Skip to content

ENDOBARRIER® and Conventional Therapy in the Management of Metabolic Syndrome in Obese Patients

ENDOBARRIER® vs Conventional Therapy in the Management of Metabolic Syndrome in Obese Patients. Medico-economic Analysis as Part of a Randomized Controlled Multicenter Trial - ENDOMETAB

Status
Terminated
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02297555
Acronym
ENDOMETAB
Enrollment
82
Registered
2014-11-21
Start date
2014-04-30
Completion date
2017-10-31
Last updated
2018-05-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Metabolic Syndrome

Keywords

Obesity, Metabolic Syndrome, ENDOBARRIER®

Brief summary

Obesity and metabolic syndrome (MS) are closely interrelated leading to increased mortality, mainly due to cardiovascular disease. In addition, some cancers are much higher when obesity is associated with metabolic syndrome. Bariatric surgery allows significant and sustained weight loss with marked improvement of MS. Considered too invasive, surgery is proposed to a small proportion of patients who could theoretically benefit. The ENDOBARRIER® device implanted endoscopically is an innovative approach developed for management of obesity in the non-surgical manner with benefits for improvement in MS already reported in literature.

Detailed description

Obesity, defined as a body mass index (BMI) over 30 kg / m², has now affected more than 14% of the French population. This condition is associated with several co-morbidities, and increased mortality, mainly due to cardiovascular disease and some cancers. These risks are much higher when obesity is associated with metabolic syndrome. Conventional medical care for metabolic syndrome, even conducted by multidisciplinary teams combining dietary advice, physical activity and psychological treatment offers only limited results, both in weight reduction and comorbidities. Bariatric surgery allows however a significant and sustained weight loss in the majority of cases, and a decrease in the frequency and severity of co-morbidities, including type 2 diabetes, and decreased mortality including cardiovascular. Considered too invasive by many practitioners and patients, surgery is therefore proposed to a small proportion of patients who could theoretically benefit. The results of surgery have, however, validated the principle of the interventional treatment of obesity and its metabolic complications. Different techniques that may replace surgery are currently being developed. Among these new approaches, the most successful is the device endoluminal liner ENDOBARRIER® (GI Dynamics ™, Boston, USA). The ENDOBARRIER® device could represent a major innovation in the non-surgical management of obesity. The benefits of installing the device on the morbidity associated with obesity are reported in the literature: impact on hypertension, diabetes, dyslipidemia and metabolic syndrome as such. This trial will compare in a randomized study the results, tolerance and cost of the interventional therapy with the device ENDOBARRIER® over conventional therapy in French patients with obesity and metabolic syndrome, with or without diabetes. The evaluation of the cost-effectiveness of this device will clarify its role in the strategy for the management of obesity and its comorbidities.

Interventions

DEVICEENDOBARRIER®

This medical device consists of a tube (impermeable fluoropolymer) inserted endoscopically and secured by hooks in the wall of the duodenal bulb. From the anchor site, this duodeno-jejunal sheath covers 60 cm in the small intestine. It thus limits the contact of nutrients with digestive juices (bile and pancreatic juice) and initial absorption, at least in part mimicking duodenal exclusion of the gastric bypass, one of the techniques of bariatric surgery.

Sponsors

Ministry of Health, France
CollaboratorOTHER_GOV
University Hospital, Lille
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
20 Years to 60 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Clinical diagnosis of Metabolic Syndrome defined by the presence of at least 3 of the 5 factors identified in the harmonization of the definition of metabolic syndrome by the International Diabetes Federation, the American Heart Association and the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute * BMI \> 30 kg/m2 * The subject must be a candidate for general anesthesia * The subject must be able to understand the options to comply with the requirement of each intervention program. * Non-pregnant female patients must agree to use a reliable method of contraception for 2 years

Exclusion criteria

* Contraindications from the notice of ENDOBARRIER device

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Frequency of patients without Metabolic Syndrome12 monthThe primary end point will be the rate of resolution of Metabolic Syndrome at 1 year as measured by frequency of patients without MS at 12 months.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The level of insulin resistance12 months, 24 months
Changed in cardiovascular risk assessed by Framingham Risk Score12 months, 24 months
Changed in quality of life12 months, 24 months
Rate of adverse events12 months, 24 months
Changed in waist circumference12 months, 24 monthsChanged in waist circumference
Changed in blood pressure12 months, 24 monthsChanged in specific metabolic syndrome parameters such blood pressure
Changed in blood sugar12 months, 24 monthsChanged in blood sugar
Changed in triglycerides12 months, 24 monthsChanged in triglycerides
Changed in HDL12 months, 24 monthsChanged in HDL
The cost-benefit ratio for each group12 months, 24 monthsThe cost-benefit ratio for each group by evaluating the medical costs in each arm

Countries

France

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026