Catheterization, Contamination
Conditions
Brief summary
The aim of the study was to investigate the incidence of glove perforation in cannulation of blood vessels (CBV) during resuscitation and compare perforation rates between single and double-gloves.
Detailed description
Exposure to blood pathogens among medical staff is a serious problem that should be first and foremost prevented . The risk of acquiring a virus from one percutaneous needle stick is 0.3% to 0.4% for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), 6% to 30% for hepatitis B (HBV), and 2.7% to 10% for hepatitis C (HCV). The prevention of blood-borne infections is particularly important during cases when emergency medical attention is needed. Emergency Response Personnel that work in this profession have taken medical rescue courses to prepare for situations of sudden health threats, hence the majority of procedures is associated with direct contact with body fluids of the patient.
Interventions
single-gloving system was used during Catheterization
double-gloving system was used during Catheterization. inner and outer gloves were the same size
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Give voluntary consent to participate in the study * Medical profession (paramedics, nurses, physicians) or medical students (nurses, paramedics, physicians)
Exclusion criteria
* Not meet the above criteria * Wrist or low back diseases
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| visible puncture | 1 day | Checking gloves for visible damage in the course of cannulation during resuscitation |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| WLT | 1 day | Water leak test was used to checking unnoticed gloves damage |
Countries
Poland