Skip to content

Microbiota Restoration Therapy for Recurrent Clostridium Difficile Infection

A Phase 2B Prospective, Randomized, Double-blinded, Placebo-controlled Clinical Study Demonstrating the Efficacy and Safety of Rebiotix RBX2660 (Microbiota Suspension) for the Treatment of Recurrent Clostridium Difficile Infection

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02299570
Acronym
PUNCHCD2
Enrollment
150
Registered
2014-11-24
Start date
2014-12-31
Completion date
2018-01-31
Last updated
2021-01-15

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Enterocolitis Clostridium Difficile Recurrent

Keywords

Clostridium difficile, C diff, CDI, CDAD, Fecal transplant, Fecal Microbiota Transplant, Diarrhea, FMT, Microbiota restoration therapy, Microbiota suspension, Fecal bacteriotherapy, C diff diarrhea

Brief summary

This is the first prospective, multi-center, double-blinded, randomized controlled study of a microbiota suspension derived from intestinal microbes. Patients who have had at least two recurrences of C. difficile infection (CDI) after a primary episode and have completed at least two rounds of standard-of-care oral antibiotic therapy or have had at least two episodes of severe CDI resulting in hospitalization may be eligible for the study. Patients whose CDI returns in less than 8 weeks after the last assigned study treatment may be eligible to receive up to 2 treatments with RBX2660 in the open-label portion of the study.

Detailed description

This is the first prospective, multi-center, double-blinded, randomized controlled study of a microbiota suspension derived from intestinal microbes. The primary assessments for this study are (i) efficacy of RBX2660 compared to placebo at 8 weeks and (ii) safety via assessment of adverse events. Study visits are at 1-, 4- and 8-weeks after treatment with additional follow-up at 3, 6 12 and 24 months post treatment. Patients who have had at least two recurrences of C. difficile infection (CDI) after a primary episode and have completed at least two rounds of standard-of-care oral antibiotic therapy or have had at least two episodes of severe CDI resulting in hospitalization may be eligible for the study. Patients whose CDI returns in less than 8 weeks after the last assigned study treatment may be eligible to receive up to 2 treatments with RBX2660 in the open-label portion of the study.

Interventions

A suspension of intestinal microbes

OTHERPlacebo

A suspension of saline and cryoprotectant

Sponsors

Rebiotix Inc.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* ≥ 18 years * Medical record documentation of recurrent CDI either: a) at least two recurrences after a primary episode and has completed at least two rounds of standard-of-care oral antibiotic therapy or b) has had at least two episodes of severe CDI resulting in hospitalization. * Documented history that the subject's recurrent CDI is controlled while on antibiotics even if the subject is not currently on antibiotics. * A positive stool test for the presence of C. difficile within 60 days prior to enrollment.

Exclusion criteria

* A known history of continued C. difficile diarrhea while taking on a course of antibiotics prescribed for CDI treatment. * Requires antibiotic therapy for a condition other than recurrent CDI. * Previous fecal transplant prior to study enrollment. * History of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), e.g., ulcerative colitis, Crohn's disease, or microscopic colitis. * History of irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). * History of chronic diarrhea. * History of celiac disease. * Colostomy. * Planned surgery requiring perioperative antibiotics within 6 months of study enrollment. * Life expectancy of \< 12 months. * Compromised immune system.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Treatment Success of Group A (2 Doses of RBX2660) vs Group B (2 Doses of Placebo) (ITT)8 weeks after last assigned study treatmentThe primary endpoint is to evaluate treatment success, defined as the absence of CDAD without the need for retreatment with C. difficile anti-infective therapy or fecal transplant (FT) at 56 days after administration of the last assigned study enema, of Group A (two enemas of RBX2660) vs. Group B (two enemas of placebo).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Treatment Success Evaluated Between Group A (Two Enemas of RBX2660) Versus Group C (1 Enema of RBX2660 and 1 Enema of Placebo) (ITT)8-weeksTreatment success, defined as the absence of CDAD without the need for retreatment with C. difficile anti-infective therapy or fecal transplant (FT) at 56 days after administration of the last assigned study enema.
SF-36 Scores Obtained at the 1-week, 4-week, and 8-week Assessments Visits During the Double-blind Period as Compared to Baseline (ITT)8-weekThe validated SF-36 scale was used to identify changes to quality of life (QoL) following study treatment. Each component is analyzed on a norm-based scoring (0-100) with a higher score representing an improvement in QoL.
Treatment Success Between Group C (1 Enema of RBX2660 and 1 Enema of Placebo) vs Group B (Two Enemas of Placebo) (ITT)8-weeksTreatment Success was defined as the absence of CDAD without the need for retreatment with C. difficile anti-infective therapy or fecal transplant (FT) at 56 days after administration of the last assigned study enema
Time to CDAD Recurrence After Completion of the Assigned Study Treatment for Group C vs. Group B (ITT)8-weeksTime to CDI Recurrence was evaluated using Kaplan-Meier Analysis and expressed by percentage of subjects who were recurrence free at a certain time point (every 7 days) from completion of the last blinded enema.
Time to CDAD Recurrence After Completion of the Assigned Study Treatment for Group A vs. Group C (ITT)8-weeksTime to CDI Recurrence was evaluated using Kaplan-Meier Analysis and expressed by percentage of subjects who were recurrence free at a certain time point (every 7 days) from completion of the last blinded enema.
Time to CDAD Recurrence After Completion of the Assigned Study Treatment for Group A vs. Group B (ITT)8-weeksTime to CDI Recurrence was evaluated using Kaplan-Meier Analysis and expressed by percentage of subjects who were recurrence free at a certain time point (every 7 days) from completion of the last blinded enema.

Countries

Canada, United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Recruitment was from 12/10/14 to 11/13/15 at 21 medical clinics in the United States and Canada. Recruiment was performed by trained investigators and study coordinators.

Pre-assignment details

Seventeen enrolled subjects did not proceed to randomization and were exited from the study. Of the 133 randomized subjects remaining, five subjects chose to withdraw prior to treatment and in one subject the first blinded enema was not able to be initiated due to anxiety and the subject subsequently chose to withdraw.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Group A
Two enemas of RBX2660 administered 7 days apart RBX2660 (microbiota suspension): A suspension of intestinal microbes
45
Group B
Two enemas of placebo administered 7 days apart Placebo: A suspension of saline and cryoprotectant
44
Group C
1 enema of RBX2660 and 1 enema of placebo administered 7 days apart RBX2660 (microbiota suspension): A suspension of intestinal microbes Placebo: A suspension of saline and cryoprotectant
44
Total133

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicGroup BGroup CTotalGroup A
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
19 Participants18 Participants63 Participants26 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
25 Participants25 Participants69 Participants19 Participants
Age, Continuous58.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 19.24
61.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 19.69
61.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 19.31
63.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 19.15
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
2 Participants1 Participants4 Participants1 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
42 Participants42 Participants127 Participants43 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants1 Participants2 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
1 Participants2 Participants3 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
43 Participants42 Participants129 Participants44 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Canada
8 participants8 participants28 participants12 participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
36 participants36 participants105 participants33 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
30 Participants25 Participants81 Participants26 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
14 Participants19 Participants52 Participants19 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
7 / 422 / 446 / 42
other
Total, other adverse events
24 / 4219 / 4420 / 42
serious
Total, serious adverse events
18 / 428 / 4412 / 42

Outcome results

Primary

Treatment Success of Group A (2 Doses of RBX2660) vs Group B (2 Doses of Placebo) (ITT)

The primary endpoint is to evaluate treatment success, defined as the absence of CDAD without the need for retreatment with C. difficile anti-infective therapy or fecal transplant (FT) at 56 days after administration of the last assigned study enema, of Group A (two enemas of RBX2660) vs. Group B (two enemas of placebo).

Time frame: 8 weeks after last assigned study treatment

Population: ITT - Subjects in the ITT that were randomized, but not treated, as well as subjects with an indeterminate treatment outcome, were also conservatively treated as treatment failures.

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Group ATreatment Success of Group A (2 Doses of RBX2660) vs Group B (2 Doses of Placebo) (ITT)Treatment Failure20 Participants
Group ATreatment Success of Group A (2 Doses of RBX2660) vs Group B (2 Doses of Placebo) (ITT)Treatment Success25 Participants
Group BTreatment Success of Group A (2 Doses of RBX2660) vs Group B (2 Doses of Placebo) (ITT)Treatment Failure25 Participants
Group BTreatment Success of Group A (2 Doses of RBX2660) vs Group B (2 Doses of Placebo) (ITT)Treatment Success19 Participants
Secondary

SF-36 Scores Obtained at the 1-week, 4-week, and 8-week Assessments Visits During the Double-blind Period as Compared to Baseline (ITT)

The validated SF-36 scale was used to identify changes to quality of life (QoL) following study treatment. Each component is analyzed on a norm-based scoring (0-100) with a higher score representing an improvement in QoL.

Time frame: 8-week

Population: ITT

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Group ASF-36 Scores Obtained at the 1-week, 4-week, and 8-week Assessments Visits During the Double-blind Period as Compared to Baseline (ITT)Physical Comp Baseline39.4 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.4
Group ASF-36 Scores Obtained at the 1-week, 4-week, and 8-week Assessments Visits During the Double-blind Period as Compared to Baseline (ITT)Physical Comp Week 144.3 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.2
Group ASF-36 Scores Obtained at the 1-week, 4-week, and 8-week Assessments Visits During the Double-blind Period as Compared to Baseline (ITT)Physical Comp Week 444.9 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.6
Group ASF-36 Scores Obtained at the 1-week, 4-week, and 8-week Assessments Visits During the Double-blind Period as Compared to Baseline (ITT)Physical Comp Week 843.9 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.9
Group ASF-36 Scores Obtained at the 1-week, 4-week, and 8-week Assessments Visits During the Double-blind Period as Compared to Baseline (ITT)Mental Comp Baseline44.6 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.5
Group ASF-36 Scores Obtained at the 1-week, 4-week, and 8-week Assessments Visits During the Double-blind Period as Compared to Baseline (ITT)Mental Comp Week 151.8 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.5
Group ASF-36 Scores Obtained at the 1-week, 4-week, and 8-week Assessments Visits During the Double-blind Period as Compared to Baseline (ITT)Mental Comp Week 453.5 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.7
Group ASF-36 Scores Obtained at the 1-week, 4-week, and 8-week Assessments Visits During the Double-blind Period as Compared to Baseline (ITT)Mental Comp Week 852.1 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.8
Group BSF-36 Scores Obtained at the 1-week, 4-week, and 8-week Assessments Visits During the Double-blind Period as Compared to Baseline (ITT)Physical Comp Week 445.6 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.2
Group BSF-36 Scores Obtained at the 1-week, 4-week, and 8-week Assessments Visits During the Double-blind Period as Compared to Baseline (ITT)Mental Comp Week 448.2 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.4
Group BSF-36 Scores Obtained at the 1-week, 4-week, and 8-week Assessments Visits During the Double-blind Period as Compared to Baseline (ITT)Physical Comp Week 845.8 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.6
Group BSF-36 Scores Obtained at the 1-week, 4-week, and 8-week Assessments Visits During the Double-blind Period as Compared to Baseline (ITT)Mental Comp Baseline42.5 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.5
Group BSF-36 Scores Obtained at the 1-week, 4-week, and 8-week Assessments Visits During the Double-blind Period as Compared to Baseline (ITT)Mental Comp Week 151.2 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.3
Group BSF-36 Scores Obtained at the 1-week, 4-week, and 8-week Assessments Visits During the Double-blind Period as Compared to Baseline (ITT)Physical Comp Baseline39.4 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.7
Group BSF-36 Scores Obtained at the 1-week, 4-week, and 8-week Assessments Visits During the Double-blind Period as Compared to Baseline (ITT)Physical Comp Week 145.0 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.7
Group BSF-36 Scores Obtained at the 1-week, 4-week, and 8-week Assessments Visits During the Double-blind Period as Compared to Baseline (ITT)Mental Comp Week 849.8 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.7
Group CSF-36 Scores Obtained at the 1-week, 4-week, and 8-week Assessments Visits During the Double-blind Period as Compared to Baseline (ITT)Physical Comp Week 446.1 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.2
Group CSF-36 Scores Obtained at the 1-week, 4-week, and 8-week Assessments Visits During the Double-blind Period as Compared to Baseline (ITT)Physical Comp Week 146.4 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.1
Group CSF-36 Scores Obtained at the 1-week, 4-week, and 8-week Assessments Visits During the Double-blind Period as Compared to Baseline (ITT)Physical Comp Baseline43.4 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.5
Group CSF-36 Scores Obtained at the 1-week, 4-week, and 8-week Assessments Visits During the Double-blind Period as Compared to Baseline (ITT)Physical Comp Week 846.5 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.1
Group CSF-36 Scores Obtained at the 1-week, 4-week, and 8-week Assessments Visits During the Double-blind Period as Compared to Baseline (ITT)Mental Comp Week 451.5 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.4
Group CSF-36 Scores Obtained at the 1-week, 4-week, and 8-week Assessments Visits During the Double-blind Period as Compared to Baseline (ITT)Mental Comp Week 150.6 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.2
Group CSF-36 Scores Obtained at the 1-week, 4-week, and 8-week Assessments Visits During the Double-blind Period as Compared to Baseline (ITT)Mental Comp Baseline45.0 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.9
Group CSF-36 Scores Obtained at the 1-week, 4-week, and 8-week Assessments Visits During the Double-blind Period as Compared to Baseline (ITT)Mental Comp Week 851.2 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.6
Secondary

Time to CDAD Recurrence After Completion of the Assigned Study Treatment for Group A vs. Group B (ITT)

Time to CDI Recurrence was evaluated using Kaplan-Meier Analysis and expressed by percentage of subjects who were recurrence free at a certain time point (every 7 days) from completion of the last blinded enema.

Time frame: 8-weeks

Population: ITT

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Group ATime to CDAD Recurrence After Completion of the Assigned Study Treatment for Group A vs. Group B (ITT)% Recurrence Free by Day 773.3 percentage of participants
Group ATime to CDAD Recurrence After Completion of the Assigned Study Treatment for Group A vs. Group B (ITT)% Recurrence Free by Day 3557.8 percentage of participants
Group ATime to CDAD Recurrence After Completion of the Assigned Study Treatment for Group A vs. Group B (ITT)% Recurrence Free by Day 2160.0 percentage of participants
Group ATime to CDAD Recurrence After Completion of the Assigned Study Treatment for Group A vs. Group B (ITT)% Recurrence Free by Day 4257.8 percentage of participants
Group ATime to CDAD Recurrence After Completion of the Assigned Study Treatment for Group A vs. Group B (ITT)% Recurrence Free by Day 1466.7 percentage of participants
Group ATime to CDAD Recurrence After Completion of the Assigned Study Treatment for Group A vs. Group B (ITT)% Recurrence Free by Day 4955.5 percentage of participants
Group ATime to CDAD Recurrence After Completion of the Assigned Study Treatment for Group A vs. Group B (ITT)% Recurrence Free by Day 2860.0 percentage of participants
Group ATime to CDAD Recurrence After Completion of the Assigned Study Treatment for Group A vs. Group B (ITT)% Recurrence Free by Day 5655.5 percentage of participants
Group ATime to CDAD Recurrence After Completion of the Assigned Study Treatment for Group A vs. Group B (ITT)% Recurrence Free by Day 091.1 percentage of participants
Group BTime to CDAD Recurrence After Completion of the Assigned Study Treatment for Group A vs. Group B (ITT)% Recurrence Free by Day 5642.2 percentage of participants
Group BTime to CDAD Recurrence After Completion of the Assigned Study Treatment for Group A vs. Group B (ITT)% Recurrence Free by Day 0100 percentage of participants
Group BTime to CDAD Recurrence After Completion of the Assigned Study Treatment for Group A vs. Group B (ITT)% Recurrence Free by Day 777.3 percentage of participants
Group BTime to CDAD Recurrence After Completion of the Assigned Study Treatment for Group A vs. Group B (ITT)% Recurrence Free by Day 1463.6 percentage of participants
Group BTime to CDAD Recurrence After Completion of the Assigned Study Treatment for Group A vs. Group B (ITT)% Recurrence Free by Day 2161.4 percentage of participants
Group BTime to CDAD Recurrence After Completion of the Assigned Study Treatment for Group A vs. Group B (ITT)% Recurrence Free by Day 2856.8 percentage of participants
Group BTime to CDAD Recurrence After Completion of the Assigned Study Treatment for Group A vs. Group B (ITT)% Recurrence Free by Day 3552.3 percentage of participants
Group BTime to CDAD Recurrence After Completion of the Assigned Study Treatment for Group A vs. Group B (ITT)% Recurrence Free by Day 4250.0 percentage of participants
Group BTime to CDAD Recurrence After Completion of the Assigned Study Treatment for Group A vs. Group B (ITT)% Recurrence Free by Day 4947.6 percentage of participants
Secondary

Time to CDAD Recurrence After Completion of the Assigned Study Treatment for Group A vs. Group C (ITT)

Time to CDI Recurrence was evaluated using Kaplan-Meier Analysis and expressed by percentage of subjects who were recurrence free at a certain time point (every 7 days) from completion of the last blinded enema.

Time frame: 8-weeks

Population: ITT

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Group ATime to CDAD Recurrence After Completion of the Assigned Study Treatment for Group A vs. Group C (ITT)% Recurrence Free by Day 773.3 percentage of participants
Group ATime to CDAD Recurrence After Completion of the Assigned Study Treatment for Group A vs. Group C (ITT)% Recurrence Free by Day 3557.8 percentage of participants
Group ATime to CDAD Recurrence After Completion of the Assigned Study Treatment for Group A vs. Group C (ITT)% Recurrence Free by Day 2160.0 percentage of participants
Group ATime to CDAD Recurrence After Completion of the Assigned Study Treatment for Group A vs. Group C (ITT)% Recurrence Free by Day 4257.8 percentage of participants
Group ATime to CDAD Recurrence After Completion of the Assigned Study Treatment for Group A vs. Group C (ITT)% Recurrence Free by Day 1466.7 percentage of participants
Group ATime to CDAD Recurrence After Completion of the Assigned Study Treatment for Group A vs. Group C (ITT)% Recurrence Free by Day 4955.5 percentage of participants
Group ATime to CDAD Recurrence After Completion of the Assigned Study Treatment for Group A vs. Group C (ITT)% Recurrence Free by Day 2860.0 percentage of participants
Group ATime to CDAD Recurrence After Completion of the Assigned Study Treatment for Group A vs. Group C (ITT)% Recurrence Free by Day 5655.5 percentage of participants
Group ATime to CDAD Recurrence After Completion of the Assigned Study Treatment for Group A vs. Group C (ITT)% Recurrence Free by 2nd Enema91.1 percentage of participants
Group BTime to CDAD Recurrence After Completion of the Assigned Study Treatment for Group A vs. Group C (ITT)% Recurrence Free by Day 5655.9 percentage of participants
Group BTime to CDAD Recurrence After Completion of the Assigned Study Treatment for Group A vs. Group C (ITT)% Recurrence Free by 2nd Enema95.5 percentage of participants
Group BTime to CDAD Recurrence After Completion of the Assigned Study Treatment for Group A vs. Group C (ITT)% Recurrence Free by Day 776.9 percentage of participants
Group BTime to CDAD Recurrence After Completion of the Assigned Study Treatment for Group A vs. Group C (ITT)% Recurrence Free by Day 1469.9 percentage of participants
Group BTime to CDAD Recurrence After Completion of the Assigned Study Treatment for Group A vs. Group C (ITT)% Recurrence Free by Day 2162.9 percentage of participants
Group BTime to CDAD Recurrence After Completion of the Assigned Study Treatment for Group A vs. Group C (ITT)% Recurrence Free by Day 2862.9 percentage of participants
Group BTime to CDAD Recurrence After Completion of the Assigned Study Treatment for Group A vs. Group C (ITT)% Recurrence Free by Day 3560.6 percentage of participants
Group BTime to CDAD Recurrence After Completion of the Assigned Study Treatment for Group A vs. Group C (ITT)% Recurrence Free by Day 4255.9 percentage of participants
Group BTime to CDAD Recurrence After Completion of the Assigned Study Treatment for Group A vs. Group C (ITT)% Recurrence Free by Day 4955.9 percentage of participants
Secondary

Time to CDAD Recurrence After Completion of the Assigned Study Treatment for Group C vs. Group B (ITT)

Time to CDI Recurrence was evaluated using Kaplan-Meier Analysis and expressed by percentage of subjects who were recurrence free at a certain time point (every 7 days) from completion of the last blinded enema.

Time frame: 8-weeks

Population: ITT

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Group ATime to CDAD Recurrence After Completion of the Assigned Study Treatment for Group C vs. Group B (ITT)% Recurrence Free by Day 776.9 percentage of participants
Group ATime to CDAD Recurrence After Completion of the Assigned Study Treatment for Group C vs. Group B (ITT)% Recurrence Free by Day 3560.6 percentage of participants
Group ATime to CDAD Recurrence After Completion of the Assigned Study Treatment for Group C vs. Group B (ITT)% Recurrence Free by Day 2162.9 percentage of participants
Group ATime to CDAD Recurrence After Completion of the Assigned Study Treatment for Group C vs. Group B (ITT)% Recurrence Free by Day 4255.9 percentage of participants
Group ATime to CDAD Recurrence After Completion of the Assigned Study Treatment for Group C vs. Group B (ITT)% Recurrence Free by Day 1469.9 percentage of participants
Group ATime to CDAD Recurrence After Completion of the Assigned Study Treatment for Group C vs. Group B (ITT)% Recurrence Free by Day 4955.9 percentage of participants
Group ATime to CDAD Recurrence After Completion of the Assigned Study Treatment for Group C vs. Group B (ITT)% Recurrence Free by Day 2862.9 percentage of participants
Group ATime to CDAD Recurrence After Completion of the Assigned Study Treatment for Group C vs. Group B (ITT)% Recurrence Free by Day 5655.9 percentage of participants
Group ATime to CDAD Recurrence After Completion of the Assigned Study Treatment for Group C vs. Group B (ITT)% Recurrence Free by 2nd Enema95.5 percentage of participants
Group BTime to CDAD Recurrence After Completion of the Assigned Study Treatment for Group C vs. Group B (ITT)% Recurrence Free by Day 5642.2 percentage of participants
Group BTime to CDAD Recurrence After Completion of the Assigned Study Treatment for Group C vs. Group B (ITT)% Recurrence Free by 2nd Enema100 percentage of participants
Group BTime to CDAD Recurrence After Completion of the Assigned Study Treatment for Group C vs. Group B (ITT)% Recurrence Free by Day 777.3 percentage of participants
Group BTime to CDAD Recurrence After Completion of the Assigned Study Treatment for Group C vs. Group B (ITT)% Recurrence Free by Day 1463.6 percentage of participants
Group BTime to CDAD Recurrence After Completion of the Assigned Study Treatment for Group C vs. Group B (ITT)% Recurrence Free by Day 2161.4 percentage of participants
Group BTime to CDAD Recurrence After Completion of the Assigned Study Treatment for Group C vs. Group B (ITT)% Recurrence Free by Day 2856.8 percentage of participants
Group BTime to CDAD Recurrence After Completion of the Assigned Study Treatment for Group C vs. Group B (ITT)% Recurrence Free by Day 3552.3 percentage of participants
Group BTime to CDAD Recurrence After Completion of the Assigned Study Treatment for Group C vs. Group B (ITT)% Recurrence Free by Day 4250.0 percentage of participants
Group BTime to CDAD Recurrence After Completion of the Assigned Study Treatment for Group C vs. Group B (ITT)% Recurrence Free by Day 4947.6 percentage of participants
Secondary

Treatment Success Between Group C (1 Enema of RBX2660 and 1 Enema of Placebo) vs Group B (Two Enemas of Placebo) (ITT)

Treatment Success was defined as the absence of CDAD without the need for retreatment with C. difficile anti-infective therapy or fecal transplant (FT) at 56 days after administration of the last assigned study enema

Time frame: 8-weeks

Population: ITT

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Group ATreatment Success Between Group C (1 Enema of RBX2660 and 1 Enema of Placebo) vs Group B (Two Enemas of Placebo) (ITT)Success19 Participants
Group ATreatment Success Between Group C (1 Enema of RBX2660 and 1 Enema of Placebo) vs Group B (Two Enemas of Placebo) (ITT)Failure25 Participants
Group BTreatment Success Between Group C (1 Enema of RBX2660 and 1 Enema of Placebo) vs Group B (Two Enemas of Placebo) (ITT)Success25 Participants
Group BTreatment Success Between Group C (1 Enema of RBX2660 and 1 Enema of Placebo) vs Group B (Two Enemas of Placebo) (ITT)Failure19 Participants
Secondary

Treatment Success Evaluated Between Group A (Two Enemas of RBX2660) Versus Group C (1 Enema of RBX2660 and 1 Enema of Placebo) (ITT)

Treatment success, defined as the absence of CDAD without the need for retreatment with C. difficile anti-infective therapy or fecal transplant (FT) at 56 days after administration of the last assigned study enema.

Time frame: 8-weeks

Population: ITT

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Group ATreatment Success Evaluated Between Group A (Two Enemas of RBX2660) Versus Group C (1 Enema of RBX2660 and 1 Enema of Placebo) (ITT)Success25 Participants
Group ATreatment Success Evaluated Between Group A (Two Enemas of RBX2660) Versus Group C (1 Enema of RBX2660 and 1 Enema of Placebo) (ITT)Failure20 Participants
Group BTreatment Success Evaluated Between Group A (Two Enemas of RBX2660) Versus Group C (1 Enema of RBX2660 and 1 Enema of Placebo) (ITT)Success25 Participants
Group BTreatment Success Evaluated Between Group A (Two Enemas of RBX2660) Versus Group C (1 Enema of RBX2660 and 1 Enema of Placebo) (ITT)Failure19 Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Jun 14, 2026