Skip to content

Gastric Outlet Obstructions Tailored Covered Stents for GOO

A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial of Malignant Gastric Outlet Obstruction: Tailored Partially Covered Stents (Placed Fluoroscopically) Versus Standard Uncovered Stents (Placed Endoscopically)

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02299258
Enrollment
63
Registered
2014-11-24
Start date
2009-05-31
Completion date
2013-03-31
Last updated
2015-02-12

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Gastric Outlet Obstruction

Brief summary

gastric outlet obstruction tailored versus standard stents for malignant gastric outlet obstruction treatments

Detailed description

To determine the shape of the GOOs, stomach opacifications were performed using contrast media before stenting. In the GOO tailored group (33 cases), the distal stents were semi-spherical with a length of 20 mm and a diameter of 28 mm. The middle stent segments had diameters of 20 mm. The proximal ends of large cup-shaped stents had 53.3 ± 5.5 mm diameters and were 15 or 20 mm long, whereas the large funnel-shaped stents had 33.6 ± 3.6 mm diameters and were 25 or 30 mm long. The control group (32 cases) received standard uncovered stents (semi-spherical, with diameters of 28 mm and 20 mm long).Our hypothesis was that unresectable GOO tailored covered stents are superior to the standard uncovered ones in terms of stent re-obstruction and stent migration. In the current study the efficacy and safety of GOO tailored covered stents for the treatment of non-resectable GOOs caused by distal gastric cancer was compared with standard uncovered stents.

Interventions

DEVICEStandard stents MTN-CG-s-20/100

The ends of the stents were semi-spherical with diameters of 28 mm and length of 20 mm. The length of the stents was 100 mm

DEVICETailored stents MTN-WE-20/100-A

cup-shaped or funnel-shaped, according to the shapes of the proximal GOOs.

Sponsors

The First People's Hospital of Yuhang District
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

GOO defined by symptoms resulting in decreased oral intake (nausea, vomiting and inability to eat),the obstruction was caused by primary distal stomach cancer and the site of stenosis was between the gastric body and duodenum bulb

Exclusion criteria

the presence of only mild symptoms in patients who could tolerate a liquid diet, clinical evidence of perforation or peritonitis, evidence of multiple small-bowel obstructions because of peritoneal seeding as well as diabetes or other diseases that affect gastric motility and use of promotility agents.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Efficiency of Stentsup to 5 yearsnumber of participants considered having efficacious outcome. Efficacy is defined by Ingrowth + overgrowth in this study

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Adverse Eventsup to 5 yearsbleeding, abdominal pain

Countries

China

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Tailored Stents MTN-WE-20/100-A
The distal portion of the GOO tailored stents was semi-spherical, with a length of 20 mm, and a diameter of 28 mm. The middle segment had a diameter of 20 mm. The overall length of the stents was 100 mm. Both the middle part and the bottom of the proximal cup segment, and a part of the proximal funnel segment, were covered by a polyethylene membrane. Tailored stents MTN-WE-20/100-A: cup-shaped or funnel-shaped, according to the shapes of the proximal GOOs.
32
Standard Stents MTN-CG-s-20/100
Standard uncovered stents were used in the control group. The ends of the stents were semi-spherical with diameters of 28 mm and length of 20 mm. The length of the stents was 100 mm Standard stents MTN-CG-s-20/100: The ends of the stents were semi-spherical with diameters of 28 mm and length of 20 mm. The length of the stents was 100 mm
31
Total63

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTailored Stents MTN-WE-20/100-AStandard Stents MTN-CG-s-20/100Total
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
32 Participants31 Participants63 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Continuous76.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.7
75.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.6
76.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.7
Gastric outlet obstruction score3.2 units on a scale3.1 units on a scale3.2 units on a scale
Region of Enrollment
China
32 participants31 participants63 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
14 Participants15 Participants29 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
18 Participants16 Participants34 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 320 / 31
serious
Total, serious adverse events
25 / 324 / 31

Outcome results

Primary

Efficiency of Stents

number of participants considered having efficacious outcome. Efficacy is defined by Ingrowth + overgrowth in this study

Time frame: up to 5 years

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Tailored Stents MTN-WE-20/100-AEfficiency of Stents1 participants
Standard Stents MTN-CG-s-20/100Efficiency of Stents7 participants
Secondary

Adverse Events

bleeding, abdominal pain

Time frame: up to 5 years

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Tailored Stents MTN-WE-20/100-AAdverse Events25 participants
Standard Stents MTN-CG-s-20/100Adverse Events4 participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026