Skip to content

Negative Pressure Wound Therapy in Obese Gynecologic Oncology Patients

Negative Pressure Wound Therapy in Obese Gynecologic Oncology Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02309944
Enrollment
93
Registered
2014-12-05
Start date
2015-05-31
Completion date
2020-06-30
Last updated
2020-07-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Gynecologic Neoplasms, Obesity, Postoperative Complications

Keywords

Wound Healing, Obesity, Gynecologic Surgery, Gynecologic Neoplasms, Surgical Complications

Brief summary

The purpose of the study is to test whether the use of a new wound closure technique can decrease the rates of wound complications in obese cancer patients.

Detailed description

Most gynecologic and many intra-abdominal malignancies are treated with an initial surgical procedure. There has been a dramatic increase in obesity rates in the US with more than one third of US adults being obese (Body Mass Index (BMI) of \> 30kg/m2). There is a direct link between obesity and wound complications following surgery with an increasing BMI leading to increasing rates of complications. Negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) is a system that utilizes sub-atmospheric pressure to improve wound healing by increasing the formation of granulation tissue. NPWT has been shown to improve outcomes in both the orthopedic and cardiothoracic surgery populations. To date, there is no prospective study evaluating the application of prophylactic NPWT in laparotomy patients. This study will be a randomized clinical trial. Patients will be enrolled at the time of consent for laparotomy for suspected gynecologic malignancy. Participants will be randomized to one of two groups: 1) Standard closure group (control arm): closure of the fascia, subcutaneous tissue and skin per the surgeon's standard method; or 2) NPWT group (study arm): closure of the fascia, subcutaneous tissue and skin per the surgeon's standard method + placement of a negative pressure wound therapy device over the closed incision for 2-3 days, with removal of the device prior to hospital discharge. The rate of wound complications for two groups will be compared.

Interventions

The standard surgical closure consists of closure of the fascia with a looped polydioxanone (PDS) suture in a running fashion either in with the use of a mass closure technique or a Smead Jones closure at the discretion of the operating surgeon, closure of the subcutaneous space if \>2 cm deep, followed by staple or suture closure of the skin.

At the close of surgery, the Prevena™ Incision Management System will be placed over the closed incision. It will be removed on post-operative day 2 or 3 as clinically indicated and prior to the patient's discharge from the hospital.

Sponsors

Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Known or suspected gynecologic or other abdominal malignancy (such as colorectal, liver, pancreatic, kidney and stomach) for which laparotomy is planned * Obese - defined as a Body Mass Index (BMI) ≥ 35 kg/m2 as calculated in the Epic computer record

Exclusion criteria

* Known true tape allergy * Sensitivity to silver * History of intolerance to Negative Pressure Wound Therapy

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Number of Participants Who Experience Wound Complications (Wound Dehiscence or Infection)one month after surgery

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Time From Surgery to Starting Adjuvant Therapy Among Those With Confirmed Malignanciesup to 20 weeks

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

93 participants originally consented, one withdrew consent and 11 did not return updated HIPAA forms and therefore could not be included in the analysis

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Standard Wound Closure
Standard surgical closure of the fascia and skin.
38
Negative Pressure Wound Therapy
Standard surgical closure as used by the standard of care group plus placement of the Prevena™ Incision Management System over the closed incision.
43
Total81

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicStandard Wound ClosureTotalNegative Pressure Wound Therapy
Age, Continuous58.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.9
59.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.4
59.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.4
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
1 Participants3 Participants2 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
36 Participants77 Participants41 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants2 Participants2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
1 Participants7 Participants6 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
1 Participants2 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
2 Participants4 Participants2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
34 Participants66 Participants32 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
38 participants81 participants43 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
38 Participants81 Participants43 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 380 / 43
other
Total, other adverse events
5 / 383 / 43
serious
Total, serious adverse events
7 / 3817 / 43

Outcome results

Primary

Number of Participants Who Experience Wound Complications (Wound Dehiscence or Infection)

Time frame: one month after surgery

Population: Follow up data is not available for 2 participants

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Standard Wound ClosureNumber of Participants Who Experience Wound Complications (Wound Dehiscence or Infection)No25 Participants
Standard Wound ClosureNumber of Participants Who Experience Wound Complications (Wound Dehiscence or Infection)Yes12 Participants
Negative Pressure Wound TherapyNumber of Participants Who Experience Wound Complications (Wound Dehiscence or Infection)No33 Participants
Negative Pressure Wound TherapyNumber of Participants Who Experience Wound Complications (Wound Dehiscence or Infection)Yes9 Participants
Comparison: Negative Pressure Wound Therapy vs. Standard Wound Closurep-value: 0.27Chi-squared
Comparison: Negative Pressure Wound Therapy vs. Standard Wound Closurep-value: 0.24Regression, Logistic
Secondary

Time From Surgery to Starting Adjuvant Therapy Among Those With Confirmed Malignancies

Time frame: up to 20 weeks

Population: Only those participants who received adjuvant therapies were analyzed in both arms. Rest of the patients didn't have cancer that required subsequent therapies.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Standard Wound ClosureTime From Surgery to Starting Adjuvant Therapy Among Those With Confirmed Malignancies37 days
Negative Pressure Wound TherapyTime From Surgery to Starting Adjuvant Therapy Among Those With Confirmed Malignancies28 days

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026