusion/exclusion criteria were included. Number of participants analyzed= participants who received at least one cycle of MabThera and available with valid data.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
All ParticipantsMabThera Regimen: Time Between Cycles23.79 daysStandard Deviation 12.04
MabThera as Maintenance TherapyMabThera Regimen: Time Between Cycles80.60 daysStandard Deviation 20.69
Secondary

Number and Type of Hospitalization Associated With MabThera Perfusion

Number and type of hospitalization (a day hospitalization, short-lasting hospitalization, and short-stay hospitalization) was reported.

Time frame: Up to 6 years

Population: All the participants (except duplicate cases and participants without data available) meeting all the inclusion/exclusion criteria were included.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
All ParticipantsNumber and Type of Hospitalization Associated With MabThera PerfusionA day hospitalization727 hospitalizations
All ParticipantsNumber and Type of Hospitalization Associated With MabThera PerfusionShort-lasting hospitalization308 hospitalizations
All ParticipantsNumber and Type of Hospitalization Associated With MabThera PerfusionShort-stay hospitalization0 hospitalizations
MabThera as Maintenance TherapyNumber and Type of Hospitalization Associated With MabThera PerfusionA day hospitalization934 hospitalizations
MabThera as Maintenance TherapyNumber and Type of Hospitalization Associated With MabThera PerfusionShort-lasting hospitalization15 hospitalizations
MabThera as Maintenance TherapyNumber and Type of Hospitalization Associated With MabThera PerfusionShort-stay hospitalization2 hospitalizations
Secondary

Number of Participants Who Used MabThera

Time frame: Up to Induction phase (18.7 months), Maintenance phase/observation phase (67.8 months)

Population: All the participants (except duplicate cases and participants without data available) meeting all the inclusion/exclusion criteria were included.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants Who Used MabTheraAt least one cycle of MabThera230 participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants Who Used MabTheraAll cycles with MabThera (monotherapy/combination)205 participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants Who Used MabTheraAt least one cycle of MabThera as monotherapy89 participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants Who Used MabTheraAll cycles with MabThera as monotherapy51 participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants Who Used MabTheraAt least one cycle of MabThera in combination178 participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants Who Used MabTheraAll cycles with MabThera in combination119 participants
MabThera as Maintenance TherapyNumber of Participants Who Used MabTheraAt least one cycle of MabThera in combination2 participants
MabThera as Maintenance TherapyNumber of Participants Who Used MabTheraAt least one cycle of MabThera127 participants
MabThera as Maintenance TherapyNumber of Participants Who Used MabTheraAll cycles with MabThera as monotherapy124 participants
MabThera as Maintenance TherapyNumber of Participants Who Used MabTheraAll cycles with MabThera (monotherapy/combination)127 participants
MabThera as Maintenance TherapyNumber of Participants Who Used MabTheraAll cycles with MabThera in combination1 participants
MabThera as Maintenance TherapyNumber of Participants Who Used MabTheraAt least one cycle of MabThera as monotherapy125 participants
Secondary

Overall Survival (OS)

The overall survival was defined as the time from the date of first induction treatment administration over the study to the date of participants' death or early study withdrawal. OS was calculated using Kaplan-Meier method.

Time frame: Up to 6 years

Population: Overall population: All the participants (except duplicate cases and participants without data available) meeting all the inclusion/exclusion criteria were included.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
All ParticipantsOverall Survival (OS)NA months
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Discontinuations and Modifications of MabThera During Maintenance Phase

Time frame: Maintenance phase : 67.8 months

Population: All the participants (except duplicate cases and participants without data available) meeting all the inclusion/exclusion criteria were included. Number of participants analyzed= participants who received at least one MabThera infusion over the maintenance therapy period. n=number of evaluable participants for each category.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
All ParticipantsPercentage of Participants With Discontinuations and Modifications of MabThera During Maintenance PhaseTreatment discontinuation: Yes (n=123)6.5 percentage of participants
All ParticipantsPercentage of Participants With Discontinuations and Modifications of MabThera During Maintenance PhaseNo. of infusion duration modifications: 5 (n=121)5.0 percentage of participants
All ParticipantsPercentage of Participants With Discontinuations and Modifications of MabThera During Maintenance PhaseNo. of infusion duration modifications: 6 (n=121)1.7 percentage of participants
All ParticipantsPercentage of Participants With Discontinuations and Modifications of MabThera During Maintenance PhaseNo. of infusion duration modifications: 7 (n=121)2.5 percentage of participants
All ParticipantsPercentage of Participants With Discontinuations and Modifications of MabThera During Maintenance PhaseNo. of infusion duration modifications: 8 (n=121)2.5 percentage of participants
All ParticipantsPercentage of Participants With Discontinuations and Modifications of MabThera During Maintenance PhaseNo. of infusion duration modifications: 9 (n=121)0.8 percentage of participants
All ParticipantsPercentage of Participants With Discontinuations and Modifications of MabThera During Maintenance PhaseTreatment discontinuation: No (n=123)93.5 percentage of participants
All ParticipantsPercentage of Participants With Discontinuations and Modifications of MabThera During Maintenance PhaseAt least 1 dose modification: Yes (n=121)41.3 percentage of participants
All ParticipantsPercentage of Participants With Discontinuations and Modifications of MabThera During Maintenance PhaseAt least 1 dose modification: No (n=121)58.7 percentage of participants
All ParticipantsPercentage of Participants With Discontinuations and Modifications of MabThera During Maintenance PhaseAt least 1 duration modification: Yes (n=121)36.4 percentage of participants
All ParticipantsPercentage of Participants With Discontinuations and Modifications of MabThera During Maintenance PhaseAt least 1 duration modification: No (n=121)63.6 percentage of participants
All ParticipantsPercentage of Participants With Discontinuations and Modifications of MabThera During Maintenance PhaseNumber (No.) of dose modifications: 0 (n=121)58.7 percentage of participants
All ParticipantsPercentage of Participants With Discontinuations and Modifications of MabThera During Maintenance PhaseNo. of dose modifications: 1 (n=121)17.4 percentage of participants
All ParticipantsPercentage of Participants With Discontinuations and Modifications of MabThera During Maintenance PhaseNo. of dose modifications: 2 (n=121)10.7 percentage of participants
All ParticipantsPercentage of Participants With Discontinuations and Modifications of MabThera During Maintenance PhaseNo. of dose modifications: 3 (n=121)5.8 percentage of participants
All ParticipantsPercentage of Participants With Discontinuations and Modifications of MabThera During Maintenance PhaseNo. of dose modifications: 4 (n=121)4.1 percentage of participants
All ParticipantsPercentage of Participants With Discontinuations and Modifications of MabThera During Maintenance PhaseNo. of dose modifications: 5 (n=121)2.5 percentage of participants
All ParticipantsPercentage of Participants With Discontinuations and Modifications of MabThera During Maintenance PhaseNo. of dose modifications: 6 (n=121)0.8 percentage of participants
All ParticipantsPercentage of Participants With Discontinuations and Modifications of MabThera During Maintenance PhaseNo. of infusion duration modifications: 0 (n=121)63.6 percentage of participants
All ParticipantsPercentage of Participants With Discontinuations and Modifications of MabThera During Maintenance PhaseNo. of infusion duration modifications: 1 (n=121)10.7 percentage of participants
All ParticipantsPercentage of Participants With Discontinuations and Modifications of MabThera During Maintenance PhaseNo. of infusion duration modifications: 2 (n=121)5.8 percentage of participants
All ParticipantsPercentage of Participants With Discontinuations and Modifications of MabThera During Maintenance PhaseNo. of infusion duration modifications: 3 (n=121)4.1 percentage of participants
All ParticipantsPercentage of Participants With Discontinuations and Modifications of MabThera During Maintenance PhaseNo of infusion duration modifications: 4 (n=121)3.3 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Disease Characteristics at First Study Disease Progression

Disease characteristics included (tumor burden, measured from whole body computed tomography (CT) scan. Groupe d'Etudes des Lymphomes Folliculaires (GELF) criteria defined as parameters to initiate treatment in participants with untreated follicular lymphoma, grade 1,2,or 3A; having just one of the criteria justified treatment: 1. involvement of \>=3 nodal sites, each with diameter of \>=3 centimeter(cm); 2. any nodal/extranodal tumor mass with diameter of \>=7cm; 3. B symptoms (temperature \>=38 degrees celsius or night sweats or weight loss \>10% over past 6 months); 4. splenomegaly; 5. pleural effusion/peritoneal ascites; 6. cytopenia (leukocytes \<1×10\^9 and/or platelets \<100×10\^9/L. One participant could present with more than 1 GELF criterion. Ann Arbor staging was used as staging system for lymphomas (Stage I to IV); stage depended upon the place where malignant tissue was located (through biopsy, CT scan, or positron emission tomography) and on systemic symptoms due to lymphoma).

Time frame: Up to 6 years

Population: Overall population: All the participants (except duplicate cases and participants without data available) meeting all the inclusion/exclusion criteria were included. Number of participants analyzed= participants with at least one disease progression over the study period. n=number of evaluable participant for each disease characteristics.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
All ParticipantsPercentage of Participants With Disease Characteristics at First Study Disease ProgressionGELF criteria: Cytopenia (n=32, 38)6.3 percentage of participants
All ParticipantsPercentage of Participants With Disease Characteristics at First Study Disease ProgressionTumor burden: Data not available (n=32, 38)3.1 percentage of participants
All ParticipantsPercentage of Participants With Disease Characteristics at First Study Disease ProgressionGELF criteria: None (n=32, 38)46.9 percentage of participants
All ParticipantsPercentage of Participants With Disease Characteristics at First Study Disease ProgressionGELF criteria: Any nodal/extra-nodal mass(n=32,38)12.5 percentage of participants
All ParticipantsPercentage of Participants With Disease Characteristics at First Study Disease ProgressionGELF criteria: Not available (n=32, 38)3.1 percentage of participants
All ParticipantsPercentage of Participants With Disease Characteristics at First Study Disease ProgressionTumor burden: Low (n=32, 38)46.9 percentage of participants
All ParticipantsPercentage of Participants With Disease Characteristics at First Study Disease ProgressionAnn-Arbor stage I (n=35, 39)11.4 percentage of participants
All ParticipantsPercentage of Participants With Disease Characteristics at First Study Disease ProgressionGELF criteria: B symptoms (n=32, 38)12.5 percentage of participants
All ParticipantsPercentage of Participants With Disease Characteristics at First Study Disease ProgressionAnn-Arbor stage II (n=35, 39)14.3 percentage of participants
All ParticipantsPercentage of Participants With Disease Characteristics at First Study Disease ProgressionGELF criteria: Splenomegaly (n=32, 38)9.4 percentage of participants
All ParticipantsPercentage of Participants With Disease Characteristics at First Study Disease ProgressionAnn-Arbor stage III (n=35, 39)14.3 percentage of participants
All ParticipantsPercentage of Participants With Disease Characteristics at First Study Disease ProgressionTumor burden: High (n=32, 38)50.0 percentage of participants
All ParticipantsPercentage of Participants With Disease Characteristics at First Study Disease ProgressionAnn-Arbor stage IV (n=35, 39)37.1 percentage of participants
All ParticipantsPercentage of Participants With Disease Characteristics at First Study Disease ProgressionGELF criteria: Pleural/ascites effusion (n=32, 38)6.3 percentage of participants
All ParticipantsPercentage of Participants With Disease Characteristics at First Study Disease ProgressionAnn-Arbor stage data not available (n=35, 39)17.1 percentage of participants
All ParticipantsPercentage of Participants With Disease Characteristics at First Study Disease ProgressionAnn-Arbor stage not assessable (n=35, 39)5.7 percentage of participants
All ParticipantsPercentage of Participants With Disease Characteristics at First Study Disease ProgressionGELF criteria: at least 3 nodal sites (n=32, 38)12.5 percentage of participants
MabThera as Maintenance TherapyPercentage of Participants With Disease Characteristics at First Study Disease ProgressionAnn-Arbor stage not assessable (n=35, 39)2.6 percentage of participants
MabThera as Maintenance TherapyPercentage of Participants With Disease Characteristics at First Study Disease ProgressionAnn-Arbor stage data not available (n=35, 39)23.1 percentage of participants
MabThera as Maintenance TherapyPercentage of Participants With Disease Characteristics at First Study Disease ProgressionTumor burden: Data not available (n=32, 38)5.3 percentage of participants
MabThera as Maintenance TherapyPercentage of Participants With Disease Characteristics at First Study Disease ProgressionTumor burden: High (n=32, 38)42.1 percentage of participants
MabThera as Maintenance TherapyPercentage of Participants With Disease Characteristics at First Study Disease ProgressionTumor burden: Low (n=32, 38)52.6 percentage of participants
MabThera as Maintenance TherapyPercentage of Participants With Disease Characteristics at First Study Disease ProgressionGELF criteria: at least 3 nodal sites (n=32, 38)21.1 percentage of participants
MabThera as Maintenance TherapyPercentage of Participants With Disease Characteristics at First Study Disease ProgressionGELF criteria: Any nodal/extra-nodal mass(n=32,38)18.4 percentage of participants
MabThera as Maintenance TherapyPercentage of Participants With Disease Characteristics at First Study Disease ProgressionGELF criteria: Splenomegaly (n=32, 38)2.6 percentage of participants
MabThera as Maintenance TherapyPercentage of Participants With Disease Characteristics at First Study Disease ProgressionGELF criteria: Pleural/ascites effusion (n=32, 38)7.9 percentage of participants
MabThera as Maintenance TherapyPercentage of Participants With Disease Characteristics at First Study Disease ProgressionGELF criteria: Cytopenia (n=32, 38)0.0 percentage of participants
MabThera as Maintenance TherapyPercentage of Participants With Disease Characteristics at First Study Disease ProgressionGELF criteria: None (n=32, 38)52.6 percentage of participants
MabThera as Maintenance TherapyPercentage of Participants With Disease Characteristics at First Study Disease ProgressionGELF criteria: Not available (n=32, 38)5.3 percentage of participants
MabThera as Maintenance TherapyPercentage of Participants With Disease Characteristics at First Study Disease ProgressionAnn-Arbor stage I (n=35, 39)15.4 percentage of participants
MabThera as Maintenance TherapyPercentage of Participants With Disease Characteristics at First Study Disease ProgressionAnn-Arbor stage II (n=35, 39)10.3 percentage of participants
MabThera as Maintenance TherapyPercentage of Participants With Disease Characteristics at First Study Disease ProgressionAnn-Arbor stage III (n=35, 39)15.4 percentage of participants
MabThera as Maintenance TherapyPercentage of Participants With Disease Characteristics at First Study Disease ProgressionAnn-Arbor stage IV (n=35, 39)33.3 percentage of participants
MabThera as Maintenance TherapyPercentage of Participants With Disease Characteristics at First Study Disease ProgressionGELF criteria: B symptoms (n=32, 38)0.0 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Last Induction Treatment Response

Last Induction treatment response: the last response assessment over the first study induction treatment (complete response \[CR\]: complete disappearance of all detectable clinical and radiographic evidence of disease and disappearance of all disease-related symptoms if present before therapy; CR unconfirmed: CR along with regression in lymph node mass by more than \[\>\]75% in the sum of the products of greatest diameters \[SPD\]; Partial Response \[PR\]: greater than or equal to \[\>=\] 50% decrease in SPD of 6 largest dominant nodes or nodal masses; Progression was 1 of the following: 1) lymphadenopathy; 2) a \>=50% increase in previously noted or new appearance of hepato/splenomegaly; 3) \>=50% increase in blood lymphocyte count with at least 5000 B lymphocytes/μL; 4) transformation to Richter's syndrome; or 5) occurrence of cytopenia; Stable disease \[SD\]: absence of necessary criteria to achieve CR or PR, but no advancement to progression) was described at the end of first study induction.

Time frame: Induction Phase: 18.7 months

Population: Overall population: All the participants (except duplicate cases and participants without data available) meeting all the inclusion/exclusion criteria were included. Number of participants analyzed (N)=number of participants evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
All ParticipantsPercentage of Participants With Last Induction Treatment ResponseComplete response38.3 percentage of participants
All ParticipantsPercentage of Participants With Last Induction Treatment ResponseComplete response not confirmed11.5 percentage of participants
All ParticipantsPercentage of Participants With Last Induction Treatment ResponsePartial response >=50%31.7 percentage of participants
All ParticipantsPercentage of Participants With Last Induction Treatment ResponsePartial response <50%6.2 percentage of participants
All ParticipantsPercentage of Participants With Last Induction Treatment ResponseStability5.3 percentage of participants
All ParticipantsPercentage of Participants With Last Induction Treatment ResponseProgression7.0 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Number of Disease Progressions

Participants with at least one disease progression after the first study induction period were reported.

Time frame: Up to 6 years

Population: Overall population: All the participants (except duplicate cases and participants without data available) meeting all the inclusion/exclusion criteria were included. Number of participants analyzed= those participants who entered in maintenance/observation after the first induction and before the first disease progression over the study.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
All ParticipantsPercentage of Participants With Number of Disease ProgressionsNumber of disease progressions: 139.22 percentage of participants
All ParticipantsPercentage of Participants With Number of Disease ProgressionsNumber of disease progressions: 31.4 percentage of participants
All ParticipantsPercentage of Participants With Number of Disease ProgressionsNumber of disease progressions: 26.8 percentage of participants
All ParticipantsPercentage of Participants With Number of Disease ProgressionsNumber of disease progressions: 40.0 percentage of participants
All ParticipantsPercentage of Participants With Number of Disease ProgressionsNumber of disease progressions: 052.7 percentage of participants
MabThera as Maintenance TherapyPercentage of Participants With Number of Disease ProgressionsNumber of disease progressions: 40.8 percentage of participants
MabThera as Maintenance TherapyPercentage of Participants With Number of Disease ProgressionsNumber of disease progressions: 068.5 percentage of participants
MabThera as Maintenance TherapyPercentage of Participants With Number of Disease ProgressionsNumber of disease progressions: 122.0 percentage of participants
MabThera as Maintenance TherapyPercentage of Participants With Number of Disease ProgressionsNumber of disease progressions: 26.3 percentage of participants
MabThera as Maintenance TherapyPercentage of Participants With Number of Disease ProgressionsNumber of disease progressions: 32.4 percentage of participants
Secondary

Progression Free Survival (PFS)

The PFS was defined as the time from the date of first induction treatment over the study (first treatment administration of first cycle) to the date of first disease progression or participants death or date of lymphoma transformation diagnosis.

Time frame: Up to 6 years

Population: Overall population: All the participants (except duplicate cases and participants without data available) meeting all the inclusion/exclusion criteria were included.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
All ParticipantsProgression Free Survival (PFS)44.4 months
Secondary

Time to Next Treatment

Time to next treatment was calculated from the date of the end of first induction treatment administration over the study to the date of the start of next treatment after disease progression.

Time frame: Up to 6 years

Population: Overall population: All the participants (except duplicate cases and participants without data available) meeting all the inclusion/exclusion criteria were included.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
All ParticipantsTime to Next TreatmentNA months

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026