Skip to content

Ketamine For Acute Treatment of Pain in Emergency Department

Ketamine For Acute Treatment of Pain in Emergency Department

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02306759
Acronym
KETAFAP
Enrollment
60
Registered
2014-12-03
Start date
2015-01-31
Completion date
2015-11-30
Last updated
2017-08-09

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Pain

Keywords

analgesia, ketamine, pain

Brief summary

The aim of the study is to compare the safety & efficacy of low dose ketamine and morphine versus morphine alone for acute generalized pain in the Emergency Department (ED). The investigators are also interested to investigate whether low-dose ketamine is a safe and effective alternative option to opioids for the acute treatment of pain in the Emergency Department. The agents that are available in the department includes acetaminophen, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory (NSAIDS) and opioids. In most cases, acetaminophen and NSAIDS are not adequate to manage acute pain crisis. There is also heightening concerns for increased opioid use or abuse by patients. Since the HCAPHS survey includes various questions which inquires about patient perception of pain management in the department, the investigators are interested in investigating the safety and efficacy of low-dose ketamine to as an alternative method to opioids for the acute management of pain. There has been limited, mostly observational pilot studies, published in the literature. Limited data in the literature have reported the incidence of nausea and vomiting ranged from 3-13%. All published literature administered low-dose ketamine as an intravenous push. To the best of our knowledge our study would be the first study to administer low-dose ketamine as a short bolus infusion to mitigate the incidence of nausea and vomiting. The investigators believe our study would provide important scientific data to fill the theoretical gap that low-dose ketamine at 0.3mg/kg/dose may be a safe and effective agent for acute pain management in an ED that is located in the center of a densely populated urban area.

Detailed description

The aim of the study is to compare the safety & efficacy of low dose ketamine and morphine versus morphine alone for acute generalized pain in the Emergency Department (ED). The is a randomized double blind placebo controlled trial to investigate the effects of low dose ketamine and morphine versus placebo and morphine for the management of acute pain in the ED.

Interventions

DRUGKetamine

Ketamine 0.3mg/kg in 50ml normal saline, administered over 15 minutes

DRUGPlacebo

Normal saline 50ml, administered over 15 minutes

Sponsors

The Brooklyn Hospital Center
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients 18 years old and older presenting with acute generalized pain * Describes pain to be greater than or equal to 3 on the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) * Provides informed consent

Exclusion criteria

* Patients who are admitted to the hospital * Severe hypertension(≥180/100) * Presence of or suspected for traumatic head injury with or without loss of consciousness * Presence of or suspected for myocardial ischemia * Presence of or suspected alcohol intoxication * Hemodynamic instability * History of schizophrenia * History of Sickle cell crisis / presenting with acute sickle cell crisis * History of or suspected recreational substance abuse * History of or suspected diagnosis of headache or migraine * History of or suspected diagnosis increase in intracranial/intraocular pressure * Known or suspected pregnancy * Allergy to ketamine or morphine * Administration of opioids in previous 4 hours * Patients with language barriers or in altered mental status who are unable to describe pain * Patients weighing over 166kg

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline of Pain as Described by Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) [Minimum:0, Maximum 10] at 15 Minutes15 minutes after administration of study interventionChange from Baseline of Pain as described by Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) \[minimum:0, maximum 10\] at 15 minutes. Lower values indicate worst outcomes while higher values indicate better outcomes.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants With Adverse Eventsduring the study periodIncidence or number of participants with adverse events.
Patient Satisfaction of Pain Control Based on a Likert ScaleAt the end of study periodPatient satisfaction of pain control based on a Likert Scale at the end of study completion, an average of 90 minutes. Scores reported out of scale of 10, 10 being most satisfied and 1 being least satisfied.
Mean Consumption of Rescue Analgesiaat designated intervals during study period (0, 15, 30, 45, 60, 75, 90, 105, 120 minutes)
ED Length of Stay (Minutes)throughout study completionED Length of stay (minutes) throughout study period

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

This was a single-center, prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial comparing the use of SDDK versus placebo as an adjunct therapy for moderate to severe acute pain in the ED. The study was conducted in a community teaching hospital with a level-2 trauma ED where more than 77,000 patients are treated annually.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Treatment
Ketamine 0.3mg/kg IVPB in 50ml NS over 15 minutes Morphine 0.1mg/kg IVP PRN at designated intervals Ketamine: Ketamine 0.3mg/kg in 50ml normal saline, administered over 15 minutes
30
Placebo
Normal saline 50ml IVPB over 15 minutes Morphine 0.1mg/kg IVP PRN at designated intervals Placebo: Normal saline 50ml, administered over 15 minutes
30
Total60

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTreatmentPlaceboTotal
Age, Continuous41 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16
48 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 17
44 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
9 Participants5 Participants14 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
21 Participants25 Participants46 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
30 participants30 participants60 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
18 Participants18 Participants36 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
12 Participants12 Participants24 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 300 / 30
other
Total, other adverse events
2 / 304 / 30
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 300 / 30

Outcome results

Primary

Change From Baseline of Pain as Described by Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) [Minimum:0, Maximum 10] at 15 Minutes

Change from Baseline of Pain as described by Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) \[minimum:0, maximum 10\] at 15 minutes. Lower values indicate worst outcomes while higher values indicate better outcomes.

Time frame: 15 minutes after administration of study intervention

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
TreatmentChange From Baseline of Pain as Described by Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) [Minimum:0, Maximum 10] at 15 Minutes3.5 units on a scale
PlaceboChange From Baseline of Pain as Described by Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) [Minimum:0, Maximum 10] at 15 Minutes6.0 units on a scale
Secondary

ED Length of Stay (Minutes)

ED Length of stay (minutes) throughout study period

Time frame: throughout study completion

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
TreatmentED Length of Stay (Minutes)267 minutesStandard Deviation 191
PlaceboED Length of Stay (Minutes)292 minutesStandard Deviation 203
Secondary

Mean Consumption of Rescue Analgesia

Time frame: at designated intervals during study period (0, 15, 30, 45, 60, 75, 90, 105, 120 minutes)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
TreatmentMean Consumption of Rescue AnalgesiaT150.23 milligramsStandard Deviation 1.3
TreatmentMean Consumption of Rescue AnalgesiaT750 milligramsStandard Deviation 0
TreatmentMean Consumption of Rescue AnalgesiaT450.07 milligramsStandard Deviation 0.37
TreatmentMean Consumption of Rescue AnalgesiaT900.48 milligramsStandard Deviation 1.66
TreatmentMean Consumption of Rescue AnalgesiaT300.37 milligramsStandard Deviation 1.45
TreatmentMean Consumption of Rescue AnalgesiaT1050.55 milligramsStandard Deviation 1.87
TreatmentMean Consumption of Rescue AnalgesiaT600 milligramsStandard Deviation 0
TreatmentMean Consumption of Rescue AnalgesiaT1200 milligramsStandard Deviation 0
TreatmentMean Consumption of Rescue AnalgesiaT50 milligramsStandard Deviation 0
PlaceboMean Consumption of Rescue AnalgesiaT1200.42 milligramsStandard Deviation 1.7
PlaceboMean Consumption of Rescue AnalgesiaT50 milligramsStandard Deviation 0
PlaceboMean Consumption of Rescue AnalgesiaT150.14 milligramsStandard Deviation 0.74
PlaceboMean Consumption of Rescue AnalgesiaT300.28 milligramsStandard Deviation 1.03
PlaceboMean Consumption of Rescue AnalgesiaT450 milligramsStandard Deviation 0
PlaceboMean Consumption of Rescue AnalgesiaT600.22 milligramsStandard Deviation 1.15
PlaceboMean Consumption of Rescue AnalgesiaT750 milligramsStandard Deviation 0
PlaceboMean Consumption of Rescue AnalgesiaT900 milligramsStandard Deviation 0
PlaceboMean Consumption of Rescue AnalgesiaT1050.42 milligramsStandard Deviation 1.26
Secondary

Number of Participants With Adverse Events

Incidence or number of participants with adverse events.

Time frame: during the study period

Population: Nausea was reported in three patients who received placebo and one patient who received ketamine. Dreams was reported in 1 patient who received placebo and one patient who received ketamine.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
TreatmentNumber of Participants With Adverse Events2 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Adverse Events4 participants
Secondary

Patient Satisfaction of Pain Control Based on a Likert Scale

Patient satisfaction of pain control based on a Likert Scale at the end of study completion, an average of 90 minutes. Scores reported out of scale of 10, 10 being most satisfied and 1 being least satisfied.

Time frame: At the end of study period

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
TreatmentPatient Satisfaction of Pain Control Based on a Likert Scale8.57 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.1
PlaceboPatient Satisfaction of Pain Control Based on a Likert Scale6.05 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.6

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026