Neck Pain
Conditions
Brief summary
To date, the benefits of massage in chronic neck pain patients has only been investigated as a singular treatment, rather than as part of a treatment package. The need for this research has been highlighted in the literature (Ezzo et al, 2007; Haraldsson et al, 2006) This research aimed to establish whether the addition of massage to a program of exercise and manual therapy offers any additional benefits over exercise and manual therapy alone in the treatment of patients with chronic neck pain.
Detailed description
39 patients with neck pain of greater than three months duration were randomised to either a massage or non-massage group in a primary care setting in the Dublin region. One therapist administered all treatments. Randomisation was carried out by the use of sequential sampling, utilising permuted blocks. Patients were excluded from the study if they had severe co-existing disease, had neck pain due to fracture, tumour, infection or other non-mechanical causes, or if the patient had a diagnosis of osteoporosis anywhere in the body. Both groups underwent up to eight weekly physiotherapy sessions. The non-massage group received exercise, manual therapy and advice over the 30 minute intervention period, in conjunction with an exercise program to perform at home. The massage group received all of the above as well as Swedish massage. Follow up was for the duration of treatment only. A number of T-tests and non-parametric tests were conducted to establish if the two groups were comparable at baseline. A mixed ANOVA was then used to analyse between-group and within-group data simultaneously. No blinding was possible, although the questionnaires were self-administered which may have limited bias.
Interventions
OTHERmassage
Swedish massage was included in one arm of the study and not the other. Administered by a trained therapist as part of the usual 30 minute treatment time. Amount of massage administered dependant on Therapist's clinical reasoning
Sponsors
Society of Musculoskeletal Medicine
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
* neck pain for greater than three months * over 18 years of age * had not received treatment for their neck pain in the previous month * could speak conversational English * were not involved in any current compensation case and * had provided written, informed consent.
Exclusion criteria
* severe co-existing disease, * neck pain due to fracture, tumour, infection or other non-mechanical causes, * if the patient had a diagnosis of osteoporosis anywhere in the body.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Numerical Pain Rating Scale | Compared baseline to score after 8 weeks of treatment | Used to accurately measure pain. On this, patients verbally rated their usual and worst (in the last week) pain from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain). Its test-retest reliability in the chronic neck pain population was established as fair to moderate (intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) =.76; 95% CI, .51-.87) by Cleland et al (2008). Farrar et al (2010) found a difference of two points to be a clinically meaningful change in the chronic pain population. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Neck Disability Index | Compared baseline to score after 8 weeks of treatment | The NDI (Appendix 3) is the most widely used and most strongly validated instrument for assessing self-rated disability in patients with neck pain (Vernon, 2008).It includes ten self-report items covering activities of daily living, concentration and pain. Responses are on a 0-5 point scale, with a total score ranging from 0 (no pain or disability) to 50 (severe pain and disability; Gay et al, 2007). |
Outcome results
None listed