Skip to content

Phase 2 Nab® -Paclitaxel (Abraxane®) Plus Gemcitabine in Subjects With Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer (LAPC)

Nab-paclitaxel (Abraxane) Plus Gemcitabine in Subjects With Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer (LAPC): An International, Open-label, Multi-center, Phase 2 Study (LAPACT).

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02301143
Acronym
LAPACT
Enrollment
107
Registered
2014-11-25
Start date
2015-04-21
Completion date
2018-04-26
Last updated
2019-03-20

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Pancreatic Neoplasms

Keywords

Pancreatic Neoplasms, Pancreatic Cancer, Locally advanced pacriatic cancer, nab-Paclitaxel, Abraxane, Gemcitabine, ABI-007

Brief summary

This clinical study is in subjects who are 18 years old or older with locally advanced pancreatic cancer who have not received prior treatment for their pancreatic cancer. The study treats all subjects with nab-Paclitaxel plus gemcitabine for approximately 6 months of treatment. Subjects who complete the treatment will choose, with their treating physicians, what additional treatment should be given: more nab-Paclitaxel plus gemcitabine, Chemoradiation therapy, or surgery to treat the locally advanced pancreatic cancer.

Detailed description

This is an international, non-randomized, open-label, multi-center, Phase 2 study in subjects who are 18 years old or older with locally advanced pancreatic cancer who have not received prior treatment for their pancreatic cancer. All subjects will be treated with nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine for 6 cycles followed by an Investigator's Choice of continuation of treatment with nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine, chemoradiation therapy, or surgery. Safety assessments by laboratory testing and physical exams will be conducted through-out the study. Efficacy assessments by physical exam will be preformed through-out the study and tumor imaging will be conducted approximately every 2 months. Subjects will be considered active study participants from enrollment up to, but not including, survival follow-up period.

Interventions

DRUGnab-Paclitaxel
DRUGGemcitabine
DRUGChemoradiation
DRUGCapecitabine
PROCEDURESurgery

Surgical intervention

Sponsors

Celgene
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Non- metastasis, unresectable, adenocarcinoma pancreatic cancer patients * No prior anticancer therapy for pancreatic cancer •≥ 18 years of age with a performance status of 0 or 1•Adequate complete blood counts, hepatic function, and renal function * Signed informed Consent

Exclusion criteria

* Active bacterial, viral, or fungal infection * Infection with hepatitis B or C, or history of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection, or receiving immunosuppressive or myelosuppressive * Subjects with sensory neuropathy, ascites, or plastic biliary stent. * Serious medical risk factors involving any of the major organ systems, or serious psychiatric disorders (including but not limited to connective tissue disorders, lung disease, and cardiac or seizure disorders) * Women who are pregnant or breast feeding

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Kaplan-Meier Estimates for Time to Treatment Failure (TTF)Day 1 of study treatment up to 28.75 months; (maximum time for the last tumor assessment)TTF was defined as the time after the first dose of study therapy to discontinuation of study therapy due to disease progression, death by any cause, or the start of a new non-protocol-defined anticancer therapy/surgery. If a participant does not progress, die or start a new non-protocol-defined anticancer therapy, the participant was censored on the last tumor assessment date. Tumor evaluations of CT or MRI scans were assessed by the investigative sites and response determined according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) guidelines, version 1.1. The definition for progressive disease (PD) was \>= 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions from nadir, and the sum showed an absolute increase of \>= 5 mm; the progression of a non-target lesion or the appearance of any new lesions is also considered progression. Median and its 90% confidence interval (CI) of TTF were estimated using the method of Brookmeyer and Crowley.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Overall Response Rate (ORR): Percentage of Participants With Complete (CR) or Partial Response (PR) According to RECIST Version 1.1Day 1 of study treatment up to the end of investigator choice period plus 28 days; up to 76.9 weeksORR was defined as the percentage of participants that achieved a combined incidence of complete (CR) and partial response (PR) using RECIST 1.1 guidelines as assessed by the investigator. Assessments after new non-protocol-defined anticancer therapy are excluded. For participants who had resectable surgery in Investigator Choice period, assessments after surgical intervention are excluded. RECIST 1.1 Definition: * CR: disappearance of all target and non-target lesions; any pathological lymph nodes (target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to \< 10 mm and no new lesions diagnosed. * PR: a \>= 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions from baseline; no evidence of progression in any of the non-target lesions diagnosed at baseline; and no new lesions diagnosed. The two-sided 90% binomial confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated by Wilson score method
Kaplan-Meier Estimate of Progression-Free Survival (PFS)Day 1 of study treatment up to 28.75 months (maximum time for the last tumor assessment)Progression-free Survival (PFS) was defined as the time from the date of the first dose to the date of disease progression or death (by any cause), whichever is earlier. The analysis day was calculated from enrollment date for one participant who was not treated. Participants who have no disease progression or have not died were censored to last tumor assessment date with progression-free. The definition for progressive disease (PD) was at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions from nadir; the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of \>= 5 mm; the progression of a non-target lesion or the appearance of any new lesions is also considered progression. Median and its 90% confidence interval of PFS were estimated using the method of Brookmeyer and Crowley.
Kaplan-Meier Estimates for Overall Survival (OS)Day 1 of study treatment up to 31.34 months (maximum time for survival follow-up)Overall survival was defined as the time from the date of first dose of study therapy to the date of death (by any cause). Participants who were alive at the end of study or clinical data cut were censored on the last known time that the participant was alive or the clinical cutoff date, whichever was earlier. Median and its 90% confidence interval of OS were estimated using the method of Brookmeyer and Crowley
Participant Counts in Response Categories Using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30): Global Health Status and 5 Functioning ScalesBaseline (Day -1), Day 1 of each cycle, for up to 19 cycles each cycle consisting of 28 days and the 28-day follow-up visitThe European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality-of-Life questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) is a validated health-related quality of life (HRQoL) measure. The EORTC QLQ-C30 is composed of both multi-item scales and single-item measures, including 5 functional scales, 3 symptom scales, 6 single symptom items, and 1 global health status / quality of life scale. No item occurs in more than one scale. All reported measures are transformed to a 0 - 100 scale. In the Global Health Status and 5 functional scales, 0 = worst possible quality of life/health status and 100 = best possible quality of life/health status. The best score on treatment is the best score from all post-baseline visits and is compared to the baseline to get the following responder categories. Responder categories: - Improved: \>=10 increase from baseline - Stable: neither increase nor decrease \>10 - Worsened: \>=10 decrease from baseline
Disease Control Rate (DCR): Percentage of Participants With Complete (CR) or Partial Response (PR), or Stable Disease (SD) for ≥ 16 Weeks According to RECIST Version 1.1Day 1 of study treatment up to the end of investigator choice period plus 28 days; up to 76.9 weeksDCR was defined as the percentage of participants with a CR or PR or SD from of date of first treatment to 16 weeks. Tumor assessments after start of non-protocol-defined anticancer therapy were excluded. RECIST 1.1 Definition: * CR: disappearance of all target and non-target lesions; any pathological lymph nodes (target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to \< 10 mm and no new lesions diagnosed. * PR: a \>= 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions from baseline; no evidence of progression in any of the non-target lesions diagnosed at baseline; and no new lesions diagnosed. * SD: neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase of lesions to qualify for PD. The two-sided 90% binomial confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated by Wilson score method.
Participant Counts in Response Categories Using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire For Pancreatic Cancer (EORTC-QLQ PAN26): Six Summary ScalesBaseline (Day -1), Day 1 of each cycle, for up to 19 cycles each cycle consisting of 28 days and the 28-day follow-up visitThe EORTC pancreatic cancer module is a validated tool intended for patients at all disease stages undergoing surgical resection, palliative surgical intervention, endoscopic palliation or palliative chemotherapy. The module includes 26 questions, organized into 7 scales and 10 individual item scores. All reported measures are transformed to a 0 to 100 scale. Six summary scales reported are: - Pancreatic Pain - Digestive Symptoms - Altered Bowel Habits - Hepatic Scale - Body Image - Sexuality Scores of 0 = optimal health state and 100 = worst possible health state. The best score on treatment is the best score from all post-baseline visits and is compared to the baseline. Responder categories: - Improved: \>=MID decrease from baseline - Stable: no increase or decrease \>MID - Worsened: \>=MID increase from baseline MID = half the baseline standard deviation
Participant Counts in Response Categories Using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire For Pancreatic Cancer (EORTC-QLQ PAN26): Satisfaction With Health Care ScaleBaseline (Day -1), Day 1 of each cycle, for up to 19 cycles each cycle consisting of 28 days and the 28-day follow-up visitThe EORTC pancreatic cancer module is a validated tool intended for patients at all disease stages undergoing surgical resection, palliative surgical intervention, endoscopic palliation or palliative chemotherapy. The module includes 26 questions, organized into 7 scales and 10 individual item scores. The summary scale for Satisfaction with Health Care is reported. All reported measures are transformed to a 0 to 100 scale. Scores of 0 = not satisfied, worst possible health state and 100 = extremely satisfied, best possible health state. The best score on treatment is the best score from all post-baseline visits and is compared to the baseline to get the following responder categories. Responder categories: - Improved: \>=MID increase from baseline - Stable: no increase or decrease \>MID - Worsened: \>=MID decrease from baseline MID = half the baseline standard deviation
Participant Counts in Response Categories Using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire For Pancreatic Cancer (EORTC-QLQ PAN26): 10 Individual Item ScoresBaseline (Day -1), Day 1 of each cycle, for up to 19 cycles each cycle consisting of 28 days and the 28-day follow-up visitThe EORTC pancreatic cancer module is a validated tool intended for patients at all disease stages undergoing surgical resection, palliative surgical intervention, endoscopic palliation or palliative chemotherapy. The module includes 26 questions, organized into 7 scales and 10 individual item scores. The 10 individual item scores are reported. All reported measures are transformed to a 0 to 100 scale. Scores of 0 = best possible health state and 100 = worst possible health state. The best score on treatment is the best score from all post-baseline visits and is compared to the baseline to get the following responder categories. Responder categories: - Improved: \>=MID decrease from baseline - Stable: no increase or decrease \>MID - Worsened: \>=MID increase from baseline MID = half the baseline standard deviation
Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Day 1 of study drug up to end of the study; up to 31.3 monthsTEAEs are defined as any adverse event (AE) that begin or worsen on or after the start of study drug or procedure of the study period through the maximum duration of the period plus 28 days. The severity of AEs was graded based on National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE), Version 4.0 and the scale: Grade 1 = Mild Grade 2 = Moderate Grade 3 = Severe Grade 4 = Life threatening Grade 5 = Death. Relation to study drug was determined by the investigator. A treatment-related TEAE is defined as TEAE which was considered to be related to one or both of the study drugs and reported as 'Suspected' on the case report form. AEs with a missing relationship were treated as 'treatment-related' in data summaries. IP (investigational product) refers to nab-Paclitaxel and/or Gemcitabine. Related TEAE refers to relation to study drug (IP).
Participant Counts in Response Categories Using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30): Symptom Scales and Single Symptom ItemsBaseline (Day -1), Day 1 of each cycle, for up to 19 cycles each cycle consisting of 28 days and the 28-day follow-up visitThe European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality-of-Life questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) is a validated health-related quality of life (HRQoL) measure. The EORTC QLQ-C30 is composed of both multi-item scales and single-item measures, including 5 functional scales, 3 symptom scales, 6 single symptom items, and 1 global health status / quality of life scale. No item occurs in more than one scale. All reported measures are transformed to a 0 to 100 scale. In the symptom scales and single symptom items, 0 = optimal health state and 100 = worst possible health state. The best score on treatment is the best score from all post-baseline visits and is compared to the baseline to get the following responder categories. Responder categories: - Improved: \>=10 decrease from baseline - Stable: neither increase nor decrease \>10 - Worsened: \>=10 increase from baseline

Countries

Canada, France, Italy, Spain, United States

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

152 patients were screened and 107 participants enrolled.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Nab-Paclitaxel Plus Gemcitabine
In the Induction period, nab-paclitaxel 125 mg/m\^2 intravenous (IV) infusion was administered over approximately 30-45 minutes on Days 1, 8, and 15, followed by gemcitabine 1000 mg/m\^2 IV infusion over approximately 30 minutes on Days 1, 8, and 15 of each 28-day cycle. For participants who completed 6 cycles of nab-paclitaxel and gemcitabine without disease progression or unacceptable toxicities, the Investigator then determined the best option for the participant in the Investigator's Choice Period: - Continuation of nab-paclitaxel and gemcitabine therapy to disease progression or unacceptable toxicity OR - Chemoradiation therapy consisting of the concurrent use of capecitabine or gemcitabine with radiation according to institutional practice OR - Surgical intervention
107
Total107

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Induction PeriodAdverse Event220
Induction PeriodDeath10
Induction PeriodEnrolled But Not Treated10
Induction PeriodNoncompliance with Study Drug10
Induction PeriodOther10
Induction PeriodPhysician Decision40
Induction PeriodProgressive Disease80
Induction PeriodProtocol Violation20
Induction PeriodSymptomatic Deterioration20
Induction PeriodWithdrawal by Subject30
Investigator's ChoiceAdverse Event03
Investigator's ChoiceNoncompliance With Study Drug01
Investigator's ChoiceOther01
Investigator's ChoiceProgressive Disease03
Investigator's ChoiceSymptomatic Deterioration01
Investigator's ChoiceUnresectable Surgery01

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicNab-Paclitaxel Plus Gemcitabine
Age, Continuous65.0 years
Age, Customized
>=65 - 75 years
50 Participants
Age, Customized
<65 years
44 Participants
Age, Customized
>75 years
13 Participants
Baseline Albumin39.0 g/L
Baseline Neutrophil - to - Lymphocyte Ratio (NLR)
<= 5
91 Participants
Baseline Neutrophil - to - Lymphocyte Ratio (NLR)
> 5
14 Participants
Baseline Neutrophil - to - Lymphocyte Ratio (NLR)
Missing
2 Participants
Carbohydrate Antigen 19-9 (CA19-9)243.3 U/mL
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status
Grade 0
50 Participants
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status
Grade 1
57 Participants
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status
Grade 2
0 Participants
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status
Grade 3
0 Participants
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status
Grade 4
0 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
1 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
78 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
28 Participants
Number of Target Lesions1.0 lesions
Physician Assessment of Peripheral Neuropathy
Grade 0
101 Participants
Physician Assessment of Peripheral Neuropathy
Grade 1
6 Participants
Physician Assessment of Peripheral Neuropathy
Grade 2
0 Participants
Physician Assessment of Peripheral Neuropathy
Grade 3
0 Participants
Physician Assessment of Peripheral Neuropathy
Grade 4
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
3 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
30 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
72 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
59 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
48 Participants
Sum of Longest Diameter of Target Lesions44.0 mm
Time from Primary Diagnosis to First Dose27.0 days

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
42 / 10667 / 106
other
Total, other adverse events
104 / 106104 / 106
serious
Total, serious adverse events
38 / 10639 / 106

Outcome results

Primary

Kaplan-Meier Estimates for Time to Treatment Failure (TTF)

TTF was defined as the time after the first dose of study therapy to discontinuation of study therapy due to disease progression, death by any cause, or the start of a new non-protocol-defined anticancer therapy/surgery. If a participant does not progress, die or start a new non-protocol-defined anticancer therapy, the participant was censored on the last tumor assessment date. Tumor evaluations of CT or MRI scans were assessed by the investigative sites and response determined according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) guidelines, version 1.1. The definition for progressive disease (PD) was \>= 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions from nadir, and the sum showed an absolute increase of \>= 5 mm; the progression of a non-target lesion or the appearance of any new lesions is also considered progression. Median and its 90% confidence interval (CI) of TTF were estimated using the method of Brookmeyer and Crowley.

Time frame: Day 1 of study treatment up to 28.75 months; (maximum time for the last tumor assessment)

Population: Intent to treat population was defined as all participants enrolled into the study.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Nab-Paclitaxel Plus GemcitabineKaplan-Meier Estimates for Time to Treatment Failure (TTF)9.0 months
Secondary

Disease Control Rate (DCR): Percentage of Participants With Complete (CR) or Partial Response (PR), or Stable Disease (SD) for ≥ 16 Weeks According to RECIST Version 1.1

DCR was defined as the percentage of participants with a CR or PR or SD from of date of first treatment to 16 weeks. Tumor assessments after start of non-protocol-defined anticancer therapy were excluded. RECIST 1.1 Definition: * CR: disappearance of all target and non-target lesions; any pathological lymph nodes (target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to \< 10 mm and no new lesions diagnosed. * PR: a \>= 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions from baseline; no evidence of progression in any of the non-target lesions diagnosed at baseline; and no new lesions diagnosed. * SD: neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase of lesions to qualify for PD. The two-sided 90% binomial confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated by Wilson score method.

Time frame: Day 1 of study treatment up to the end of investigator choice period plus 28 days; up to 76.9 weeks

Population: Intent to treat population was defined as all participants enrolled into the study.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Nab-Paclitaxel Plus GemcitabineDisease Control Rate (DCR): Percentage of Participants With Complete (CR) or Partial Response (PR), or Stable Disease (SD) for ≥ 16 Weeks According to RECIST Version 1.177.6 percentage of participants
Secondary

Kaplan-Meier Estimate of Progression-Free Survival (PFS)

Progression-free Survival (PFS) was defined as the time from the date of the first dose to the date of disease progression or death (by any cause), whichever is earlier. The analysis day was calculated from enrollment date for one participant who was not treated. Participants who have no disease progression or have not died were censored to last tumor assessment date with progression-free. The definition for progressive disease (PD) was at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions from nadir; the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of \>= 5 mm; the progression of a non-target lesion or the appearance of any new lesions is also considered progression. Median and its 90% confidence interval of PFS were estimated using the method of Brookmeyer and Crowley.

Time frame: Day 1 of study treatment up to 28.75 months (maximum time for the last tumor assessment)

Population: Intent to treat population was defined as all participants who were enrolled into the study.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Nab-Paclitaxel Plus GemcitabineKaplan-Meier Estimate of Progression-Free Survival (PFS)10.9 months
Secondary

Kaplan-Meier Estimates for Overall Survival (OS)

Overall survival was defined as the time from the date of first dose of study therapy to the date of death (by any cause). Participants who were alive at the end of study or clinical data cut were censored on the last known time that the participant was alive or the clinical cutoff date, whichever was earlier. Median and its 90% confidence interval of OS were estimated using the method of Brookmeyer and Crowley

Time frame: Day 1 of study treatment up to 31.34 months (maximum time for survival follow-up)

Population: Intent to treat population was defined as all participants who were enrolled into the study.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Nab-Paclitaxel Plus GemcitabineKaplan-Meier Estimates for Overall Survival (OS)18.8 months
Secondary

Overall Response Rate (ORR): Percentage of Participants With Complete (CR) or Partial Response (PR) According to RECIST Version 1.1

ORR was defined as the percentage of participants that achieved a combined incidence of complete (CR) and partial response (PR) using RECIST 1.1 guidelines as assessed by the investigator. Assessments after new non-protocol-defined anticancer therapy are excluded. For participants who had resectable surgery in Investigator Choice period, assessments after surgical intervention are excluded. RECIST 1.1 Definition: * CR: disappearance of all target and non-target lesions; any pathological lymph nodes (target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to \< 10 mm and no new lesions diagnosed. * PR: a \>= 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions from baseline; no evidence of progression in any of the non-target lesions diagnosed at baseline; and no new lesions diagnosed. The two-sided 90% binomial confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated by Wilson score method

Time frame: Day 1 of study treatment up to the end of investigator choice period plus 28 days; up to 76.9 weeks

Population: Intent to treat population was defined as all participants who were enrolled into the study.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Nab-Paclitaxel Plus GemcitabineOverall Response Rate (ORR): Percentage of Participants With Complete (CR) or Partial Response (PR) According to RECIST Version 1.139.3 percentage of participants
Secondary

Participant Counts in Response Categories Using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30): Global Health Status and 5 Functioning Scales

The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality-of-Life questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) is a validated health-related quality of life (HRQoL) measure. The EORTC QLQ-C30 is composed of both multi-item scales and single-item measures, including 5 functional scales, 3 symptom scales, 6 single symptom items, and 1 global health status / quality of life scale. No item occurs in more than one scale. All reported measures are transformed to a 0 - 100 scale. In the Global Health Status and 5 functional scales, 0 = worst possible quality of life/health status and 100 = best possible quality of life/health status. The best score on treatment is the best score from all post-baseline visits and is compared to the baseline to get the following responder categories. Responder categories: - Improved: \>=10 increase from baseline - Stable: neither increase nor decrease \>10 - Worsened: \>=10 decrease from baseline

Time frame: Baseline (Day -1), Day 1 of each cycle, for up to 19 cycles each cycle consisting of 28 days and the 28-day follow-up visit

Population: Intent to treat population was defined as all participants enrolled into the study with both baseline and post baseline values.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Nab-Paclitaxel Plus GemcitabineParticipant Counts in Response Categories Using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30): Global Health Status and 5 Functioning ScalesGlobal Health Status: Improved43 Participants
Nab-Paclitaxel Plus GemcitabineParticipant Counts in Response Categories Using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30): Global Health Status and 5 Functioning ScalesGlobal Health Status: Stable34 Participants
Nab-Paclitaxel Plus GemcitabineParticipant Counts in Response Categories Using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30): Global Health Status and 5 Functioning ScalesGlobal Health Status: Worsened18 Participants
Nab-Paclitaxel Plus GemcitabineParticipant Counts in Response Categories Using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30): Global Health Status and 5 Functioning ScalesPhysical Functioning Scale: Improved20 Participants
Nab-Paclitaxel Plus GemcitabineParticipant Counts in Response Categories Using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30): Global Health Status and 5 Functioning ScalesPhysical Functioning Scale: Stable66 Participants
Nab-Paclitaxel Plus GemcitabineParticipant Counts in Response Categories Using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30): Global Health Status and 5 Functioning ScalesPhysical Functioning Scale: Worsened9 Participants
Nab-Paclitaxel Plus GemcitabineParticipant Counts in Response Categories Using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30): Global Health Status and 5 Functioning ScalesRole Functioning Scale: Improved36 Participants
Nab-Paclitaxel Plus GemcitabineParticipant Counts in Response Categories Using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30): Global Health Status and 5 Functioning ScalesRole Functioning Scale: Stable46 Participants
Nab-Paclitaxel Plus GemcitabineParticipant Counts in Response Categories Using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30): Global Health Status and 5 Functioning ScalesRole Functioning Scale: Worsened13 Participants
Nab-Paclitaxel Plus GemcitabineParticipant Counts in Response Categories Using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30): Global Health Status and 5 Functioning ScalesEmotional Functioning Scale: Improved50 Participants
Nab-Paclitaxel Plus GemcitabineParticipant Counts in Response Categories Using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30): Global Health Status and 5 Functioning ScalesEmotional Functioning Scale: Stable40 Participants
Nab-Paclitaxel Plus GemcitabineParticipant Counts in Response Categories Using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30): Global Health Status and 5 Functioning ScalesEmotional Functioning Scale: Worsened5 Participants
Nab-Paclitaxel Plus GemcitabineParticipant Counts in Response Categories Using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30): Global Health Status and 5 Functioning ScalesCognitive Functioning Scale: Improved33 Participants
Nab-Paclitaxel Plus GemcitabineParticipant Counts in Response Categories Using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30): Global Health Status and 5 Functioning ScalesCognitive Functioning Scale: Stable51 Participants
Nab-Paclitaxel Plus GemcitabineParticipant Counts in Response Categories Using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30): Global Health Status and 5 Functioning ScalesCognitive Functioning Scale: Worsened11 Participants
Nab-Paclitaxel Plus GemcitabineParticipant Counts in Response Categories Using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30): Global Health Status and 5 Functioning ScalesSocial Functioning Scale: Improved38 Participants
Nab-Paclitaxel Plus GemcitabineParticipant Counts in Response Categories Using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30): Global Health Status and 5 Functioning ScalesSocial Functioning Scale: Stable43 Participants
Nab-Paclitaxel Plus GemcitabineParticipant Counts in Response Categories Using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30): Global Health Status and 5 Functioning ScalesSocial Functioning Scale: Worsened14 Participants
Secondary

Participant Counts in Response Categories Using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30): Symptom Scales and Single Symptom Items

The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality-of-Life questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) is a validated health-related quality of life (HRQoL) measure. The EORTC QLQ-C30 is composed of both multi-item scales and single-item measures, including 5 functional scales, 3 symptom scales, 6 single symptom items, and 1 global health status / quality of life scale. No item occurs in more than one scale. All reported measures are transformed to a 0 to 100 scale. In the symptom scales and single symptom items, 0 = optimal health state and 100 = worst possible health state. The best score on treatment is the best score from all post-baseline visits and is compared to the baseline to get the following responder categories. Responder categories: - Improved: \>=10 decrease from baseline - Stable: neither increase nor decrease \>10 - Worsened: \>=10 increase from baseline

Time frame: Baseline (Day -1), Day 1 of each cycle, for up to 19 cycles each cycle consisting of 28 days and the 28-day follow-up visit

Population: Intent to treat population was defined as all participants enrolled into the study with both baseline and post baseline values.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Nab-Paclitaxel Plus GemcitabineParticipant Counts in Response Categories Using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30): Symptom Scales and Single Symptom ItemsSymptom Scale-Fatigue: Improved46 Participants
Nab-Paclitaxel Plus GemcitabineParticipant Counts in Response Categories Using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30): Symptom Scales and Single Symptom ItemsSymptom Scale-Fatigue: Stable24 Participants
Nab-Paclitaxel Plus GemcitabineParticipant Counts in Response Categories Using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30): Symptom Scales and Single Symptom ItemsSymptom Scale-Fatigue: Worsened25 Participants
Nab-Paclitaxel Plus GemcitabineParticipant Counts in Response Categories Using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30): Symptom Scales and Single Symptom ItemsScale-Nausea+Vomiting: Improved29 Participants
Nab-Paclitaxel Plus GemcitabineParticipant Counts in Response Categories Using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30): Symptom Scales and Single Symptom ItemsScale-Nausea+Vomiting: Stable64 Participants
Nab-Paclitaxel Plus GemcitabineParticipant Counts in Response Categories Using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30): Symptom Scales and Single Symptom ItemsScale-Nausea+Vomiting: Worsened2 Participants
Nab-Paclitaxel Plus GemcitabineParticipant Counts in Response Categories Using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30): Symptom Scales and Single Symptom ItemsSymptom Scale-Pain: Improved62 Participants
Nab-Paclitaxel Plus GemcitabineParticipant Counts in Response Categories Using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30): Symptom Scales and Single Symptom ItemsSymptom Scale-Pain: Stable29 Participants
Nab-Paclitaxel Plus GemcitabineParticipant Counts in Response Categories Using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30): Symptom Scales and Single Symptom ItemsSymptom Scale-Pain: Worsened4 Participants
Nab-Paclitaxel Plus GemcitabineParticipant Counts in Response Categories Using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30): Symptom Scales and Single Symptom ItemsSymptom - Dyspnoea: Improved12 Participants
Nab-Paclitaxel Plus GemcitabineParticipant Counts in Response Categories Using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30): Symptom Scales and Single Symptom ItemsSymptom - Dyspnoea: Stable74 Participants
Nab-Paclitaxel Plus GemcitabineParticipant Counts in Response Categories Using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30): Symptom Scales and Single Symptom ItemsSymptom - Dyspnoea: Worsened9 Participants
Nab-Paclitaxel Plus GemcitabineParticipant Counts in Response Categories Using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30): Symptom Scales and Single Symptom ItemsSymptom - Insomnia: Improved53 Participants
Nab-Paclitaxel Plus GemcitabineParticipant Counts in Response Categories Using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30): Symptom Scales and Single Symptom ItemsSymptom - Insomnia: Stable35 Participants
Nab-Paclitaxel Plus GemcitabineParticipant Counts in Response Categories Using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30): Symptom Scales and Single Symptom ItemsSymptom - Insomnia: Worsened7 Participants
Nab-Paclitaxel Plus GemcitabineParticipant Counts in Response Categories Using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30): Symptom Scales and Single Symptom ItemsSymptom - Appetite loss: Improved48 Participants
Nab-Paclitaxel Plus GemcitabineParticipant Counts in Response Categories Using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30): Symptom Scales and Single Symptom ItemsSymptom - Appetite loss: Stable39 Participants
Nab-Paclitaxel Plus GemcitabineParticipant Counts in Response Categories Using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30): Symptom Scales and Single Symptom ItemsSymptom - Appetite loss: Worsened8 Participants
Nab-Paclitaxel Plus GemcitabineParticipant Counts in Response Categories Using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30): Symptom Scales and Single Symptom ItemsSymptom - Constipation: Improved46 Participants
Nab-Paclitaxel Plus GemcitabineParticipant Counts in Response Categories Using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30): Symptom Scales and Single Symptom ItemsSymptom - Constipation: Stable45 Participants
Nab-Paclitaxel Plus GemcitabineParticipant Counts in Response Categories Using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30): Symptom Scales and Single Symptom ItemsSymptom - Constipation: Worsened4 Participants
Nab-Paclitaxel Plus GemcitabineParticipant Counts in Response Categories Using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30): Symptom Scales and Single Symptom ItemsSymptom - Diarrhoea: Improved18 Participants
Nab-Paclitaxel Plus GemcitabineParticipant Counts in Response Categories Using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30): Symptom Scales and Single Symptom ItemsSymptom - Diarrhoea: Stable69 Participants
Nab-Paclitaxel Plus GemcitabineParticipant Counts in Response Categories Using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30): Symptom Scales and Single Symptom ItemsSymptom - Diarrhoea: Worsened8 Participants
Nab-Paclitaxel Plus GemcitabineParticipant Counts in Response Categories Using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30): Symptom Scales and Single Symptom ItemsSymptom - Financial difficulties: Improved17 Participants
Nab-Paclitaxel Plus GemcitabineParticipant Counts in Response Categories Using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30): Symptom Scales and Single Symptom ItemsSymptom - Financial difficulties: stable:74 Participants
Nab-Paclitaxel Plus GemcitabineParticipant Counts in Response Categories Using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30): Symptom Scales and Single Symptom ItemsSymptom - Financial difficulties: Worsened4 Participants
Secondary

Participant Counts in Response Categories Using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire For Pancreatic Cancer (EORTC-QLQ PAN26): 10 Individual Item Scores

The EORTC pancreatic cancer module is a validated tool intended for patients at all disease stages undergoing surgical resection, palliative surgical intervention, endoscopic palliation or palliative chemotherapy. The module includes 26 questions, organized into 7 scales and 10 individual item scores. The 10 individual item scores are reported. All reported measures are transformed to a 0 to 100 scale. Scores of 0 = best possible health state and 100 = worst possible health state. The best score on treatment is the best score from all post-baseline visits and is compared to the baseline to get the following responder categories. Responder categories: - Improved: \>=MID decrease from baseline - Stable: no increase or decrease \>MID - Worsened: \>=MID increase from baseline MID = half the baseline standard deviation

Time frame: Baseline (Day -1), Day 1 of each cycle, for up to 19 cycles each cycle consisting of 28 days and the 28-day follow-up visit

Population: Intent to treat population was defined as all participants enrolled into the study with both baseline and post baseline values.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Nab-Paclitaxel Plus GemcitabineParticipant Counts in Response Categories Using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire For Pancreatic Cancer (EORTC-QLQ PAN26): 10 Individual Item ScoresAbdominal Bloating: Improved50 Participants
Nab-Paclitaxel Plus GemcitabineParticipant Counts in Response Categories Using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire For Pancreatic Cancer (EORTC-QLQ PAN26): 10 Individual Item ScoresAbdominal Bloating: Stable42 Participants
Nab-Paclitaxel Plus GemcitabineParticipant Counts in Response Categories Using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire For Pancreatic Cancer (EORTC-QLQ PAN26): 10 Individual Item ScoresAbdominal Bloating: Worsened3 Participants
Nab-Paclitaxel Plus GemcitabineParticipant Counts in Response Categories Using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire For Pancreatic Cancer (EORTC-QLQ PAN26): 10 Individual Item ScoresTaste Changes: Improved20 Participants
Nab-Paclitaxel Plus GemcitabineParticipant Counts in Response Categories Using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire For Pancreatic Cancer (EORTC-QLQ PAN26): 10 Individual Item ScoresTaste Changes: Stable54 Participants
Nab-Paclitaxel Plus GemcitabineParticipant Counts in Response Categories Using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire For Pancreatic Cancer (EORTC-QLQ PAN26): 10 Individual Item ScoresTaste Changes: Worsened21 Participants
Nab-Paclitaxel Plus GemcitabineParticipant Counts in Response Categories Using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire For Pancreatic Cancer (EORTC-QLQ PAN26): 10 Individual Item ScoresIndigestion: Improved41 Participants
Nab-Paclitaxel Plus GemcitabineParticipant Counts in Response Categories Using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire For Pancreatic Cancer (EORTC-QLQ PAN26): 10 Individual Item ScoresIndigestion: Stable47 Participants
Nab-Paclitaxel Plus GemcitabineParticipant Counts in Response Categories Using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire For Pancreatic Cancer (EORTC-QLQ PAN26): 10 Individual Item ScoresIndigestion: Worsened7 Participants
Nab-Paclitaxel Plus GemcitabineParticipant Counts in Response Categories Using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire For Pancreatic Cancer (EORTC-QLQ PAN26): 10 Individual Item ScoresFlatulence: Improved47 Participants
Nab-Paclitaxel Plus GemcitabineParticipant Counts in Response Categories Using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire For Pancreatic Cancer (EORTC-QLQ PAN26): 10 Individual Item ScoresFlatulence: Stable37 Participants
Nab-Paclitaxel Plus GemcitabineParticipant Counts in Response Categories Using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire For Pancreatic Cancer (EORTC-QLQ PAN26): 10 Individual Item ScoresFlatulence: Worsened11 Participants
Nab-Paclitaxel Plus GemcitabineParticipant Counts in Response Categories Using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire For Pancreatic Cancer (EORTC-QLQ PAN26): 10 Individual Item ScoresWeight Loss: Improved36 Participants
Nab-Paclitaxel Plus GemcitabineParticipant Counts in Response Categories Using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire For Pancreatic Cancer (EORTC-QLQ PAN26): 10 Individual Item ScoresWeight Loss: Stable56 Participants
Nab-Paclitaxel Plus GemcitabineParticipant Counts in Response Categories Using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire For Pancreatic Cancer (EORTC-QLQ PAN26): 10 Individual Item ScoresWeight Loss: Worsened3 Participants
Nab-Paclitaxel Plus GemcitabineParticipant Counts in Response Categories Using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire For Pancreatic Cancer (EORTC-QLQ PAN26): 10 Individual Item ScoresLimb Weakness: Improved22 Participants
Nab-Paclitaxel Plus GemcitabineParticipant Counts in Response Categories Using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire For Pancreatic Cancer (EORTC-QLQ PAN26): 10 Individual Item ScoresLimb Weakness: Stable55 Participants
Nab-Paclitaxel Plus GemcitabineParticipant Counts in Response Categories Using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire For Pancreatic Cancer (EORTC-QLQ PAN26): 10 Individual Item ScoresLimb Weakness: Worsened18 Participants
Nab-Paclitaxel Plus GemcitabineParticipant Counts in Response Categories Using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire For Pancreatic Cancer (EORTC-QLQ PAN26): 10 Individual Item ScoresDry Mouth: Improved37 Participants
Nab-Paclitaxel Plus GemcitabineParticipant Counts in Response Categories Using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire For Pancreatic Cancer (EORTC-QLQ PAN26): 10 Individual Item ScoresDry Mouth: Stable45 Participants
Nab-Paclitaxel Plus GemcitabineParticipant Counts in Response Categories Using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire For Pancreatic Cancer (EORTC-QLQ PAN26): 10 Individual Item ScoresDry Mouth: Worsened13 Participants
Nab-Paclitaxel Plus GemcitabineParticipant Counts in Response Categories Using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire For Pancreatic Cancer (EORTC-QLQ PAN26): 10 Individual Item ScoresTreatment Side-Effects: Improved8 Participants
Nab-Paclitaxel Plus GemcitabineParticipant Counts in Response Categories Using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire For Pancreatic Cancer (EORTC-QLQ PAN26): 10 Individual Item ScoresTreatment Side-Effects: Stable48 Participants
Nab-Paclitaxel Plus GemcitabineParticipant Counts in Response Categories Using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire For Pancreatic Cancer (EORTC-QLQ PAN26): 10 Individual Item ScoresTreatment Side-Effects: Worsened39 Participants
Nab-Paclitaxel Plus GemcitabineParticipant Counts in Response Categories Using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire For Pancreatic Cancer (EORTC-QLQ PAN26): 10 Individual Item ScoresWorry About Future Health: Improved42 Participants
Nab-Paclitaxel Plus GemcitabineParticipant Counts in Response Categories Using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire For Pancreatic Cancer (EORTC-QLQ PAN26): 10 Individual Item ScoresWorry About Future Health: Stable45 Participants
Nab-Paclitaxel Plus GemcitabineParticipant Counts in Response Categories Using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire For Pancreatic Cancer (EORTC-QLQ PAN26): 10 Individual Item ScoresWorry About Future Health: Worsened8 Participants
Nab-Paclitaxel Plus GemcitabineParticipant Counts in Response Categories Using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire For Pancreatic Cancer (EORTC-QLQ PAN26): 10 Individual Item ScoresLimits on Activity Planning: Improved42 Participants
Nab-Paclitaxel Plus GemcitabineParticipant Counts in Response Categories Using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire For Pancreatic Cancer (EORTC-QLQ PAN26): 10 Individual Item ScoresLimits on Activity Planning: Stable42 Participants
Nab-Paclitaxel Plus GemcitabineParticipant Counts in Response Categories Using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire For Pancreatic Cancer (EORTC-QLQ PAN26): 10 Individual Item ScoresLimits on Activity Planning: Worsened11 Participants
Secondary

Participant Counts in Response Categories Using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire For Pancreatic Cancer (EORTC-QLQ PAN26): Satisfaction With Health Care Scale

The EORTC pancreatic cancer module is a validated tool intended for patients at all disease stages undergoing surgical resection, palliative surgical intervention, endoscopic palliation or palliative chemotherapy. The module includes 26 questions, organized into 7 scales and 10 individual item scores. The summary scale for Satisfaction with Health Care is reported. All reported measures are transformed to a 0 to 100 scale. Scores of 0 = not satisfied, worst possible health state and 100 = extremely satisfied, best possible health state. The best score on treatment is the best score from all post-baseline visits and is compared to the baseline to get the following responder categories. Responder categories: - Improved: \>=MID increase from baseline - Stable: no increase or decrease \>MID - Worsened: \>=MID decrease from baseline MID = half the baseline standard deviation

Time frame: Baseline (Day -1), Day 1 of each cycle, for up to 19 cycles each cycle consisting of 28 days and the 28-day follow-up visit

Population: Intent to treat population was defined as all participants enrolled into the study with both baseline and post baseline values.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Nab-Paclitaxel Plus GemcitabineParticipant Counts in Response Categories Using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire For Pancreatic Cancer (EORTC-QLQ PAN26): Satisfaction With Health Care ScaleSatisfaction with Health Care Scale: Improved42 Participants
Nab-Paclitaxel Plus GemcitabineParticipant Counts in Response Categories Using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire For Pancreatic Cancer (EORTC-QLQ PAN26): Satisfaction With Health Care ScaleSatisfaction with Health Care Scale: Stable40 Participants
Nab-Paclitaxel Plus GemcitabineParticipant Counts in Response Categories Using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire For Pancreatic Cancer (EORTC-QLQ PAN26): Satisfaction With Health Care ScaleSatisfaction with Health Care Scale: Worsened13 Participants
Secondary

Participant Counts in Response Categories Using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire For Pancreatic Cancer (EORTC-QLQ PAN26): Six Summary Scales

The EORTC pancreatic cancer module is a validated tool intended for patients at all disease stages undergoing surgical resection, palliative surgical intervention, endoscopic palliation or palliative chemotherapy. The module includes 26 questions, organized into 7 scales and 10 individual item scores. All reported measures are transformed to a 0 to 100 scale. Six summary scales reported are: - Pancreatic Pain - Digestive Symptoms - Altered Bowel Habits - Hepatic Scale - Body Image - Sexuality Scores of 0 = optimal health state and 100 = worst possible health state. The best score on treatment is the best score from all post-baseline visits and is compared to the baseline. Responder categories: - Improved: \>=MID decrease from baseline - Stable: no increase or decrease \>MID - Worsened: \>=MID increase from baseline MID = half the baseline standard deviation

Time frame: Baseline (Day -1), Day 1 of each cycle, for up to 19 cycles each cycle consisting of 28 days and the 28-day follow-up visit

Population: Intent to treat population was defined as all participants enrolled into the study with both baseline and post baseline values.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Nab-Paclitaxel Plus GemcitabineParticipant Counts in Response Categories Using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire For Pancreatic Cancer (EORTC-QLQ PAN26): Six Summary ScalesPancreatic Pain Scale: Improved62 Participants
Nab-Paclitaxel Plus GemcitabineParticipant Counts in Response Categories Using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire For Pancreatic Cancer (EORTC-QLQ PAN26): Six Summary ScalesPancreatic Pain Scale: Stable33 Participants
Nab-Paclitaxel Plus GemcitabineParticipant Counts in Response Categories Using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire For Pancreatic Cancer (EORTC-QLQ PAN26): Six Summary ScalesPancreatic Pain Scale: Worsened0 Participants
Nab-Paclitaxel Plus GemcitabineParticipant Counts in Response Categories Using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire For Pancreatic Cancer (EORTC-QLQ PAN26): Six Summary ScalesDigestive Symptom Scale: Improved49 Participants
Nab-Paclitaxel Plus GemcitabineParticipant Counts in Response Categories Using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire For Pancreatic Cancer (EORTC-QLQ PAN26): Six Summary ScalesDigestive Symptom Scale: Stable36 Participants
Nab-Paclitaxel Plus GemcitabineParticipant Counts in Response Categories Using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire For Pancreatic Cancer (EORTC-QLQ PAN26): Six Summary ScalesDigestive Symptom Scale: Worsened10 Participants
Nab-Paclitaxel Plus GemcitabineParticipant Counts in Response Categories Using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire For Pancreatic Cancer (EORTC-QLQ PAN26): Six Summary ScalesAltered Bowel Habits Scale: Improved28 Participants
Nab-Paclitaxel Plus GemcitabineParticipant Counts in Response Categories Using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire For Pancreatic Cancer (EORTC-QLQ PAN26): Six Summary ScalesAltered Bowel Habits Scale: Stable53 Participants
Nab-Paclitaxel Plus GemcitabineParticipant Counts in Response Categories Using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire For Pancreatic Cancer (EORTC-QLQ PAN26): Six Summary ScalesAltered Bowel Habits Scale: Worsened14 Participants
Nab-Paclitaxel Plus GemcitabineParticipant Counts in Response Categories Using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire For Pancreatic Cancer (EORTC-QLQ PAN26): Six Summary ScalesHepatic Scale: Improved25 Participants
Nab-Paclitaxel Plus GemcitabineParticipant Counts in Response Categories Using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire For Pancreatic Cancer (EORTC-QLQ PAN26): Six Summary ScalesHepatic Scale: Stable66 Participants
Nab-Paclitaxel Plus GemcitabineParticipant Counts in Response Categories Using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire For Pancreatic Cancer (EORTC-QLQ PAN26): Six Summary ScalesHepatic Scale: Worsened4 Participants
Nab-Paclitaxel Plus GemcitabineParticipant Counts in Response Categories Using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire For Pancreatic Cancer (EORTC-QLQ PAN26): Six Summary ScalesBody Image Scale: Improved22 Participants
Nab-Paclitaxel Plus GemcitabineParticipant Counts in Response Categories Using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire For Pancreatic Cancer (EORTC-QLQ PAN26): Six Summary ScalesBody Image Scale: Stable50 Participants
Nab-Paclitaxel Plus GemcitabineParticipant Counts in Response Categories Using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire For Pancreatic Cancer (EORTC-QLQ PAN26): Six Summary ScalesBody Image Scale: Worsened23 Participants
Nab-Paclitaxel Plus GemcitabineParticipant Counts in Response Categories Using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire For Pancreatic Cancer (EORTC-QLQ PAN26): Six Summary ScalesSexuality Scale: Improved31 Participants
Nab-Paclitaxel Plus GemcitabineParticipant Counts in Response Categories Using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire For Pancreatic Cancer (EORTC-QLQ PAN26): Six Summary ScalesSexuality Scale: Stable51 Participants
Nab-Paclitaxel Plus GemcitabineParticipant Counts in Response Categories Using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire For Pancreatic Cancer (EORTC-QLQ PAN26): Six Summary ScalesSexuality Scale: Worsened13 Participants
Secondary

Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)

TEAEs are defined as any adverse event (AE) that begin or worsen on or after the start of study drug or procedure of the study period through the maximum duration of the period plus 28 days. The severity of AEs was graded based on National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE), Version 4.0 and the scale: Grade 1 = Mild Grade 2 = Moderate Grade 3 = Severe Grade 4 = Life threatening Grade 5 = Death. Relation to study drug was determined by the investigator. A treatment-related TEAE is defined as TEAE which was considered to be related to one or both of the study drugs and reported as 'Suspected' on the case report form. AEs with a missing relationship were treated as 'treatment-related' in data summaries. IP (investigational product) refers to nab-Paclitaxel and/or Gemcitabine. Related TEAE refers to relation to study drug (IP).

Time frame: Day 1 of study drug up to end of the study; up to 31.3 months

Population: The Treated population consists of all participants who received at least 1 dose of nab-paclitaxel or gemcitabine.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Nab-Paclitaxel Plus GemcitabineParticipants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)>= 1 TEAE105 Participants
Nab-Paclitaxel Plus GemcitabineParticipants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)>=1 related TEAE102 Participants
Nab-Paclitaxel Plus GemcitabineParticipants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)>=1 TEAE of severity grade 3 or higher85 Participants
Nab-Paclitaxel Plus GemcitabineParticipants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)>=1 related TEAE of severity grade 3 or higher72 Participants
Nab-Paclitaxel Plus GemcitabineParticipants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)>=1 serious TEAE38 Participants
Nab-Paclitaxel Plus GemcitabineParticipants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)>= 1 related serious TEAE14 Participants
Nab-Paclitaxel Plus GemcitabineParticipants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)>=1 TEAE leading to discontinuation of IP25 Participants
Nab-Paclitaxel Plus GemcitabineParticipants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)>=1 related TEAE leading to discontinuation of IP15 Participants
Nab-Paclitaxel Plus GemcitabineParticipants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)>=1 TEAE leading to dose reduction of IP69 Participants
Nab-Paclitaxel Plus GemcitabineParticipants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)>=1 related TEAE leading to dose reduction of IP68 Participants
Nab-Paclitaxel Plus GemcitabineParticipants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)>=1 TEAE leading to interruption of IP66 Participants
Nab-Paclitaxel Plus GemcitabineParticipants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)>=1 related TEAE leading to interruption of IP48 Participants
Nab-Paclitaxel Plus GemcitabineParticipants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)>= TEAE leading to death2 Participants
Nab-Paclitaxel Plus GemcitabineParticipants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)>=1 related TEAE leading to death0 Participants
Nab-Paclitaxel Plus Gemcitabine (Overall)Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)>=1 TEAE leading to interruption of IP68 Participants
Nab-Paclitaxel Plus Gemcitabine (Overall)Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)>= 1 TEAE105 Participants
Nab-Paclitaxel Plus Gemcitabine (Overall)Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)>=1 related TEAE leading to discontinuation of IP18 Participants
Nab-Paclitaxel Plus Gemcitabine (Overall)Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)>=1 related TEAE103 Participants
Nab-Paclitaxel Plus Gemcitabine (Overall)Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)>= TEAE leading to death2 Participants
Nab-Paclitaxel Plus Gemcitabine (Overall)Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)>=1 TEAE of severity grade 3 or higher90 Participants
Nab-Paclitaxel Plus Gemcitabine (Overall)Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)>=1 TEAE leading to dose reduction of IP72 Participants
Nab-Paclitaxel Plus Gemcitabine (Overall)Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)>=1 related TEAE of severity grade 3 or higher75 Participants
Nab-Paclitaxel Plus Gemcitabine (Overall)Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)>=1 related TEAE leading to interruption of IP50 Participants
Nab-Paclitaxel Plus Gemcitabine (Overall)Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)>=1 serious TEAE39 Participants
Nab-Paclitaxel Plus Gemcitabine (Overall)Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)>=1 related TEAE leading to dose reduction of IP71 Participants
Nab-Paclitaxel Plus Gemcitabine (Overall)Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)>= 1 related serious TEAE14 Participants
Nab-Paclitaxel Plus Gemcitabine (Overall)Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)>=1 related TEAE leading to death0 Participants
Nab-Paclitaxel Plus Gemcitabine (Overall)Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)>=1 TEAE leading to discontinuation of IP28 Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 2, 2026