Skip to content

Geriatric Fracture Centers - Evaluation of a Geriatric Co-management Program

A Prospective Multicenter Cohort Study to Evaluate the Benefit of the Geriatric Fracture Center (GFC) Concept

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02297581
Enrollment
282
Registered
2014-11-21
Start date
2015-05-31
Completion date
2020-05-31
Last updated
2020-06-04

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Hip Fractures

Keywords

Geriatrics [MeSH], Osteoporotic fractures [MeSH], Hip fractures [MeSH], Cost benefit analysis [MeSH], Quality of life [MeSH], Mortality [MeSH], Complications

Brief summary

The study will assess patients with at least one major AE related to treatment / hospitalization / immobilization in the Geriatric Fracture Center (GFC) group compared to the usual care group.

Detailed description

Patients aged ≥ 70 years or older with an osteoporotic hip fracture treated with an osteosynthesis or endoprosthesis will be included in this study. The primary objective of the study is to assess the difference in the numbers of pre-defined major adverse events (AE) which are related to the treatment, hospitalization and/or immobilization between patients who were treated in a geriatric fracture center or in a usual care center. As a secondary objective, health economic implications and cost-effectiveness comparison analyses will be performed. In order to be able to analyze data based on the geographic regions as well as globally, in each participating country, both a Geriatric Fracture Center (GFC) and a Usual Care Center (UCC) will be included.

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

AO Innovation Translation Center
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
70 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Preoperative Inclusion Criteria: * Age ≥ 70 years * Geriatric patients with hip fractures Treated either with oOsteosynthesis or oEndoprosthesis * Ability of the patient or assigned representative to understand the content of the patient information / Informed Consent Form * Signed and dated Institutional Review Board (IRB) / Ethics Committee (EC)-approved written informed consent Preoperative

Exclusion criteria

* Recent history of substance abuse (ie, recreational drugs, alcohol) that would preclude reliable assessment * Prisoner * Participation in any other medical device or medicinal product study within the previous month that could influence the results of the present study

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Major Adverse Events related to treatment / residential status / immobilizationFrom surgery up to 1 year follow-upMajor AEs related to treatment / residential status / immobilization: * Delirium * Congestive heart failure * Pneumonia * Deep venous thrombosis * Pulmonary embolism * Pressure ulcers * Myocardial infarction

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Any other AEs not mentioned under primary outcome measure(s) as well as its relationship to the treatment / residential status / immobilizationFrom surgery up to 1 year follow-up
Activities of daily livingBaseline, 12 weeks and 1 year postoperativeModified Barthel index pre-injury, at 12 weeks and 12 months
Number of re-admissions to an acute hospitalFrom surgery up to 1 year follow-up
Timed up and go test (TUG)12 weeks and 1 year follow-up
Parker Mobility ScoreBaseline, 12 weeks and 1 year follow-upParker Mobility Score pre-injury, at 12 weeks and 12 months
MortalityFrom surgery up to 1 year follow-up
Quality of Life12 weeks and 1 year postoperativeQuality of life using the EuroQoL questionnaire (EQ-5D)
PainFrom surgery up to1 year follow-upPain using the numeric rating scale
Direct and indirect costsBaseline up to 1 year follow-upAll direct and indirect costs will be documented for a cost-effectiveness analysis (medication, treatment, physiotherapy, postoperative care etc)
Number of patients receiving adequate secondary fracture preventionBaseline up to 1 year follow-up
Time from admission to start of fluid managementBaseline (admission to surgery), about 1-2 days
Time from admission to surgeryBaseline (admission to surgery), about 1-2 days
Time from surgery to discharge 1 and 2Baseline (admission to discharge), about 1-2 weeksDischarge 1 is defined as discharge from orthopaedic / trauma department Discharge 2 is defined as the timepoint when the patient is discharged to their definite residential status, i.e. residential status where no further change in residential status is planned . Discharge 1 and 2 may occur on the same date.
Residential statusBaseline up to 1 year follow-upPre-injury, at discharge 1 and 2, at 12 weeks and 12 months
FallsFrom surgery up to 1 year follow-upNumbers of falls
MedicationBaseline up to 1 year follow-upNumber of different types of medication at admission, discharge 1, 12 weeks, 12 months and information whether analgesics, osteoporosis and other medications are administered at all study visit time points
Number of patients for which the nutrition status was evaluated / adaptedBaseline (admission to discharge), about 1-2 days
Occurrence of a contralateral hip fractureRetrospective assessment of pre-injury status up to 1 year follow-up
Time from admission to start of pain medicationBaseline (admission to surgery), about 1-2 days

Countries

Austria, Netherlands, Singapore, Spain, Thailand, United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 26, 2026