Skip to content

Motion Immune Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)

Examining the Clinical Utility of Motion Immune MRI Across Multiple Patient Populations

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02302521
Enrollment
16
Registered
2014-11-27
Start date
2015-05-28
Completion date
2016-11-26
Last updated
2017-08-11

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Parkinson's Disease

Keywords

MRI

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate our recently developed MRI reconstruction strategy for producing artifact-free neuro and abdominal MRI data. The new reconstruction strategies, including 1) REKAM and 2) MUSE, are capable of effectively removing motion-related artifacts resulting from global and local motion during neuro and free-breathing abdominal MRI scans, without modifying the MRI pulse sequences and protocols that are currently used in clinical scans. The study team aims to recruit 60 subjects across multiple challenge patient populations: 10 healthy young adults (age 20-30) and 10 healthy older adults (aged 50-70) for abdominal MRI, as well as 20 tremor dominant PD patients and 20 children (age 4-8) for brain MRI scans. There are no known risks in taking MRIs and a unique code will be assigned to each participant to protect their PHI.

Interventions

DEVICEMultiplex Sensitivity Encoding (MUSE)

It is an algorithm for MRI post-processing/image reconstruction (see reference: Chen).

Sponsors

Duke University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
CASE_CONTROL
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

1. subject's age is within one of the following age ranges (4-8, 20-30, or 50-70 years old); 2. male or female; 3. healthy volunteer or diagnosed with PD ; and 4. devoid of the following

Exclusion criteria

.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Rating of image quality (based on 8 criteria) by multiple radiologists (blind to reconstruction method)1 day (At time of image analysis)The ratings will be compared to compare the quality of images processed with MUSE versus conventional reconstruction methods

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026