Skip to content

Rivaroxaban Versus Aspirin in Secondary Prevention of Stroke and Prevention of Systemic Embolism in Patients With Recent Embolic Stroke of Undetermined Source (ESUS)

Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Double-dummy, Active-comparator, Event-driven, Superiority Phase III Study of Secondary Prevention of Stroke and Prevention of Systemic Embolism in Patients With a Recent Embolic Stroke of Undetermined Source (ESUS), Comparing Rivaroxaban 15 mg Once Daily With Aspirin 100 mg

Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02313909
Acronym
NAVIGATE ESUS
Enrollment
7213
Registered
2014-12-10
Start date
2014-12-23
Completion date
2018-02-15
Last updated
2019-01-09

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Stroke

Keywords

Rivaroxaban, Xarelto, Aspirin, Acetylsalicylic acid (ASA), Oral Anticoagulant, Blood Thinner, Stroke, Ischemic Stroke, Cryptogenic Stroke, Embolic stroke of undetermined source, ESUS, Transient Ischemic Attack, Thromboembolism, Cerebrovascular Disease

Brief summary

This is a study in patients who recently had a brain attack (stroke) and in whom no clear cause of the stroke could be identified. These strokes are likely due to a blood clot and therefore, can be called embolic stroke of undetermined source. The abbreviation is ESUS. The study will compare 2 blood thinners. Patients will be randomly assigned to either Rivaroxaban 15 mg or Aspirin 100 mg and the study is intended to show, if patients given rivaroxaban have fewer blood clots in the brain (stroke) or in other blood vessels.

Interventions

DRUGRivaroxaban (Xarelto, BAY59-7939)

15 mg, once daily, orally, tablet

100 mg, once daily, orally, tablet

Matching placebo, once daily, orally, tablet

OTHERAspirin-Placebo

Matching placebo, once daily, orally, tablet

Sponsors

Janssen Research & Development, LLC
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Population Health Research Institute
CollaboratorOTHER
Bayer
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
50 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Recent ESUS (between 7 days and 6 months), defined as: * Recent ischemic stroke (including transient ischemic attack with positive neuroimaging) visualized by brain imaging that is not lacunar, and * Absence of cervical carotid atherosclerotic stenosis\> 50% or occlusion, and * No atrial fibrillation after ≥ 24-hour cardiac rhythm monitoring, and * No intra-cardiac thrombus on either transesophageal or transthoracic echocardiography, and * No other specific cause of stroke (for example, arteritis, dissection, migraine/vasospasm, drug abuse)

Exclusion criteria

* Severely disabling stroke (modified Rankin score ≥4) * Indication for chronic anticoagulation or antiplatelet therapy * Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) \< 30 mL/min/1.73 m\^2

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Incidence Rate of the Composite Efficacy Outcome (Adjudicated)From randomization until the efficacy cut-off date (median 326 days)Components of composite efficacy outcome (adjudicated) includes stroke (ischemic, hemorrhagic, and undefined stroke, TIA with positive neuroimaging) and systemic embolism. Incidence rate estimated as number of participants with incident events divided by cumulative at-risk time, where participant is no longer at risk once an incident event occurred.
Incidence Rate of a Major Bleeding Event According to the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis (ISTH) Criteria (Adjudicated)From randomization until the efficacy cut-off date (median 326 days)Major bleeding event (as per ISTH), defined as bleeding event that met at least one of following: fatal bleeding; symptomatic bleeding in a critical area or organ (intraarticular, intramuscular with compartment syndrome, intraocular, intraspinal, pericardial, or retroperitoneal); symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage; clinically overt bleeding associated with a recent decrease in the hemoglobin level of greater than or equal to (\>=) 2 grams per decilitre (g/dL) (20 grams per liter \[g/L\]; 1.24 millimoles per liter \[mmol/L\]) compared to the most recent hemoglobin value available before the event; clinically overt bleeding leading to transfusion of 2 or more units of packed red blood cells or whole blood. The results were based on classification of events that have been positively adjudicated as major bleeding events. Incidence rate estimated as number of subjects with incident events divided by cumulative at-risk time, where subject is no longer at risk once an incident event occurred.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Incidence Rate of the Following: Stroke, Ischemic Stroke, Disabling Stroke, Cardiovascular (CV) Death, Myocardial InfarctionFrom randomization until the efficacy cut-off date (median 326 days)Disabling stroke is defined as stroke with modified Rankin score (mRS) greater than or equal to (\>=) 4 as assessed by investigator. mRS spans 0-6, running from perfect health to death. A score of 0-3 indicates functional status ranging from no symptoms to moderate disability (defined in the mRS as requiring some help, but able to walk without assistance); mRS 4-6 indicates functional status ranging from moderately severe disability (unable to walk or to attend to own bodily needs without assistance)through to death. CV death includes death due to hemorrhage and death with undetermined/unknown cause. Diagnosis of myocardial infarction requires combination of: 1) evidence of myocardial necrosis either changes in cardiac biomarkers or post-mortem pathological findings); 2) supporting information derived from clinical presentation, electrocardiographic changes, or results of myocardial or coronary artery imaging.
Incidence Rate of Life-Threatening Bleeding EventsFrom randomization until the efficacy cut-off date (median 326 days)Life-threatening bleeding was defined as a subset of major bleeding that met at least one of the following criteria: 1) fatal bleeding; 2) symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage; 3) reduction in hemoglobin of at least 5 g/dl (50 g/l; 3.10 mmol/L); 4) transfusion of at least 4 units of packed red cells or whole blood; 5) associated with hypotension requiring the use of intravenous inotropic agents; 6) necessitated surgical intervention. Incidence rate estimated as number of participants with incident events divided by cumulative at-risk time, where participant is no longer at risk once an incident event occurred.
Incidence Rate of Any of the Following: Cardiovascular Death, Recurrent Stroke, Systemic Embolism and Myocardial InfarctionFrom randomization until the efficacy cut-off date (median 326 days)Incidence rate estimated as number of participants with incident events divided by cumulative at-risk time, where participant is no longer at risk once an incident event occurred. Cardiovascular death includes death due to hemorrhage and death with undetermined/unknown cause. Systemic embolism is defined as abrupt vascular insufficiency associated with clinical or radiological evidence of arterial occlusion in the absence of other likely mechanisms. The diagnosis of myocardial infarction requires the combination of: 1)evidence of myocardial necrosis (either changes in cardiac biomarkers or post-mortem pathological findings); and 2)supporting information derived from the clinical presentation, electrocardiographic changes, or the results of myocardial or coronary artery imaging.
Incidence Rate of Intracranial HemorrhageFrom randomization until the efficacy cut-off date (median 326 days)Intracranial hemorrhage included all bleeding events that occurred in intracerebral, sub arachnoidal as well as subdural or epidural sites. The below table displays results for all randomized participants and the outcomes at or after randomization until the efficacy cut-off date. Incidence rate estimated as number of participants with incident events divided by cumulative at-risk time, where participant is no longer at risk once an incident event occurred.
Incidence Rate of Clinically Relevant Non-Major Bleeding EventsFrom randomization until the efficacy cut-off date (median 326 days)Non-major clinically relevant bleeding was defined as non-major overt bleeding but required medical attention (example: hospitalization, medical treatment for bleeding), and/or was associated with the study drug interruption of more than 14 days. The results were based on the outcome events at or after randomization until the efficacy cut-off date. Incidence rate estimated as number of participants with incident events divided by cumulative at-risk time, where participant is no longer at risk once an incident event occurred.
Incidence Rate of All-Cause MortalityFrom randomization until the efficacy cut-off date (median 326 days)All-cause mortality includes all deaths of participants due to any cause.

Countries

Argentina, Australia, Austria, Belgium, Brazil, Canada, Chile, China, Czechia, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Ireland, Israel, Italy, Japan, Mexico, Poland, Portugal, Russia, South Africa, South Korea, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Turkey (Türkiye), United Kingdom, United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Study was conducted at multiple centers in 31 countries between 23 December 2014 (first participant first visit) and 15 February 2018 (last participant last visit).

Pre-assignment details

Overall, 7582 participants were screened; of these 369 participants were screen failures. A total of 7213 participants were randomized, of which 92 never took study drug; 3562 were treated with rivaroxaban(Xarelto, BAY59-7939) /placebo and 3559 were treated with acetylsalicylic acid/placebo.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Rivaroxaban 15 mg OD
Subjects received rivaroxaban 15 mg immediate-release film-coated tablet and matching placebo of acetylsalicylic acid orally once daily (OD).
3,609
Acetylsalicylic Acid 100 mg OD
Subjects received acetylsalicylic acid 100 mg enteric-coated tablet and matching placebo of rivaroxaban orally once daily (OD).
3,604
Total7,213

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyConsent withdrawn by participant3333
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up2417

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicRivaroxaban 15 mg ODAcetylsalicylic Acid 100 mg ODTotal
Age, Continuous66.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.8
66.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.8
66.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.8
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
716 Participants698 Participants1414 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
51 Participants60 Participants111 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
229 Participants241 Participants470 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
2613 Participants2605 Participants5218 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
1377 Participants1400 Participants2777 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
2232 Participants2204 Participants4436 Participants
Stroke or TIA (prior to qualifying stroke) or Other medical history
Other medical history
2989 count of participants2961 count of participants5950 count of participants
Stroke or TIA (prior to qualifying stroke) or Other medical history
Stroke or TIA
620 count of participants643 count of participants1263 count of participants
Time from qualifying stroke to randomization38.0 days36.0 days37.0 days

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
73 / 3,56258 / 3,559
other
Total, other adverse events
308 / 3,562294 / 3,559
serious
Total, serious adverse events
466 / 3,562434 / 3,559

Outcome results

Primary

Incidence Rate of a Major Bleeding Event According to the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis (ISTH) Criteria (Adjudicated)

Major bleeding event (as per ISTH), defined as bleeding event that met at least one of following: fatal bleeding; symptomatic bleeding in a critical area or organ (intraarticular, intramuscular with compartment syndrome, intraocular, intraspinal, pericardial, or retroperitoneal); symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage; clinically overt bleeding associated with a recent decrease in the hemoglobin level of greater than or equal to (\>=) 2 grams per decilitre (g/dL) (20 grams per liter \[g/L\]; 1.24 millimoles per liter \[mmol/L\]) compared to the most recent hemoglobin value available before the event; clinically overt bleeding leading to transfusion of 2 or more units of packed red blood cells or whole blood. The results were based on classification of events that have been positively adjudicated as major bleeding events. Incidence rate estimated as number of subjects with incident events divided by cumulative at-risk time, where subject is no longer at risk once an incident event occurred.

Time frame: From randomization until the efficacy cut-off date (median 326 days)

Population: Intention-to-treat analysis set included all randomized participants. Participants who were evaluable for this measure at given time period for the arm were included in the category.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Rivaroxaban 15 mg ODIncidence Rate of a Major Bleeding Event According to the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis (ISTH) Criteria (Adjudicated)1.82 event/100 participant-years
Acetylsalicylic Acid 100 mg ODIncidence Rate of a Major Bleeding Event According to the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis (ISTH) Criteria (Adjudicated)0.67 event/100 participant-years
Comparison: Statistical analysis: ISTH major bleeding events: Risk reduction was estimated with the stratified Cox proportional hazards model. Hazard ratios (95% confidence interval) as compared to acetylsalicylic acid arm were reported. Rivaroxaban treatment was compared with the Acetylsalicylic acid control group using a stratified log-rank test. P-values (two-sided) as compared to acetylsalicylic acid arm were based on the log-rank test.p-value: 0.0000295% CI: [1.68, 4.39]Log Rank
Primary

Incidence Rate of the Composite Efficacy Outcome (Adjudicated)

Components of composite efficacy outcome (adjudicated) includes stroke (ischemic, hemorrhagic, and undefined stroke, TIA with positive neuroimaging) and systemic embolism. Incidence rate estimated as number of participants with incident events divided by cumulative at-risk time, where participant is no longer at risk once an incident event occurred.

Time frame: From randomization until the efficacy cut-off date (median 326 days)

Population: Intention-to-treat analysis set included all randomized participants. Participants who were evaluable for this measure at given time period for the arm were included in the category.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Rivaroxaban 15 mg ODIncidence Rate of the Composite Efficacy Outcome (Adjudicated)5.14 event/100 participant-years
Acetylsalicylic Acid 100 mg ODIncidence Rate of the Composite Efficacy Outcome (Adjudicated)4.78 event/100 participant-years
Comparison: Statistical analysis: Stroke + Systemic embolism: Risk reduction was estimated with the stratified Cox proportional hazards model. Hazard ratios (95% confidence interval) as compared to acetylsalicylic acid arm were reported. Rivaroxaban treatment was compared with the Acetylsalicylic acid control group using a stratified log-rank test. P-values (two-sided) as compared to acetylsalicylic acid arm were based on the log-rank test.p-value: 0.5188495% CI: [0.87, 1.33]Log Rank
Secondary

Incidence Rate of All-Cause Mortality

All-cause mortality includes all deaths of participants due to any cause.

Time frame: From randomization until the efficacy cut-off date (median 326 days)

Population: Intention-to-treat analysis set included all randomized participants. Participants who were evaluable for this measure at given time period for the arm were included in the category.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Rivaroxaban 15 mg ODIncidence Rate of All-Cause Mortality1.88 event/100 participant-years
Acetylsalicylic Acid 100 mg ODIncidence Rate of All-Cause Mortality1.50 event/100 participant-years
Comparison: Risk reduction was estimated with the stratified Cox proportional hazards model. Hazard ratios (95% confidence interval) as compared to acetylsalicylic acid arm were reported. Confidence intervals were calculated, if at least 1 event in each treatment arm existed. Rivaroxaban treatment was compared with the Acetylsalicylic acid control group using a stratified log-rank test. P-values (two-sided) as compared to acetylsalicylic acid arm were based on the log-rank test.p-value: 0.2207895% CI: [0.87, 1.81]Log Rank
Secondary

Incidence Rate of Any of the Following: Cardiovascular Death, Recurrent Stroke, Systemic Embolism and Myocardial Infarction

Incidence rate estimated as number of participants with incident events divided by cumulative at-risk time, where participant is no longer at risk once an incident event occurred. Cardiovascular death includes death due to hemorrhage and death with undetermined/unknown cause. Systemic embolism is defined as abrupt vascular insufficiency associated with clinical or radiological evidence of arterial occlusion in the absence of other likely mechanisms. The diagnosis of myocardial infarction requires the combination of: 1)evidence of myocardial necrosis (either changes in cardiac biomarkers or post-mortem pathological findings); and 2)supporting information derived from the clinical presentation, electrocardiographic changes, or the results of myocardial or coronary artery imaging.

Time frame: From randomization until the efficacy cut-off date (median 326 days)

Population: Intention-to-treat analysis set included all randomized participants. Participants who were evaluable for this measure at given time period for the arm were included in the category.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Rivaroxaban 15 mg ODIncidence Rate of Any of the Following: Cardiovascular Death, Recurrent Stroke, Systemic Embolism and Myocardial Infarction6.20 event/100 participant-years
Acetylsalicylic Acid 100 mg ODIncidence Rate of Any of the Following: Cardiovascular Death, Recurrent Stroke, Systemic Embolism and Myocardial Infarction5.85 event/100 participant-years
Comparison: Statistical analysis: Risk reduction was estimated with the stratified Cox proportional hazards model. Hazard ratios (95% confidence interval) as compared to acetylsalicylic acid arm were reported. Confidence intervals were calculated, if at least 1 event in each treatment arm existed. Rivaroxaban treatment was compared with the Acetylsalicylic acid control group using a stratified log-rank test. P-values (two-sided) as compared to acetylsalicylic acid arm were based on the log-rank test.p-value: 0.5692295% CI: [0.87, 1.29]Log Rank
Secondary

Incidence Rate of Clinically Relevant Non-Major Bleeding Events

Non-major clinically relevant bleeding was defined as non-major overt bleeding but required medical attention (example: hospitalization, medical treatment for bleeding), and/or was associated with the study drug interruption of more than 14 days. The results were based on the outcome events at or after randomization until the efficacy cut-off date. Incidence rate estimated as number of participants with incident events divided by cumulative at-risk time, where participant is no longer at risk once an incident event occurred.

Time frame: From randomization until the efficacy cut-off date (median 326 days)

Population: Intention-to-treat analysis set included all randomized participants. Participants who were evaluable for this measure at given time period for the arm were included in the category.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Rivaroxaban 15 mg ODIncidence Rate of Clinically Relevant Non-Major Bleeding Events3.52 event/100 participant-years
Acetylsalicylic Acid 100 mg ODIncidence Rate of Clinically Relevant Non-Major Bleeding Events2.32 event/100 participant-years
Comparison: Statistical analysis: Risk reduction was estimated with the stratified Cox proportional hazards model. Hazard ratios (95% confidence interval) as compared to acetylsalicylic acid arm were reported. Rivaroxaban treatment was compared with the Acetylsalicylic acid control group using a stratified log-rank test. P-values (two-sided) as compared to acetylsalicylic acid arm were based on the log-rank test.p-value: 0.0045195% CI: [1.13, 2]Log Rank
Secondary

Incidence Rate of Intracranial Hemorrhage

Intracranial hemorrhage included all bleeding events that occurred in intracerebral, sub arachnoidal as well as subdural or epidural sites. The below table displays results for all randomized participants and the outcomes at or after randomization until the efficacy cut-off date. Incidence rate estimated as number of participants with incident events divided by cumulative at-risk time, where participant is no longer at risk once an incident event occurred.

Time frame: From randomization until the efficacy cut-off date (median 326 days)

Population: Intention-to-treat analysis set included all randomized participants. Participants who were evaluable for this measure at given time period for the arm were included in the category.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Rivaroxaban 15 mg ODIncidence Rate of Intracranial Hemorrhage0.70 event/100 participant-years
Acetylsalicylic Acid 100 mg ODIncidence Rate of Intracranial Hemorrhage0.35 event/100 participant-years
Comparison: Statistical analysis 1: Risk reduction was estimated with the stratified Cox proportional hazards model. Hazard ratios (95% confidence interval) as compared to acetylsalicylic acid arm were reported. Rivaroxaban treatment was compared with the Acetylsalicylic acid control group using a stratified log-rank test. P-values (two-sided) as compared to acetylsalicylic acid arm were based on the log-rank test.p-value: 0.0440995% CI: [1, 4.02]Log Rank
Secondary

Incidence Rate of Life-Threatening Bleeding Events

Life-threatening bleeding was defined as a subset of major bleeding that met at least one of the following criteria: 1) fatal bleeding; 2) symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage; 3) reduction in hemoglobin of at least 5 g/dl (50 g/l; 3.10 mmol/L); 4) transfusion of at least 4 units of packed red cells or whole blood; 5) associated with hypotension requiring the use of intravenous inotropic agents; 6) necessitated surgical intervention. Incidence rate estimated as number of participants with incident events divided by cumulative at-risk time, where participant is no longer at risk once an incident event occurred.

Time frame: From randomization until the efficacy cut-off date (median 326 days)

Population: Intention-to-treat analysis set included all randomized participants. Participants who were evaluable for this measure at given time period for the arm were included in the category.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Rivaroxaban 15 mg ODIncidence Rate of Life-Threatening Bleeding Events1.02 event/100 participant-years
Acetylsalicylic Acid 100 mg ODIncidence Rate of Life-Threatening Bleeding Events0.43 event/100 participant-years
Comparison: Statistical analysis: Risk reduction was estimated with the stratified Cox proportional hazards model. Hazard ratios (95% confidence interval) as compared to acetylsalicylic acid arm were reported. Rivaroxaban treatment was compared with the Acetylsalicylic acid control group using a stratified log-rank test. P-values (two-sided) as compared to acetylsalicylic acid arm were based on the log-rank test.p-value: 0.0044395% CI: [1.28, 4.29]Log Rank
Secondary

Incidence Rate of the Following: Stroke, Ischemic Stroke, Disabling Stroke, Cardiovascular (CV) Death, Myocardial Infarction

Disabling stroke is defined as stroke with modified Rankin score (mRS) greater than or equal to (\>=) 4 as assessed by investigator. mRS spans 0-6, running from perfect health to death. A score of 0-3 indicates functional status ranging from no symptoms to moderate disability (defined in the mRS as requiring some help, but able to walk without assistance); mRS 4-6 indicates functional status ranging from moderately severe disability (unable to walk or to attend to own bodily needs without assistance)through to death. CV death includes death due to hemorrhage and death with undetermined/unknown cause. Diagnosis of myocardial infarction requires combination of: 1) evidence of myocardial necrosis either changes in cardiac biomarkers or post-mortem pathological findings); 2) supporting information derived from clinical presentation, electrocardiographic changes, or results of myocardial or coronary artery imaging.

Time frame: From randomization until the efficacy cut-off date (median 326 days)

Population: Intention-to-treat analysis set included all randomized participants. Participants who were evaluable for this measure at given time period for the arm were included in the category.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Rivaroxaban 15 mg ODIncidence Rate of the Following: Stroke, Ischemic Stroke, Disabling Stroke, Cardiovascular (CV) Death, Myocardial InfarctionCV death(includes death due to hemorrhage)0.99 event/100 participant-years
Rivaroxaban 15 mg ODIncidence Rate of the Following: Stroke, Ischemic Stroke, Disabling Stroke, Cardiovascular (CV) Death, Myocardial InfarctionDisabling stroke1.20 event/100 participant-years
Rivaroxaban 15 mg ODIncidence Rate of the Following: Stroke, Ischemic Stroke, Disabling Stroke, Cardiovascular (CV) Death, Myocardial InfarctionIschemic stroke4.71 event/100 participant-years
Rivaroxaban 15 mg ODIncidence Rate of the Following: Stroke, Ischemic Stroke, Disabling Stroke, Cardiovascular (CV) Death, Myocardial InfarctionMyocardial infarction0.49 event/100 participant-years
Rivaroxaban 15 mg ODIncidence Rate of the Following: Stroke, Ischemic Stroke, Disabling Stroke, Cardiovascular (CV) Death, Myocardial InfarctionStroke5.11 event/100 participant-years
Acetylsalicylic Acid 100 mg ODIncidence Rate of the Following: Stroke, Ischemic Stroke, Disabling Stroke, Cardiovascular (CV) Death, Myocardial InfarctionMyocardial infarction0.67 event/100 participant-years
Acetylsalicylic Acid 100 mg ODIncidence Rate of the Following: Stroke, Ischemic Stroke, Disabling Stroke, Cardiovascular (CV) Death, Myocardial InfarctionDisabling stroke0.84 event/100 participant-years
Acetylsalicylic Acid 100 mg ODIncidence Rate of the Following: Stroke, Ischemic Stroke, Disabling Stroke, Cardiovascular (CV) Death, Myocardial InfarctionStroke4.71 event/100 participant-years
Acetylsalicylic Acid 100 mg ODIncidence Rate of the Following: Stroke, Ischemic Stroke, Disabling Stroke, Cardiovascular (CV) Death, Myocardial InfarctionIschemic stroke4.56 event/100 participant-years
Acetylsalicylic Acid 100 mg ODIncidence Rate of the Following: Stroke, Ischemic Stroke, Disabling Stroke, Cardiovascular (CV) Death, Myocardial InfarctionCV death(includes death due to hemorrhage)0.66 event/100 participant-years
Comparison: Statistical analysis 1: Stroke: Risk reduction was estimated with the stratified Cox proportional hazards model. Hazard ratios (95% confidence interval) as compared to acetylsalicylic acid arm were reported. Rivaroxaban treatment was compared with the Acetylsalicylic acid control group using a stratified log-rank test. P-values (two-sided) as compared to acetylsalicylic acid arm were based on the log-rank test.p-value: 0.479795% CI: [0.87, 1.34]Log Rank
Comparison: Statistical analysis 2: Ischemic stroke: Risk reduction was estimated with the stratified Cox proportional hazards model. Hazard ratios (95% confidence interval) as compared to acetylsalicylic acid arm were reported. Rivaroxaban treatment was compared with the Acetylsalicylic acid control group using a stratified log-rank test. P-values (two-sided) as compared to acetylsalicylic acid arm were based on the log-rank test.p-value: 0.7873895% CI: [0.83, 1.29]Log Rank
Comparison: Statistical analysis 3: Disabling stroke: Risk reduction was estimated with the stratified Cox proportional hazards model. Hazard ratios (95% confidence interval) as compared to acetylsalicylic acid arm were reported. Rivaroxaban treatment was compared with the Acetylsalicylic acid control group using a stratified log-rank test. P-values (two-sided) as compared to acetylsalicylic acid arm were based on the log-rank test.p-value: 0.1482295% CI: [0.88, 2.28]Log Rank
Comparison: Statistical analysis 4:CV death: Risk reduction was estimated with the stratified Cox proportional hazards model. Hazard ratios (95% confidence interval) as compared to acetylsalicylic acid arm were reported. Rivaroxaban treatment was compared with the Acetylsalicylic acid control group using a stratified log-rank test. P-values (two-sided) as compared to acetylsalicylic acid arm were based on the log-rank test.p-value: 0.1405195% CI: [0.87, 2.52]Log Rank
Comparison: Statistical analysis 5: Myocardial infarction: Risk reduction was estimated with the stratified Cox proportional hazards model. Hazard ratios (95% confidence interval) as compared to acetylsalicylic acid arm were reported. Rivaroxaban treatment was compared with the Acetylsalicylic acid control group using a stratified log-rank test. P-values (two-sided) as compared to acetylsalicylic acid arm were based on the log-rank test.p-value: 0.3428495% CI: [0.39, 1.38]Log Rank

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 9, 2026