Skip to content

Metformin to Augment Strength Training Effective Response in Seniors (MASTERS)

Novel Actions of Metformin to Augment Resistance Training Adaptations in Older Adults

Status
Completed
Phases
Early Phase 1
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02308228
Enrollment
109
Registered
2014-12-04
Start date
2015-01-14
Completion date
2018-06-28
Last updated
2019-09-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Aging

Keywords

Aging, Hypertrophy, Metformin, Strength, Muscle

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to determine whether a commonly prescribed drug, metformin, can enhance the benefits seen during resistance exercise such as increased muscle mass and strength.

Detailed description

Muscle mass and strength are critical determinants not only of a person's quality of life and functional independence, but also metabolic health, as muscle is the organ primarily responsible for insulin-mediated glucose uptake. The elderly suffer obligatory losses of muscle mass and strength, exacerbated by illness and physical inactivity. Progressive resistance exercise training (PRT) is the most effective intervention identified to improve muscular strength, and combat the muscle atrophy of aging (sarcopenia); however, overall the muscle response to PRT is blunted in the elderly and variability of response increased, with some individuals actually losing muscle mass. The Bamman and Peterson labs have independently been studying the molecular and cellular mechanisms underlying the non-responder phenotype, with the goal of identifying novel intervention strategies to promote mass and strength gains to improve function. We hypothesize that the abundance of anti-inflammatory, alternatively activated M2 macrophages in muscle predicts response to PRT in the elderly; those with the highest number of M2 macrophages and lowest inflammatory gene expression prior to the start of training gained the most mass. Further, we determined that metformin treatment increased M2 macrophage abundance, and decreased inflammatory cytokine gene expression. These provocative findings have led us to our central hypothesis that adjuvant metformin may improve the responses to PRT in the elderly by altering the muscle tissue inflammatory environment, thereby enhancing mechanisms that drive PRT-induced myofiber hypertrophy.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALProgressive Resistance Training

Participants will complete 14 weeks (42 sessions, 3x/week) of progressive resistance training which will consist of 8 constant load movements to train all major muscle groups bilaterally.

DRUGMetformin

Participants will be randomized to receive metformin in conjunction with their strength training program.

Sponsors

University of Alabama at Birmingham
CollaboratorOTHER
Philip Kern
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
65 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* ≥65 years of age. * Independently mobile with a SPPB score 3-12. * Access to transportation. * Capable of providing informed consent (cognitively intact).

Exclusion criteria

* Obesity (BMI\>30) * Serum creatinine \>1.4 because of risk of lactic acidosis with metformin. * History of regular resistance training within the past year. * History (or ECG evidence) of previous myocardial infarction, history of congestive heart failure. * Current angina pectoris or symptoms of myocardial ischemia or congestive heart failure. * Chronic aspirin or NSAID use (unless it can be safely stopped prior to the biopsies), and any other use of an anticoagulant (e.g., Coumadin) or history of bleeding. * History of alcoholism or liver disease. * History of hypo- or hyper-coagulation disorders including subjects taking Coumadin. * Any end-stage disease and/or a life expectancy less than one year. * Neurological, musculoskeletal, or other disorder that would preclude them from completing resistance training and all performance tests. * Uncontrolled hypertension. * Diabetes mellitus as demonstrated with- HgbA1C\>6.5, or fasting glu\>126 mg/dl. * Any other medical condition that would interfere with testing or increase one's risk of complications during exercise, as judged by the study physicians. * Any other condition or events considered exclusionary by the PI and/or physician, such as non-compliance. * Lidocaine allergy (1% lidocaine is the local anesthetic used during the muscle biopsy procedure).

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percent Change in Type 2 Myofiber Cross Sectional Area16 weeksThe ability of metformin to improve the hypertrophic response to resistance training will be determined. Muscle biopsies of the vastus lateralis will be used to quantify myofiber cross-sectional area. The percent change in type 2 myofiber size between week 16 and week 0 was used.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percent Change in Normal Density Muscle Size by Computed Tomography16 weeksThe ability of metformin to improve the hypertrophic response at the whole muscle level will be quantified by computed tomography. Percent change in normal density muscle area will be calculated as the difference between week 16 and week 0.

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percent Change in Muscle StrengthWeek 4 and week 16Determine if metformin treatment augments strength gains in conjunction with progressive resistance training by one repetition maximum assessments. Maximum (1RM) leg extension muscle strength was assessed at week 4 (to account for neurological adaptations during the initial stages of the resistance program) and week 16. The percent change from week 4 to week 16 is reported.
Percent Change in Total Body Lean Mass by DXA16 weeksTo determine if metformin improves changes in body composition associated with progressive resistance training. Percent change in total body lean mass in kg was calculated as the difference between week 16 and week 0 from a total body DXA scan.
Insulin Sensitivity16 weeksA standard OGTT will be used to determine insulin sensitivity using the Matsuda Index.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Number of individuals consented and further screened for eligibility = 144 Number of participants randomized to drug/placebo = 109 Number of participants completing exercise intervention with drug/placebo use = 94

Pre-assignment details

Participants may have been excluded prior to randomization to study drug for the following reasons: 1. Screen fail (OGTT, ECG, Blood results) 2. Withdrawals (changed mind, lost to follow up, spouse screen fail)

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Metformin
Participants will be randomized to receive Metformin (1700 mg/day) for a period of 16 weeks; 2 weeks of Metformin only followed by 14 weeks of continued Metformin use in combination with progressive resistance training. Progressive Resistance Training: Participants will complete 14 weeks (42 sessions, 3x/week) of progressive resistance training which will consist of 8 constant load movements to train all major muscle groups bilaterally. Metformin: Participants will be randomized to receive metformin in conjunction with their strength training program.
54
Placebo, Sugar Pill
Participants will be randomized to receive placebo sugar pills (1700 mg/day) for a period of 16 weeks; 2 weeks of placebo only followed by 14 weeks of continued placebo use in combination with progressive resistance training. Placebos will be almost identical to the Metformin medication. Progressive Resistance Training: Participants will complete 14 weeks (42 sessions, 3x/week) of progressive resistance training which will consist of 8 constant load movements to train all major muscle groups bilaterally.
55
Total109

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyAdverse Event34
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject53

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicMetforminTotalPlacebo, Sugar Pill
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
53 Participants106 Participants53 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
1 Participants3 Participants2 Participants
Age, Continuous69.4 years69.4 years69.3 years
BMI26.9 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.1
26.3 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.1
25.7 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.1
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
46 Participants94 Participants48 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Physical Activity Survey for the Elderly (PASE)155.5 Scores on a Scale159.3 Scores on a Scale165.7 Scores on a Scale
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
45 Participants92 Participants47 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
54 participants109 participants55 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
22 Participants51 Participants29 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
24 Participants43 Participants19 Participants
Short Form-36 Mental Component (SF-36)56.7 Scores on a Scale56.6 Scores on a Scale56.5 Scores on a Scale
Short Form-36 Physical Component (SF-36)54.7 Scores on a Scale55.0 Scores on a Scale55.2 Scores on a Scale
Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB)11 Scores on a Scale11 Scores on a Scale11 Scores on a Scale

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 540 / 55
other
Total, other adverse events
17 / 546 / 55
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 540 / 55

Outcome results

Primary

Percent Change in Type 2 Myofiber Cross Sectional Area

The ability of metformin to improve the hypertrophic response to resistance training will be determined. Muscle biopsies of the vastus lateralis will be used to quantify myofiber cross-sectional area. The percent change in type 2 myofiber size between week 16 and week 0 was used.

Time frame: 16 weeks

Population: The largest, highest quality pairs of baseline and week 16 mounts were used for quantification of immunohistochemistry (N=30/group)

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
MetforminPercent Change in Type 2 Myofiber Cross Sectional Area18.5 Percent changeStandard Deviation 31.5
Placebo, Sugar PillPercent Change in Type 2 Myofiber Cross Sectional Area14.5 Percent changeStandard Deviation 29.7
Secondary

Percent Change in Normal Density Muscle Size by Computed Tomography

The ability of metformin to improve the hypertrophic response at the whole muscle level will be quantified by computed tomography. Percent change in normal density muscle area will be calculated as the difference between week 16 and week 0.

Time frame: 16 weeks

Population: Missing data points include those who, based on femur area, CT positioning at post measure was incorrect = 16. In addition, 1 subject was excluded from analysis as CT data indicated 45% loss of thigh muscle area, which was not consistent with other data for this subject.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
MetforminPercent Change in Normal Density Muscle Size by Computed Tomography4.2 Percent changeStandard Deviation 9.1
Placebo, Sugar PillPercent Change in Normal Density Muscle Size by Computed Tomography10.5 Percent changeStandard Deviation 7
Other Pre-specified

Insulin Sensitivity

A standard OGTT will be used to determine insulin sensitivity using the Matsuda Index.

Time frame: 16 weeks

Other Pre-specified

Percent Change in Muscle Strength

Determine if metformin treatment augments strength gains in conjunction with progressive resistance training by one repetition maximum assessments. Maximum (1RM) leg extension muscle strength was assessed at week 4 (to account for neurological adaptations during the initial stages of the resistance program) and week 16. The percent change from week 4 to week 16 is reported.

Time frame: Week 4 and week 16

Population: Some participants were not able to complete the procedure on the day of testing, injured etc

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
MetforminPercent Change in Muscle Strength15.3 Percent changeStandard Deviation 18.5
Placebo, Sugar PillPercent Change in Muscle Strength23.1 Percent changeStandard Deviation 18.9
Other Pre-specified

Percent Change in Total Body Lean Mass by DXA

To determine if metformin improves changes in body composition associated with progressive resistance training. Percent change in total body lean mass in kg was calculated as the difference between week 16 and week 0 from a total body DXA scan.

Time frame: 16 weeks

Population: Analysis of lean muscle mass for those who completed the interventions.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
MetforminPercent Change in Total Body Lean Mass by DXA0.41 Percent changeStandard Deviation 2.25
Placebo, Sugar PillPercent Change in Total Body Lean Mass by DXA1.95 Percent changeStandard Deviation 2.69

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 27, 2026