Skip to content

PK Analysis of Piperacillin in Septic Shock Patients

Population Pharmacokinetics of Piperacillin in the Early Phase of Septic Shock - Does Standard Dosing Result in Therapeutic Plasma Concentrations?

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02306928
Enrollment
15
Registered
2014-12-03
Start date
2014-09-30
Completion date
2015-01-31
Last updated
2016-02-11

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Septic Shock

Keywords

Septic shock, Intensive care unit, Therapeutic drug monitoring, Pharmacokinetics, Critically ill

Brief summary

Antibiotic dosing in septic shock patients poses a challenge for clinicians due to the pharmacokinetic changes seen in this population. Piperacillin/tazobactam is often used for empirical treatment, and initial appropriate dosing is crucial for reducing mortality. We determined the pharmacokinetic profile of piperacillin 4g every 8 hour in 15 patients treated empirically for septic shock. A PK population model was established with the dual purpose to assess current standard treatment and to simulate alternative dosing regimens and modes of administration. Time above the minimal inhibitory concentration (T\>MIC) predicted for each patient were evaluated against clinical breakpoint MIC for Pseudomonas aeruginosa (16 mg/L). Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PK-PD) targets evaluated were 100% f T\>MIC and 50% fT\>4xMIC.

Detailed description

Early appropriate antimicrobial therapy is of utmost importance for reducing mortality in critically ill patients with sepsis and septic shock. Patophysiological changes associated with the septic process, such as changes in volume of distribution (Vd), drug clearance (CL), decrease in plasma-protein concentration and organ dysfunction, lead to pharmacokinetic (PK) changes that may alter the efficacy of the antimicrobial given. As a consequence, antibiotic plasma concentrations are variable and hard to predict in these patients, which makes optimal antibiotic exposure a challenge, especially in the early phase of treatment. In sepctic shock patients, appropriate dosing is even more important, as effective antimicrobial therapy within the first hour of documented hypotension is associated with increased survival to hospital discharge. Piperacillin/tazobactam is a β-lactam - β-lactamase inhibitor combination frequently used for empirical treatment in the critically ill. It is a time-dependent antibiotic where antibacterial activity is related to the time for which the free, unbound concentation of the drug is maintained above the minimal inhibitory concentration (f T\>MIC). Maximizing f T\>MIC both increases the therapeutic impact and reduces the risk of drug resistance development. Because of the PK changes seen in the critically ill, standard dosing of antimicrobials may result in subtherapeutic plasma-concentrations (17) and it has been suggested that current empiric dosing recommendations for ICU patients are inadequate and needs to be reconsidered (18). Patients with septic shock are especially vulnerable (7) and optimal dosing in these patients is crucial for reducing mortality. Piperacillin/tazobactam 4g/0.5g every 8 hour (h) is the empiric standard dosing for sepsis and septic shock. The aim of this study was to determine if this dosing results in therapeutic plasma concentrations in septic shock patients, within the initial 24 hours of therapy. A PK population model was established with the dual purpose to assess current standard treatment and to simulate alternative dosing regimens and modes of administration. Critically ill patients with known or suspected septic shock who required noradrenaline infusion and who were prescribed piperaillin/tazobactam 4g/0.5g (Tazocin®) by the treating physician were eligible for the study. Patients on renal replacement therapy and patients under the age of 18 were not included. Piperacillin/tazobactam 4g/0.5g was administered intravenously (i.v.) over 3 minutes every 8 h. Blood samples (4 mL) were collected by trained staff from an arterial catheter around the time of administration of the third consecutive infusion. Each patient had a total of eight blood samples drawn; before administration of the drug (time 0), at 10, 20, 30 minutes and 1, 2, 4 and 8 h after administration of the drug. The unbound piperacillin plasma concentrations were determined using ultra high performance liquid chromatography. If a bacteria was isolated from a patient, a MIC to piperacillin was obtained using E-tests on Mueller-Hinton agar plates. These MICs as well as clinical MIC breakpoints according to the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) for Pseudomonas aeruginosa were used to evaluate the following PK/PD targets: 100% f T\>MIC and 50% fT\>4xMIC. There was no intervention in the study.

Interventions

OTHERBlood draw

Sponsors

University of Aarhus
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
CASE_ONLY
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Treatment with piperacillin/tazobactam for less than 24 hours. Treatment with noradrenaline. -

Exclusion criteria

Renal replacement therapy. Age under 18. \-

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
100% f T>MIC: Free Piperacillin Concentration Maintained Above the MIC Throughout the Dosing Interval.Participants were followed up to the third dosing interval after initiation of piperacillin/tazobactam. An average of 24 hours.The piperacillin plasma concentration-time profiles were best described by a two-compartment model. Each individual model predicted T\>MIC was compared to clinical breakpoint MIC for P.aeruginosa (16 mg/L). The number of patients who achieved the pre-defined PK/PD target were reported.
50% fT>4xMIC: Free Piperacillin Concentration Maintained at a Level Fourfold the MIC for at Least 50% of the Dosing Interval.Participants were followed up to the third dosing interval after initiation of piperacillin/tazobactam. An average of 24 hours.The piperacillin plasma concentration-time profiles were best described by a two-compartment model. Each individual model predicted T\>MIC was compared to clinical breakpoint MIC for P.aeruginosa (16 mg/L). The number of patients who achieved the pre-defined PK/PD target were reported.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The Maximum Concentration of Piperacillin (Cmax)Participants were followed up to the third dosing interval after initiation of piperacillin/tazobactam. An average of 24 hours.Maximum plasma concentration was predicted for each individual based on the final model fit.
The Area Under the Plasma-concentration Time Curve Concentration-time Curve From 0-8 Hours After the Studied Dose (AUC 0-8)Participants were followed up to the third dosing interval after initiation of piperacillin/tazobactam. An average of 24 hours.Area under the free plasma concentration-time curve (fAUC0-8) was predicted for each individual based on the final model fit.
Trough Piperacillin Plasma Concentration (Cmin)Participants were followed up to the third dosing interval after initiation of piperacillin/tazobactam. An average of 24 hours.Trough plasma concentration (Cmin) was predicted for each individual based on the final model fit.

Countries

Denmark

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Piperacillin Pharmacokinetics
Patients with known or suspected septic shock who who required noradrenaline infusion and who were prescribed piperaillin/tazobactam 4g/0.5g (Tazocin®) by the treating physician were eligible for the study. Patients on renal replacement therapy and patients under the age of 18 were not included. Included patients had plasma concentrations of piperacillin, being the active β-lactam component, determined. Age, gender, body weight, APACHE (Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation) score on admission, SOFA (Sequential Organ Failure Assessment) score on day of sampling, amount of noradrenalin-infusion given during the third dosing interval and presence of acute kidney failure (AKI) of each enrolled patient were registered.
15
Total15

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPiperacillin Pharmacokinetics
Age, Continuous66 years
Body weight80 kg
Sex: Female, Male
Female
4 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
11 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 0
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 0

Outcome results

Primary

100% f T>MIC: Free Piperacillin Concentration Maintained Above the MIC Throughout the Dosing Interval.

The piperacillin plasma concentration-time profiles were best described by a two-compartment model. Each individual model predicted T\>MIC was compared to clinical breakpoint MIC for P.aeruginosa (16 mg/L). The number of patients who achieved the pre-defined PK/PD target were reported.

Time frame: Participants were followed up to the third dosing interval after initiation of piperacillin/tazobactam. An average of 24 hours.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Piperacillin Pharmacokinetics100% f T>MIC: Free Piperacillin Concentration Maintained Above the MIC Throughout the Dosing Interval.10 participants
Primary

50% fT>4xMIC: Free Piperacillin Concentration Maintained at a Level Fourfold the MIC for at Least 50% of the Dosing Interval.

The piperacillin plasma concentration-time profiles were best described by a two-compartment model. Each individual model predicted T\>MIC was compared to clinical breakpoint MIC for P.aeruginosa (16 mg/L). The number of patients who achieved the pre-defined PK/PD target were reported.

Time frame: Participants were followed up to the third dosing interval after initiation of piperacillin/tazobactam. An average of 24 hours.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Piperacillin Pharmacokinetics50% fT>4xMIC: Free Piperacillin Concentration Maintained at a Level Fourfold the MIC for at Least 50% of the Dosing Interval.12 participants
Secondary

The Area Under the Plasma-concentration Time Curve Concentration-time Curve From 0-8 Hours After the Studied Dose (AUC 0-8)

Area under the free plasma concentration-time curve (fAUC0-8) was predicted for each individual based on the final model fit.

Time frame: Participants were followed up to the third dosing interval after initiation of piperacillin/tazobactam. An average of 24 hours.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Piperacillin PharmacokineticsThe Area Under the Plasma-concentration Time Curve Concentration-time Curve From 0-8 Hours After the Studied Dose (AUC 0-8)1148 mg.hr/L
Secondary

The Maximum Concentration of Piperacillin (Cmax)

Maximum plasma concentration was predicted for each individual based on the final model fit.

Time frame: Participants were followed up to the third dosing interval after initiation of piperacillin/tazobactam. An average of 24 hours.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Piperacillin PharmacokineticsThe Maximum Concentration of Piperacillin (Cmax)546 mg/L
Secondary

Trough Piperacillin Plasma Concentration (Cmin)

Trough plasma concentration (Cmin) was predicted for each individual based on the final model fit.

Time frame: Participants were followed up to the third dosing interval after initiation of piperacillin/tazobactam. An average of 24 hours.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Piperacillin PharmacokineticsTrough Piperacillin Plasma Concentration (Cmin)51.7 mg/L

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 4, 2026