Skip to content

Xience Versus Synergy in Left Main PCI

Improved Drug Eluting Stent for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention of the Left Main Artery in a Real World All-comers Population

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02303717
Acronym
IDEAL-LM
Enrollment
818
Registered
2014-12-01
Start date
2014-12-31
Completion date
2020-12-31
Last updated
2014-12-01

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Coronary Artery Disease

Keywords

Left main, PCI, DES

Brief summary

A prospective, randomized, multicenter study in patients with an indication for coronary artery revascularisation who have been accepted for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of the left main coronary artery. Patients will undergo standard PCI of the left main coronary artery and will be randomized in a 1:1 fashion to the Synergy stent or to the XIENCE stent. Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) will be stopped at t=4 months in the Synergy arm whereas in the control arm DAPT will be continued for 12 months. A subgroup of 100 patients will have control angiography with Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) at t=3 months after treatment.

Detailed description

PCI of the left main coronary artery is a complex procedure with increased risk of both short and long-term major cardiac adverse events. With the use of coronary artery stents the outcome has significant improved and PCI of the left main is included in the European Society Cardiology guidelines \[8\]. However the results of first generation drug eluting stents still show significant room for improvement, as the risk of very late stent thrombosis has been shown to accrue up to 5 year follow-up. The newest generation of drug eluting stents have improved radial strength with thinner strut thickness, bioresorbable coatings for local drug delivery which are resorbed in 3 months and are applied only direct to the vessel wall. These stents have been evaluated in non-complex disease with good results. A comparison of the newest generation drug eluting stents in combination with a short duration of dual antiplatelet therapy versus current standard PCI techniques in complex PCI of left main coronary artery disease is therefore desirable. The study stent (Synergy) is an evolution of currently used drug eluting stents and in initial trials demonstrated similar results for surrogate endpoints \[4,5\] On clinical endpoints no difference has been demonstrated. This results in a very small possibility of inferiority to current stents where re-intervention is the largest risk. For shortening DAPT several non-randomized studies have shown high safety with a very low risk (1%) of stent thrombosis \[6\]. Based on the improved properties of the study stent (biodegradable coating) the risk of early DAPT discontinuation should be minimal. For the relevant subgroup control coronary angiography with the additional use of OCT imaging can be considered a standard procedure with a very low risk of major complications (0.4%) \[7\] This study will investigate the short term angiographic and long term clinical outcome of after implantation of an improved drug eluting coronary artery stent (Everolimus-eluting Platinum Chromium Stent with Abluminal Bioabsorbable Polymer) with shorter post interventional dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) in comparison to a conventional drug eluting stent with a permanent Polymer followed by 12 months DAPT for treatment of unprotected left main coronary artery disease.

Interventions

DEVICEPercutaneous coronary intervention

Percutaneous coronary stent implantation

DRUGDual antiplatelet therapy

Dual antiplatelet therapy with aspirin and either clopidogrel, prasugrel or ticagrelor will be recommended for 12 months duration in the Xience stent arm but only 4 months duration in the Synergy stent arm.

Sponsors

Boston Scientific Corporation
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Venn Life Sciences
CollaboratorOTHER
Cardialysis B.V.
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Diagram B.V.
CollaboratorOTHER
NHS National Waiting Times Centre Board
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients with an indication for coronary artery revascularisation by ESC guidelines and accepted for PCI of the left main coronary artery will be included in the study. Main inclusion criteria: 1. Patient has an indication for coronary artery revascularisation of the left main artery in accordance with the ESC guidelines 2. Patient has been discussed with the cardiac surgeon prior to PCI procedure 3. Patient is accepted for PCI 4. Patient is at least 18 years of age. 5. The patient understands and accepts the meaning and the aims of the study and is willing to provide written informed consent 6. The patient is willing to comply with specified follow-up evaluation and can be contacted by telephone.

Exclusion criteria

1. Not able to receive anti-platelet treatment due to contraindications 2. Known allergy to acetylsalicylic acid, clopidogrel, prasugrel or ticagrelor 3. Cardiogenic shock 4. STEMI within the last 5 days 5. Planned surgery within 12 months after stent introduction 6. History of bleeding diathesis or active major bleedings 7. Major surgery within previous 15 days 8. Current participation in another trial which has not yet reached its primary endpoint 9. Life expectancy \< 12 months 10. Hypersensitivity or contraindication to everolimus or structurally-related compounds, cobalt, chromium, nickel, tungsten, acrylic, platinum and fluoropolymers 11. Female patient with child bearing potential not taking adequate contraceptives or currently breastfeeding

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
MACE2 yearsThe primary endpoint is the rate of MACE defined as death from any cause or MI or ischemia-driven target vessel revascularization (TVR) at 2 years after the procedure.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Ischaemia driven target vessel revascularisation2 yearsComponent of combined primary end-point (MACE)
Procedural success2 yearsAttainment of \<30% residual stenosis of the target lesion and no in-hospital device-oriented composite endpoints (DOCE) defined as cardiac death, MI not clearly attributable to a non-treated vessel, and clinically-indicated target lesion revascularization.).
Stent thrombosis2 yearsStent thrombosis according to ARC definition at all time points.
Bleeding2 yearsThe composite of BARC 3 or 5 bleeding at 24 months according to BARC definition. The individual bleeding events (BARC 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5) according to the BARC definition
All cause mortality2 yearsComponent of the primary endpoint (MACE)
MI2 yearsMyocardial infarction as defined in protocol. Component of combined primary end-point (MACE)

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Angiographic late loss (mm)3 monthsBased on 3 month angiographic follow-up sub-study (n=100)
OCT derived healing score (no units)3 monthsBased on 3 month OCT follow-up sub-study (n=100) OCT endpoints 3 months post-procedure (subgroup of patients) QCA parameters
Combined primary end-point in patients eligible for CABG vs patients considered inoperable2 yearsSecondary analysis comparing patients eligible for cardiac surgery with those deemed inoperable.

Contacts

Primary ContactKeith G Oldroyd, MB ChB
keith.oldroyd@nhs.net+44 141 951 5180
Backup ContactCatherine Sinclair, PhD
catherine.sinclair@gjnh.scot.nhs.uk+44 141 951 5440

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026