Follicular Lymphoma
Conditions
Brief summary
This French national, multicenter, prospective, longitudinal, observational study will describe the treatment modalities of a cohort of patients with relapsed or refractory follicular non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, with evaluation of the cohort overall and according to the presence or not of MabThera® (rituximab) maintenance therapy. Actively participating physicians will enroll patients and collect therapeutic management data in a real-life setting up to 5 years.
Interventions
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Adult patient (age \>/= 18 years) * Presenting with WHO grade 1-3, CD20-positive follicular non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, histologically confirmed at initial diagnosis * In relapse (or refractory) after at least one line of treatment, regardless of the nature of previous treatments (chemotherapy and/or immunotherapy and/or radioimmunoconjugate therapy and/or radiation+chemotherapy) and for whom a decision was made to give salvage therapy * Having received oral and written information about the study and having raised no objections to electronic capture and processing of his/her personal data
Exclusion criteria
* Patient participating in a clinical trial evaluating a new, non-commercialized cancer treatment at the time of inclusion * Follicular lymphoma presenting with a transformation to diffuse large cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma * First line treatment with radiotherapy alone * Initial abstention from treatment (decision to not treat the progression at the time of inclusion in the OLYMPE study)
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Percentage of Participants With MabThera Maintenance Therapy and at Least One Observation Phase | Maintenance/observation Phase: 67.8 months | After study induction period (three visits) participants entered into either of two periods: 1. period of maintenance with MabThera followed by observation or 2. period of observation/maintenance without MabThera, followed by maintenance with MabThera. |
| Percentage of Participants With Modalities of the Therapeutic Decision Before First Study Induction Treatment Phase | Baseline | At study inclusion, the therapeutic management of participants was decided by either pluri-disciplinary consultation meeting, Only the physician in charge of the participant, Discussion between physicians, or Punctual consultation of an external physician. Percentage of participants with each of these modalities of therapeutic decision was reported. |
| Percentage of Participants With Treatments Prescribed Over the First Study Induction Phase | Induction Phase: 18.7 months | Over the first treatment induction period, participants received following therapies for the treatment of refractory/relapsed follicular non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: chemotherapy combined with MabThera, chemotherapy alone, MabThera monotherapy, and stem cell transplantation, radio-immunotherapy, or radiation therapy combined with any other treatment. Study induction treatment phase consists total of three visits (one before the first cycle, one halfway through therapy and one after the last cycle to evaluate response). Induction treatment duration ranged between \<3 months to \>6 months. Each participants may received more than one therapy. |
| Percentage of Participants With Chemotherapies Prescribed Over the First Study Induction Phase | Induction Phase: 18.7 months | Over the first study induction phase, participants received the following chemotherapy: regimen including fludarabine; regimen including aracytine - platinum salts; cyclophosphamide/hydroxydaunorubicin/oncovin/prednisone (CHOP-like); cyclophosphamide/vincristine/prednisone (CVP); regimen including ifosfamide - etoposide; and other chemotherapy. One participant could receive more than one type of chemotherapy over the first treatment induction period. |
| Percentage of Participants With MabThera as Maintenance Therapy | Maintenance/observation Phase: 67.8 months | During the maintenance period participants received four weekly infusion of MabThera. |
| Duration of MabThera Maintenance Therapy When Associated With Observation | Maintenance/observation Phase: 67.8 months | Duration of MabThera maintenance therapy was calculated from the end of induction period to the day before the first disease progression over the study (or to the date of last participant information if no disease progression until the end of the participant follow-up). Disease progression was based on the followings: Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status; presence of B symptoms (fever 38°C in absence of infection for more than 8 days, night sweats, weight loss exceeding 10% in 6 months); evaluation of tumor mass (Groupe d'Etudes des Lymphomes Folliculaires criteria); number of nodal sites; number and location of extranodal sites; Ann-Arbor stage (I to IV); any histological documentation: type of biopsy (nodal, extranodal, bone marrow); histological type (progression of follicular non-Hodgkin's lymphomas or transformation); latest available hemoglobin, neutrophils, normal or leukemic lymphocytes, platelets, lactate dehydrogenase, and total gamma globulins level. |
| Percentage of Participants With Prescription of Injection Prophylaxis | Maintenance/observation Phase: 67.8 months | Participants was prescribed with either of the following infection prophylaxis treatment: anti-pneumocystosis agents, antiviral agents, or immunoglobulins. |
| Percentage of Participants With Injection Prophylaxis Treatment | Maintenance/observation Phase: 67.8 months | Participants received anti-pneumocystosis agents, antiviral agents, or immunoglobulins as infection prophylaxis. One participant could receive more than one infection prophylaxis treatment. |
| Percentage of Participants With Modalities of the Therapeutic Decision at First Study Disease Progression | Up to 6 years | The therapeutic management of participants was decided by either pluri-disciplinary consultation meeting, Only the physician in charge of the participant, Discussion between physicians, or Punctual consultation of an external physician. Percentage of participants with each of these modalities of therapeutic decision was reported. |
| Number of Participants With Therapeutic Management After the First Study Disease Progression | Up to 6 years | After the first disease progression the participants received chemotherapy, immunotherapy, radio immunotherapy, stem cell transplantation, or radiation therapy for therapeutic management of the refractory/relapsed follicular non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. One participant could receive more than one type of treatment after the first study disease progression. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| MabThera Regimen: Time Between Cycles | Up to Induction phase (18.7 months), Maintenance phase/observation phase (67.8 months) | — |
| Percentage of Participants With Discontinuations and Modifications of MabThera During Maintenance Phase | Maintenance phase : 67.8 months | — |
| Overall Survival (OS) | Up to 6 years | The overall survival was defined as the time from the date of first induction treatment administration over the study to the date of participants' death or early study withdrawal. OS was calculated using Kaplan-Meier method. |
| Number and Type of Hospitalization Associated With MabThera Perfusion | Up to 6 years | Number and type of hospitalization (a day hospitalization, short-lasting hospitalization, and short-stay hospitalization) was reported. |
| Function Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-General (FACT-G) With Lymphoma-Specific Additional Concerns Subscale (Lym) Total Score | Up to 6 years (assessed at start, mid and end of induction [induction: 18.7 months], at each infusion during maintenance [maintenance phase: 67.8 months], and at disease progression [maximum up to 6 years]) | The FACT-G with Lymphoma-Specific Additional Concerns Subscale (Lym) total score was calculated by adding the score obtained on the FACT-G (physical well-being, scored 0-28; social well-being, scored 0-28; functional well-being, scored 0-28; emotional well-being, scored 0-24), to the score obtained on the LYM subscale (15 items; responses to each item range from 0, Not at all to 4, Very much). Total score ranges from 0 to 168. Higher scores indicated a better participant-reported outcome/quality of life over the past week when responding to the items. |
| Percentage of Participants With Last Induction Treatment Response | Induction Phase: 18.7 months | Last Induction treatment response: the last response assessment over the first study induction treatment (complete response \[CR\]: complete disappearance of all detectable clinical and radiographic evidence of disease and disappearance of all disease-related symptoms if present before therapy; CR unconfirmed: CR along with regression in lymph node mass by more than \[\>\]75% in the sum of the products of greatest diameters \[SPD\]; Partial Response \[PR\]: greater than or equal to \[\>=\] 50% decrease in SPD of 6 largest dominant nodes or nodal masses; Progression was 1 of the following: 1) lymphadenopathy; 2) a \>=50% increase in previously noted or new appearance of hepato/splenomegaly; 3) \>=50% increase in blood lymphocyte count with at least 5000 B lymphocytes/μL; 4) transformation to Richter's syndrome; or 5) occurrence of cytopenia; Stable disease \[SD\]: absence of necessary criteria to achieve CR or PR, but no advancement to progression) was described at the end of first study induction. |
| Percentage of Participants With Number of Disease Progressions | Up to 6 years | Participants with at least one disease progression after the first study induction period were reported. |
| Percentage of Participants With Disease Characteristics at First Study Disease Progression | Up to 6 years | Disease characteristics included (tumor burden, measured from whole body computed tomography (CT) scan. Groupe d'Etudes des Lymphomes Folliculaires (GELF) criteria defined as parameters to initiate treatment in participants with untreated follicular lymphoma, grade 1,2,or 3A; having just one of the criteria justified treatment: 1. involvement of \>=3 nodal sites, each with diameter of \>=3 centimeter(cm); 2. any nodal/extranodal tumor mass with diameter of \>=7cm; 3. B symptoms (temperature \>=38 degrees celsius or night sweats or weight loss \>10% over past 6 months); 4. splenomegaly; 5. pleural effusion/peritoneal ascites; 6. cytopenia (leukocytes \<1×10\^9 and/or platelets \<100×10\^9/L. One participant could present with more than 1 GELF criterion. Ann Arbor staging was used as staging system for lymphomas (Stage I to IV); stage depended upon the place where malignant tissue was located (through biopsy, CT scan, or positron emission tomography) and on systemic symptoms due to lymphoma). |
| Progression Free Survival (PFS) | Up to 6 years | The PFS was defined as the time from the date of first induction treatment over the study (first treatment administration of first cycle) to the date of first disease progression or participants death or date of lymphoma transformation diagnosis. |
| Time to Next Treatment | Up to 6 years | Time to next treatment was calculated from the date of the end of first induction treatment administration over the study to the date of the start of next treatment after disease progression. |
| Number of Participants Who Used MabThera | Up to Induction phase (18.7 months), Maintenance phase/observation phase (67.8 months) | — |
| MabThera Regimen: Dose of MabThera | Up to Induction phase (18.7 months), Maintenance phase/observation phase (67.8 months) | All participants who received MabThera treatment before the first disease progression were reported. |
| MabThera Regimen: Infusion Duration | Up to Induction phase (18.7 months), Maintenance phase/observation phase (67.8 months) | — |
| MabThera Regimen: Number of Cycles of MabThera | Up to Induction phase (18.7 months), Maintenance phase/observation phase (67.8 months) | — |
Countries
France
Participant flow
Pre-assignment details
Of 260 participants, 5 were excluded as no data available and duplicate cases (N=255; safety population) and 14 were excluded as other selection criteria not met (N=241; overall population).
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| All Participants Participants with histologically confirmed, refractory/relapsed CD2 0-positive follicular non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (grade IIII), whatever the first-line treatment was (chemotherapy and/or immunotherapy and/or radio-immunoconjugate and/or radiochemotherapy), and eligible for salvage treatment were observed for approximately 6 years. | 241 |
| Total | 241 |
Withdrawals & dropouts
| Period | Reason | FG000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overall Study | Death | 63 |
| Overall Study | Did not met selection criteria | 14 |
| Overall Study | Lost to Follow-up | 9 |
| Overall Study | Lymphoma transformation | 2 |
| Overall Study | No data and duplicate cases | 5 |
| Overall Study | Participant moved/changed medical team | 11 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | All Participants |
|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | 61.6 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.2 |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 110 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 131 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk |
|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | — / — |
| other Total, other adverse events | 134 / 243 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 94 / 243 |
Outcome results
Duration of MabThera Maintenance Therapy When Associated With Observation
Duration of MabThera maintenance therapy was calculated from the end of induction period to the day before the first disease progression over the study (or to the date of last participant information if no disease progression until the end of the participant follow-up). Disease progression was based on the followings: Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status; presence of B symptoms (fever 38°C in absence of infection for more than 8 days, night sweats, weight loss exceeding 10% in 6 months); evaluation of tumor mass (Groupe d'Etudes des Lymphomes Folliculaires criteria); number of nodal sites; number and location of extranodal sites; Ann-Arbor stage (I to IV); any histological documentation: type of biopsy (nodal, extranodal, bone marrow); histological type (progression of follicular non-Hodgkin's lymphomas or transformation); latest available hemoglobin, neutrophils, normal or leukemic lymphocytes, platelets, lactate dehydrogenase, and total gamma globulins level.
Time frame: Maintenance/observation Phase: 67.8 months
Population: Overall population: All the participants (except duplicate cases and participants without data available) meeting all the inclusion/exclusion criteria were included. Number of participants analyzed = those who received at least one infusion of MabThera and completed maintenance therapy with MabThera when associated with observation period.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| All Participants | Duration of MabThera Maintenance Therapy When Associated With Observation | 24.5 months |
Number of Participants With Therapeutic Management After the First Study Disease Progression
After the first disease progression the participants received chemotherapy, immunotherapy, radio immunotherapy, stem cell transplantation, or radiation therapy for therapeutic management of the refractory/relapsed follicular non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. One participant could receive more than one type of treatment after the first study disease progression.
Time frame: Up to 6 years
Population: Overall population: All the participants (except duplicate cases and participants without data available) meeting all the inclusion/exclusion criteria were included. Number of participants analyzed= participants with at least one disease progression over the study period.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| All Participants | Number of Participants With Therapeutic Management After the First Study Disease Progression | Chemotherapy | 24 participants |
| All Participants | Number of Participants With Therapeutic Management After the First Study Disease Progression | Radio immunotherapy | 0 participants |
| All Participants | Number of Participants With Therapeutic Management After the First Study Disease Progression | Missing | 2 participants |
| All Participants | Number of Participants With Therapeutic Management After the First Study Disease Progression | Stem cell transplantation | 7 participants |
| All Participants | Number of Participants With Therapeutic Management After the First Study Disease Progression | Immunotherapy | 24 participants |
| All Participants | Number of Participants With Therapeutic Management After the First Study Disease Progression | Radiation therapy | 6 participants |
| MabThera as Maintenance Therapy | Number of Participants With Therapeutic Management After the First Study Disease Progression | Immunotherapy | 27 participants |
| MabThera as Maintenance Therapy | Number of Participants With Therapeutic Management After the First Study Disease Progression | Missing | 4 participants |
| MabThera as Maintenance Therapy | Number of Participants With Therapeutic Management After the First Study Disease Progression | Chemotherapy | 29 participants |
| MabThera as Maintenance Therapy | Number of Participants With Therapeutic Management After the First Study Disease Progression | Radiation therapy | 5 participants |
| MabThera as Maintenance Therapy | Number of Participants With Therapeutic Management After the First Study Disease Progression | Radio immunotherapy | 4 participants |
| MabThera as Maintenance Therapy | Number of Participants With Therapeutic Management After the First Study Disease Progression | Stem cell transplantation | 7 participants |
Percentage of Participants With Chemotherapies Prescribed Over the First Study Induction Phase
Over the first study induction phase, participants received the following chemotherapy: regimen including fludarabine; regimen including aracytine - platinum salts; cyclophosphamide/hydroxydaunorubicin/oncovin/prednisone (CHOP-like); cyclophosphamide/vincristine/prednisone (CVP); regimen including ifosfamide - etoposide; and other chemotherapy. One participant could receive more than one type of chemotherapy over the first treatment induction period.
Time frame: Induction Phase: 18.7 months
Population: Overall population: All the participants (except duplicate cases and participants without data available) meeting all the inclusion/exclusion criteria were included.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| All Participants | Percentage of Participants With Chemotherapies Prescribed Over the First Study Induction Phase | Regimen including fludarabine | 45.9 percentage of participants |
| All Participants | Percentage of Participants With Chemotherapies Prescribed Over the First Study Induction Phase | Regimen including aracytine - platinum salts | 44.3 percentage of participants |
| All Participants | Percentage of Participants With Chemotherapies Prescribed Over the First Study Induction Phase | CHOP-like | 32.0 percentage of participants |
| All Participants | Percentage of Participants With Chemotherapies Prescribed Over the First Study Induction Phase | CVP | 13.1 percentage of participants |
| All Participants | Percentage of Participants With Chemotherapies Prescribed Over the First Study Induction Phase | Regimen including ifosfamide - etoposide | 10.7 percentage of participants |
| All Participants | Percentage of Participants With Chemotherapies Prescribed Over the First Study Induction Phase | Other chemotherapy | 23.8 percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants With Injection Prophylaxis Treatment
Participants received anti-pneumocystosis agents, antiviral agents, or immunoglobulins as infection prophylaxis. One participant could receive more than one infection prophylaxis treatment.
Time frame: Maintenance/observation Phase: 67.8 months
Population: Overall population: All the participants (except duplicate cases and participants without data available) meeting all the inclusion/exclusion criteria were included. Number participants analyzed= all participants having had maintenance/observation period before the first study disease progression and received infection prophylaxis treatment.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| All Participants | Percentage of Participants With Injection Prophylaxis Treatment | Anti-pneumocystosis agent | 65.8 percentage of participants |
| All Participants | Percentage of Participants With Injection Prophylaxis Treatment | Antiviral agents | 83.5 percentage of participants |
| All Participants | Percentage of Participants With Injection Prophylaxis Treatment | Immunoglobulins | 26.9 percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants With MabThera as Maintenance Therapy
During the maintenance period participants received four weekly infusion of MabThera.
Time frame: Maintenance/observation Phase: 67.8 months
Population: Overall population: All the participants (except duplicate cases and participants without data available) meeting all the inclusion/exclusion criteria were included. Number of participants analyzed= those who entered in maintenance/observation after the first induction and before the first disease progression over the study.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| All Participants | Percentage of Participants With MabThera as Maintenance Therapy | 63.2 percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants With MabThera Maintenance Therapy and at Least One Observation Phase
After study induction period (three visits) participants entered into either of two periods: 1. period of maintenance with MabThera followed by observation or 2. period of observation/maintenance without MabThera, followed by maintenance with MabThera.
Time frame: Maintenance/observation Phase: 67.8 months
Population: Overall population: All the participants (except duplicate cases and participants without data available) meeting all the inclusion/exclusion criteria were included. Number of participants analyzed = those who received at least one MabThera infusion over the maintenance therapy period.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| All Participants | Percentage of Participants With MabThera Maintenance Therapy and at Least One Observation Phase | Maintenance with MabThera followed by observation | 70.9 percentage of participants |
| All Participants | Percentage of Participants With MabThera Maintenance Therapy and at Least One Observation Phase | Observation followed by maintenance with MabThera | 1.6 percentage of participants |
| All Participants | Percentage of Participants With MabThera Maintenance Therapy and at Least One Observation Phase | Only maintenance therapy | 27.6 percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants With Modalities of the Therapeutic Decision at First Study Disease Progression
The therapeutic management of participants was decided by either pluri-disciplinary consultation meeting, Only the physician in charge of the participant, Discussion between physicians, or Punctual consultation of an external physician. Percentage of participants with each of these modalities of therapeutic decision was reported.
Time frame: Up to 6 years
Population: Overall population: All the participants (except duplicate cases and participants without data available) meeting all the inclusion/exclusion criteria were included. Number of participants analyzed= participants with at least one disease progression over the study period.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| All Participants | Percentage of Participants With Modalities of the Therapeutic Decision at First Study Disease Progression | Pluri-disciplinary consultation meeting | 80.0 percentage of participants |
| All Participants | Percentage of Participants With Modalities of the Therapeutic Decision at First Study Disease Progression | Only physician in charge of the participant | 17.1 percentage of participants |
| All Participants | Percentage of Participants With Modalities of the Therapeutic Decision at First Study Disease Progression | Discussion between physicians | 2.9 percentage of participants |
| All Participants | Percentage of Participants With Modalities of the Therapeutic Decision at First Study Disease Progression | Punctual consultation with an external physician | 0.0 percentage of participants |
| MabThera as Maintenance Therapy | Percentage of Participants With Modalities of the Therapeutic Decision at First Study Disease Progression | Punctual consultation with an external physician | 2.5 percentage of participants |
| MabThera as Maintenance Therapy | Percentage of Participants With Modalities of the Therapeutic Decision at First Study Disease Progression | Pluri-disciplinary consultation meeting | 67.5 percentage of participants |
| MabThera as Maintenance Therapy | Percentage of Participants With Modalities of the Therapeutic Decision at First Study Disease Progression | Discussion between physicians | 10.0 percentage of participants |
| MabThera as Maintenance Therapy | Percentage of Participants With Modalities of the Therapeutic Decision at First Study Disease Progression | Only physician in charge of the participant | 20.0 percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants With Modalities of the Therapeutic Decision Before First Study Induction Treatment Phase
At study inclusion, the therapeutic management of participants was decided by either pluri-disciplinary consultation meeting, Only the physician in charge of the participant, Discussion between physicians, or Punctual consultation of an external physician. Percentage of participants with each of these modalities of therapeutic decision was reported.
Time frame: Baseline
Population: Overall population: All the participants (except duplicate cases and participants without data available) meeting all the inclusion/exclusion criteria were included. Number of participants analyzed = participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| All Participants | Percentage of Participants With Modalities of the Therapeutic Decision Before First Study Induction Treatment Phase | Pluri-disciplinary consultation meeting | 81.9 percentage of participants |
| All Participants | Percentage of Participants With Modalities of the Therapeutic Decision Before First Study Induction Treatment Phase | Discussion between physicians | 6.3 percentage of participants |
| All Participants | Percentage of Participants With Modalities of the Therapeutic Decision Before First Study Induction Treatment Phase | Only the physician in charge of the participants | 8.4 percentage of participants |
| All Participants | Percentage of Participants With Modalities of the Therapeutic Decision Before First Study Induction Treatment Phase | Punctual consultation of an external physician | 3.4 percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants With Prescription of Injection Prophylaxis
Participants was prescribed with either of the following infection prophylaxis treatment: anti-pneumocystosis agents, antiviral agents, or immunoglobulins.
Time frame: Maintenance/observation Phase: 67.8 months
Population: Overall population: All the participants (except duplicate cases and participants without data available) meeting all the inclusion/exclusion criteria were included. Number of participants analyzed=all participants having had maintenance/observation period before the first study disease progression.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| All Participants | Percentage of Participants With Prescription of Injection Prophylaxis | 39.3 percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants With Treatments Prescribed Over the First Study Induction Phase
Over the first treatment induction period, participants received following therapies for the treatment of refractory/relapsed follicular non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: chemotherapy combined with MabThera, chemotherapy alone, MabThera monotherapy, and stem cell transplantation, radio-immunotherapy, or radiation therapy combined with any other treatment. Study induction treatment phase consists total of three visits (one before the first cycle, one halfway through therapy and one after the last cycle to evaluate response). Induction treatment duration ranged between \<3 months to \>6 months. Each participants may received more than one therapy.
Time frame: Induction Phase: 18.7 months
Population: Overall population: All the participants (except duplicate cases and participants without data available) meeting all the inclusion/exclusion criteria were included.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| All Participants | Percentage of Participants With Treatments Prescribed Over the First Study Induction Phase | Chemotherapy plus MabThera | 47.7 percentage of participants |
| All Participants | Percentage of Participants With Treatments Prescribed Over the First Study Induction Phase | Radiation therapy | 2.5 percentage of participants |
| All Participants | Percentage of Participants With Treatments Prescribed Over the First Study Induction Phase | Stem Cells Transplantation | 19.5 percentage of participants |
| All Participants | Percentage of Participants With Treatments Prescribed Over the First Study Induction Phase | Radio-immunotherapy | 11.2 percentage of participants |
| All Participants | Percentage of Participants With Treatments Prescribed Over the First Study Induction Phase | Chemotherapy alone | 2.9 percentage of participants |
| All Participants | Percentage of Participants With Treatments Prescribed Over the First Study Induction Phase | MabThera as monotherapy | 21.2 percentage of participants |
Function Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-General (FACT-G) With Lymphoma-Specific Additional Concerns Subscale (Lym) Total Score
The FACT-G with Lymphoma-Specific Additional Concerns Subscale (Lym) total score was calculated by adding the score obtained on the FACT-G (physical well-being, scored 0-28; social well-being, scored 0-28; functional well-being, scored 0-28; emotional well-being, scored 0-24), to the score obtained on the LYM subscale (15 items; responses to each item range from 0, Not at all to 4, Very much). Total score ranges from 0 to 168. Higher scores indicated a better participant-reported outcome/quality of life over the past week when responding to the items.
Time frame: Up to 6 years (assessed at start, mid and end of induction [induction: 18.7 months], at each infusion during maintenance [maintenance phase: 67.8 months], and at disease progression [maximum up to 6 years])
Population: All the participants (except duplicate cases and participants without data available) meeting all the inclusion/exclusion criteria were included. n=number of evaluable questionnaires for each category.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| All Participants | Function Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-General (FACT-G) With Lymphoma-Specific Additional Concerns Subscale (Lym) Total Score | Physical well-being (n=661) | 22.14 score on scale | Standard Deviation 4.99 |
| All Participants | Function Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-General (FACT-G) With Lymphoma-Specific Additional Concerns Subscale (Lym) Total Score | Social well-being (n=660) | 17.67 score on scale | Standard Deviation 5.31 |
| All Participants | Function Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-General (FACT-G) With Lymphoma-Specific Additional Concerns Subscale (Lym) Total Score | Emotional well-being (n=664) | 17.30 score on scale | Standard Deviation 4.46 |
| All Participants | Function Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-General (FACT-G) With Lymphoma-Specific Additional Concerns Subscale (Lym) Total Score | Functional well-being (n=659) | 15.32 score on scale | Standard Deviation 5.69 |
| All Participants | Function Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-General (FACT-G) With Lymphoma-Specific Additional Concerns Subscale (Lym) Total Score | Other worrying participants (n=662) | 45.92 score on scale | Standard Deviation 8.88 |
| All Participants | Function Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-General (FACT-G) With Lymphoma-Specific Additional Concerns Subscale (Lym) Total Score | Global score (n=663) | 118.11 score on scale | Standard Deviation 23.09 |
MabThera Regimen: Dose of MabThera
All participants who received MabThera treatment before the first disease progression were reported.
Time frame: Up to Induction phase (18.7 months), Maintenance phase/observation phase (67.8 months)
Population: All the participants (except duplicate cases and participants without data available) meeting all the inclusion/exclusion criteria were included. Number of participants analyzed= participants who received at least one cycle of MabThera and available with valid data for this outcome.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| All Participants | MabThera Regimen: Dose of MabThera | 661.25 milligram (mg) | Standard Deviation 92.94 |
| MabThera as Maintenance Therapy | MabThera Regimen: Dose of MabThera | 671.15 milligram (mg) | Standard Deviation 111.05 |
MabThera Regimen: Infusion Duration
Time frame: Up to Induction phase (18.7 months), Maintenance phase/observation phase (67.8 months)
Population: All the participants (except duplicate cases and participants without data available) meeting all the inclusion/exclusion criteria were included. Number of participants analyzed= participants who received at least one cycle of MabThera and available with valid data.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| All Participants | MabThera Regimen: Infusion Duration | 168.60 minutes (mn) | Standard Deviation 64.74 |
| MabThera as Maintenance Therapy | MabThera Regimen: Infusion Duration | 150.25 minutes (mn) | Standard Deviation 60.09 |
MabThera Regimen: Number of Cycles of MabThera
Time frame: Up to Induction phase (18.7 months), Maintenance phase/observation phase (67.8 months)
Population: All the participants (except duplicate cases and participants without data available) meeting all the inclusion/exclusion criteria were included. Number of participants analyzed= participants who received at least one cycle of MabThera and available with valid data for this outcome.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| All Participants | MabThera Regimen: Number of Cycles of MabThera | 4.8 number of cycles | Standard Deviation 1.9 |
| MabThera as Maintenance Therapy | MabThera Regimen: Number of Cycles of MabThera | 7.6 number of cycles | Standard Deviation 3.2 |
MabThera Regimen: Time Between Cycles
Time frame: Up to Induction phase (18.7 months), Maintenance phase/observation phase (67.8 months)
Population: All the participants (except duplicate cases and participants without data available) meeting all the inclusion/exclusion criteria were included. Number of participants analyzed= participants who received at least one cycle of MabThera and available with valid data.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| All Participants | MabThera Regimen: Time Between Cycles | 23.79 days | Standard Deviation 12.04 |
| MabThera as Maintenance Therapy | MabThera Regimen: Time Between Cycles | 80.60 days | Standard Deviation 20.69 |
Number and Type of Hospitalization Associated With MabThera Perfusion
Number and type of hospitalization (a day hospitalization, short-lasting hospitalization, and short-stay hospitalization) was reported.
Time frame: Up to 6 years
Population: All the participants (except duplicate cases and participants without data available) meeting all the inclusion/exclusion criteria were included.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| All Participants | Number and Type of Hospitalization Associated With MabThera Perfusion | A day hospitalization | 727 hospitalizations |
| All Participants | Number and Type of Hospitalization Associated With MabThera Perfusion | Short-lasting hospitalization | 308 hospitalizations |
| All Participants | Number and Type of Hospitalization Associated With MabThera Perfusion | Short-stay hospitalization | 0 hospitalizations |
| MabThera as Maintenance Therapy | Number and Type of Hospitalization Associated With MabThera Perfusion | A day hospitalization | 934 hospitalizations |
| MabThera as Maintenance Therapy | Number and Type of Hospitalization Associated With MabThera Perfusion | Short-lasting hospitalization | 15 hospitalizations |
| MabThera as Maintenance Therapy | Number and Type of Hospitalization Associated With MabThera Perfusion | Short-stay hospitalization | 2 hospitalizations |
Number of Participants Who Used MabThera
Time frame: Up to Induction phase (18.7 months), Maintenance phase/observation phase (67.8 months)
Population: All the participants (except duplicate cases and participants without data available) meeting all the inclusion/exclusion criteria were included.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| All Participants | Number of Participants Who Used MabThera | At least one cycle of MabThera | 230 participants |
| All Participants | Number of Participants Who Used MabThera | All cycles with MabThera (monotherapy/combination) | 205 participants |
| All Participants | Number of Participants Who Used MabThera | At least one cycle of MabThera as monotherapy | 89 participants |
| All Participants | Number of Participants Who Used MabThera | All cycles with MabThera as monotherapy | 51 participants |
| All Participants | Number of Participants Who Used MabThera | At least one cycle of MabThera in combination | 178 participants |
| All Participants | Number of Participants Who Used MabThera | All cycles with MabThera in combination | 119 participants |
| MabThera as Maintenance Therapy | Number of Participants Who Used MabThera | At least one cycle of MabThera in combination | 2 participants |
| MabThera as Maintenance Therapy | Number of Participants Who Used MabThera | At least one cycle of MabThera | 127 participants |
| MabThera as Maintenance Therapy | Number of Participants Who Used MabThera | All cycles with MabThera as monotherapy | 124 participants |
| MabThera as Maintenance Therapy | Number of Participants Who Used MabThera | All cycles with MabThera (monotherapy/combination) | 127 participants |
| MabThera as Maintenance Therapy | Number of Participants Who Used MabThera | All cycles with MabThera in combination | 1 participants |
| MabThera as Maintenance Therapy | Number of Participants Who Used MabThera | At least one cycle of MabThera as monotherapy | 125 participants |
Overall Survival (OS)
The overall survival was defined as the time from the date of first induction treatment administration over the study to the date of participants' death or early study withdrawal. OS was calculated using Kaplan-Meier method.
Time frame: Up to 6 years
Population: Overall population: All the participants (except duplicate cases and participants without data available) meeting all the inclusion/exclusion criteria were included.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| All Participants | Overall Survival (OS) | NA months |
Percentage of Participants With Discontinuations and Modifications of MabThera During Maintenance Phase
Time frame: Maintenance phase : 67.8 months
Population: All the participants (except duplicate cases and participants without data available) meeting all the inclusion/exclusion criteria were included. Number of participants analyzed= participants who received at least one MabThera infusion over the maintenance therapy period. n=number of evaluable participants for each category.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| All Participants | Percentage of Participants With Discontinuations and Modifications of MabThera During Maintenance Phase | Treatment discontinuation: Yes (n=123) | 6.5 percentage of participants |
| All Participants | Percentage of Participants With Discontinuations and Modifications of MabThera During Maintenance Phase | No. of infusion duration modifications: 5 (n=121) | 5.0 percentage of participants |
| All Participants | Percentage of Participants With Discontinuations and Modifications of MabThera During Maintenance Phase | No. of infusion duration modifications: 6 (n=121) | 1.7 percentage of participants |
| All Participants | Percentage of Participants With Discontinuations and Modifications of MabThera During Maintenance Phase | No. of infusion duration modifications: 7 (n=121) | 2.5 percentage of participants |
| All Participants | Percentage of Participants With Discontinuations and Modifications of MabThera During Maintenance Phase | No. of infusion duration modifications: 8 (n=121) | 2.5 percentage of participants |
| All Participants | Percentage of Participants With Discontinuations and Modifications of MabThera During Maintenance Phase | No. of infusion duration modifications: 9 (n=121) | 0.8 percentage of participants |
| All Participants | Percentage of Participants With Discontinuations and Modifications of MabThera During Maintenance Phase | Treatment discontinuation: No (n=123) | 93.5 percentage of participants |
| All Participants | Percentage of Participants With Discontinuations and Modifications of MabThera During Maintenance Phase | At least 1 dose modification: Yes (n=121) | 41.3 percentage of participants |
| All Participants | Percentage of Participants With Discontinuations and Modifications of MabThera During Maintenance Phase | At least 1 dose modification: No (n=121) | 58.7 percentage of participants |
| All Participants | Percentage of Participants With Discontinuations and Modifications of MabThera During Maintenance Phase | At least 1 duration modification: Yes (n=121) | 36.4 percentage of participants |
| All Participants | Percentage of Participants With Discontinuations and Modifications of MabThera During Maintenance Phase | At least 1 duration modification: No (n=121) | 63.6 percentage of participants |
| All Participants | Percentage of Participants With Discontinuations and Modifications of MabThera During Maintenance Phase | Number (No.) of dose modifications: 0 (n=121) | 58.7 percentage of participants |
| All Participants | Percentage of Participants With Discontinuations and Modifications of MabThera During Maintenance Phase | No. of dose modifications: 1 (n=121) | 17.4 percentage of participants |
| All Participants | Percentage of Participants With Discontinuations and Modifications of MabThera During Maintenance Phase | No. of dose modifications: 2 (n=121) | 10.7 percentage of participants |
| All Participants | Percentage of Participants With Discontinuations and Modifications of MabThera During Maintenance Phase | No. of dose modifications: 3 (n=121) | 5.8 percentage of participants |
| All Participants | Percentage of Participants With Discontinuations and Modifications of MabThera During Maintenance Phase | No. of dose modifications: 4 (n=121) | 4.1 percentage of participants |
| All Participants | Percentage of Participants With Discontinuations and Modifications of MabThera During Maintenance Phase | No. of dose modifications: 5 (n=121) | 2.5 percentage of participants |
| All Participants | Percentage of Participants With Discontinuations and Modifications of MabThera During Maintenance Phase | No. of dose modifications: 6 (n=121) | 0.8 percentage of participants |
| All Participants | Percentage of Participants With Discontinuations and Modifications of MabThera During Maintenance Phase | No. of infusion duration modifications: 0 (n=121) | 63.6 percentage of participants |
| All Participants | Percentage of Participants With Discontinuations and Modifications of MabThera During Maintenance Phase | No. of infusion duration modifications: 1 (n=121) | 10.7 percentage of participants |
| All Participants | Percentage of Participants With Discontinuations and Modifications of MabThera During Maintenance Phase | No. of infusion duration modifications: 2 (n=121) | 5.8 percentage of participants |
| All Participants | Percentage of Participants With Discontinuations and Modifications of MabThera During Maintenance Phase | No. of infusion duration modifications: 3 (n=121) | 4.1 percentage of participants |
| All Participants | Percentage of Participants With Discontinuations and Modifications of MabThera During Maintenance Phase | No of infusion duration modifications: 4 (n=121) | 3.3 percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants With Disease Characteristics at First Study Disease Progression
Disease characteristics included (tumor burden, measured from whole body computed tomography (CT) scan. Groupe d'Etudes des Lymphomes Folliculaires (GELF) criteria defined as parameters to initiate treatment in participants with untreated follicular lymphoma, grade 1,2,or 3A; having just one of the criteria justified treatment: 1. involvement of \>=3 nodal sites, each with diameter of \>=3 centimeter(cm); 2. any nodal/extranodal tumor mass with diameter of \>=7cm; 3. B symptoms (temperature \>=38 degrees celsius or night sweats or weight loss \>10% over past 6 months); 4. splenomegaly; 5. pleural effusion/peritoneal ascites; 6. cytopenia (leukocytes \<1×10\^9 and/or platelets \<100×10\^9/L. One participant could present with more than 1 GELF criterion. Ann Arbor staging was used as staging system for lymphomas (Stage I to IV); stage depended upon the place where malignant tissue was located (through biopsy, CT scan, or positron emission tomography) and on systemic symptoms due to lymphoma).
Time frame: Up to 6 years
Population: Overall population: All the participants (except duplicate cases and participants without data available) meeting all the inclusion/exclusion criteria were included. Number of participants analyzed= participants with at least one disease progression over the study period. n=number of evaluable participant for each disease characteristics.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| All Participants | Percentage of Participants With Disease Characteristics at First Study Disease Progression | GELF criteria: Cytopenia (n=32, 38) | 6.3 percentage of participants |
| All Participants | Percentage of Participants With Disease Characteristics at First Study Disease Progression | Tumor burden: Data not available (n=32, 38) | 3.1 percentage of participants |
| All Participants | Percentage of Participants With Disease Characteristics at First Study Disease Progression | GELF criteria: None (n=32, 38) | 46.9 percentage of participants |
| All Participants | Percentage of Participants With Disease Characteristics at First Study Disease Progression | GELF criteria: Any nodal/extra-nodal mass(n=32,38) | 12.5 percentage of participants |
| All Participants | Percentage of Participants With Disease Characteristics at First Study Disease Progression | GELF criteria: Not available (n=32, 38) | 3.1 percentage of participants |
| All Participants | Percentage of Participants With Disease Characteristics at First Study Disease Progression | Tumor burden: Low (n=32, 38) | 46.9 percentage of participants |
| All Participants | Percentage of Participants With Disease Characteristics at First Study Disease Progression | Ann-Arbor stage I (n=35, 39) | 11.4 percentage of participants |
| All Participants | Percentage of Participants With Disease Characteristics at First Study Disease Progression | GELF criteria: B symptoms (n=32, 38) | 12.5 percentage of participants |
| All Participants | Percentage of Participants With Disease Characteristics at First Study Disease Progression | Ann-Arbor stage II (n=35, 39) | 14.3 percentage of participants |
| All Participants | Percentage of Participants With Disease Characteristics at First Study Disease Progression | GELF criteria: Splenomegaly (n=32, 38) | 9.4 percentage of participants |
| All Participants | Percentage of Participants With Disease Characteristics at First Study Disease Progression | Ann-Arbor stage III (n=35, 39) | 14.3 percentage of participants |
| All Participants | Percentage of Participants With Disease Characteristics at First Study Disease Progression | Tumor burden: High (n=32, 38) | 50.0 percentage of participants |
| All Participants | Percentage of Participants With Disease Characteristics at First Study Disease Progression | Ann-Arbor stage IV (n=35, 39) | 37.1 percentage of participants |
| All Participants | Percentage of Participants With Disease Characteristics at First Study Disease Progression | GELF criteria: Pleural/ascites effusion (n=32, 38) | 6.3 percentage of participants |
| All Participants | Percentage of Participants With Disease Characteristics at First Study Disease Progression | Ann-Arbor stage data not available (n=35, 39) | 17.1 percentage of participants |
| All Participants | Percentage of Participants With Disease Characteristics at First Study Disease Progression | Ann-Arbor stage not assessable (n=35, 39) | 5.7 percentage of participants |
| All Participants | Percentage of Participants With Disease Characteristics at First Study Disease Progression | GELF criteria: at least 3 nodal sites (n=32, 38) | 12.5 percentage of participants |
| MabThera as Maintenance Therapy | Percentage of Participants With Disease Characteristics at First Study Disease Progression | Ann-Arbor stage not assessable (n=35, 39) | 2.6 percentage of participants |
| MabThera as Maintenance Therapy | Percentage of Participants With Disease Characteristics at First Study Disease Progression | Ann-Arbor stage data not available (n=35, 39) | 23.1 percentage of participants |
| MabThera as Maintenance Therapy | Percentage of Participants With Disease Characteristics at First Study Disease Progression | Tumor burden: Data not available (n=32, 38) | 5.3 percentage of participants |
| MabThera as Maintenance Therapy | Percentage of Participants With Disease Characteristics at First Study Disease Progression | Tumor burden: High (n=32, 38) | 42.1 percentage of participants |
| MabThera as Maintenance Therapy | Percentage of Participants With Disease Characteristics at First Study Disease Progression | Tumor burden: Low (n=32, 38) | 52.6 percentage of participants |
| MabThera as Maintenance Therapy | Percentage of Participants With Disease Characteristics at First Study Disease Progression | GELF criteria: at least 3 nodal sites (n=32, 38) | 21.1 percentage of participants |
| MabThera as Maintenance Therapy | Percentage of Participants With Disease Characteristics at First Study Disease Progression | GELF criteria: Any nodal/extra-nodal mass(n=32,38) | 18.4 percentage of participants |
| MabThera as Maintenance Therapy | Percentage of Participants With Disease Characteristics at First Study Disease Progression | GELF criteria: Splenomegaly (n=32, 38) | 2.6 percentage of participants |
| MabThera as Maintenance Therapy | Percentage of Participants With Disease Characteristics at First Study Disease Progression | GELF criteria: Pleural/ascites effusion (n=32, 38) | 7.9 percentage of participants |
| MabThera as Maintenance Therapy | Percentage of Participants With Disease Characteristics at First Study Disease Progression | GELF criteria: Cytopenia (n=32, 38) | 0.0 percentage of participants |
| MabThera as Maintenance Therapy | Percentage of Participants With Disease Characteristics at First Study Disease Progression | GELF criteria: None (n=32, 38) | 52.6 percentage of participants |
| MabThera as Maintenance Therapy | Percentage of Participants With Disease Characteristics at First Study Disease Progression | GELF criteria: Not available (n=32, 38) | 5.3 percentage of participants |
| MabThera as Maintenance Therapy | Percentage of Participants With Disease Characteristics at First Study Disease Progression | Ann-Arbor stage I (n=35, 39) | 15.4 percentage of participants |
| MabThera as Maintenance Therapy | Percentage of Participants With Disease Characteristics at First Study Disease Progression | Ann-Arbor stage II (n=35, 39) | 10.3 percentage of participants |
| MabThera as Maintenance Therapy | Percentage of Participants With Disease Characteristics at First Study Disease Progression | Ann-Arbor stage III (n=35, 39) | 15.4 percentage of participants |
| MabThera as Maintenance Therapy | Percentage of Participants With Disease Characteristics at First Study Disease Progression | Ann-Arbor stage IV (n=35, 39) | 33.3 percentage of participants |
| MabThera as Maintenance Therapy | Percentage of Participants With Disease Characteristics at First Study Disease Progression | GELF criteria: B symptoms (n=32, 38) | 0.0 percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants With Last Induction Treatment Response
Last Induction treatment response: the last response assessment over the first study induction treatment (complete response \[CR\]: complete disappearance of all detectable clinical and radiographic evidence of disease and disappearance of all disease-related symptoms if present before therapy; CR unconfirmed: CR along with regression in lymph node mass by more than \[\>\]75% in the sum of the products of greatest diameters \[SPD\]; Partial Response \[PR\]: greater than or equal to \[\>=\] 50% decrease in SPD of 6 largest dominant nodes or nodal masses; Progression was 1 of the following: 1) lymphadenopathy; 2) a \>=50% increase in previously noted or new appearance of hepato/splenomegaly; 3) \>=50% increase in blood lymphocyte count with at least 5000 B lymphocytes/μL; 4) transformation to Richter's syndrome; or 5) occurrence of cytopenia; Stable disease \[SD\]: absence of necessary criteria to achieve CR or PR, but no advancement to progression) was described at the end of first study induction.
Time frame: Induction Phase: 18.7 months
Population: Overall population: All the participants (except duplicate cases and participants without data available) meeting all the inclusion/exclusion criteria were included. Number of participants analyzed (N)=number of participants evaluable for this outcome measure.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| All Participants | Percentage of Participants With Last Induction Treatment Response | Complete response | 38.3 percentage of participants |
| All Participants | Percentage of Participants With Last Induction Treatment Response | Complete response not confirmed | 11.5 percentage of participants |
| All Participants | Percentage of Participants With Last Induction Treatment Response | Partial response >=50% | 31.7 percentage of participants |
| All Participants | Percentage of Participants With Last Induction Treatment Response | Partial response <50% | 6.2 percentage of participants |
| All Participants | Percentage of Participants With Last Induction Treatment Response | Stability | 5.3 percentage of participants |
| All Participants | Percentage of Participants With Last Induction Treatment Response | Progression | 7.0 percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants With Number of Disease Progressions
Participants with at least one disease progression after the first study induction period were reported.
Time frame: Up to 6 years
Population: Overall population: All the participants (except duplicate cases and participants without data available) meeting all the inclusion/exclusion criteria were included. Number of participants analyzed= those participants who entered in maintenance/observation after the first induction and before the first disease progression over the study.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| All Participants | Percentage of Participants With Number of Disease Progressions | Number of disease progressions: 1 | 39.22 percentage of participants |
| All Participants | Percentage of Participants With Number of Disease Progressions | Number of disease progressions: 3 | 1.4 percentage of participants |
| All Participants | Percentage of Participants With Number of Disease Progressions | Number of disease progressions: 2 | 6.8 percentage of participants |
| All Participants | Percentage of Participants With Number of Disease Progressions | Number of disease progressions: 4 | 0.0 percentage of participants |
| All Participants | Percentage of Participants With Number of Disease Progressions | Number of disease progressions: 0 | 52.7 percentage of participants |
| MabThera as Maintenance Therapy | Percentage of Participants With Number of Disease Progressions | Number of disease progressions: 4 | 0.8 percentage of participants |
| MabThera as Maintenance Therapy | Percentage of Participants With Number of Disease Progressions | Number of disease progressions: 0 | 68.5 percentage of participants |
| MabThera as Maintenance Therapy | Percentage of Participants With Number of Disease Progressions | Number of disease progressions: 1 | 22.0 percentage of participants |
| MabThera as Maintenance Therapy | Percentage of Participants With Number of Disease Progressions | Number of disease progressions: 2 | 6.3 percentage of participants |
| MabThera as Maintenance Therapy | Percentage of Participants With Number of Disease Progressions | Number of disease progressions: 3 | 2.4 percentage of participants |
Progression Free Survival (PFS)
The PFS was defined as the time from the date of first induction treatment over the study (first treatment administration of first cycle) to the date of first disease progression or participants death or date of lymphoma transformation diagnosis.
Time frame: Up to 6 years
Population: Overall population: All the participants (except duplicate cases and participants without data available) meeting all the inclusion/exclusion criteria were included.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| All Participants | Progression Free Survival (PFS) | 44.4 months |
Time to Next Treatment
Time to next treatment was calculated from the date of the end of first induction treatment administration over the study to the date of the start of next treatment after disease progression.
Time frame: Up to 6 years
Population: Overall population: All the participants (except duplicate cases and participants without data available) meeting all the inclusion/exclusion criteria were included.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| All Participants | Time to Next Treatment | NA months |