Skip to content

A Study of Ipatasertib (GDC-0068) in Combination With Paclitaxel as Neoadjuvant Treatment for Participants With Early Stage Triple Negative Breast Cancer

A Phase II Randomized, Double-Blind, Study of Ipatasertib (GDC-0068), an Inhibitor to AKT, in Combination With Paclitaxel as Neoadjuvant Treatment for Patients With Early Stage Triple Negative Breast Cancer

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02301988
Enrollment
151
Registered
2014-11-26
Start date
2015-02-17
Completion date
2017-08-02
Last updated
2018-10-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Breast Cancer

Brief summary

This is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter, pre-operative Phase II study designed to estimate the efficacy of ipatasertib combined with paclitaxel chemotherapy versus placebo combined with paclitaxel chemotherapy in women with Stage Ia - IIIa triple-negative breast adenocarcinoma. The anticipated time on study treatment is 12 weeks.

Interventions

DRUGIpatasertib

Ipatasertib will be administered at a dose of 400 milligrams (mg) orally daily on Days 1-21 of each 28-day cycle for 3 cycles.

DRUGPaclitaxel

Paclitaxel will be administered at a dose of 80 milligrams per square meter (mg/m\^2) as IV infusion QW for 3 cycles.

DRUGPlacebo

Participants will receive placebo (matching to ipatasertib) orally daily on Days 1-21 of each 28-day cycle for 3 cycles.

Sponsors

SOLTI Breast Cancer Research Group
CollaboratorOTHER
Genentech, Inc.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Premenopausal or postmenopausal women * Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0 or 1 * Histologically documented, Stage Ia to operable Stage IIIa, triple-negative carcinoma of the breast with primary tumor greter than or equal to (\>/=) 1.5 centimeters (cm) in largest diameter (cT1-3) by MRI * Adequate hematologic and organ function within 14 days before the first study treatment * Availability of tumor tissue from formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) core biopsy of breast primary tumor * For female participants of childbearing potential, agreement to use highly effective form(s) of contraception for the duration of the study and for at least 6 months after last dose of study treatment

Exclusion criteria

* Known human epidermal growth factor 2 (HER2)-positive, estrogen receptor (ER)-positive, or progesterone receptor (PgR)-positive breast cancer * Any prior treatment for the current primary invasive breast cancer * Participants with cT4 or cN3 stage breast tumors * Metastatic (Stage IV) breast cancer * Bilateral invasive breast cancer * Multicentric breast cancer * Any disease, metabolic dysfunction, physical examination finding, or clinical laboratory finding that contraindicates the use of an investigational drug or that may affect the interpretation of the results or render the participant at high risk from treatment complications

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants With Pathological Complete Response (pCR) in Breast and Axilla as Defined by ypT0/Tis ypN0 in the American Joint Committee on Cancer Staging System (in All Participants)Surgery visit (at approximately Weeks 14 to 19)pCR was defined by ypT0/Tis ypN0 in the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) Staging System with the following determination for breast and axilla by local pathology laboratory evaluation: T0: no evidence of primary tumor; Tis: early cancer that has not spread to neighboring tissue and N0: no cancer found in the lymph nodes.
Percentage of Participants With pCR in Breast and Axilla as Defined by ypT0/Tis ypN0 in the American Joint Committee on Cancer Staging System (in Participants Who Have Phosphatase and Tensin Homolog [PTEN]-Low Tumors)Surgery visit (at approximately Weeks 14 to 19)pCR was defined by ypT0/Tis ypN0 in the AJCC Staging System with the following determination for breast and axilla by local pathology laboratory evaluation: T0: no evidence of primary tumor; Tis: early cancer that has not spread to neighboring tissue and N0: no cancer found in the lymph nodes.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants With Objective Tumor Response by Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI), As Assessed by Investigator Per the Modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) (in All Participants)Screening up to disease progression or death (assessed at screening, pre-surgical visit [approximately Weeks 10-12], early termination visit [up to Week 16])Objective tumor response (OR) was based on criteria related to changes in size of target lesions according to modified RECIST. Target lesions were selected on the basis of their size (lesions with the longest diameter) as well as the feasibility of reproducible repeated measurements. OR was the sum of complete response (CR) and partial response (PR). CR: disappearance of all target lesions. PR: at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters.
Percentage of Participants With pCR in Breast and Axilla as Defined by ypT0/Tis ypN0 in the American Joint Committee on Cancer Staging System (in Participants Who Are Akt Diagnostic Positive [Dx+])Surgery visit (at approximately Weeks 14 to 19)pCR was defined by ypT0/Tis ypN0 in the AJCC Staging System with the following determination for breast and axilla by local pathology laboratory evaluation: T0: no evidence of primary tumor; Tis: early cancer that has not spread to neighboring tissue and N0: no cancer found in the lymph nodes.
Percentage of Participants With Objective Tumor Response by MRI, As Assessed by Investigator Per Modified RECIST (in Participants Who Have PTEN-low Tumors)Screening up to disease progression or death (assessed at screening, pre-surgical visit [approximately Weeks 10-12], early termination visit [up to Week 16])ORR was based on criteria related to changes in size of target lesions according to modified RECIST. Target lesions were selected on the basis of their size (lesions with the longest diameter) as well as the feasibility of reproducible repeated measurements. ORR was the sum of complete response (CR) and partial response (PR). CR: disappearance of all target lesions. PR: at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters.
Percentage of Participants With pCR in Breast as Defined by ypT0/Tis in the American Joint Committee on Cancer Staging System (in Participants Who Are Akt Dx+)Surgery visit (at approximately Weeks 14 to 19)pCR was defined by ypT0/Tis in the AJCC Staging System with the following determination for breast by local pathology laboratory evaluation: T0: no evidence of primary tumor; Tis: early cancer that has not spread to neighboring tissue.
Percentage of Participants With pCR According to American Joint Committee on Cancer Staging System, by Breast Cancer SubtypeSurgery visit (at approximately Weeks 14 to 19)pCR was defined by ypT0/Tis in the AJCC Staging System with the following determination for breast subtypes by local pathology laboratory evaluation: T0: no evidence of primary tumor; Tis: early cancer that has not spread to neighboring tissue. The intrinsic molecular subtypes of breast cancer included here are luminal A (LumA), Her-2, basal-like, normal and unknown.
Percentage of Participants With pCR in Breast as Defined by ypT0/Tis in the American Joint Committee on Cancer Staging System (in All Participants)Surgery visit (at approximately Weeks 14 to 19)pCR was defined by ypT0/Tis in the AJCC Staging System with the following determination for breast by local pathology laboratory evaluation: T0: no evidence of primary tumor; Tis: early cancer that has not spread to neighboring tissue.
Percentage of Participants With Response to Conversion to BCS Among Participants With T2 or T3 TumorsFrom screening to surgery visit (at approximately Weeks 14 to 19)After neoadjuvant treatment, the number of patients who is appropriate for breast conserving surgery is reported as a measure of efficacy of the treatment to shrink the tumor enough for patients to benefit from less aggressive surgical management. Breast-conserving surgery was defined as removal of part of the breast tissue during surgery. T2 or T3 in the AJCC Staging System were defined as follows: T2: tumor was more than 2 centimeter (cm) but no more than 5 cm across; T3: tumor was larger than 5 cm across.
Percentage of Participants With Adverse EventsScreening up to Week 24An adverse event is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product and which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with the treatment. An adverse event can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding, for example), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a pharmaceutical product, whether or not considered related to the pharmaceutical product. Preexisting conditions which worsen during a study are also considered as adverse events.
Plasma Concentrations of Ipatasertib on Day 1 and Day 80.5 and 4 hours post dose on Day 1 of Cycle 1, 166 and 170 hours post dose from Day 1 of Cycle 1 (Cycle length = 28 days)Plasma samples for pharmacokinetic characterization was collected at various timepoints in all participants.
Minimum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmin) of Ipatasertib0.5 and 4 hours post dose on Day 1 of Cycle 1, 166 and 170 hours post dose from Day 1 of Cycle 1 (Cycle length = 28 days)Plasma samples for pharmacokinetic characterization was collected on Day 1 and Day 8 in all participants.
Percentage of Participants With Response to Undergoing Breast Conserving Surgery (BCS) Among Participants With T2 or T3 TumorsSurgery visit (at approximately Weeks 14 to 19)After neoadjuvant treatment, the number of patients who is appropriate for breast conserving surgery is reported as a measure of efficacy of the treatment to shrink the tumor enough for patients to benefit from less aggressive surgical management. Breast-conserving surgery was defined as removal of part of the breast tissue during surgery. T2 or T3 in the AJCC Staging System were defined as follows: T2: tumor was more than 2 centimeter (cm) but no more than 5 cm across; T3: tumor was larger than 5 cm across.
Percentage of Participants With pCR in Breast as Defined by ypT0/Tis in the American Joint Committee on Cancer Staging System (in Participants Who Have PTEN-low Tumors)Surgery visit (at approximately Weeks 14 to 19)pCR was defined by ypT0/Tis in the AJCC Staging System with the following determination for breast by local pathology laboratory evaluation: T0: no evidence of primary tumor; Tis: early cancer that has not spread to neighboring tissue.

Countries

Portugal, Spain, United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Ipatasertib + Paclitaxel
Participants received ipatasertib orally daily on Days 1-21 of each 28-day cycle for 3 cycles and paclitaxel intravenous (IV) infusion every week (QW) for 3 cycles (12 total doses).
76
Placebo + Paclitaxel
Participants received placebo (matching to ipatasertib) orally daily on Days 1-21 of each 28-day cycle for 3 cycles and paclitaxel IV infusion QW for 3 cycles (12 total doses).
75
Total151

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyAdverse Event11
Overall StudyDeath10
Overall StudyLack of Efficacy32
Overall StudyPhysician Decision22
Overall StudyUnknown Reason13
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject21

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPlacebo + PaclitaxelTotalIpatasertib + Paclitaxel
Age, Continuous53.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12
53.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.5
53.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.9
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
3 Participants5 Participants2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
1 Participants3 Participants2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
70 Participants141 Participants71 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
75 Participants151 Participants76 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
1 / 760 / 75
other
Total, other adverse events
76 / 7673 / 75
serious
Total, serious adverse events
10 / 763 / 75

Outcome results

Primary

Percentage of Participants With Pathological Complete Response (pCR) in Breast and Axilla as Defined by ypT0/Tis ypN0 in the American Joint Committee on Cancer Staging System (in All Participants)

pCR was defined by ypT0/Tis ypN0 in the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) Staging System with the following determination for breast and axilla by local pathology laboratory evaluation: T0: no evidence of primary tumor; Tis: early cancer that has not spread to neighboring tissue and N0: no cancer found in the lymph nodes.

Time frame: Surgery visit (at approximately Weeks 14 to 19)

Population: The ITT population included all randomized participants.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Ipatasertib + PaclitaxelPercentage of Participants With Pathological Complete Response (pCR) in Breast and Axilla as Defined by ypT0/Tis ypN0 in the American Joint Committee on Cancer Staging System (in All Participants)17.1 percentage of participants
Placebo + PaclitaxelPercentage of Participants With Pathological Complete Response (pCR) in Breast and Axilla as Defined by ypT0/Tis ypN0 in the American Joint Committee on Cancer Staging System (in All Participants)13.3 percentage of participants
Comparison: Unstratified Analysisp-value: 0.51995% CI: [-8.99, 16.54]Chi-squared
Primary

Percentage of Participants With pCR in Breast and Axilla as Defined by ypT0/Tis ypN0 in the American Joint Committee on Cancer Staging System (in Participants Who Have Phosphatase and Tensin Homolog [PTEN]-Low Tumors)

pCR was defined by ypT0/Tis ypN0 in the AJCC Staging System with the following determination for breast and axilla by local pathology laboratory evaluation: T0: no evidence of primary tumor; Tis: early cancer that has not spread to neighboring tissue and N0: no cancer found in the lymph nodes.

Time frame: Surgery visit (at approximately Weeks 14 to 19)

Population: The ITT population included all randomized participants who have PTEN-low tumors.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Ipatasertib + PaclitaxelPercentage of Participants With pCR in Breast and Axilla as Defined by ypT0/Tis ypN0 in the American Joint Committee on Cancer Staging System (in Participants Who Have Phosphatase and Tensin Homolog [PTEN]-Low Tumors)15.8 percentage of participants
Placebo + PaclitaxelPercentage of Participants With pCR in Breast and Axilla as Defined by ypT0/Tis ypN0 in the American Joint Committee on Cancer Staging System (in Participants Who Have Phosphatase and Tensin Homolog [PTEN]-Low Tumors)12.5 percentage of participants
Comparison: Unstratified analysisp-value: 0.781795% CI: [-25.52, 32.1]Chi-squared
Secondary

Minimum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmin) of Ipatasertib

Plasma samples for pharmacokinetic characterization was collected on Day 1 and Day 8 in all participants.

Time frame: 0.5 and 4 hours post dose on Day 1 of Cycle 1, 166 and 170 hours post dose from Day 1 of Cycle 1 (Cycle length = 28 days)

Population: The ITT population included all participants.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Ipatasertib + PaclitaxelMinimum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmin) of Ipatasertib37.5 ng/mLStandard Deviation 28.3
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Adverse Events

An adverse event is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product and which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with the treatment. An adverse event can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding, for example), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a pharmaceutical product, whether or not considered related to the pharmaceutical product. Preexisting conditions which worsen during a study are also considered as adverse events.

Time frame: Screening up to Week 24

Population: The safety population was identical to the ITT population and included all randomized participants.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Ipatasertib + PaclitaxelPercentage of Participants With Adverse Events100 percentage of participants
Placebo + PaclitaxelPercentage of Participants With Adverse Events98.7 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Objective Tumor Response by Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI), As Assessed by Investigator Per the Modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) (in All Participants)

Objective tumor response (OR) was based on criteria related to changes in size of target lesions according to modified RECIST. Target lesions were selected on the basis of their size (lesions with the longest diameter) as well as the feasibility of reproducible repeated measurements. OR was the sum of complete response (CR) and partial response (PR). CR: disappearance of all target lesions. PR: at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters.

Time frame: Screening up to disease progression or death (assessed at screening, pre-surgical visit [approximately Weeks 10-12], early termination visit [up to Week 16])

Population: The ITT population included all randomized participants.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Ipatasertib + PaclitaxelPercentage of Participants With Objective Tumor Response by Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI), As Assessed by Investigator Per the Modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) (in All Participants)67.1 percentage of participants
Placebo + PaclitaxelPercentage of Participants With Objective Tumor Response by Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI), As Assessed by Investigator Per the Modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) (in All Participants)56.0 percentage of participants
Comparison: Unstratified analysisp-value: 0.160795% CI: [-5.64, 27.85]Chi-squared
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Objective Tumor Response by MRI, As Assessed by Investigator Per Modified RECIST (in Participants Who Have PTEN-low Tumors)

ORR was based on criteria related to changes in size of target lesions according to modified RECIST. Target lesions were selected on the basis of their size (lesions with the longest diameter) as well as the feasibility of reproducible repeated measurements. ORR was the sum of complete response (CR) and partial response (PR). CR: disappearance of all target lesions. PR: at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters.

Time frame: Screening up to disease progression or death (assessed at screening, pre-surgical visit [approximately Weeks 10-12], early termination visit [up to Week 16])

Population: The ITT population included all randomized participants who have PTEN-low tumors.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Ipatasertib + PaclitaxelPercentage of Participants With Objective Tumor Response by MRI, As Assessed by Investigator Per Modified RECIST (in Participants Who Have PTEN-low Tumors)73.7 percentage of participants
Placebo + PaclitaxelPercentage of Participants With Objective Tumor Response by MRI, As Assessed by Investigator Per Modified RECIST (in Participants Who Have PTEN-low Tumors)50.0 percentage of participants
Comparison: Unstratified Analysisp-value: 0.148695% CI: [-13.57, 60.94]Chi-squared
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With pCR According to American Joint Committee on Cancer Staging System, by Breast Cancer Subtype

pCR was defined by ypT0/Tis in the AJCC Staging System with the following determination for breast subtypes by local pathology laboratory evaluation: T0: no evidence of primary tumor; Tis: early cancer that has not spread to neighboring tissue. The intrinsic molecular subtypes of breast cancer included here are luminal A (LumA), Her-2, basal-like, normal and unknown.

Time frame: Surgery visit (at approximately Weeks 14 to 19)

Population: The ITT population included all randomized participants.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Ipatasertib + PaclitaxelPercentage of Participants With pCR According to American Joint Committee on Cancer Staging System, by Breast Cancer SubtypeUnknown18.5 percentage of participants
Ipatasertib + PaclitaxelPercentage of Participants With pCR According to American Joint Committee on Cancer Staging System, by Breast Cancer SubtypeBasal22.0 percentage of participants
Ipatasertib + PaclitaxelPercentage of Participants With pCR According to American Joint Committee on Cancer Staging System, by Breast Cancer SubtypeNormal50.0 percentage of participants
Ipatasertib + PaclitaxelPercentage of Participants With pCR According to American Joint Committee on Cancer Staging System, by Breast Cancer SubtypeHer233.3 percentage of participants
Placebo + PaclitaxelPercentage of Participants With pCR According to American Joint Committee on Cancer Staging System, by Breast Cancer SubtypeBasal10.8 percentage of participants
Placebo + PaclitaxelPercentage of Participants With pCR According to American Joint Committee on Cancer Staging System, by Breast Cancer SubtypeNormal0 percentage of participants
Placebo + PaclitaxelPercentage of Participants With pCR According to American Joint Committee on Cancer Staging System, by Breast Cancer SubtypeUnknown21.9 percentage of participants
Placebo + PaclitaxelPercentage of Participants With pCR According to American Joint Committee on Cancer Staging System, by Breast Cancer SubtypeHer20 percentage of participants
Placebo + PaclitaxelPercentage of Participants With pCR According to American Joint Committee on Cancer Staging System, by Breast Cancer SubtypeLumA0 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With pCR in Breast and Axilla as Defined by ypT0/Tis ypN0 in the American Joint Committee on Cancer Staging System (in Participants Who Are Akt Diagnostic Positive [Dx+])

pCR was defined by ypT0/Tis ypN0 in the AJCC Staging System with the following determination for breast and axilla by local pathology laboratory evaluation: T0: no evidence of primary tumor; Tis: early cancer that has not spread to neighboring tissue and N0: no cancer found in the lymph nodes.

Time frame: Surgery visit (at approximately Weeks 14 to 19)

Population: The ITT population included all randomized participants who are Akt Dx+.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Ipatasertib + PaclitaxelPercentage of Participants With pCR in Breast and Axilla as Defined by ypT0/Tis ypN0 in the American Joint Committee on Cancer Staging System (in Participants Who Are Akt Diagnostic Positive [Dx+])17.9 percentage of participants
Placebo + PaclitaxelPercentage of Participants With pCR in Breast and Axilla as Defined by ypT0/Tis ypN0 in the American Joint Committee on Cancer Staging System (in Participants Who Are Akt Diagnostic Positive [Dx+])11.8 percentage of participants
p-value: 0.49895% CI: [-15.01, 27.2]Chi-squared
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With pCR in Breast as Defined by ypT0/Tis in the American Joint Committee on Cancer Staging System (in All Participants)

pCR was defined by ypT0/Tis in the AJCC Staging System with the following determination for breast by local pathology laboratory evaluation: T0: no evidence of primary tumor; Tis: early cancer that has not spread to neighboring tissue.

Time frame: Surgery visit (at approximately Weeks 14 to 19)

Population: The ITT population included all randomized participants.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Ipatasertib + PaclitaxelPercentage of Participants With pCR in Breast as Defined by ypT0/Tis in the American Joint Committee on Cancer Staging System (in All Participants)22.4 percentage of participants
Placebo + PaclitaxelPercentage of Participants With pCR in Breast as Defined by ypT0/Tis in the American Joint Committee on Cancer Staging System (in All Participants)14.7 percentage of participants
Comparison: Unstratified analysisp-value: 0.223495% CI: [-5.95, 21.35]Chi-squared
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With pCR in Breast as Defined by ypT0/Tis in the American Joint Committee on Cancer Staging System (in Participants Who Are Akt Dx+)

pCR was defined by ypT0/Tis in the AJCC Staging System with the following determination for breast by local pathology laboratory evaluation: T0: no evidence of primary tumor; Tis: early cancer that has not spread to neighboring tissue.

Time frame: Surgery visit (at approximately Weeks 14 to 19)

Population: The ITT population included all randomized participants who are Akt Dx+.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Ipatasertib + PaclitaxelPercentage of Participants With pCR in Breast as Defined by ypT0/Tis in the American Joint Committee on Cancer Staging System (in Participants Who Are Akt Dx+)21.4 percentage of participants
Placebo + PaclitaxelPercentage of Participants With pCR in Breast as Defined by ypT0/Tis in the American Joint Committee on Cancer Staging System (in Participants Who Are Akt Dx+)11.8 percentage of participants
p-value: 0.303295% CI: [-12.25, 31.58]Chi-squared
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With pCR in Breast as Defined by ypT0/Tis in the American Joint Committee on Cancer Staging System (in Participants Who Have PTEN-low Tumors)

pCR was defined by ypT0/Tis in the AJCC Staging System with the following determination for breast by local pathology laboratory evaluation: T0: no evidence of primary tumor; Tis: early cancer that has not spread to neighboring tissue.

Time frame: Surgery visit (at approximately Weeks 14 to 19)

Population: The ITT population included all randomized participants who have PTEN-low tumors.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Ipatasertib + PaclitaxelPercentage of Participants With pCR in Breast as Defined by ypT0/Tis in the American Joint Committee on Cancer Staging System (in Participants Who Have PTEN-low Tumors)15.8 percentage of participants
Placebo + PaclitaxelPercentage of Participants With pCR in Breast as Defined by ypT0/Tis in the American Joint Committee on Cancer Staging System (in Participants Who Have PTEN-low Tumors)18.8 percentage of participants
Comparison: Unstratified analysisp-value: 0.816995% CI: [-33.91, 27.99]Chi-squared
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Response to Conversion to BCS Among Participants With T2 or T3 Tumors

After neoadjuvant treatment, the number of patients who is appropriate for breast conserving surgery is reported as a measure of efficacy of the treatment to shrink the tumor enough for patients to benefit from less aggressive surgical management. Breast-conserving surgery was defined as removal of part of the breast tissue during surgery. T2 or T3 in the AJCC Staging System were defined as follows: T2: tumor was more than 2 centimeter (cm) but no more than 5 cm across; T3: tumor was larger than 5 cm across.

Time frame: From screening to surgery visit (at approximately Weeks 14 to 19)

Population: The ITT population included all randomized participants with T2 or T3 Tumors with response to conversion to BCS.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Ipatasertib + PaclitaxelPercentage of Participants With Response to Conversion to BCS Among Participants With T2 or T3 Tumors33.3 percentage of participants
Placebo + PaclitaxelPercentage of Participants With Response to Conversion to BCS Among Participants With T2 or T3 Tumors25 percentage of participants
p-value: 0.629195% CI: [-33.04, 49.71]Chi-squared
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Response to Undergoing Breast Conserving Surgery (BCS) Among Participants With T2 or T3 Tumors

After neoadjuvant treatment, the number of patients who is appropriate for breast conserving surgery is reported as a measure of efficacy of the treatment to shrink the tumor enough for patients to benefit from less aggressive surgical management. Breast-conserving surgery was defined as removal of part of the breast tissue during surgery. T2 or T3 in the AJCC Staging System were defined as follows: T2: tumor was more than 2 centimeter (cm) but no more than 5 cm across; T3: tumor was larger than 5 cm across.

Time frame: Surgery visit (at approximately Weeks 14 to 19)

Population: The ITT population included all randomized participants with T2 or T3 Tumors.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Ipatasertib + PaclitaxelPercentage of Participants With Response to Undergoing Breast Conserving Surgery (BCS) Among Participants With T2 or T3 Tumors64.5 percentage of participants
Placebo + PaclitaxelPercentage of Participants With Response to Undergoing Breast Conserving Surgery (BCS) Among Participants With T2 or T3 Tumors60.3 percentage of participants
p-value: 0.62895% CI: [-14.37, 22.76]Chi-squared
Secondary

Plasma Concentrations of Ipatasertib on Day 1 and Day 8

Plasma samples for pharmacokinetic characterization was collected at various timepoints in all participants.

Time frame: 0.5 and 4 hours post dose on Day 1 of Cycle 1, 166 and 170 hours post dose from Day 1 of Cycle 1 (Cycle length = 28 days)

Population: The ITT population included all randomized participants. Reported here are data for participants with data available.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Ipatasertib + PaclitaxelPlasma Concentrations of Ipatasertib on Day 1 and Day 80.5 hours290 ng/mLStandard Deviation 312
Ipatasertib + PaclitaxelPlasma Concentrations of Ipatasertib on Day 1 and Day 84 hours196 ng/mLStandard Deviation 93
Ipatasertib + PaclitaxelPlasma Concentrations of Ipatasertib on Day 1 and Day 8166 hours37.5 ng/mLStandard Deviation 28.3
Ipatasertib + PaclitaxelPlasma Concentrations of Ipatasertib on Day 1 and Day 8170 hours355 ng/mLStandard Deviation 204

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 4, 2026