Colon Cancer, Minimal Residual Disease
Conditions
Keywords
perioperative analgesia, minimal residual disease, cancer recurrence, epidural, morphine, piritramide, colon, cancer, circulating cancer cells, colon cancer surgery
Brief summary
The aim of this study is to compare the effects of three types of perioperative analgesia on the number of circulating cancer cells (representing minimal residual disease) following radical colon cancer surgery. Patients will be randomized into one of three groups. The intervention group will receive combined regional and general anesthesia during surgery and postoperative epidural analgesia. The two control groups will receive balanced general anesthesia and either morphine-based or piritramide-based postoperative analgesia. We hypothesize that epidural analgesia will be favorable to both piritramide-based and morphine-based analgesia and that piritramide-based analgesia will be favorable to morphine-based analgesia with regard to the number of circulating cancer cells and its development in the early postoperative period.
Detailed description
Techniques of regional analgesia such as epidural analgesia may favorably influence metastasis development following cancer surgery compared to analgesia based on strong opioids such as morphine or piritramide. These beneficial effects, if present, are probably attributable to less immunosuppression of antimetastatic immune defenses. The aim of this study is to identify techniques of perioperative analgesia with the potential to prevent metastasis development in patients undergoing open radical colon cancer surgery. In the early postoperative period, a relationship between metastasis development and the number of circulating cancer cells representing minimal residual disease has been shown. Therefore, effects of epidural, morphine-based and piritramide-based analgesia on the number of circulating cancer cells will be compared at several time points during the peroperative and early postoperative periods. The number of circulating cancer cells will be assessed in peripheral venous blood samples using real-time polymerase chain reaction. Perioperative care will be standardized and patients will be followed by clinical observation, laboratory analyses and monitoring instrumentation daily during their hospital stay.
Interventions
DRUGPiritramide
see Arm/group description
DRUGMorphine
see Arm/group description
OTHEREpidural analgesia
see Arm/group description
Sponsors
Brno University Hospital
Tomas Bata Hospital, Czech Republic
The Institute of Molecular and Translational Medicine, Czech Republic
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
* Patients undergoing open radical surgery for colon cancer (without known extension beyond colon) * Age over 18 years * Written informed consent
Exclusion criteria
* Allergy or intolerance of morphine, piritramide, marcaine, sufentanil or volatile anesthetics * History of colon cancer resection * Other cancer present (apart from those in complete long-term remission for minimum 6 months) * Chronic opioid medication and/or opioid administration 7 days or less prior to surgery * Any contraindication to thoracic epidural anesthesia/analgesia * Systemic therapy with immunosuppressive drugs or corticoids (apart from topical and inhalational) * Any surgery within the last 30 days (apart from minor day-case procedures)  - Chronic or acute infectious disease, particularly hepatitis, AIDS, tuberculosis
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Change from baseline number of circulating cancer cells at 3 weeks after surgery | Baseline prior to surgery, on day 2 postoperatively and three weeks after surgery | Number of circulating cancer cells will be measured in venous blood samples. The quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction using carcinoembryonic antigen and cytokeratine 20 as markers for circulating cancer cells will be used for minimal residual disease detection. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Pain intensity assessment | 3 days postoperatively | Self reported pain intensity. Scale: 0 = no pain, 10 = worst pain imaginable. A score 0-10 will be recorded every four hours. |
Countries
Czechia
Outcome results
None listed