Fluoroscopically-guided Epidural Block in the Midthoracic Region: A Comparison of Anterioposterior Versus Oblique View Approach

Status

Terminated

Phases

Study type

Interventional

Source

ClinicalTrials.gov

Registry ID

NCT02300714

Enrollment

Registered

2014-11-25

Start date

2014-11-30

Completion date

2015-07-14

Last updated

2019-03-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Low Back Pain Requiring Epidural Injection

Brief summary

A comparison of anterioposterior versus oblique view approach method for fluoroscopically-guided epidural block in the midthoracic region. The investigators evaluate differences on total radiation time and technical feasibility between anterioposterior and oblique view approach method.

Interventions

PROCEDUREoblique view approach

Study design

Allocation

RANDOMIZED

Intervention model

PARALLEL

Primary purpose

OTHER

Masking

SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

ALL

Age

20 Years to 80 Years

Healthy volunteers

Inclusion criteria

* Adult patients who were scheduled for the transforaminal epidural injection in midthoracic region (T5-T7)

Exclusion criteria

* Local anesthetic allergy, coagulopathy

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame	Description
Total radiation exposure time	immediately ≤1 sec after the confirmation of successful epidural injection	Total radiation exposure time during whole epidural procedure.

Secondary

Measure	Time frame	Description
The number of the needle readjustments	immediately ≤1 sec after the confirmation of successful epidural injection	The number of the needle readjustments for successful epidural injection

Countries

South Korea

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026