Skip to content

Feedback and Rewards to Increase Motivation for Therapy in Stroke Rehabilitation

Feedback and Rewards to Increase Motivation for Therapy in Stroke Rehabilitation

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02315963
Enrollment
62
Registered
2014-12-12
Start date
2016-04-30
Completion date
2020-12-31
Last updated
2021-02-01

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Stroke

Brief summary

High motivation is a predictor for good therapy results in physical therapy \[Grahn 2000\]. The investigator want to show that it is possible to increase patients motivation for stroke rehabilitation by providing them objective performance feedback about the patients therapy progress.

Detailed description

High motivation is a predictor for good therapy results in physical therapy \[Grahn 2000\]. Additional focus on motivation and rewards has fallen on the topic of stroke rehabilitation since it was shown in an animal model that the brain centers involved with motivation and rewards are crucial to motor learning \[Hosp 2011\]. The investigators goal is to target the overall motivation for therapy. During the guided therapy sessions the therapists will be the main motivators and the investigators do not want to interfere with that. But the amount of guided therapy sessions is often limited due to economical reason rather than therapeutic ones. Therefore patients are encouraged to do training on their own if possible and to be active during the patients stay in the rehabilitation clinic. The investigators target the patients motivation to train by themselves and be active but also the patients attitude towards the guided therapies. It is known that performance feedback can improve motivation \[Harackiewicz 1979\]. Therefore the investigators want to use the data about therapy progress to produce feedback for patients visualizing the patients progress and efforts during the patients stay in the clinic. The investigators will compare patients who receive normal therapy to patients who receive normal therapy plus performance feedback regarding a variety of motivation measures.

Interventions

Performance Feedback regarding the patients efforts and accomplishments during the patients stay in the rehabilitation clinic, an expected average of 6 weeks. The data available about the patients progress will be analysed and processed to create a visual illustration shown to the patient on a daily bases.

Sponsors

Cereneo AG
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* First time Inpatient at the Cereneo rehabilitation clinic

Exclusion criteria

* Rey-Figur Kopie \<= 25 AND Rechnerisches Denken WIE \<=5 * Becks Depression Inventar (BDI) \> 17 * Major aphasia preventing understanding of study materials (according to the treating physician).

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
MotivationWeekly for the duration of the participants stay at the hospital an expected average of 6 weeksWeekly: Intrinsic Motivation Inventory Questionnaire

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Clinical scores (e.g. Fugl-Meyer Score)When decided by therapists for the duration of the participants stay at the hospital an expected average of 6 weeksStandard quality assessments of the study site (rehabilitation clinic)

Countries

Switzerland

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026