Skip to content

Non-invasive Focal Therapy for Osteoid Osteoma

Treatment of Osteoid Osteoma With MR Guided High Intensity Focused Ultrasound

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Phase 2Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02302651
Enrollment
60
Registered
2014-11-27
Start date
2010-06-30
Completion date
2015-12-31
Last updated
2014-11-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Osteoma, Osteoid

Keywords

high intensity focused ultrasound, osteoid osteoma, bone tumor

Brief summary

Non-invasive treatment of Osteoid osteoma using MRI guided high-intensity focused ultrasound. This study is designed as an intention-to-treat using a totally non-invasive approach for pain reduction, quality of life improvement and long-term bone restoration. Procedure is performed in a single session using limited amount of acoustic energy to target the osteoid nidus. Treatment will be performed under anesthesia (peripheral or general according to age and lesion position).

Detailed description

An osteoid osteoma is a benign, painful musculoskeletal tumor that usually occurs in young males. The standard of care in the United States is computed tomography (CT)-guided radiofrequency ablation, a minimally invasive percutaneous procedure, with clinical success rates ranging between 85% and 98%. Percutaneous or surgical therapy can lead to non-negligible side-effects and limited efficacy for pediatric population or young adults with osteoid osteoma. We investigate whether selective focal ablation of osteoid lesions can reduce this treatment burden without compromising long-term clinical efficacy. Treatments will be performed using a 3.0-T MR unit (Discovery MR 750; GE Medical Systems, Milwaukee,Wis) featuring a Conformité Européenne-approved ExAblate MR-guided focused ultrasound system (InSightec,Tirat-Carmel, Israel) in which the ultrasound transducer is housed in the patient table. Alignment between the lesion and the transducer will be obtained in each patient by using a moistened gel pad and degassed water for acoustic coupling. This approach avoided air- skin interfaces, which can cause energy reflection and skin burns. After patient positioning, the lesion is localized with MR for treatment by using variably orientated non enhanced T1- and T2-weighted acquisitions. In general, an ideal 90° incidental angle between the planned focused ultrasound path and the lesion, relative to the bone long axis, is obtained or at least approximated. The shortest skin-lesion distance is selected for the beam pathway. Care will be taken to avoid multiple interfaces (skin, muscle, fasciae) as much as possible so as to minimize deflection of the focused ultrasound beam. Each lesion will be manually segmented by the operator to precisely delineate the nidus, skin surface, and cortical surface of the bone. Sensitive areas surrounding the target volumes will also be drawn to limit the energy and prevent unwanted thermal damage. The treatment plan is than calculated automatically by the ExAblate software according to previously acquired parameters, including the energy (in joules), the interval between two sonications, the sonication duration, and the spot size, which are modifiable by the operator. Thereafter, a low-energy sonication test will be performed to confirm the path and correct direction of the ultrasound beam into the target area and to confirm the planned energy dose and the effective dose deployed to the lesion. The increase in tissue temperature is evaluated by using real-time MR thermometry of phase-difference fast spoiled gradient-echo sequences (proton resonant frequency shift method). The sequences are acquired to provide temperature-dependent images and real-time mapping of the thermal dose on a preferred imaging plane. The proton resonant frequency shift method starts simultaneously with each sonication. Similar to other treatments of bone lesions that use MR-guided focused ultrasound, the temperature increase is determined on the adjacent periskeletal tissue. In fact, proton resonant frequency sequences cannot effectively measure the temperature on the bone surface because of the absence of moving protons in the cortical zone. Thus, MR thermometry reveals a temperature increase, which propagates by conductive processes from the bone to the immediately adjacent soft tissues that respond linearly to an increase in bone temperature, thereby allowing an accurate measure of heating. Portions of periosteum and adjacent tumor that are not fully ablated can be re-treated if deemed necessary. The critical temperature threshold for ablation is set at 65°C in the soft tissues adjacent to the targeted bone structures. Postprocedural care includes evaluation of possible skin burns, monitoring of vital signs for 2 hours after treatment in the MR department, and administration of analgesic and/or antiemetic drugs if requested. Treatment-related adverse events will be recorded as minor or major on the basis of medical severity, additional treatment, and long-term consequences for patients. Treatment will be performed on an outpatient basis in the patients who receive only local and peripheral anesthesia; the patient who receives general anesthesia is usually hospitalized for 24 hours after treatment.

Interventions

DEVICEMR guided High Intensity focused ultrasound

High Intensity Focused Ultrasound is a totally non-invasive procedure that can destroy tumors transcutaneously; safety and efficacy profile are dramatically increased by the MRI guidance

Sponsors

University of Roma La Sapienza
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
3 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* clinical and imaging diagnosis of osteoid osteoma * painful non-vertebral location

Exclusion criteria

* general contraindication to MRI * vertebral location of the lesion * claustrophobia and prior surgery or RFA are not an absolute exclusion criterion

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Safety - Adverse Events (serious and otherwise)1 yearto assess complications
Efficacy (Symptoms reduction)4 yearsSymptoms reduction

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
nidus vascularization (correlation between nidus vascularization reduction and symptoms relieve)4 yearscorrelation between nidus vascularization reduction and symptoms relieve

Countries

Italy

Contacts

Primary ContactAlessandro Napoli, MD, PhD
alessandro.napoli@uniroma1.it3357718114

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 26, 2026