Child, Surgery
Conditions
Keywords
central venous catheters
Brief summary
The purpose of this study is to compare the differences in central venous catheter insertion time, success rate, and complication between thin-wall needle technique and catheter-over-the-needle technique for central venous catheterization in children.
Detailed description
Catheterization was performed using ultrasound with an out-of-plane approach by inserting the introducer needle (thin-wall needle technique) or Angiocath Plus™ catheter (catheter-over-the-needle technique) in 45 - 60° to the patient's skin while viewing the vein in a cross section.
Interventions
using a 22 G Angiocath Plus™ catheter
using 18 - 21 G introducer needle
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* surgery under general anesthesia * require central venous catheterization
Exclusion criteria
* hematoma in central vein * central vein anomaly * catheterization site infection
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Guide-wire insertion time | interval between skin penetration and removal of the needle or catheter after guide wire insertion, an expected average of 80 seconds |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Time to first puncture of central vein | interval between skin penetration of the needle or catheter and flashback of blood, an expected average of 25 seconds |
| Total time of central venous catheter insertion | interval between skin penetration of the needle or catheter and installation of the indwelling catheter, an expected average of 3 minutes |
| Number of central vein puncture trial | up to 5 times, an expected average observation time of 25 seconds |
| Number of guide-wire insertion trial | up to 5 times, an expected average observation time of 80 seconds |
Countries
South Korea