Skip to content

Cap Assisted Balloon Enteroscopy Versus Conventional Balloon Enteroscopy In The Evaluation Of Obscure Gastrointestinal Bleeding: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Cap Assisted Balloon Enteroscopy Versus Conventional Balloon Enteroscopy In The Evaluation Of Obscure Gastrointestinal Bleeding: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Status
Terminated
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02315404
Enrollment
87
Registered
2014-12-11
Start date
2014-01-31
Completion date
2017-05-31
Last updated
2018-06-25

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Obscure Gastrointestinal Bleeding

Keywords

Obscure gastrointestinal bleeding, Overt gastrointestinal bleeding, Occult gastrointestinal bleeding, Enteroscopy

Brief summary

Gastrointestinal bleeding originating from the small bowel is difficult to diagnose and treat because the small bowel is difficult to see and reach. Balloon assisted enteroscopy (BAE) is a new enteroscopy methods that allow examination of the small bowel and allows for diagnosis and treatment of bleeding originating from this part of the intestine. Unfortunately, BAE is unsuccessful in identifying the cause of bleeding in 40-50% of patients. This may be due to limited visualization of the small bowel lining during conventional endoscopy. One way to improve visualization of the small bowel lining is by adding a transparent plastic cap to the end of the endoscope (camera), which allows the endoscope to see around sharp turned and behind folds in the small bowel. The investigators goal in this randomized controlled study is to see if adding a transparent cap to the end of the endoscope will help to identify and treat small bowel bleeding. The investigators will invite patients referred for BAE to participate in the study; the alternative to participating in the study is having standard BAE (without a cap). If patients choose to participate in the study they will be randomized to BAE with or without a cap on the end of the endoscope. Subjects time commitment will be limited to the consent process and pre-procedure paperwork at time of initial endoscopy and time required to complete telephone questionnaire at 12 months follow up.

Interventions

PROCEDURECAP

CAP fitted to the end of the endoscope

Sponsors

Washington University School of Medicine
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 95 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Adult (≥18 years old) patients undergoing BAE for the evaluation of OGIB or iron deficiency anemia.

Exclusion criteria

* Unable to provide written informed consent. * Pregnancy or lactation. * Suspected bowel obstruction or GI perforation. * Unable to tolerate sedation or general anesthesia due to medical co-morbidities. * Uncorrected coagulopathy (platelet count \<50,000, INR\> 2, PTT\> 2x upper limit of normal). * Patient undergoing retrograde BAE.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Diagnostic yield of BAE vs. Cap assisted BAE (C-BAE).1 dayDiagnostic yield defined as proportion of enteroscopies in which clinically significant findings were identified. a. Clinically significant findings being defined as P2 lesion (lesion considered to have high potential for bleeding; such as typical angiomata, large ulceration, tumor or varices)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Overall Diagnostic yield of BAE vs. C-BAE1 dayDiagnostic yield defined as proportion of enteroscopies in which any abnormality is detected. a. Abnormalities classified as: i. P0: lesion with no bleeding potential, including visible submucosal veins, diverticula without the presence of blood or nodules without mucosal break. ii. P1: lesion considered as having uncertain bleeding potential, such as a red spot on the intestinal mucosa or small erosions. iii. P2: lesion considered to have high potential for bleeding; such as typical angiomata, large ulceration, tumor or varices
Therapeutic yield BAE vs. Cap assisted BAE (C-BAE).1 dayTherapeutic yield being defined as proportion of enteroscopies in which a therapeutic intervention was undertaken. Interventions included in this calculation were polypectomy, argon plasma coagulation, bipolar coagulation, dilation of strictures, and endoscopic clipping. Biopsy was considered to be a therapeutic intervention if histopathology results lead to the initiation of a medical or surgical therapy (i.e: resection of mass, medical therapy for Crohn's disease)
iii. Depth of small bowel insertion: calculated according to the method of Efthymiou et al.1 dayFold counting method: The number of complete folds (valvulae conniventes) will be counted during withdrawal of the endoscope; with the assumption that the distance between folds is approximately 0.9 cm.
vProcedure related adverse events.1 day
Recurrence of GI bleeding at 12 months, as evaluated by questionnaire12 months

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026